Shock effects on the upper limit of the collision weld process window
Blake Barnett, Anupam Vivek, Glenn Daehn
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 365-378.
Shock effects on the upper limit of the collision weld process window
The maximum flyer impact velocity based on a dynamic solidification cracking mechanism is proposed to describe the upper limit of collision welding process windows. Thus, the upper limit of the weld window is governed by the evolution of dynamic stresses and temperatures at the weld interface. Current formulations for the upper limit of the collision weld window assume that both the flyer and target are made of the same material and approximate stress propagation velocities using the acoustic velocity or the shear wave velocity of the weld material. However, collision welding fundamentally depends on the impacts that generate shockwaves in weld members, which can dominate the stress propagation velocities in thin weld sections. Therefore, this study proposes an alternative weld window upper limit that approximates stress propagation using shock velocities calculated from modified 1-D Rankine-Hugoniot relations. The shock upper limit is validated against the experimental and simulation data in the collision welding literature, and offers a design tool to rapidly predict more accurate optimal collision weld process limits for similar and dissimilar weld couples compared to existing models without the cost or complexity of high-fidelity simulations.
Collision welding / Solid-state welding / Shock impact / Weld process modelling / Explosive bonding / Laser impulse welding (LIW)
[1.] |
|
[2.] |
|
[3.] |
|
[4.] |
|
[5.] |
|
[6.] |
|
[7.] |
|
[8.] |
|
[9.] |
|
[10.] |
|
[11.] |
|
[12.] |
|
[13.] |
Wittman RH (1973) Influence of collision parameters on the strength and microstructure of explosion-welded aluminum alloys. Proc 2nd Int Symp Use Explos Energy Manufacturer 153–168
|
[14.] |
|
[15.] |
|
[16.] |
|
[17.] |
|
[18.] |
Émurlaeva YY, Bataev IA, Zhou Q et al (2019) Welding window: comparison of the Deribas and Wittman approaches and SPH simulation results. Metals (Base) 9(12):1323
|
[19.] |
|
[20.] |
|
[21.] |
|
[22.] |
|
[23.] |
|
[24.] |
|
[25.] |
|
[26.] |
|
[27.] |
|
[28.] |
Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids. In: 2nd ed. Clarendon Press
|
[29.] |
Zakharenko ID (1990) Explosion welding of metals. Minsk: Science and Engineering
|
[30.] |
|
[31.] |
|
[32.] |
|
[33.] |
|
[34.] |
|
[35.] |
|
[36.] |
Thurston B, Mao Y, Lewis T et al (2021) Augmentation of plasma-based impulse generation with rapid chemical reactions BT - forming the future. In: Daehn G, Cao J, Kinsey B et al (eds) Forming the future, Springer, Cham
|
[37.] |
|
[38.] |
|
[39.] |
Klueh RL (2005) Properties and selection: iron, steel, and high-performance alloys. ASM International
|
[40.] |
Committee A (1990) Properties and selection: nonferrous alloys and special purpose materials. ASM International 92. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v02.9781627081627
|
[41.] |
|
[42.] |
|
[43.] |
|
[44.] |
Vivek A, Gonzalez M, Barnett B et al (2023) Process effects on the heterogenous microctructure of an impact welded interface. In: Proc TMS 2023 Annu Meeting, San Diego
|
[45.] |
Nassiri A, Vivek A, Abke T et al (2017) Depiction of interfacial morphology in impact welded Ti/Cu bimetallic systems using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Appl Phys Lett 110:231601. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984742
|
[46.] |
|
[47.] |
PlotDigitizer, 3.1.5 (accessed Dec 4 2023). Available: https://plotdigitizer.com.
|
[48.] |
|
[49.] |
|
[50.] |
|
[51.] |
|
[52.] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |