Survey on machine learning applied to CNC milling processes

Abstract

Computer numerical control (CNC) milling is one of the most critical manufacturing processes for metal-cutting applications in different industry sectors. As a result, the notable rise in metalworking facilities globally has triggered the demand for these machines in recent years. Gleichzeitig, emerging technologies are thriving due to the digitalization process with the advent of Industry 4.0. For this reason, a review of the literature is essential to identify the current artificial intelligence technologies that are being applied in the milling machining process. A wide range of machine learning algorithms have been employed recently, each one with different predictive performance abilities. Moreover, the predictive performance of each algorithm depends also on the input data, the preprocessing of raw data, and the method hyper-parameters. Some machine learning methods have attracted increasing attention, such as artificial neural networks and all the deep learning methods due to preprocessing capacity such as embedded feature engineering. In this survey, we also attempted to describe the types of input data (e.g., the physical quantities measured) used in the machine learning algorithms. Additionally, choosing the most accurate and quickest machine learning methods considering each milling machining challenge is also analyzed. Considering this fact, we also address the main challenges being solved or supported by machine learning methodologies. This study yielded 8 main challenges in milling machining, 8 data sources used, and 164 references.

Keywords

Machine learning / Deep learning / Milling process / Quality prediction

References

[1] DavimJP Machining: fundamentals and recent advances, 2008 Berlin Springer

[2] SchmitzL, SmithK Machining dynamics: frequency response to improved productivity, 2009 New York Springer

[3] GirsangIP, DhupiaJS AndrewYC. Machine tools for machining. Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology, 2015 Berlin Springer

[4] YoussefHA, El-HofyH Machining technology: machine tools and operations, 2008 Boca Raton CRC Press

[5] BudakE, AltintasY. Analytical prediction of chatter stability in milling—part I: general formulation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control, 1998, 120(1): 22-30

[6] MaM, RenA, TylerC, et al.. Integration of discrete-event dynamics and machining dynamics for machine tool: modeling, analysis and algorithms. Manuf Lett, 2023, 35: 321-332

[7] Vu NN (2020) Effect of technology parameters on tool wear in milling process: an overview. J Multidiscip Eng Sci Technol 7(2):11500–11507

[8] LiY, YuM, BaiY, et al.. A review of thermal error modeling methods for machine tools. Appl Sci, 2021, 11: 5216

[9] EgorovIN, EgorovNY, EgorovaSI, et al.. Milling duration influence on strontium hexaferrite technological characteristics. Defect Diffus Forum, 2021, 410: 730-734

[10] SickB. On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: a review of more than a decade of research. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2002, 16: 487-546

[11] RizalM, GhaniJA, NuawiMZ, et al.. A review of sensor system and application in milling process for tool condition monitoring. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol, 2014, 7: 2083-2097

[12] TetiR, JemielniakK, O’DonnellG, et al.. Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann, 2010, 59: 717-739

[13] MiottoR, WangF, WangS, et al.. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform, 2018, 19: 1236-1246

[14] GuptaA Feature selection techniques in machine learning, 2024 Berlin Springer

[15] LiDC, WenIH, ChenWC. A novel data transformation model for small data-set learning. Int J Prod Res, 2016, 54: 7453-7463

[16] AggogeriF, PellegriniN, TaglianiFL. Recent advances on machine learning applications in machining processes. Appl Sci, 2021, 11: 8764

[17] RichterMM, PaulS, KepuskaV, et al. Signal processing and machine learning with applications, 2022 Cham Springer

[18] LiZM, SongQH, JinPJ, et al.. Chatter suppression techniques in milling processes: a state of the art review. Chin J Aeronaut, 2023, 37: 1-23

[19] MoreiraJ, CarvalhoA, HorvathT A general introduction to data analytics, 2018 New York Wiley

[20] Wu J, Liu C, Cui W et al (2019) Personalized collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on linear regression. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on power data science. IEEE, Florence

[21] EzugwuAE, IkotunAM, OyeladeOO, et al.. A comprehensive survey of clustering algorithms: state-of-the-art machine learning applications, taxonomy, challenges, and future research prospects. Eng Appl Artif Intell, 2022, 110, ArticleID: 104743

[22] BarnettV, LewisT Outliers in statistical data, 1994 New York Wiley

[23] Zhang W, Yang G, Lin Y et al (2018) On definition of deep learning. In: 2018 world automation congress. IEEE, Puerto Rico

[24] NamK, WangF. The performance of using an autoencoder for prediction and susceptibility assessment of landslides. Geoenviron Disasters, 2019, 6: 1-14

[25] Chiu MH, Yu YR, Liaw HL et al (2016) The use of facial micro-expression state and tree-forest model for predicting conceptual-conflict based conceptual change. In: International conference on learning sciences. ISLS, Singapore

[26] CortesC, VapnikV. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn, 1995, 20: 273-297

[27] LeeJ, DavariH, SinghJ, et al.. Industrial artificial intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett, 2018, 18: 20-23

[28] YueCX, GaoHN, LiuXL, et al.. A review of chatter vibration research in milling. Chin J Aeronaut, 2019, 32: 215-242

[29] AltintaşY, BudakE. Analytical prediction of stability lobes in milling. CIRP Ann, 1995, 44: 357-362

[30] Yesilli MC, Tymochko S, Khasawneh FA et al (2019) Chatter diagnosis in milling using supervised learning and topological features vector. In: 2019 18th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications. IEEE, San Diego

[31] ChenY, LiH, JingX, et al.. Intelligent chatter detection using image features and support vector machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 102: 1433-1442

[32] SenerB, GudelekMU, OzbayogluAM, et al.. A novel chatter detection method for milling using deep convolution neural networks. Measurement, 2021, 182, ArticleID: 109689

[33] ZachariaK, KrishnakumarP. Chatter prediction in high speed machining of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) using machine learning techniques. Mater Today Proc, 2020, 24: 350-358

[34] ShiF, CaoH, ZhangX, et al.. A reinforced k-nearest neighbors method with application to chatter identification in high-speed milling. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2020, 67: 10844-10855

[35] LiK, HeS, LiB, et al.. A novel online chatter detection method in milling process based on multiscale entropy and gradient tree boosting. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2020, 135, ArticleID: 106385

[36] TranMQ, LiuMK, TranQV. Milling chatter detection using scalogram and deep convolutional neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 107: 1505-1516

[37] PengC, WangL, LiaoTW. A new method for the prediction of chatter stability lobes based on dynamic cutting force simulation model and support vector machine. J Sound Vib, 2015, 354: 118-131

[38] KarandikarJ, SaleebyK, FeldhausenT, et al.. Evaluation of automated stability testing in machining through closed-loop control and Bayesian machine learning. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2022, 181, ArticleID: 109531

[39] KarandikarJ, ChaudhuriA, SmithS, et al.. Process window estimation in manufacturing through entropy-sigma active learning. Manuf Lett, 2022, 34: 87-92

[40] SchmitzT, CorneliusA, KarandikarJ, et al.. Receptance coupling substructure analysis and chatter frequency-informed machine learning for milling stability. CIRP Ann, 2022, 71: 321-324

[41] PostelM, BugdayciB, WegenerK. Ensemble transfer learning for refining stability predictions in milling using experimental stability states. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 107: 4123-4139

[42] DenkenaB, BergmannB, ReimerS. Analysis of different machine learning algorithms to learn stability lobe diagrams. Procedia CIRP, 2020, 88: 282-287

[43] DunY, ZhuL, YanB, et al.. A chatter detection method in milling of thin-walled TC4 alloy workpiece based on auto-encoding and hybrid clustering. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2021, 158, ArticleID: 107755

[44] FuY, ZhangY, QiaoH, et al.. Analysis of feature extracting ability for cutting state monitoring using deep belief networks. Procedia CIRP, 2015, 31: 29-34

[45] Zhao R, Wang J, Yan R et al (2016) Machine health monitoring with LSTM networks. In: 2016 10th international conference on sensing technology. IEEE, Nanjing

[46] UnverHO, SenerB. Exploring the potential of transfer learning for chatter detection. Procedia Comput Sci, 2022, 200: 151-159

[47] UnverHO, SenerB. A novel transfer learning framework for chatter detection using convolutional neural networks. J Intell Manuf, 2023, 34: 1105-1124

[48] ZhuW, ZhuangJ, GuoB, et al.. An optimized convolutional neural network for chatter detection in the milling of thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 106: 3881-3895

[49] Li M, Burzo M (2021) Tool wear monitoring using machine learning. In: 2021 IEEE Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering. IEEE, Canada

[50] SerinG, SenerB, OzbayogluAM, et al.. Review of tool condition monitoring in machining and opportunities for deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 109: 953-974

[51] HaberRE, AliqueA. Intelligent process supervision for predicting tool wear in machining processes. Mechatronics, 2003, 13: 825-849

[52] GhoshN, RaviY, PatraA, et al.. Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2007, 21: 466-479

[53] Wu D, Jennings C, Terpenny J et al (2016) Cloud-based machine learning for predictive analytics: tool wear prediction in milling. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on big data. IEEE, Bethesda

[54] WuD, JenningsC, TerpennyJ, et al.. A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: tool wear prediction using random forests. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2017, 139, ArticleID: 071018

[55] ShenY, YangF, HabibullahMS, et al.. Predicting tool wear size across multi-cutting conditions using advanced machine learning techniques. J Intell Manuf, 2021, 32: 1753-1766

[56] LeiZ, ZhouY, SunB, et al.. An intrinsic timescale decomposition-based kernel extreme learning machine method to detect tool wear conditions in the milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 106: 1203-1212

[57] ChengY, ZhuH, HuK, et al.. Multisensory data-driven health degradation monitoring of machining tools by generalized multiclass support vector machine. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 47102-47113

[58] LiZ, LiuR, WuD. Data-driven smart manufacturing: tool wear monitoring with audio signals and machine learning. J Manuf Process, 2019, 48: 66-76

[59] JiangZ, SunC, ZhuZ, et al.. The monitoring of milling tool tipping by estimating holder exponents of vibration. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 96661-96668

[60] YangQ, PattipatiKR, AwasthiU, et al.. Hybrid data-driven and model-informed online tool wear detection in milling machines. J Manuf Syst, 2022, 63: 329-343

[61] GudelekMU, SerinG, OzbayogluAM, et al.. An industrially viable wavelet long-short term memory-deep multilayer perceptron-based approach to tool condition monitoring considering operational variability. Proc Inst Mech Eng E-J Process Mech Eng, 2022, 237: 2532-2546

[62] BajajNS, PatangeAD, JegadeeshwaranR, et al.. A bayesian optimized discriminant analysis model for condition monitoring of face milling cutter using vibration datasets. J Nondestruct Eval, 2022, 5, ArticleID: 021002

[63] SunC, MaM, ZhaoZ, et al.. Deep transfer learning based on sparse autoencoder for remaining useful life prediction of tool in manufacturing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 2018, 15: 2416-2425

[64] HahnTV, MechefskeCK. Self-supervised learning for tool wear monitoring with a disentangled-variational-autoencoder. Int J Hydro, 2021, 4: 69-98

[65] ProteauA, ZemouriR, TahanA, et al.. Dimension reduction and 2D-visualization for early change of state detection in a machining process with a variational autoencoder approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 111: 3597-3611

[66] OuJ, LiH, HuangG, et al.. Intelligent analysis of tool wear state using stacked denoising autoencoder with online sequential-extreme learning machine. Measurement, 2021, 167, ArticleID: 108153

[67] OchoaLEE, QuindeIBR, SumbaJPC, et al.. New approach based on autoencoders to monitor the tool wear condition in HSM. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 52: 206-211

[68] Vimal B, Surya M, Darshan et al (2021) MFCC based audio classification using machine learning. In: 2021 12th international conference on computing communication and networking technologies. IEEE, Kharagpur

[69] KimJ, LeeH, JeonJW, et al.. Stacked auto-encoder based CNC tool diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform feature extraction. Processes, 2020, 8: 456

[70] DouJ, XuC, JiaoS, et al.. An unsupervised online monitoring method for tool wear using a sparse auto-encoder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 106: 2493-2507

[71] OuJ, LiH, HuangG, et al.. A novel order analysis and stacked sparse auto-encoder feature learning method for milling tool wear condition monitoring. Sensors, 2020, 20: 2878

[72] ShiC, LuoB, HeS, et al.. Tool wear prediction via multidimensional stacked sparse autoencoders with feature fusion. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 2019, 16: 5150-5159

[73] ValizadehM, WolffSJ. Convolutional neural network applications in additive manufacturing: a review. Adv Ind Manuf Eng, 2022, 4, ArticleID: 100072

[74] CaoX, ChenB, YaoB, et al.. An intelligent milling tool wear monitoring methodology based on convolutional neural network with derived wavelet frames coefficient. Appl Sci, 2019, 9: 3912

[75] LiuJ. Convolutional neural network-based human movement recognition algorithm in sports analysis. Front Psychol, 2021, 12: 1738

[76] MamledesaiH, SorianoMA, AhmadR. A qualitative tool condition monitoring framework using convolution neural network and transfer learning. Appl Sci, 2020, 10: 7298

[77] Zheng H, Lin J (2019) A deep learning approach for high speed machining tool wear monitoring. In: 2019, 3rd international conference on robotics and automation sciences. IEEE, Wuhan

[78] XuX, WangJ, MingW, et al.. In-process tap tool wear monitoring and prediction using a novel model based on deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2021, 112: 453-466

[79] CaoXC, ChenBQ, YaoB, et al.. Combining translation-invariant wavelet frames and convolutional neural network for intelligent tool wear state identification. Comput Ind, 2019, 106: 71-84

[80] HuangZ, ZhuJ, LeiJ, et al.. Tool wear predicting based on multi-domain feature fusion by deep convolutional neural network in milling operations. J Intell Manuf, 2020, 31: 953-966

[81] WuX, LiuY, ZhouX, et al.. Automatic identification of tool wear based on convolutional neural network in face milling process. Sensors, 2019, 19: 3817

[82] SongK, WangM, LiuL, et al.. Intelligent recognition of milling cutter wear state with cutting parameter independence based on deep learning of spindle current clutter signal. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 109: 929-942

[83] Martínez-ArellanoG, TerrazasG, RatchevS. Tool wear classification using time series imaging and deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 104: 3647-3662

[84] HuangZ, ZhuJ, LeiJ, et al.. Tool wear predicting based on multisensory raw signals fusion by reshaped time series convolutional neural network in manufacturing. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 178640-178651

[85] XuX, WangJ, ZhongB, et al.. Deep learning-based tool wear prediction and its application for machining process using multi-scale feature fusion and channel attention mechanism. Measurement, 2021, 177, ArticleID: 109254

[86] ZhangX, WangS, LiW, et al.. Heterogeneous sensors-based feature optimisation and deep learning for tool wear prediction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2021, 114: 2651-2675

[87] HanT, LiuC, YangW, et al.. A novel adversarial learning framework in deep convolutional neural network for intelligent diagnosis of mechanical faults. Knowl Based Syst, 2019, 165: 474-487

[88] MaJ, LuoD, LiaoX, et al.. Tool wear mechanism and prediction in milling TC18 titanium alloy using deep learning. Measurement, 2021, 173, ArticleID: 108554

[89] ZhouY, SunB, SunW. A tool condition monitoring method based on two-layer angle kernel extreme learning machine and binary differential evolution for milling. Measurement, 2020, 166, ArticleID: 108186

[90] SunH, ZhangJ, MoR, et al.. In-process tool condition forecasting based on a deep learning method. Robot Cim-Int Manuf, 2020, 64, ArticleID: 101924

[91] LiG, FuY, ChenD, et al.. Deep anomaly detection for CNC machine cutting tool using spindle current signals. Sensors, 2020, 20: 4896

[92] Xia P, Huang Y, Xiao D et al (2021) Tool wear prediction under varying milling conditions via temporal convolutional network and auxiliary learning. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on prognostics and health management. IEEE, Detroit

[93] YuW, KimIY, MechefskeC. Remaining useful life estimation using a bidirectional recurrent neural network based autoencoder scheme. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2019, 129: 764-780

[94] WangJ, YanJ, LiC, et al.. Deep heterogeneous GRU model for predictive analytics in smart manufacturing: application to tool wear prediction. Comput Ind, 2019, 111: 1-14

[95] Gugulothu N, Tv V, Malhotra P et al (2017) Predicting remaining useful life using time series embeddings based on recurrent neural networks. arXiv:1709.01073. https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2018.v9i1.2689

[96] LiuH, LiuZ, JiaW, et al.. A novel transformer-based neural network model for tool wear estimation. Meas Sci Technol, 2020, 31, ArticleID: 065106

[97] CaiW, ZhangW, HuX, et al.. A hybrid information model based on long short-term memory network for tool condition monitoring. J Intell Manuf, 2020, 31: 1497-1510

[98] MoldovanOG, DzitacS, MogaI, et al.. Tool-wear analysis using image processing of the tool flank. Symmetry, 2017, 9: 296

[99] AmbadekarP, ChoudhariC. CNN based tool monitoring system to predict life of cutting tool. SN Appl Sci, 2020, 2: 860

[100] AnQ, TaoZ, XuX, et al.. A data-driven model for milling tool remaining useful life prediction with convolutional and stacked LSTM network. Measurement, 2020, 154, ArticleID: 107461

[101] LinYC, WuKD, ShihWC, et al.. Prediction of surface roughness based on cutting parameters and machining vibration in end milling using regression method and artificial neural network. Appl Sci, 2020, 10: 3941

[102] ChenCH, JengSY, LinCJ. Prediction and analysis of the surface roughness in CNC end milling using neural networks. Appl Sci, 2021, 12: 393

[103] LuX, HuX, WangH, et al.. Research on the prediction model of micro-milling surface roughness of Inconel 718 based on SVM. Ind Lubr Tribol, 2016, 68: 206-211

[104] RifaiAP, AoyamaH, ThoNH, et al.. Evaluation of turned and milled surfaces roughness using convolutional neural network. Measurement, 2020, 161, ArticleID: 107860

[105] KantzosC, LaoJ, RollettA. Design of an interpretable convolutional neural network for stress concentration prediction in rough surfaces. Mater Charact, 2019, 158, ArticleID: 109961

[106] WangP, LiuZ, GaoRX, et al.. Heterogeneous data-driven hybrid machine learning for tool condition prognosis. CIRP Ann, 2019, 68: 455-458

[107] BhandariB, ParkG. Noncontact surface roughness evaluation of milling surface using CNN-deep learning models. Int J Comput Integr Manuf, 2021, 37: 423-437

[108] BhandariB. Comparative study of popular deep learning models for machining roughness classification using sound and force signals. Micromachines, 2021, 12: 1484

[109] LinWJ, LoSH, YoungHT, et al.. Evaluation of deep learning neural networks for surface roughness prediction using vibration signal analysis. Appl Sci, 2019, 9: 1462

[110] Tejakumar D, Mahardi, Wang IH et al (2020) Predicting surface roughness using keras DNN model. In: 2020 IEEE Eurasia conference on IOT, communication and engineering (ECICE). IEEE, Yunlin

[111] YuJ, LiuG. RETRACTED: knowledge-based deep belief network for machining roughness prediction and knowledge discovery. Comput Ind, 2020, 121 ArticleID: 103262

[112] LuZ, WangM, DaiW. Machined surface quality monitoring using a wireless sensory tool holder in the machining process. Sensors, 2019, 19: 1847

[113] GrzendaM, BustilloA. Semi-supervised roughness prediction with partly unlabeled vibration data streams. J Intell Manuf, 2019, 30: 933-945

[114] ArnoldF, HänelA, NestlerA, et al.. New approaches for the determination of specific values for process models in machining using artificial neural networks. Procedia Manuf, 2017, 11: 1463-1470

[115] ElangovanM, SakthivelN, SaravanamuruganS, et al.. Machine learning approach to the prediction of surface roughness using statistical features of vibration signal acquired in turning. Procedia Comput Sci, 2015, 50: 282-288

[116] FujishimaM, NarimatsuK, IrinoN, et al.. Adaptive thermal displacement compensation method based on deep learning. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol, 2019, 25: 22-25

[117] TianY, PanG. An unsupervised regularization and dropout based deep neural network and its application for thermal error prediction. Appl Sci, 2020, 10: 2870

[118] LiZ, ZhuB, DaiY, et al.. Research on thermal error modeling of motorized spindle based on BP neural network optimized by beetle antennae search algorithm. Machines, 2021, 9: 286

[119] LiP, LouP, YanJ, et al.. The thermal error modeling with deep transfer learning. J Phys Conf Ser, 2020, 1576, ArticleID: 012003

[120] LiuPL, DuZC, LiHM, et al.. Thermal error modeling based on BiLSTM deep learning for CNC machine tool. Adv Manuf, 2021, 9: 235-249

[121] LiB, TianX, ZhangM. Thermal error modeling of machine tool spindle based on the improved algorithm optimized BP neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 105: 1497-1505

[122] LiZ, LiG, XuK, et al.. Temperature-sensitive point selection and thermal error modeling of spindle based on synthetical temperature information. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2021, 113: 1029-1043

[123] ShiH, JiangC, YanZ, et al.. Bayesian neural network-based thermal error modeling of feed drive system of CNC machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 108: 3031-3044

[124] Zhang X, Wang C, Lou P et al (2020) Machine tools thermal error modeling with imbalanced data based on transfer learning. In: 2020 IEEE 5th international conference on cloud computing and big data analytics (ICCCBDA). IEEE, Chengdu

[125] GouveiaRM, SilvaF, ReisP, et al.. Machining duplex stainless steel: comparative study regarding end mill coated tools. Coatings, 2016, 6: 51

[126] KatarakiPS, Abu MansorMS. Automatic designation of feature faces to recognize interacting and compound volumetric features for prismatic parts. Eng Comput, 2020, 36: 1499-1515

[127] NingF, ShiY, CaiM, et al.. Manufacturing cost estimation based on the machining process and deep-learning method. J Manuf Syst, 2020, 56: 11-22

[128] AtiaMR, KhalilJ, MokhtarM. A cost estimation model for machining operations; an ANN parametric approach. J Al-Azhar Univ Eng Sect, 2017, 12: 878-885

[129] FlorjaničB, KuzmanK. Estimation of time for manufacturing of injection moulds using artificial neural networks-based model. Polimeri časopis za plastiku i gumu, 2012, 33(1): 12-21

[130] YooS, KangN. Explainable artificial intelligence for manufacturing cost estimation and machining feature visualization. Expert Syst Appl, 2021, 183, ArticleID: 115430

[131] SaricT, SimunovicG, SimunovicK, et al.. Estimation of machining time for CNC manufacturing using neural computing. Int J Simul Model, 2016, 15: 663-675

[132] MustafaA. Modelling of the hole quality characteristics by extreme learning machine in fiber laser drilling of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process, 2018, 36: 138-148

[133] WangKS, LiZ, BraatenJ, et al.. Interpretation and compensation of backlash error data in machine centers for intelligent predictive maintenance using ANNs. Adv Manuf, 2015, 3: 97-104

[134] WangJ, LuS, WangSH, et al.. A review on extreme learning machine. Multimed Tools Appl, 2021, 81: 41611-41660

[135] GurgencT, UcarF, KorkmazD, et al.. A study on the extreme learning machine based prediction of machining times of the cycloidal gears in CNC milling machines. Prod Eng, 2019, 13: 635-647

[136] PantazisD, GoodallP, ConwayPP, et al.. An automated feature extraction method with application to empirical model development from machining power data. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2019, 124: 21-35

[137] Chen T, Shang H, Bi Q (2019) A prediction method of five-axis machine tool energy consumption with GBRT algorithm. In: 2019 IEEE 5th international conference on mechatronics system and robots (ICMSR). IEEE, Singapore

[138] BrillingerM, WuwerM, HadiMA, et al.. Energy prediction for CNC machining with machine learning. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol, 2021, 35: 715-723

[139] CaoJ, XiaX, WangL, et al.. A novel CNC milling energy consumption prediction method based on program parsing and parallel neural network. Sustainability, 2021, 13: 13918

[140] Bhinge R, Biswas N, Dornfeld D et al (2014) An intelligent machine monitoring system for energy prediction using a Gaussian process regression. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on big data. IEEE, Washington

[141] MekarthySMR. A combined finite element and machine learning approach for the prediction of specific cutting forces and maximum tool temperatures in machining. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2022, 56: 66-85

[142] PengB, BergsT, SchraknepperD, et al.. A hybrid approach using machine learning to predict the cutting forces under consideration of the tool wear. Procedia CIRP, 2019, 82: 302-307

[143] CharalampousP. Prediction of cutting forces in milling using machine learning algorithms and finite element analysis. J Mater Eng Perform, 2021, 30: 2002-2013

[144] GeorgeK, KannanS, RazaA, et al.. A hybrid finite element-machine learning backward training approach to analyze the optimal machining conditions. Materials, 2021, 14: 6717

[145] FengJ, HouN, JianZ, et al.. An efficient method to predict the chatter stability of titanium alloy thin-walled workpieces during high-speed milling by considering varying dynamic parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 106: 5407-5420

[146] RizalM, GhaniJA, NuawiMZ, et al.. An embedded multi-sensor system on the rotating dynamometer for real-time condition monitoring in milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 95: 811-823

[147] WangJ, MaY, ZhangL, et al.. Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications. J Manuf Syst, 2018, 48: 144-156

[148] MaL, MelkoteSN, CastleJB. PVDF sensor-based monitoring of milling torque. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2014, 70: 1603-1614

[149] NguyenV, MelkoteS, DeshamudreA, et al.. PVDF sensor based monitoring of single-point cutting. J Manuf Process, 2016, 24: 328-337

[150] WangC, ChengK, ChenX, et al.. Design of an instrumented smart cutting tool and its implementation and application perspectives. Smart Mater Struct, 2014, 23, ArticleID: 035019

[151] AlbrechtA, ParkSS, AltintasY, et al.. High frequency bandwidth cutting force measurement in milling using capacitance displacement sensors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2005, 45: 993-1008

[152] QinY, WangD, YangY. Integrated cutting force measurement system based on MEMS sensor for monitoring milling process. Microsyst Technol, 2020, 26: 2095-2104

[153] QinY, ZhaoY, LiY, et al.. A novel dynamometer for monitoring milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 92: 2535-2543

[154] XieZ, LiJ, LuY. An integrated wireless vibration sensing tool holder for milling tool condition monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 95: 2885-2896

[155] MaL, MelkoteSN, MorehouseJB, et al.. Thin-film PVDF sensor-based monitoring of cutting forces in peripheral end milling. J Dyn Syst Meas Control, 2012, 134, ArticleID: 051014

[156] LuoM, LuoH, AxinteD, et al.. A wireless instrumented milling cutter system with embedded PVDF sensors. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2018, 110: 556-568

[157] WuF, LiY, GuoB, et al.. The design of force measuring tool holder system based on wireless transmission. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 38556-38566

[158] Iliyas AhmadM, YusofY, DaudME, et al.. Machine monitoring system: a decade in review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 108: 3645-3659

[159] AnowarF, SadaouiS, SelimB. Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, T-SNE). Comput Sci Rev, 2021, 40 ArticleID: 100378

[160] CaggianoA. Cloud-based manufacturing process monitoring for smart diagnosis services. Int J Comput Integr Manuf, 2018, 31: 612-623

[161] QiaoH, WangT, WangP. A tool wear monitoring and prediction system based on multiscale deep learning models and fog computing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 108: 2367-2384

[162] Roy B (2020) All about feature scaling. Towards data science. https://towardsdatascience.com/all-about-feature-scaling-bcc0ad75cb35. Accessed 19 Mar 2021

[163] ShaoS, McAleerS, YanR, et al.. Highly accurate machine fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 2018, 15: 2446-2455

[164] YangF, ZhangW, TaoL, et al.. Transfer learning strategies for deep learning-based PHM algorithms. Appl Sci, 2020, 10: 2361

[165] ChenJ, HuP, ZhouH, et al.. Toward intelligent machine tool. Engineering, 2019, 5: 679-690

Funding

Produtech(46102)

Universidade do Porto

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)