Digital twin-driven green material optimal selection and evolution in product iterative design
Feng Xiang, Ya-Dong Zhou, Zhi Zhang, Xiao-Fu Zou, Fei Tao, Ying Zuo
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4) : 647-662.
Digital twin-driven green material optimal selection and evolution in product iterative design
In recent years, green concepts have been integrated into the product iterative design in the manufacturing field to address global competition and sustainability issues. However, previous efforts for green material optimal selection disregarded the interaction and fusion among physical entities, virtual models, and users, resulting in distortions and inaccuracies among user, physical entity, and virtual model such as inconsistency among the expected value, predicted simulation value, and actual performance value of evaluation indices. Therefore, this study proposes a digital twin-driven green material optimal selection and evolution method for product iterative design. Firstly, a novel framework is proposed. Subsequently, an analysis is carried out from six perspectives: the digital twin model construction for green material optimal selection, evolution mechanism of the digital twin model, multi-objective prediction and optimization, algorithm design, decision-making, and product function verification. Finally, taking the material selection of a shared bicycle frame as an example, the proposed method was verified by the prediction and iterative optimization of the carbon emission index.
Product iterative design / Digital twin (DT) / Green material optimal selection / Evolution mechanism / Iterative optimization
[1.] |
|
[2.] |
|
[3.] |
|
[4.] |
Apple_Environmental_Progress_Report_2020. https://www.apple.com/euro/environment/pdf/a/generic/Apple_Environmental_Progress_Report_2020.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2022
|
[5.] |
|
[6.] |
|
[7.] |
|
[8.] |
|
[9.] |
|
[10.] |
|
[11.] |
van der Valk H, Haße H, Möller F et al (2020) A taxonomy of digital twins. In: The 26th Americas conference on information systems, 15–17 August, Salt Lake City
|
[12.] |
|
[13.] |
|
[14.] |
|
[15.] |
|
[16.] |
|
[17.] |
|
[18.] |
|
[19.] |
|
[20.] |
|
[21.] |
|
[22.] |
|
[23.] |
|
[24.] |
|
[25.] |
|
[26.] |
|
[27.] |
|
[28.] |
|
[29.] |
|
[30.] |
|
[31.] |
|
[32.] |
|
[33.] |
|
[34.] |
|
[35.] |
|
[36.] |
|
[37.] |
|
[38.] |
|
[39.] |
|
[40.] |
|
[41.] |
|
[42.] |
|
[43.] |
|
[44.] |
|
[45.] |
MatWeb. https://matweb.com/. Accessed 7 Apr 2022
|
[46.] |
MetalChina. https://www.metalchina.com/. Accessed 7 Apr 2022
|
[47.] |
Liu JF, Wen XJ, Zhou HG et al (2022) Digital twin-enabled machining process modeling. Adv Eng Inform 54:1–13
|
[48.] |
Wang L, Luo ZD, Tang HT (2023) A novel model for dynamic manufacturing service collaboration on industrial internet. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3252408
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |