Low-damage bone cutting using a newly developed rotary ultrasonic surgical handpiece

Abstract

Bone cutting is a common procedure in surgery, during which conventional rotary cutting causes extensive damage to the bone while single ultrasonic cutting, as a newer tool, results in minimally invasive injury but has obviously low efficiency. This study aimed to achieve low-damage, high-efficiency bone cutting using a newly developed surgical rotary ultrasonic (RU) handpiece coupled with ultrasonic vibration and rotary cutting. To solve the clinical miniature size and power limits, a quarter-wave barbell ultrasonic horn with a mid-reduction structure was designed based on the vibration theory. It enhanced the vibration amplitude output by 22% compared with a common stepped horn. A new non-contact rotary transformer with “T+U” shaped cores was developed with a higher coupling coefficient of 0.95 and transmission efficiency of 94% compared with common industrial transformers. Handpiece performance was evaluated in terms of vibration responses and cutting characteristics during cortical bone cutting. The results demonstrated that the new tool had good vibration characteristics with the expected amplitude and frequency, even at a low power of approximately 1 W, which was less than 1/100 of that used in industrial RU tools. Compared with conventional rotary cutting, the new tool significantly reduced cutting forces by 32%–44% without losing cutting efficiency and diminished surface chipping damage in the bone, which was especially important for low-trauma surgery. This study advances the bone cutting processes for high-quality surgery by developing a new RU surgical tool.

Keywords

Bone cutting / Rotary ultrasonic (RU) / Force / Damage / Power transfer

References

[1] Dahotre N, Joshi S (2016) Machining of bone and hard tissues. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39158-8

[2] Zhang Y, Wang CY, Zhou SB, et al.. A comparison review on orthopedic surgery using piezosurgery and conventional tools. Proc CIRP, 2017, 65: 99-104

[3] Liao ZR, Axinte DA, Gao D. A novel cutting tool design to avoid surface damage in bone machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2017, 116: 52-59

[4] Shu LM, Li SH, Terashima M, et al.. A novel self-centring drill bit design for low-trauma bone drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2020, 154: 103568

[5] Akhbar MFA, Sulong AW. Surgical drill bit design and thermomechanical damage in bone drilling: a review. Ann Biomed Eng, 2021, 49: 29-56

[6] Zhang Y, Robles-Linares JA, Chen L, et al.. Advances in machining of hard tissues – from material removal mechanisms to tooling solutions. Int J Mach Tool Manu, 2022, 172: 103838

[7] Pantawane MV, Chipper RT, Robertson WB, et al.. Evolution of surface morphology of Er:YAG laser-machined human bone. Lasers Med Sci, 2020, 35: 1477-1485

[8] Song XF, Zhao J, Yan H, et al.. Waterjet machining of biological tissues in medical surgeries: from soft tissue dissection to bone cutting. J Manuf Process, 2023, 107: 529-548

[9] Schafer ME, Clear R (2023) Power ultrasonics. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820254-8.00010-5

[10] Cleary R, Wallace R, Simpson H, et al.. A longitudinal-torsional mode ultrasonic needle for deep penetration into bone. Ultrasonics, 2022, 124: 106756

[11] Zhang SB, Chen ZR, Wu HQ, et al.. Bone cutting processes and removal behaviors in orthopedic surgery with an ultrasonic orthopedic scalpel. Ultrasonics, 2023, 131: 106966

[12] Moon RDC, Srikandarajah N, Clark S, et al.. Primary lumbar decompression using ultrasonic bone curette compared to conventional technique. Brit J Neurosurg, 2021, 35(6775-779

[13] Leti Acciaro A, Lando M, Starnoni M, et al.. Piezoelectric bone surgery. Overview in applications and proof of feasibility in hand and plastic surgery. Indian J Orthop, 2022, 56: 66-72

[14] Li YZ, Zhang DZ, Wang H, et al.. Theoretical and experimental investigations on rotary ultrasonic surface micro-machining of brittle materials. Ultrason Sonochem, 2022, 89: 106162

[15] Yang ZC, Zhu LD, Zhang GX, et al.. Review of ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining in advanced materials. Int J Mach Tool Manufact, 2020, 156: 103594

[16] Alam K, Al-Ghaithi A, Piya S, et al.. In-vitro experimental study of histopathology of bone in vibrational drilling. Med Eng Phys, 2019, 67: 78-87

[17] Gupta V, Pandey PM, Gupta RK, et al.. Rotary ultrasonic drilling on bone: a novel technique to put an end to thermal injury to bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2017, 231: 189-196

[18] Shu LM, Sugita N. Analysis of fracture, force, and temperature in orthogonal elliptical vibration-assisted bone cutting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020, 103: 103599

[19] Agarwal R, Singh RP, Gupta V, et al.. Influence of cutting force on temperature, microcracks and chip morphology during rotary ultrasonic bone drilling: an in-vitro study. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2022, 44: 301

[20] Gupta V, Singh RP, Pandey PM, et al.. In vitro comparison of conventional surgical and rotary ultrasonic bone drilling techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2020, 234: 398-411

[21] Gupta V, Pandey PM, Silberschmidt VV. Rotary ultrasonic bone drilling: improved pullout strength and reduced damage. Med Eng Phys, 2017, 41: 1-8

[22] Singh G, Jain V, Gupta D, et al.. Parametric effect of vibrational drilling on osteonecrosis and comparative histopathology study with conventional drilling of cortical bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2018, 232: 975-986

[23] Agarwal R, Singh J, Gupta V. Prediction of temperature elevation in rotary ultrasonic bone drilling using machine learning models: an in-vitro experimental study. Med Eng Phys, 2022, 110: 103869

[24] Iacoangeli M, Neri P, Balercia P, et al.. Piezosurgery for osteotomies in orbital surgery: our experience and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2013, 4: 188-191

[25] Abella F, De Ribot J, Doria G, et al.. Applications of piezoelectric surgery in endodontic surgery: a literature review. J Endod, 2014, 40: 325-332

[26] Wang JJ, Feng PF, Zhang JF, et al.. Experimental study on vibration stability in rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramic matrix composites: cutting force variation at hole entrance. Ceram Int, 2018, 44: 14386-14392

[27] Xu LH, Na HB, Han GC. Machinability improvement with ultrasonic vibration-assisted micro-milling. Adv Mech Eng, 2018, 10: 1-12

[28] Song XF, Yang JJ, Ren HT, et al.. Ultrasonic assisted high rotational speed diamond machining of dental glass ceramics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 96: 387-399

[29] Rose JL (1999) Ultrasonic waves in solid media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107273610

[30] Fahy F, Gardonio P (2007) Sound and structural vibration. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373633-8.X5000-5

[31] Du PF, Han L, Qiu X, et al.. Development of a high-precision piezoelectric ultrasonic milling tool using longitudinal-bending hybrid transducer. Int J Mech Sci, 2022, 222: 107239

[32] Zhou HL, Zhang JF, Yu DW, et al.. Advances in rotary ultrasonic machining system for hard and brittle materials. Adv Mech Eng, 2019, 11: 1-13

[33] Luan YJ, Lin B, Ma XR, et al.. Innovative contactless energy transfer accessory for rotary ultrasonic machining and its circuit compensation based on coil turns. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2017, 64: 7810-7818

[34] Yang JJ, Fang ZD, Wei BY, et al.. Theoretical explanation of the ‘local resonance’ in stepped acoustic horn based on four-end network method. J Mater Process Technol, 2009, 209: 3106-3110

[35] Nguyen HT, Nguyen HD, Uan JY, et al.. A nonrational B-spline profiled horn with high displacement amplification for ultrasonic welding. Ultrasonics, 2014, 54: 2063-2071

[36] Xu L, Liu SQ, Xu P, et al.. The vibrational properties of the high power ultrasonic focused radiator with rodlike and tubular structures in a composite vibration. Appl Acoust, 2015, 87: 72-82

[37] Fu ZQ, Xian XJ, Lin SY, et al.. Investigations of the barbell ultrasonic transducer operated in the full-wave vibrational mode. Ultrasonics, 2012, 52: 578-586

[38] Dong ZG, Zheng FF, Zhu XL, et al.. Characterization of material removal in ultrasonically assisted grinding of SiCp/Al with high volume fraction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 93: 2827-2839

[39] Zhang J, Long Z, Wang C, et al.. Compensation modeling and optimization on contactless rotary transformer in rotary ultrasonic machining. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2020, 142: 101001

[40] Zhu X, Liu L, Qi H. Performances of a contactless energy transfer system for rotary ultrasonic machining applications. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 51981-51990

[41] Jiang XG, Wang KQ, Shao RJ, et al.. Self-compensation theory and design of contactless energy transfer and vibration system for rotary ultrasonic machining. IEEE T Power Electr, 2018, 33: 8650-8660

[42] Fu Y, Wang AM. Dynamic compensation optimization and frequency characteristic analysis for contactless energy transfer under load variations in rotary ultrasonic machining. IEEE T Ind Electron, 2023, 70: 2948-2958

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52275457/51875404)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Shanghai University and Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature