A data-driven approach to RUL prediction of tools

Wei Li , Liang-Chi Zhang , Chu-Han Wu , Yan Wang , Zhen-Xiang Cui , Chao Niu

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 6 -18.

PDF
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 6 -18. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-023-00464-y
Article

A data-driven approach to RUL prediction of tools

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

An effective and reliable prediction of the remaining useful life (RUL) of a tool is important to a metal forming process because it can significantly reduce unexpected maintenance, avoid machine shutdowns and increase system stability. This study proposes a new data-driven approach to the RUL prediction for metal forming processes under multiple contact sliding conditions. The data-driven approach took advantage of bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). A pre-trained lightweight CNN-based network, WearNet, was re-trained to classify the wear states of workpiece surfaces with a high accuracy, then the classification results were passed into a BLSTM-based regression model as inputs for RUL estimation. The experimental results demonstrated that this approach was able to predict the RUL values with a small error (below 5%) and a low root mean square error (RMSE) (around 1.5), which was more superior and robust than the other state-of-the-art methods.

Keywords

Remaining useful life (RUL) / Bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM) / Data-driven approach / Metal forming

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei Li, Liang-Chi Zhang, Chu-Han Wu, Yan Wang, Zhen-Xiang Cui, Chao Niu. A data-driven approach to RUL prediction of tools. Advances in Manufacturing, 2024, 12(1): 6-18 DOI:10.1007/s40436-023-00464-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Wu JY, Wu M, Chen Z, et al. A joint classification-regression method for multi-stage remaining useful life prediction. J Manuf Syst, 2021, 58: 109-119.

[2]

Huang C, Huang H, Li Y, et al. A novel deep convolutional neural network-bootstrap integrated method for RUL prediction of rolling bearing. J Manuf Syst, 2021, 61: 757-772.

[3]

Ferreira C, Gonçalves G. Remaining useful life prediction and challenges: a literature review on the use of machine learning methods. J Manuf Syst, 2022, 63: 550-562.

[4]

Ding H, Yang L, Cheng Z, et al. A remaining useful life prediction method for bearing based on deep neural networks. Meas, 2021, 172: 108878.

[5]

Arena M, Di Pasquale V, Iannone R, et al. A maintenance driven scheduling cockpit for integrated production and maintenance operation schedule. Adv Manuf, 2022, 10: 205-219.

[6]

Li Y, Xiang Y, Pan B, et al. A hybrid remaining useful life prediction method for cutting tool considering the wear state. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2022, 121: 3583-3596.

[7]

Cubillo A, Perinpanayagam S, Esperon-Miguez M. A review of physics-based models in prognostics: application to gears and bearings of rotating machinery. Adv Mech Eng, 2016, 8: 1-21.

[8]

Si X, Wang W, Hu C, et al. Remaining useful life estimation–a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Oper Res, 2011, 213: 1-14.

[9]

Wang Y, Deng C, Wu J, et al. Failure time prediction for mechanical device based on the degradation sequence. J Intell Manuf, 2015, 26: 1181-1199.

[10]

Carr MJ, Wang W. Modeling failure modes for residual life prediction using stochastic filtering theory. IEEE Trans Reliab, 2010, 59: 346-355.

[11]

Peng C, Tseng S. Statistical lifetime inference with skew-Wiener linear degradation models. IEEE Trans Reliab, 2013, 62: 338-350.

[12]

Bian L, Gebraeel N. Stochastic modeling and real-time prognostics for multi-component systems with degradation rate interactions. IIE Trans, 2014, 46: 470-482.

[13]

Liu Y, Zuo MJ, Li Y, et al. Dynamic reliability assessment for multi-state systems utilizing system-level inspection data. IEEE Trans Reliab, 2015, 64: 1287-1299.

[14]

Tobon-Mejia DA, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, et al. A data-driven failure prognostics method based on mixture of Gaussians hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans Reliab, 2012, 61: 491-503.

[15]

Pham H, Yang B, Nguyen T. Machine performance degradation assessment and remaining useful life prediction using proportional hazard model and support vector machine. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2012, 32: 320-330.

[16]

Ren L, Sun Y, Cui J, et al. Bearing remaining useful life prediction based on deep autoencoder and deep neural networks. J Manuf Syst, 2021, 48: 71-77.

[17]

Liu J, Wang W, Ma F, et al. A data-model-fusion prognostic framework for dynamic system state forecasting. Eng Appl Artif Intell, 2012, 25: 814-823.

[18]

Mikołajczyk T, Nowicki K, Bustillo A, et al. Predicting tool life in turning operations using neural networks and image processing. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2018, 104: 503-513.

[19]

Guo L, Li N, Jia F, et al. A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing, 2017, 240: 98-109.

[20]

Saon S, Hiyama T. Predicting remaining useful life of rotating machinery based artificial neural network. Comput Math with Appl, 2010, 60: 1078-1087.

[21]

Wang W, Vrbanek J Jr. An evolving fuzzy predictor for industrial applications. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2008, 16: 1439-1449.

[22]

Li W, Zhang L, Chen X, et al. Predicting the evolution of sheet metal surface scratching by the technique of artificial intelligence. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2021, 112: 853-865.

[23]

Vapnik V, Golowich SE, Smola A (1997) Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation, and signal processing. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 9:281–287

[24]

Benkedjouh T, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, et al. Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression. J Intell Manuf, 2015, 26: 213-223.

[25]

Benkedjouh T, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, et al. Remaining useful life estimation based on nonlinear feature reduction and support vector regression. Eng Appl Artif Intell, 2013, 26: 1751-1760.

[26]

Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput, 1997, 9: 1735-1780.

[27]

Gers FA, Schmidhuber J, Cummins F. Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput, 2000, 12: 2451-2471.

[28]

Shen F, Yan R. A new intermediate-domain SVM-based transfer model for rolling bearing RUL prediction. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2022, 27: 1357-1369.

[29]

Qin Y, Xiang S, Chai Y, et al. Macroscopic-microscopic attention in LSTM networks based on fusion features for gear remaining life prediction. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019, 67: 10865-10875.

[30]

Li W, Zhang L, Wu C, et al. A new lightweight deep neural network for surface scratch detection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2022, 123: 1999-2015.

[31]

Yang B, Lei Y, Jia F, et al. An intelligent fault diagnosis approach based on transfer learning from laboratory bearings to locomotive bearings. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2019, 122: 692-706.

[32]

Zhu J, Chen N, Shen C. A new deep transfer learning method for bearing fault diagnosis under different working conditions. IEEE Sens J, 2019, 20: 8394-8402.

[33]

Liu L, Song X, Chen K, et al. An enhanced encoder-decoder framework for bearing remaining useful life prediction. Meas, 2021, 170: 108753.

[34]

Xiang S, Qin Y, Zhu C, et al. Long short-term memory neural network with weight amplification and its application into gear remaining useful life prediction. Eng Appl Artif Intell, 2020, 91: 103587.

[35]

Zhou J, Zhao X, Gao J. Tool remaining useful life prediction method based on LSTM under variable working conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019, 104: 4715-4726.

[36]

Ma M, Mao Z. Deep-convolution-based LSTM network for remaining useful life prediction. IEEE Trans Industr Inform, 2020, 17: 1658-1667.

[37]

Habbouche H, Benkedjouh T, Zerhouni N. Intelligent prognostics of bearings based on bidirectional long short-term memory and wavelet packet decomposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2021, 114: 145-157.

[38]

Liu C, Zhu L. A two-stage approach for predicting the remaining useful life of tools using bidirectional long short-term memory. Meas, 2020, 164: 108029.

[39]

Du LiuPL, ZC, Li HM. Thermal error modeling based on BiLSTM deep learning for CNC machine tool. Adv Manuf, 2021, 9: 235-249.

[40]

Hou M, Pi D, Li B. Similarity-based deep learning approach for remaining useful life prediction. Meas, 2020, 159: 107788.

[41]

Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res, 2014, 15: 1929-1958.

[42]

Zhang K, Chen J, Zhang T, Zhou Z. A compact convolutional neural network augmented with multiscale feature extraction of acquired monitoring data for mechanical intelligent fault diagnosis. J Manuf Syst, 2020, 55: 273-284.

[43]

Zeng F, Li Y, Jiang Y, et al. An online transfer learning-based remaining useful life prediction method of ball bearings. Meas, 2021, 176: 109201.

[44]

Finkeldey F, Saadallah A, Wiederkehr P, et al. Real-time prediction of process forces in milling operations using synchronized data fusion of simulation and sensor data. Eng Appl Artif Intell, 2020, 94: 103753.

Funding

Baosteel-Australia Joint Research and Development Centre http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100020692(BA17001)

ARC Hub for Computational Particle Technology(IH140100035)

Chinese Guangdong Specific Discipline Project(2020ZDZX2006)

Shenzhen Key Laboratory Project of Cross-scale Manufacturing Mechanics(ZDSYS20200810171201007)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

213

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/