Identification of nonlinear process described by neural fuzzy Hammerstein-Wiener model using multi-signal processing

Abstract

In this study, a novel approach for nonlinear process identification via neural fuzzy-based Hammerstein-Wiener model with process disturbance by means of multi-signal processing is presented. The Hammerstein-Wiener model consists of three blocks where a dynamic linear block is sandwiched between two static nonlinear blocks. Multi-signal sources are designed for achieving identification separation of the Hammerstein-Wiener process. The correlation analysis theory is utilized for estimating unknown parameters of output nonlinearity and linear block using separable signals, thus the interference of process disturbance is solved. Furthermore, the immeasurable intermediate variable and immeasurable noise term in identification model is taken over by auxiliary model output and estimate residuals, and then auxiliary model-based recursive extended least squares parameter estimation algorithm is derived to calculate parameters of the input nonlinearity and noise model. Finally, convergence analysis of the suggested identification scheme is derived using stochastic process theory. The simulation results indicate that proposed identification approach yields high identification accuracy and has good robustness.

Keywords

Nonlinear process / Parameter identification / Hammerstein-Wiener model / Neural fuzzy model / Multiple signal processing

References

[1.] Gou J, Liu H (2017) Hammerstein system identification with quantised inputs and quantised output observations. IET Control Theory A 11(4):593–599

[2.] Zhang J, Chin KS, Lawrynczuk M. Nonlinear model predictive control based on piecewise linear Hammerstein models. Nonlinear Dyn, 2018, 92(3): 1001-1021.

[3.] Mu B, Chen HF, Wang LY, et al. Recursive identification of Hammerstein systems: convergence rate and asymptotic normality. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2017, 62(7): 3277-3292.

[4.] Jia L, Li X, Chiu MS. Correlation analysis based MIMO neuro-fuzzy Hammerstein model with noises. J Process Contr, 2016, 41: 76-91.

[5.] Cheng CM, Peng ZK, Zhang WM. A novel approach for identification of cascade of Hammerstein model. Nonlinear Dyn, 2016, 86(1): 513-522.

[6.] Li F, Chen L, Wo S, et al. Modeling and parameter learning for the Hammerstein-Wiener model with disturbance. Meas Control, 2020, 53(5/6): 971-982.

[7.] Zhang B, Mao Z. Bias compensation principle based recursive least squares identification method for Hammerstein nonlinear models. J Franklin Inst, 2017, 354(3): 1340-1355.

[8.] Hagenblad A, Ljung J, Wills A. Maximum likelihood identification of Wiener models. Automatica, 2008, 44(11): 2697-2705.

[9.] Kazemi M, Arefi MM. A fast iterative recursive least squares algorithm for Wiener model identification of highly nonlinear systems. ISA T, 2017, 67: 382-388.

[10.] Schoukens M, Rolain Y. Parametric identification of parallel Wiener models. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2012, 61(10): 2825-2832.

[11.] Li J, Hua C, Tang Y, et al. Stochastic gradient with changing forgetting factor-based parameter identification for Wiener systems. Appl Math Lett, 2014, 33: 40-45.

[12.] Zhou L, Li X, Pan F. Gradient-based iterative identification for Wiener nonlinear models with non-uniform sampling. Nonlinear Dyn, 2015, 76(1): 627-634.

[13.] Quachio R, Garcia C. MPC relevant identification method for Hammerstein and Wiener models. J Process Contr, 2019, 80: 78-88.

[14.] Bloemen HHJ, Chou CT, van den Boom TJJ, et al. Wiener model identification and predictive control for dual composition control of a distillation column. J Process Contr, 2001, 11(6): 601-620.

[15.] Al-Dhaifallah M, Nisar KS, Agarwal P, et al. Modeling and identification of heat exchanger process using least squares support vector machines. Therm Sci, 2017, 21(6): 2859-2869.

[16.] George SJ, Kamat S, Madhavan KP. Modeling of pH process using wave net based Hammerstein model. J Process Contr, 2007, 17(6): 551-561.

[17.] Li F, Jia L, Peng D, et al. Neuro-fuzzy based identification method for Hammerstein output error model with colored noise. Neurocomputing, 2017, 244: 90-101.

[18.] Luo SX, Song YD. Data-driven predictive control of Hammerstein-Wiener models based on subspace identification. Inform Sciences, 2018, 422: 447-461.

[19.] Yu F, Mao Z, Jia M, et al. Recursive parameter identification of Hammerstein-Wiener systems with measurement noise. Signal Process, 2014, 105: 137-147.

[20.] Jeng JC, Lin YW. Data-driven nonlinear control design using virtual reference feedback tuning based on block-oriented modeling of nonlinear models. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2018, 57(22): 7583-7599.

[21.] Li G, Wen C, Zheng WX, et al. Identification of a class of nonlinear autoregressive models with exogenous inputs based on kernel machines. IEEE T Signal Process, 2011, 59(5): 2146-2159.

[22.] Ding B, Ping X. Dynamic output feedback model predictive control for nonlinear models represented by Hammerstein-Wiener model. J Process Contr, 2012, 22(9): 1773-1784.

[23.] Wills A, Schon TB, Ljung L, et al. Identification of Hammerstein-Wiener models. Automatica, 2013, 49(1): 70-81.

[24.] Zhu Y. Estimation of an N-L-N Hammerstein-Wiener model. Automatica, 2002, 38(9): 1607-1614.

[25.] Voros J. Iterative identification of nonlinear dynamic models with output backlash using three-block cascade models. Nonlinear Dyn, 2015, 79(3): 2187-2195.

[26.] Allafi W, Zajic I, Uddin K, et al. Parameter identification of the fractional-order Hammerstein-Wiener model using simplified refined instrumental variable fractional-order continuous time. IET Control Theory A, 2017, 11(15): 2591-2598.

[27.] Bai EW. A blind approach to the Hammerstein-Wiener model identification. Automatica, 2002, 38(6): 967-979.

[28.] Brouri A, Kadi L, Slassi S. Frequency identification of Hammerstein-Wiener models with backlash input nonlinearity. Int J Control Autom Syst, 2017, 15(5): 2222-2232.

[29.] Li F, Yao K, Li B, et al. A novel learning algorithm of the neuro-fuzzy based Hammerstein-Wiener model corrupted by process noise. J Frankl Inst, 2021, 358(3): 2115-2137.

[30.] Sung SW, Je CH, Lee J, et al. Improved system identification method for Hammerstein-Wiener processes. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2008, 25(4): 631-636.

[31.] Wang DQ, Ding F. Hierarchical least squares estimation algorithm for Hammerstein-Wiener models. IEEE Signal Proc Lett, 2012, 19(2): 825-828.

[32.] Ward MacArthur J. A new approach for nonlinear process identification using orthonormal bases and ordinal splines. J Process Contr, 2012, 22(2): 375-389.

[33.] Yu F, Mao Z, Yuan P, et al. Recursive parameter identification for Hammerstein-Wiener models using modified EKF algorithm. ISA T, 2017, 70: 104-115.

[34.] Wang D, Ding F. Extended stochastic gradient identification algorithms for Hammerstein-Wiener ARMAX models. Comput Math Appl, 2008, 56: 3157-3164.

[35.] Wang J, Chen T, Wang L (2009) A blind approach to identification of Hammerstein-Wiener models corrupted by nonlinear-process noise. In: Processing of the 7th Asian control conference, Hong Kong, China, 24−29 August, pp 1340−1345

[36.] Ni B, Gilson M, Garnier H. Refined instrumental variable method for Hammerstein-Wiener continuous-time model identification. IET Control Theory, 2013, A7(9): 1276-1286.

[37.] Wang Z, Wang Y, Ji Z. A novel two-stage estimation algorithm for nonlinear Hammerstein-Wiener models from noisy input and output data. J Frankl Inst, 2017, 354: 1937-1944.

[38.] Lang ZQ. On identification of the controlled plants described by the Hammerstein models. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1994, 39(3): 569-573.

[39.] Navarro-Almanza R, Sanchez MA, Castro JR, et al. Interpretable Mamdani neuro-fuzzy model through context awareness and linguistic adaptation. Expert Syst Appl, 2022, 189.

[40.] Soto J, Castillo O, Melin P, et al. A new approach to multiple time series prediction using MIMO fuzzy aggregation models with modular neural networks. Int J Fuzzy Syst, 2019, 21(5): 1629-1648.

[41.] Soto J, Melin P, Castillo O. A new approach for time series prediction using ensembles of IT2FNN models with optimization of fuzzy integrators. Int J Fuzzy Syst, 2018, 20(3): 701-728.

[42.] Castillo O, Castro JR, Melin P, et al. Application of interval type-2 fuzzy neural networks in non-linear identification and time series prediction. Soft Comput, 2014, 18(6): 1213-1224.

[43.] Li J, Zong T, Lu G. Parameter identification of Hammerstein-Wiener nonlinear systems with unknown time delay based on the linear variable weight particle swarm optimization. ISA T, 2021.

[44.] Abouda SE, Abid DBH, Elloumi M et al (2019) Identification of nonlinear dynamic systems using fuzzy Hammerstein-Wiener systems. In: The 19th international conference on sciences and techniques of automatic control and computer engineering (STA), 24−26 March, Sousse, Tunisia, https://doi.org/10.1109/STA.2019.8717218

[45.] Li F, Jia L, Peng D. Identification method of neuro-fuzzy-based Hammerstein model with coloured noise. IET Control Theory A, 2017, 11(17): 3026-3037.

[46.] Enqvist M, Ljung L. Linear approximations of nonlinear FIR models for separable input processes. Automatica, 2005, 41(3): 459-473.

[47.] Ding F, Wang F, Xu L, et al. Parameter identification for pseudo-linear models using the auxiliary model and the decomposition technique. IET Control Theory A, 2017, 11(13): 390-400.

[48.] Ljung L. Model identification: theory for the user, 1999, 2 Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

[49.] Ding F, Gu Y. Performance analysis of the auxiliary model-based least-squares identification algorithm for one-step state-delay systems. Int J Comput Math, 2012, 89(15): 2019-2028.

[50.] Wang Y, Ding F. Recursive least squares algorithm and gradient algorithm for Hammerstein-Wiener models using the data filtering. Nonlinear Dyn, 2016, 84(2): 1045-1053.

[51.] Mohammadzadeh A, Rathinasamy S. Energy management in photovoltaic battery hybrid systems: a novel type-2 fuzzy control. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2020, 45(41): 20970-20982.

[52.] Mosavi A, Qasem SN, Shokri M, et al. Fractional-order fuzzy control approach for photovoltaic/battery systems under unknown dynamics, variable irradiation and temperature. Electronics, 2020, 9(9): 1455.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809(61903050); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004608(BK20191035)