Influence of thermal effects and fluid dynamics on part sedimentation in volumetric additive manufacturing

Yi-Fei Wang , Xiao-Xiao Han , Xiao-Long Zhu , Wei Zhu , Feng Chen

Advances in Manufacturing ›› : 1 -22.

PDF
Advances in Manufacturing ›› :1 -22. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-026-00599-8
Article
research-article
Influence of thermal effects and fluid dynamics on part sedimentation in volumetric additive manufacturing
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Part sedimentation in volumetric additive manufacturing (VAM) technology is a well-known detrimental effect that can significantly deteriorate printing resolution and shape fidelity. This study reveals the underlying mechanism by which process parameters and material properties affect the sedimentation properties of parts fabricated by VAM, considering the intrinsic thermal process and its interaction with polymerization kinetics. It was found that thermally induced changes in material viscosity and polymerization parameters played an essential role in regulating sedimentation behavior. Lowering the ambient and initial printing temperatures can increase viscosity resistance and thus weaken the sedimentation phenomenon, whereas a longer printing time adversely influences part sinking. Optimal thermal conditions that simultaneously ensure low sedimentation and a relatively short printing time should be determined during printing, particularly for thermally thinned materials. Importantly, using the wall-end effect, the model revealed that settlement could be effectively mitigated by solidifying the part near the bottom of the container. The experiments confirmed a reduction of approximately 39.4% in sedimentation displacement. The thermal-solid-fluid coupled model developed in this study offers a valuable tool to guide the design of new photosensitive materials as well as the optimization of process parameters, which is essential to improve the printing outcomes of VAM and thus facilitate its broader applications.

Keywords

Volumetric additive manufacturing (VAM) / Sedimentation / Three-dimensional (3D) printing / Numerical simulation / Parametric analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yi-Fei Wang, Xiao-Xiao Han, Xiao-Long Zhu, Wei Zhu, Feng Chen. Influence of thermal effects and fluid dynamics on part sedimentation in volumetric additive manufacturing. Advances in Manufacturing 1-22 DOI:10.1007/s40436-026-00599-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, et al. . Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. PNAS, 2016, 113(12): 3179-3184

[2]

Skylar-Scott MA, Mueller J, Visser CW, et al. . Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature, 2019, 575(7782): 330-335

[3]

Pazhamannil RV, Govindan P, Edacherian A. Optimized projections and dose slices for the volumetric additive manufacturing of three dimensional objects. Mater Today Proc, 2021, 44: 922-925

[4]

Schwartz JJ, Boydston AJ. Multimaterial actinic spatial control 3D and 4D printing. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 791

[5]

Deore B, Sampson KL, Lacelle T, et al. . Direct printing of functional 3D objects using polymerization-induced phase separation. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 55

[6]

Kelly B, Bhattacharya I, Shusteff M et al (2017) Computed axial lithography (CAL): toward single step 3D printing of arbitrary geometries. arXiv:1705.05893. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.05893

[7]

Bhattacharya I, Toombs J, Taylor H. High fidelity volumetric additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2021, 47 102299

[8]

Gisario A, Kazarian M, Martina F, et al. . Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: a review. J Manuf Syst, 2019, 53: 124-149

[9]

Srivastava M, Rathee S. Additive manufacturing: recent trends, applications and future outlooks. Prog Addit Manuf, 2022, 7(2): 261-287

[10]

Lee ARHA, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al. . 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science, 2019, 365(6452): 482-487

[11]

He N, Wang XN, Shi LY, et al. . Photoinhibiting via simultaneous photoabsorption and free-radical reaction for high-fidelity light-based bioprinting. Nat Commun, 2023, 14(1): 3063

[12]

Zhu XL, Chen F, Cao H, et al. . Design and fused deposition modeling of triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds with channels and hydrogel for breast reconstruction. Int J Bioprint, 2023, 9(2): 685

[13]

Aduba DCJrMargaretta ED, Marnot AE, et al. . Vat photopolymerization 3D printing of acid-cleavable PEG-methacrylate networks for biomaterial applications. Mater Today Commun, 2019, 19: 204-211

[14]

Han D, Lee H. Recent advances in multi-material additive manufacturing: methods and applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng, 2020, 28: 158-166

[15]

Regehly M, Garmshausen Y, Reuter M, et al. . Xolography for linear volumetric 3D printing. Nature, 2020, 588: 620-624

[16]

Loterie D, Delrot P, Moser C. High-resolution tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 852

[17]

Größbacher G, Bartolf-Kopp M, Gergely C, et al. . Volumetric printing across melt electrowritten scaffolds fabricates multi-material living constructs with tunable architecture and mechanics. Adv Mater, 2023, 35(32): 300756

[18]

Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H, et al. . Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science, 2019, 363: 1075-1079

[19]

Mo XW, Ouyang LL, Xiong Z, et al. . Advances in digital light processing of hydrogels. Biomed Mater, 2022, 17 042002

[20]

Madrid-Wolff J, Boniface A, Loterie D et al (2021) Light-based volumetric additive manufacturing in scattering resins. arXiv:2105.14952. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105144

[21]

Rackson CM, Toombs JT, De Beer MP, et al. . Latent image volumetric additive manufacturing. Opt Lett, 2022, 47: 1279

[22]

Toombs JT, Luitz M, Cook CC, et al. . Volumetric additive manufacturing of silica glass with microscale computed axial lithography. Science, 2022, 376(6590): 308-312

[23]

Salajeghe R, Meile DH, Kruse CS, et al. . Numerical modeling of part sedimentation during volumetric additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2023, 66 103459

[24]

Li CC, Toombs J, Luk SM et al (2022) Computational optimization and the role of optical metrology in tomographic additive manufacturing. In: advanced fabrication technologies for micro/nano optics and photonics XV, vol 12012, pp 38−44. SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2610558

[25]

Zhang B, Gao L, Xue Q et al (2020) Strengths, weaknesses, and applications of computational axial lithography in tissue engineering: comments on Kelly et al., Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science 363: 1075–1079 (2019). Bio-Des Manuf 3(1):5−6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00057-9

[26]

Bonyár A, Szalóki M, Borók A, et al. . The effect of femtosecond laser irradiation and plasmon field on the degree of conversion of a UDMA-TEGDMA copolymer nanocomposite doped with gold nanorods. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(21): 13575

[27]

Ozkan B, Sameni F, Goulas A, et al. . Hot ceramic lithography of silica-based ceramic cores: The effect of process temperature on vat-photopolymierisation. Addit Manuf, 2022, 58 103033

[28]

Alsandi Q, Ikeda M, Arisaka Y, et al. . Evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of light and heat polymerized UDMA for DLP 3D printer. Sensors, 2021, 21: 3331

[29]

Goodner MD, Bowman CN. Development of a comprehensive free radical photopolymerization model incorporating heat and mass transfer effects in thick films. Chem Eng Sci, 2002, 57(5): 887-900

[30]

Kim S. Exotherm behavior of the polymer-based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mater, 2004, 20: 383-387

[31]

Xia WZ, Cook WD. Exotherm control in the thermal polymerization of nona-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (NEGDM) using a dual radical initiator system. Polymer, 2003, 44: 79-88

[32]

Bernal PN, Delrot P, Loterie D, et al. . Volumetric bioprinting of complex living-tissue constructs within seconds. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1904209

[33]

Pitzanti G, Mohylyuk V, Corduas F, et al. . Urethane dimethacrylate-based photopolymerizable resins for stereolithography 3D printing: a physicochemical characterisation and biocompatibility evaluation. Drug Deliv Transl Res, 2024, 14(1): 177-190

[34]

Alarcon RT, Gaglieri C, Dos Santos GC, et al. . A deep investigation into the thermal degradation of urethane dimethacrylate polymer. J Therm Anal Calorim, 2022, 147: 3083-3097

[35]

Nan XY, Sun LL, Wu MS, et al. . Dark polymerization of acrylamide induced by tyrosine-containing peptide. Polym Bull, 2021, 78: 4649-4664

[36]

Kilambi H, Reddy SK, Schneidewind L, et al. . Copolymerization and dark polymerization studies for photopolymerization of novel acrylic monomers. Polymer, 2007, 48: 2014-2021

[37]

Kerai LV, Bardés J, Hilton S, et al. . Two strategies to enhance ungual drug permeation from UV-cured films: incomplete polymerisation to increase drug release and incorporation of chemical enhancers. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2018, 123: 217-227

[38]

Papakonstantinou AE, Eliades T, Cellesi F, et al. . Evaluation of UDMA’s potential as a substitute for Bis-GMA in orthodontic adhesives. Dent Mater, 2013, 29: 898-905

[39]

Salajeghe R, Sander Kruse C, Helmuth Meile D et al (2022) Investigating the influence of thermal and mechanical properties of resin on the sedimentation rate of the printed geometry in the volumetric additive manufacturing technique. In: proceedings of the 33rd annual international solid freeform fabrication (SFF) symposium. The University of Texas at Austin, US

[40]

Dewaele M, Truffier-Boutry D, Devaux J, et al. . Volume contraction in photocured dental resins: the shrinkage-conversion relationship revisited. Dent Mater, 2006, 22: 359-365

[41]

Miletic V. Dental composite materials for direct restorations, 2018, Berlin. Springer

[42]

Wang K, Wang ZZ. Shrinkage stress evolution during photopolymerization: theory and experiments. J Mech Phys Solids, 2023, 178 105350

[43]

Alnazzawi A, Watts DC. Simultaneous determination of polymerization shrinkage, exotherm and thermal expansion coefficient for dental resin-composites. Dent Mater, 2012, 28: 1240-1249

[44]

Concha F, Almendra ER. Settling velocities of particulate systems, 1. Settling velocities of individual spherical particles. Int J Miner Process, 1979, 5: 349-367

[45]

Barszczewska-Rybarek IM. A Guide through the dental dimethacrylate polymer network structural characterization and interpretation of physico-mechanical properties. Materials, 2019, 12: 4057

[46]

Huang K, Franchin G, Colombo P. Volumetric additive manufacturing of SiOC by xolography. Small, 2024, 20(37): 2402356

[47]

Borók A, Szalóki M, Gál D, et al. . Long-term oxygen plasma etching of UDMA:TEGDMA methacrylate resin: etching rate and physical property changes. Polym Test, 2025, 144 108732

[48]

Sarosi C, Moldovan M, Soanca A, et al. . Effects of monomer composition of urethane methacrylate based resins on the C=C degree of conversion, residual monomer content and mechanical properties. Polymers, 2021, 13: 4415

[49]

Fugolin AP, De Paula AB, Dobson A, et al. . Alternative monomer for BisGMA-free resin composites formulations. Dent Mater, 2020, 36: 884-892

[50]

Lee JK, Choi JY, Lim BS, et al. . Change of properties during storage of a UDMA/TEGDMA dental resin. J Biomed Mater Res, 2004, 68B: 216-221

[51]

Scherzer T, Langguth H. Temperature dependence of the oxygen solubility in acrylates and its effect on the induction period in UV photopolymerization. Macromol Chem Phys, 2005, 206: 240-245

[52]

Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME. Bubbles, drops, and particles, 1978, New York. Academic Press

[53]

Taki K, Hayashi R, Taniguchi T, et al. . Enhancement of dark polymerization by oxygen quenching during network formation in ultraviolet-light-induced radical polymerization of multifunctional monomers and reactive polymer. J Photopol Sci Technol, 2020, 33: 251-259

[54]

Fonceca I, Hidalgo RC, Maza D. Motion of a sphere in a viscous fluid towards a wall confined versus unconfined conditions. Granular Matter, 2022, 24: 42

[55]

Arsenijević ZLJ, Grbavčić ŽB, Garić-Grulović RV, et al. . Wall effects on the velocities of a single sphere settling in a stagnant and counter-current fluid and rising in a co-current fluid. Powder Technol, 2010, 203: 237-242

[56]

Callens SJP, Fan D, Van Hengel IAJ, et al. . Emergent collective organization of bone cells in complex curvature fields. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 855

[57]

Peng S, Xu J, Li D, et al. . Ultra-fast 3D printing of assembly—free complex optics with sub-nanometer surface quality at mesoscale. Int J Extrem Manuf, 2023, 5 035007

[58]

Yokojima S, Takashima R, Asada H, et al. . Impacts of particle shape on sedimentation of particles. Eur J Mech B/Fluids, 2021, 89: 323-331

[59]

Michaelides EE, Feng Z. Review—drag coefficients of non-spherical and irregularly shaped particles. J Fluids Eng, 2023, 145 060801

[60]

Whyte DJ, Doeven EH, Sutti A, et al. . Volumetric additive manufacturing: a new frontier in layer-less 3D printing. Addit Manuf, 2024, 84 104094

[61]

Hall PC, Chasko D, Wheeler T, et al. . A versatile and high-resolution hydrogel platform for volumetric additive manufacturing based on poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate and alginate blends. Adv Mater Technol, 2025, 10(8): 2401668

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52075158)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Shanghai University and Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/