Numerical analysis and experimental validation of surface roughness and morphology in honing of Inconel 718 nickel-based superalloy

Chang-Yong Yang, Zhi Wang, Hao Su, Yu-Can Fu, Nian-Hui Zhang, Wen-Feng Ding

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 130-142.

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 130-142. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-022-00422-0
Article

Numerical analysis and experimental validation of surface roughness and morphology in honing of Inconel 718 nickel-based superalloy

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Honing is an important technology for machining onboard system parts. The parts are usually made of difficult-to-machining materials, e.g., Inconel 718 superalloy. Honing can improve the finishing accuracy and surface quality. However, the selection of the honing parameters was primarily based on the results of a large number of experiments. Therefore, the establishment of a reliable model is needed to predict the honed surface roughness and morphology, and offers a theoretical direction for the choice of parameters. In the present study, a numerical simulation model was constructed for analysis of the honing process by Python. The oilstone, workpiece surface morphology and motion trajectory were discretized by Python, and the machined surface was obtained by trajectory interference. Firstly, based on the statistical analysis of the surface topography of oilstone, the shape of grains was simplified and the surface topography of oilstone was built accordingly. Then, the initial surface morphology of the workpiece was constructed and the trajectory of grains on the workpiece surface was analyzed, which showed the distribution of the removed material. Meanwhile, the plastic deformation of material was analyzed in the simulation model. The critical depth of three stages of contact between grains and workpiece was calculated by the theoretical formula: scratching, ploughing and cutting. By analyzing the distribution of bulge, the plastic deformation in ploughing and cutting stage was studied. Further, the simulated results of honed surface roughness and morphology were validated and agreed reasonably well with the honing experiment. Finally, the effects of honing process parameters, including grain size, tangential speed, axial speed, radial speed and abrasive volume percentage, on the surface roughness of the workpiece were analyzed by the simulation model.

Keywords

Numerical analysis / Surface roughness / Plastic deformation / Morphology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chang-Yong Yang, Zhi Wang, Hao Su, Yu-Can Fu, Nian-Hui Zhang, Wen-Feng Ding. Numerical analysis and experimental validation of surface roughness and morphology in honing of Inconel 718 nickel-based superalloy. Advances in Manufacturing, 2023, 11(1): 130‒142 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-022-00422-0

References

[1.]
Choudhury IA, El-Baradie MA. Machinability of nickel-base super alloys: a general review. J Mater Process Technol, 1998, 77(1): 278-284.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Kong XW, Li B, Jin ZH, et al. Broaching performance of superalloy GH4169 based on FEM. J Mater Sci Technol, 2011, 27(12): 1178-1184.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
Pervaiz S, Rashid A, Deiab I, et al. Influence of tool materials on machinability of titanium- and nickel-based alloys: a review. Mater Manuf Processes, 2014, 29(3): 219-252.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Joliet R, Kansteiner M, Kersting P. A process model for force-controlled honing simulations. Procedia CIRP, 2015, 28: 46-51.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, Coba-Salcedo M. Modelling of surface finish and material removal rate in rough honing. Precis Eng, 2014, 38(1): 100-108.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
BŠhre D, Schmitt C, Moos U. Analysis of the differences between force control and feed control strategies during the honing of bores. Procedia CIRP, 2012, 1: 377-381.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Vrac DS, Sidjanin LP, Kovac PP, et al. The influence of honing process parameters on surface quality, productivity, cutting angle and coefficients of friction. Ind Lubr Tribol, 2012, 64(2): 77-83.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
Gafarov AM, Gafarov VA, Aliev GS. Surface roughness in honing with dosed removal of surface layer. Russ Eng Res, 2011, 31(10): 1030-1033.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Hecker RL, Liang SY. Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2003, 43(8): 755-761.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Kumar S, Paul S. Numerical modelling of ground surface topography: effect of traverse and helical superabrasive grinding with touch dressing. Prod Eng Res Devel, 2012, 6(2): 199-204.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
Chakrabarti S, Paul S. Numerical modelling of surface topography in superabrasive grinding. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2008, 39(1/2): 29-38.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12.]
Chen H, Tang J. A model for prediction of surface roughness in ultrasonic-assisted grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2015, 77(1/4): 643-651.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13.]
Mahesh G, Muthu S, Devadasan SR. Prediction of surface roughness of end milling operation using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2015, 77(1/4): 369-381.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Goeldel B, El Mansori M, Dumur D. Macroscopic simulation of the liner honing process. CIRP Ann, 2012, 61(1): 319-322.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Goeldel B, Mansori ME, Dumur D. Simulation of roughness and surface texture evolution at macroscopic scale during cylinder honing process. Procedia CIRP, 2013, 8: 27-32.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
Spencer A, Almqvist A, Larsson R. A numerical model to investigate the effect of honing angle on the hydrodynamic lubrication between a combustion engine piston ring and cylinder liner. Proceed Institut Mech Eng, Part J: J Eng Tribol, 2011, 225(7): 683-689.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17.]
Moos U, Bähre D. Analysis of process forces for the precision honing of small bores. Procedia CIRP, 2015, 31: 387-392.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
Schmitt C, Bähre D. Analysis of the process dynamics for the precision honing of bores. Procedia CIRP, 2014, 17: 692-697.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
Schmitt C, Bähre D. An approach to the calculation of process forces during the precision honing of small bores. Procedia CIRP, 2013, 7: 282-287.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Reizer R. Simulation of 3D gaussian surface topography. Wear, 2011, 271(3/4): 539-543.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21.]
Pawlus P. Simulation of stratified surface topographies. Wear, 2008, 264(5/6): 457-463.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
Lu Y, Li J, Liang R, et al. Investigation on the effect of honing parameters on cylindricity of engine cylinder liner. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 111(11/12): 3111-3122.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23.]
Zhou X, Xi F. Modeling and predicting surface roughness of the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2002, 42(8): 969-977.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24.]
Zhang X, Zhou Z. Analytically predicating the multi-dimensional accuracy of the honed engine cylinder bore. J Tribol, 2020, 142: 1-23.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25.]
Gassilloud R, Ballif C, Gasser P, et al. Deformation mechanisms of silicon during nanoscratching. Physica Status Solidi (a): Appl Mater Sci, 2005, 202(15): 2858-2869.
CrossRef Google scholar
[26.]
Son S, Lim H, Ahn J. The effect of vibration cutting on minimum cutting thickness. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2006, 46(15): 2066-2072.
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809(No. 52075252)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/