Material removal rate model for high-shear and low-pressure grinding with body-armor-like wheel

Ye-Bing Tian , Bing Liu , Xiao-Mei Song , Shuang Liu , Guo-Yu Zhang

Advances in Manufacturing ›› : 1 -22.

PDF
Advances in Manufacturing ›› : 1 -22. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-025-00550-3
Article

Material removal rate model for high-shear and low-pressure grinding with body-armor-like wheel

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

High-shear and low-pressure grinding with a body-armor-like grinding wheel is a novel grinding method with great potential for ultraprecision machining of difficult-to-cut materials. However, the material removal rate model for the new grinding process is still lacking. In this study, elastohydrodynamic pressure distribution at the working interface between a body-armor-like grinding wheel and the workpiece was revealed. The microcontact state of the single abrasive grain in the interface was uncovered. The formulas of the forces acting on the rubbing, plowing, and cutting abrasive grain were analyzed. Based on the force model of the single abrasive grain and the Gaussian distribution of the grain protrusion heights, the actual grinding depth of the cut model and specific removal rate model were proposed for the novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding process. The influence of the grinding wheel and processing parameters on the material removal rate was investigated. It was found that the actual cut grinding depth decreased with the increase of the workpiece feed rate while the material removal rate remained almost constant. By comparing with experimental and theoretical results, it was shown that the model could accurately predict the actual grinding depth of cut and specific removal rate under different processing parameters, with a minimum prediction error of 1.5%. The maximum actual grinding depth of cut (i.e., 0.60 μm), was obtained for Inconel 718 workpiece. The findings of this study provide theoretical guidance for the practical application of high-shear and low-pressure grinding.

Keywords

High-shear and low-pressure grinding / Material removal model / Elastohydrodynamic pressure / Body-armor-like grinding wheel

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ye-Bing Tian, Bing Liu, Xiao-Mei Song, Shuang Liu, Guo-Yu Zhang. Material removal rate model for high-shear and low-pressure grinding with body-armor-like wheel. Advances in Manufacturing 1-22 DOI:10.1007/s40436-025-00550-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ZhaoB, XiaoGD, DingWF, et al.. Effect of grain contents of a single-aggregated cubic boron nitride grain on material removal mechanism during Ti-6Al-4V alloy grinding. Ceram Int, 2020, 46: 17666-17674

[2]

LiG, KangRK, WangH, et al.. A grinding force model and surface formation mechanism of cup wheels considering crystallographic orientation. J Mater Process Technol, 2023, 322, ArticleID: 118187

[3]

GhoshS, ChattopadhyayAB, PaulS. Modelling of specific energy requirement during high-efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2008, 48: 1242-1253

[4]

EzugwuEO. Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2005, 45: 1353-1367

[5]

KopacJ, KrajnikP. High-performance grinding-a review. J Mater Process Tech, 2006, 175(1/5): 278-284

[6]

ZhangSQ, YangZX, JiangRS, et al.. Effect of creep feed grinding on surface integrity and fatigue life of Ni3Al based superalloy IC10. Chin J Aeronaut, 2021, 34: 438-448

[7]

MohamedAO, BauerR, WarkentinA. Application of shallow circumferential grooved wheels to creep-feed grinding. J Mater Process Tech, 2013, 213(5): 700-706

[8]

LiBZ, NiJM, YangJG, et al.. Study on high-speed grinding mechanisms for quality and process efficiency. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2014, 70: 813-819

[9]

WuY, LuP, LinFH, et al.. Explosion accident analysis of ultra-high-speed grinding wheel. Eng Fail Anal, 2020, 122, ArticleID: 105209

[10]

BellA, JinT, StephensonDJ. Burn threshold prediction for high efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2011, 51(6): 433-438

[11]

NanH, AxinteD. Textured grinding wheels: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2016, 109: 8-35

[12]

SinghH, SharmaVS, DograM. Exploration of graphene assisted vegetables oil based minimum quantity lubrication for surface grinding of Ti-6Al-4V-eLi. Tribol Int, 2020, 144, ArticleID: 106113

[13]

GeYC, ZhuZW, ZhuYW. Electrochemical deep grinding of cast nickel-base superalloys. J Manuf Process, 2019, 47: 291-296

[14]

TianYB, LiLG, FanS, et al.. A novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding method using specially developed abrasive tools. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf, 2021, 235: 166-172

[15]

ZhangY, LiB, YangJ, et al.. Modeling and optimization of alloy steel 20CrMnTi grinding process parameters based on experiment investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 95: 1859-1873

[16]

ZhangYZ, XuXP. Influence of surface topography evolution of grinding wheel on the optimal material removal rate in grinding process of cemented carbide. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater, 2019, 80: 130-143

[17]

YanSJ, XuXH, YangZY, et al.. An improved robotic abrasive belt grinding force model considering the effects of cut-in and cut-off. J Manuf Process, 2019, 37: 496-508

[18]

ZhangXQ, ChenHB, XuJJ, et al.. A novel sound-based belt condition monitoring method for robotic grinding using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. J Mater Process Tech, 2018, 260: 9-19

[19]

WangNN, ZhangGP, RenLJ, et al.. Vision and sound fusion-based material removal rate monitoring for abrasive belt grinding using improved LightGBM algorithm. J Manuf Process, 2021, 66: 281-292

[20]

RenLJ, WangNN, WangXH, et al.. Modeling and analysis of material removal depth contour for curved-surfaces abrasive belt grinding. J Mater Process Tech, 2023, 316, ArticleID: 117945

[21]

QuC, LvYJ, YangZY, et al.. An improved chip-thickness model for surface roughness prediction in robotic belt grinding considering the elastic state at contact wheel-workpiece interface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 104: 3209-3217

[22]

LvYJ, PengZ, QuC, et al.. An adaptive trajectory planning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of blade leading and trailing edges based on material removal profile model. Rob Comput Integr Manuf, 2020, 66, ArticleID: 101987

[23]

LiLF, RenXK, FengHJ, et al.. A novel material removal rate model based on single grain force for robotic belt grinding. J Manuf Process, 2021, 68(3): 1-12

[24]

QiJD, ZhangDH, LiS, et al.. A micro-model of the material removal depth for the polishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2016, 86: 2759-2770

[25]

WangGL, WangYQ, XuZX. Modeling and analysis of the material removal depth for stone polishing. J Mater Process Tech, 2009, 209: 2453-2463

[26]

WangYJ, HuangY, ChenYX, et al.. Model of an abrasive belt grinding surface removal contour and its application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2016, 82: 2113-2122

[27]

PandiyanV, CaesarendraW, TjahjowidodoT, et al.. Predictive modelling and analysis of process parameters on material removal characteristics in abrasive belt grinding process. Appl Sci, 2017, 7(4): 363

[28]

GaoKY, ChenHB, ZhangXQ, et al.. A novel material removal prediction method based on acoustic sensing and ensemble XGBoost learning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 105: 217-232

[29]

RenLJ, ZhangGP, WangY, et al.. A new in-process material removal rate monitoring approach in abrasive belt grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 104: 2715-2726

[30]

TianYB, LiLG, HanJG, et al.. Development of novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding tool with flexible composite. Mater Manuf Process, 2021, 36: 479-487

[31]

LiuB, TianYB, HanJG, et al.. Development of a new high-shear and low-pressure grinding wheel and its grinding characteristics for Incone l718 alloy. Chin J Aeronaut, 2022, 35: 278-286

[32]

YaoWF, LyuBH, ZhangTQ, et al.. Effect of elastohydrodynamic characteristics on surface roughness in cylindrical shear thickening polishing process. Wear, 2023, 530–531, ArticleID: 205026

[33]

JohnsonKL Contact mechanics, 2012 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

[34]

PopovVL Contact mechanics and friction: physical principles and applications, 2010 Heidelberg Springer

[35]

ChenJP, PengYN. Super hard and brittle material removal mechanism in fixed abrasive lapping: theory and modeling. Tribology Int, 2023, 184, ArticleID: 108493

[36]

JohnsonKL. The correlation of indentation experiments. J Mech Phys Solids, 1970, 18: 115-126

[37]

JohnsonK Contact mechanics, 1985 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

[38]

DomanDA, WarkentinA, BauerR. A survey of recent grinding wheel topography models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2006, 46: 343-352

[39]

LiM, LyuBH, YuanJL, et al.. Shear-thickening polishing method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2015, 94: 88-99

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(51875329)

Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation(ZR2023ME112)

Innovation Capacity Improvement Programme for High-tech SMEs of Shandong Province(2022TSGC1333)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Shanghai University and Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

175

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/