Influence of thermal effects and fluid dynamics on part sedimentation in volumetric additive manufacturing
Yi-Fei Wang , Xiao-Xiao Han , Xiao-Long Zhu , Wei Zhu , Feng Chen
Advances in Manufacturing ›› : 1 -22.
Part sedimentation in volumetric additive manufacturing (VAM) technology is a well-known detrimental effect that can significantly deteriorate printing resolution and shape fidelity. This study reveals the underlying mechanism by which process parameters and material properties affect the sedimentation properties of parts fabricated by VAM, considering the intrinsic thermal process and its interaction with polymerization kinetics. It was found that thermally induced changes in material viscosity and polymerization parameters played an essential role in regulating sedimentation behavior. Lowering the ambient and initial printing temperatures can increase viscosity resistance and thus weaken the sedimentation phenomenon, whereas a longer printing time adversely influences part sinking. Optimal thermal conditions that simultaneously ensure low sedimentation and a relatively short printing time should be determined during printing, particularly for thermally thinned materials. Importantly, using the wall-end effect, the model revealed that settlement could be effectively mitigated by solidifying the part near the bottom of the container. The experiments confirmed a reduction of approximately 39.4% in sedimentation displacement. The thermal-solid-fluid coupled model developed in this study offers a valuable tool to guide the design of new photosensitive materials as well as the optimization of process parameters, which is essential to improve the printing outcomes of VAM and thus facilitate its broader applications.
Volumetric additive manufacturing (VAM) / Sedimentation / Three-dimensional (3D) printing / Numerical simulation / Parametric analysis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Kelly B, Bhattacharya I, Shusteff M et al (2017) Computed axial lithography (CAL): toward single step 3D printing of arbitrary geometries. arXiv:1705.05893. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.05893 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Madrid-Wolff J, Boniface A, Loterie D et al (2021) Light-based volumetric additive manufacturing in scattering resins. arXiv:2105.14952. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105144 |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Li CC, Toombs J, Luk SM et al (2022) Computational optimization and the role of optical metrology in tomographic additive manufacturing. In: advanced fabrication technologies for micro/nano optics and photonics XV, vol 12012, pp 38−44. SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2610558 |
| [25] |
Zhang B, Gao L, Xue Q et al (2020) Strengths, weaknesses, and applications of computational axial lithography in tissue engineering: comments on Kelly et al., Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science 363: 1075–1079 (2019). Bio-Des Manuf 3(1):5−6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00057-9 |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Salajeghe R, Sander Kruse C, Helmuth Meile D et al (2022) Investigating the influence of thermal and mechanical properties of resin on the sedimentation rate of the printed geometry in the volumetric additive manufacturing technique. In: proceedings of the 33rd annual international solid freeform fabrication (SFF) symposium. The University of Texas at Austin, US |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
Shanghai University and Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |