PDF
Abstract
High-shear and low-pressure grinding with a body-armor-like grinding wheel is a novel grinding method with great potential for ultraprecision machining of difficult-to-cut materials. However, the material removal rate model for the new grinding process is still lacking. In this study, elastohydrodynamic pressure distribution at the working interface between a body-armor-like grinding wheel and the workpiece was revealed. The microcontact state of the single abrasive grain in the interface was uncovered. The formulas of the forces acting on the rubbing, plowing, and cutting abrasive grain were analyzed. Based on the force model of the single abrasive grain and the Gaussian distribution of the grain protrusion heights, the actual grinding depth of the cut model and specific removal rate model were proposed for the novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding process. The influence of the grinding wheel and processing parameters on the material removal rate was investigated. It was found that the actual cut grinding depth decreased with the increase of the workpiece feed rate while the material removal rate remained almost constant. By comparing with experimental and theoretical results, it was shown that the model could accurately predict the actual grinding depth of cut and specific removal rate under different processing parameters, with a minimum prediction error of 1.5%. The maximum actual grinding depth of cut (i.e., 0.60 μm), was obtained for Inconel 718 workpiece. The findings of this study provide theoretical guidance for the practical application of high-shear and low-pressure grinding.
Keywords
High-shear and low-pressure grinding
/
Material removal model
/
Elastohydrodynamic pressure
/
Body-armor-like grinding wheel
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Ye-Bing Tian, Bing Liu, Xiao-Mei Song, Shuang Liu, Guo-Yu Zhang.
Material removal rate model for high-shear and low-pressure grinding with body-armor-like wheel.
Advances in Manufacturing, 2026, 14(1): 189-210 DOI:10.1007/s40436-025-00550-3
| [1] |
Zhao B, Xiao GD, Ding WFet al.. Effect of grain contents of a single-aggregated cubic boron nitride grain on material removal mechanism during Ti-6Al-4V alloy grinding. Ceram Int, 2020, 46: 17666-17674
|
| [2] |
Li G, Kang RK, Wang Het al.. A grinding force model and surface formation mechanism of cup wheels considering crystallographic orientation. J Mater Process Technol, 2023, 322 118187
|
| [3] |
Ghosh S, Chattopadhyay AB, Paul S. Modelling of specific energy requirement during high-efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2008, 48: 1242-1253
|
| [4] |
Ezugwu EO. Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2005, 45: 1353-1367
|
| [5] |
Kopac J, Krajnik P. High-performance grinding-a review. J Mater Process Tech, 2006, 175(1/5): 278-284
|
| [6] |
Zhang SQ, Yang ZX, Jiang RSet al.. Effect of creep feed grinding on surface integrity and fatigue life of Ni3Al based superalloy IC10. Chin J Aeronaut, 2021, 34: 438-448
|
| [7] |
Mohamed AO, Bauer R, Warkentin A. Application of shallow circumferential grooved wheels to creep-feed grinding. J Mater Process Tech, 2013, 213(5): 700-706
|
| [8] |
Li BZ, Ni JM, Yang JGet al.. Study on high-speed grinding mechanisms for quality and process efficiency. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2014, 70: 813-819
|
| [9] |
Wu Y, Lu P, Lin FHet al.. Explosion accident analysis of ultra-high-speed grinding wheel. Eng Fail Anal, 2020, 122 105209
|
| [10] |
Bell A, Jin T, Stephenson DJ. Burn threshold prediction for high efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2011, 51(6): 433-438
|
| [11] |
Nan H, Axinte D. Textured grinding wheels: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2016, 109: 8-35
|
| [12] |
Singh H, Sharma VS, Dogra M. Exploration of graphene assisted vegetables oil based minimum quantity lubrication for surface grinding of Ti-6Al-4V-eLi. Tribol Int, 2020, 144 106113
|
| [13] |
Ge YC, Zhu ZW, Zhu YW. Electrochemical deep grinding of cast nickel-base superalloys. J Manuf Process, 2019, 47: 291-296
|
| [14] |
Tian YB, Li LG, Fan Set al.. A novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding method using specially developed abrasive tools. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf, 2021, 235: 166-172
|
| [15] |
Zhang Y, Li B, Yang Jet al.. Modeling and optimization of alloy steel 20CrMnTi grinding process parameters based on experiment investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 95: 1859-1873
|
| [16] |
Zhang YZ, Xu XP. Influence of surface topography evolution of grinding wheel on the optimal material removal rate in grinding process of cemented carbide. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater, 2019, 80: 130-143
|
| [17] |
Yan SJ, Xu XH, Yang ZYet al.. An improved robotic abrasive belt grinding force model considering the effects of cut-in and cut-off. J Manuf Process, 2019, 37: 496-508
|
| [18] |
Zhang XQ, Chen HB, Xu JJet al.. A novel sound-based belt condition monitoring method for robotic grinding using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. J Mater Process Tech, 2018, 260: 9-19
|
| [19] |
Wang NN, Zhang GP, Ren LJet al.. Vision and sound fusion-based material removal rate monitoring for abrasive belt grinding using improved LightGBM algorithm. J Manuf Process, 2021, 66: 281-292
|
| [20] |
Ren LJ, Wang NN, Wang XHet al.. Modeling and analysis of material removal depth contour for curved-surfaces abrasive belt grinding. J Mater Process Tech, 2023, 316 117945
|
| [21] |
Qu C, Lv YJ, Yang ZYet al.. An improved chip-thickness model for surface roughness prediction in robotic belt grinding considering the elastic state at contact wheel-workpiece interface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 104: 3209-3217
|
| [22] |
Lv YJ, Peng Z, Qu Cet al.. An adaptive trajectory planning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of blade leading and trailing edges based on material removal profile model. Rob Comput Integr Manuf, 2020, 66 101987
|
| [23] |
Li LF, Ren XK, Feng HJet al.. A novel material removal rate model based on single grain force for robotic belt grinding. J Manuf Process, 2021, 68(3): 1-12
|
| [24] |
Qi JD, Zhang DH, Li Set al.. A micro-model of the material removal depth for the polishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2016, 86: 2759-2770
|
| [25] |
Wang GL, Wang YQ, Xu ZX. Modeling and analysis of the material removal depth for stone polishing. J Mater Process Tech, 2009, 209: 2453-2463
|
| [26] |
Wang YJ, Huang Y, Chen YXet al.. Model of an abrasive belt grinding surface removal contour and its application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2016, 82: 2113-2122
|
| [27] |
Pandiyan V, Caesarendra W, Tjahjowidodo Tet al.. Predictive modelling and analysis of process parameters on material removal characteristics in abrasive belt grinding process. Appl Sci, 2017, 7(4): 363
|
| [28] |
Gao KY, Chen HB, Zhang XQet al.. A novel material removal prediction method based on acoustic sensing and ensemble XGBoost learning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 105: 217-232
|
| [29] |
Ren LJ, Zhang GP, Wang Yet al.. A new in-process material removal rate monitoring approach in abrasive belt grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 104: 2715-2726
|
| [30] |
Tian YB, Li LG, Han JGet al.. Development of novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding tool with flexible composite. Mater Manuf Process, 2021, 36: 479-487
|
| [31] |
Liu B, Tian YB, Han JGet al.. Development of a new high-shear and low-pressure grinding wheel and its grinding characteristics for Incone l718 alloy. Chin J Aeronaut, 2022, 35: 278-286
|
| [32] |
Yao WF, Lyu BH, Zhang TQet al.. Effect of elastohydrodynamic characteristics on surface roughness in cylindrical shear thickening polishing process. Wear, 2023, 530–531 205026
|
| [33] |
Johnson KL. Contact mechanics, 2012, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
|
| [34] |
Popov VL. Contact mechanics and friction: physical principles and applications, 2010, Heidelberg, Springer
|
| [35] |
Chen JP, Peng YN. Super hard and brittle material removal mechanism in fixed abrasive lapping: theory and modeling. Tribology Int, 2023, 184 108493
|
| [36] |
Johnson KL. The correlation of indentation experiments. J Mech Phys Solids, 1970, 18: 115-126
|
| [37] |
Johnson K. Contact mechanics, 1985, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
|
| [38] |
Doman DA, Warkentin A, Bauer R. A survey of recent grinding wheel topography models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2006, 46: 343-352
|
| [39] |
Li M, Lyu BH, Yuan JLet al.. Shear-thickening polishing method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2015, 94: 88-99
|
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(51875329)
Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation(ZR2023ME112)
Innovation Capacity Improvement Programme for High-tech SMEs of Shandong Province(2022TSGC1333)
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Shanghai University and Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature