Study on arc behavior and droplet transfer mechanisms under complex paths

Abstract

Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is an economical and efficient technology for manufacturing large metal parts with complex physical states that are difficult to observe in situ. However, in-depth systematic research on the fluid flow state and droplet transition behavior in WAAM under complex paths is lacking. Firstly, the free surface of the molten pool was tracked using the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method. Subsequently, by integrating matrix transformation methods, the dual ellipsoidal heat source was varied over time, and its dynamic effects on the molten pool were studied. Finally, the shapes and sizes of the deposited bead and weld pool were determined. The results showed that the droplets brought heat and kinetic energy to the molten pool and that the kinetic energy of the molten pool was more easily dissipated on complex paths than on straight paths. The impact of droplets on the molten pool, creating a negative pressure, is one of the reasons for the precipitation of gas and the eventual formation of a unique bubble distribution. The primary reason for the tilt of the molten pool in the moving direction was the influence of the liquid tension and arc pressure. The simulated profiles of the deposited bead and droplet transfer are validated using experimental cross-sectional and high-speed camera images. The consistency between the simulation results and the experimental outcomes was good, aiding the precise control of specific requirements in future production.

Keywords

Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) / Heat and mass transfer / Numerical simulation / Path strategy / Engineering / Interdisciplinary Engineering

References

[1] HerzogD, SeydaV, WyciskE, et al. . Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater, 2016, 117: 371-392.

[2] FortunaSV, FilippovAV, KolubaevEA, et al. . Wire feed electron beam additive manufacturing of metallic components. AIP Conf Proc, 2018, 2051: 020092.

[3] NegiS, NambolanAA, KapilS, et al. . Review on electron beam based additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J, 2020, 263485-498.

[4] LiY, SuC, ZhuJ. Comprehensive review of wire arc additive manufacturing: hardware system, physical process, monitoring, property characterization, application and future prospects. Results Eng, 2022, 13: 100330.

[5] BidareP, JiménezA, HassaninH, et al. . Porosity, cracks, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured tooling alloys: a review. Adv Manuf, 2022, 102175-204.

[6] GengH, LiJ, XiongJ, et al. . Geometric limitation and tensile properties of wire and arc additive manufacturing 5A06 aluminum alloy parts. J Mater Eng Perform, 2017, 26: 621-629.

[7] AldalurE, SuarezA, VeigaF. Metal transfer modes for wire arc additive manufacturing Al-Mg alloys: influence of heat input in microstructure and porosity. J Mater Process Technol, 2021, 297: 117271.

[8] ZhangY, JiangM, LuW. Double electrodes improve GMAW heat input control. Weld J, 2004, 831139-41

[9] LuY, ChenS, ShiY, et al. . Double-electrode arc welding process: principle, variants, control and developments. J Manuf Process, 2014, 16193-108.

[10] PriyadarshiD, SharmaRK. Porosity in aluminium matrix composites: cause, effect and defence. Mater Sci: Ind J, 2016, 144119-129

[11] ReadN, WangW, EssaK, et al. . Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: process optimisation and mechanical properties development. Mater Des, 2015, 65: 417-424.

[12] TodaH, OogoH, UesugiK, et al. . Roles of pre-existing hydrogen micropores on ductile fracture. Mater Trans, 2009, 5092285-2290.

[13] MayerH, PapakyriacouM, ZettlB, et al. . Influence of porosity on the fatigue limit of die cast magnesium and aluminum alloys. Int J Fatigue, 2003, 253245-256.

[14] WangX, FanD, HuangJ, et al. . A unified model of coupled arc plasma and weld pool for double electrodes TIG welding. J Phys D Appl Phys, 2014, 4727275202.

[15] MurphyAB, TanakaM, YamamotoK, et al. . Modelling of thermal plasmas for arc welding: the role of the shielding gas properties and of metal vapour. J Phys D Appl Phys, 2009, 4219194006.

[16] SemenovO, DemchenkoV, KrivtsunI, et al. . A dynamic model of droplet formation in GMA welding. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng, 2012, 204045003.

[17] CadiouS, CourtoisM, CarinM, et al. . Heat transfer, fluid flow and electromagnetic model of droplets generation and melt pool behaviour for wire arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2020, 148: 119102.

[18] YinX, GouJ, ZhangJ, et al. . Numerical study of arc plasmas and weld pools for GTAW with applied axial magnetic fields. J Phys D: Appl Phys, 2012, 4528285203.

[19] CasusoM, VeigaF, SuárezA, et al. . Model for the prediction of deformations in the manufacture of thin-walled parts by wire arc additive manufacturing technology. Metals, 2021, 115678.

[20] OginoY, AsaiS, HirataY. Numerical simulation of WAAM process by a GMAW weld pool model. Weld World, 2018, 62: 393-401.

[21] ManurungYHP, PrajadhianaKP, AdenanMS, et al. . Analysis of material property models on WAAM distortion using nonlinear numerical computation and experimental verification with P-GMAW. Arch Civ Mech Eng, 2021, 21: 1-13.

[22] VeigaF, SuarezA, AldalurE, et al. . Wire arc additive manufacturing of invar parts: bead geometry and melt pool monitoring. Meas, 2022, 189: 110452.

[23] HuJ, TsaiHL. Heat and mass transfer in gas metal arc welding, part II: the metal. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2007, 50: 808-820.

[24] RaoZH, HuJ, LiaoSM, et al. . Modeling of the transport phenomena in GMAW using argon-helium mixtures. Part I—the arc. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2010, 5325/265707-5721.

[25] WirthF, ArpagausS, WegenerK. Analysis of melt pool dynamics in laser cladding and direct metal deposition by automated high-speed camera image evaluation. Addit Manuf, 2018, 21: 369-382

[26] ZhouX, ZhangH, WangG, et al. . Three-dimensional numerical simulation of arc and metal transport in arc welding based additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2016, 103: 521-537.

[27] HertelM, RoseS, FüsselU. Numerical simulation of arc and droplet transfer in pulsed GMAW of mild steel in argon. Weld World, 2016, 60: 1055-1061.

[28] BaiX, ColegroveP, DingJ, et al. . Numerical analysis of heat transfer and fluid flow in multilayer deposition of PAW-based wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2018, 124: 504-516.

[29] BaoY, WangB, HeZ, et al. . Recent progress in flexible supporting technology for aerospace thin-walled parts: a review. Chin J Aeronaut, 2022, 35310-26.

[30] GoldakJ, ChakravartiA, BibbyM. A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Mater Trans B, 1984, 15B: 299-305.

[31] DingJ, ColegroveP, MehnenJ, et al. . A computationally efficient finite element model of wire and arc additive manufacture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2014, 70: 227-236.

Funding

Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province(tsqn202211085)

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province(ZR2022ME106)

Qingdao Postdoctoral Science Foundation(QDBSH20240101039)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Shanghai University and Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature