Improving RSW nugget diameter prediction method: unleashing the power of multi-fidelity neural networks and transfer learning

Zhong-Jie Yue, Qiu-Ren Chen, Zu-Guo Bao, Li Huang, Guo-Bi Tan, Ze-Hong Hou, Mu-Shi Li, Shi-Yao Huang, Hai-Long Zhao, Jing-Yu Kong, Jia Wang, Qing Liu

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 409-427.

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 409-427. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-024-00503-2
Article

Improving RSW nugget diameter prediction method: unleashing the power of multi-fidelity neural networks and transfer learning

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This research presents an innovative approach to accurately predict the nugget diameter in resistance spot welding (RSW) by leveraging machine learning and transfer learning methods. Initially, low-fidelity (LF) data were obtained through finite element numerical simulation and design of experiments (DOEs) to train the LF machine learning model. Subsequently, high-fidelity (HF) data were collected from RSW process experiments and used to fine-tune the LF model by transfer learning techniques. The accuracy and generalization performance of the models were thoroughly validated. The results demonstrated that combining different fidelity datasets and employing transfer learning could significantly improve the prediction accuracy while minimize the costs associated with experimental trials, and provide an effective and valuable method for predicting critical process parameters in RSW.

Keywords

Resistance spot welding (RSW) / Nugget diameter prediction / Multi-fidelity neural networks / Transfer learning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhong-Jie Yue, Qiu-Ren Chen, Zu-Guo Bao, Li Huang, Guo-Bi Tan, Ze-Hong Hou, Mu-Shi Li, Shi-Yao Huang, Hai-Long Zhao, Jing-Yu Kong, Jia Wang, Qing Liu. Improving RSW nugget diameter prediction method: unleashing the power of multi-fidelity neural networks and transfer learning. Advances in Manufacturing, 2024, 12(3): 409‒427 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-024-00503-2

References

[1.]
Makoto K, Yoshimasa F, Kazuhiro O, et al. Estimation of tensile shear strength of spot welded joint of steel sheets. Q J Jpn Weld Soc, 1996, 14(4): 754-761.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Oikawa H, Murayama G, Hiwatashi S, et al. Resistance spot weldability of high strength steel sheets for automobiles and the quality assurance of joints. Weld World, 2007, 51(3): 7-18.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
Pouranvari M, Asgari HR, Mosavizadch SM, et al. Effect of weld nugget size on overload failure mode of resistance spot welds. Sci Technol Weld Joi, 2007, 12(3): 217-225.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Sun DQ, Lang B, Sun DX, et al. Microstructures and mechanical properties of resistance spot welded magnesium alloy joints. Mater Sci Eng A, 2007, 460: 494-498.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Sim J, Kim KY. Hybrid nugget diameter prediction for resistance spot welding. Procedia Manuf, 2018, 17: 395-402.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Birada AK, Dabade BM. Optimization of resistance spot welding process parameters in dissimilar joint of MS and ASS 304 sheets. Mater Today Proc, 2020, 26(2): 1284-1288.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Luo Y, Li CT, Xu HB. Regression modeling and process analysis of resistance spot welding on galvanized steel sheet. Mater Des, 2009, 30(7): 2547-2555.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
Pandya KS, Grolleau V, Roth CC, et al. Fracture response of resistance spot welded dual phase steel sheets: experiments and modeling. Int J Mech Sci, 2020, 187.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Kumar A, Ghosh GK, Panda S, et al. Numerical simulation of weld nugget in resistance spot welding process. Mater Today Proc, 2020, 27: 2958-2963.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Andersson O, Melander A. Prediction and verification of resistance spot welding results of ultra-high strength steels through FE simulations. Model Numer Simul Mater Sci, 2015, 5(1): 26-37.
[11.]
Eisazadeh H, Hamedi M, Halvaee A. New parametric study of nugget size in resistance spot welding process using finite element method. Mater Des, 2010, 31(1): 149-157.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12.]
Hussein HK, Shareef IR, Zayer IA. Prediction of spot welding parameters using fuzzy logic controlling. Eastern-Eur J Enterp Technol, 2019, 5(2): 57-64.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13.]
Thongchai A, Kawin S, Phisut A, et al. Resistance spot welding optimization based on artificial neural network. Int J Manuf Eng, 2014, 2014.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Mallaradhya HM, Kumar MV, Chandra MSV. Optimization of parameters and prediction of response values using regression and ANN model in resistance spot welding of 17-4 precipitation hardened stainless steel. J Adv Manuf Syst, 2022, 21(2): 275-291.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Tan Y, Fang P, Zhang Y et al (1999) Evaluating nugget sizes of spot welds by using artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computational intelligence, theory and applications: fuzzy days, 25‒28 May, Springer, Berlin
[16.]
Panza L, Bruno G, Antal G, et al. Machine learning tool for the prediction of electrode wear effect on the quality of resistance spot welds. Int J Interact Des Manuf, 2024.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17.]
Kitano H, Nakamura T. Combined artificial neural network and least squares method for exploring relationships between welding conditions and weld characteristics. Weld Lett, 2018.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
Kitano H, Nakamura T. Automatic derivation of empirical formulas for characteristics of weld joints using machine learning based technique. J Jpn Weld Soc, 2019, 88(7): 532-535.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
Kitano H. Numeric law discovery and knowledge extraction from welding phenomena using machine learning technique. Mater Jpn, 2019, 58(8): 449-452.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Kitano H, Sato A, Iyota M, et al. Investigation of relationship between resistance spot welding condition and nugget shape by utilizing machine learning based technique. Weld Int, 2021, 33(4/6): 223-230.
[21.]
Gavidel SR, Jeremy L. Performance analysis and comparison of machine learning algorithms for predicting nugget width of resistance spot welding joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 105: 3779-3796.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
Li M, Liu Z, Huang L, et al. Automatic identification framework of the geometric parameters on self-piercing riveting cross-section using deep learning. J Manuf Process, 2022, 83: 427-437.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23.]
Zhang Z, Wen G, Chen S. Weld image deep learning-based on-line defects detection using convolutional neural networks for Al alloy in robotic arc welding. J Manuf Process, 2019, 45: 208-216.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24.]
Dai W, Li D, Tang D, et al. Deep learning assisted vision inspection of resistance spot welds. J Manuf Process, 2021, 62(8): 262-274.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25.]
Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH. Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim, 2017, 55: 1029-1050.
CrossRef Google scholar
[26.]
Zhang X, Xie F, Ji T, et al. Multi-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng, 2021, 373.
CrossRef Google scholar
[27.]
Zhang Y, Kim NH, Park C, et al. Multi-fidelity surrogate based on single linear regression. AIAA J, 2017, 56(12): 1-9.
[28.]
Li M, Liu Z, Huang L, et al. Multi-fidelity data-driven optimization design framework for self-piercing riveting process parameters. J Manuf Process, 2023, 99: 812-824.
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation(52205377); National Key Research and Development Program(2022YFB4601804); Key Basic Research Project of Suzhou(#SJC2022031)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/