A novel paradigm for feedback control in LPBF: layer-wise correction for overhang structures
Ema Vasileska , Ali Gökhan Demir , Bianca Maria Colosimo , Barbara Previtali
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 326 -344.
A novel paradigm for feedback control in LPBF: layer-wise correction for overhang structures
In laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), it is common practice to select process parameters to achieve high density parts starting from simple geometries such as cubes or cylinders. However, additive manufacturing is usually adopted to produce very complex geometries, where parameters should be tuned locally, depending on the local features to be processed. In fact, geometrical features, such as overhangs, acute corners, and thin walls may lead to over- or under-heating conditions, which may result in geometrical inaccuracy, high roughness, volumetric errors (i.e., porosity) or even job failure due to surface collapse. This work proposes a layer-wise control strategy to improve the geometrical precision of overhanging regions using a coaxial melt pool monitoring system. The melt-pool images acquired at each layer are used in a control-loop to adapt the process parameters locally at the next layer in order to minimize surface defects. In particular, the laser duty cycle is used as a controllable parameter to correct the energy density. This work presents the main architecture of the proposed approach, the control strategy and the experimental procedure that need to be applied to design the control parameters. The layer-wise control strategy was tested on AISI 316L stainless steel using an open LPFB platform. The results showed that the proposed layer-wise control solution results in a constant melt pool observed via the laser heated area size starting from the second layer onward, leading to a significant improvement in the geometrical accuracy of 5 mm-long bridge geometries.
Closed-loop control / Melt pool monitoring / Defect correction / Pulsed-wave emission
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Duflou JR, Sichani EF, De Keuster J et al (2009) Developement of a real time monitoring and adaptive control for laser flame cutting. J Laser Appl 2009:527–536 |
| [23] |
Postma S, Aarts RGKM, Meijer J et al (2018) Penetration control in laser welding of sheet metal using optical sensors. Proc of ICALEO 2001:1083–1092 |
| [24] |
Kempen KJP, Vrancken B, Thijs L et al (2013) Lowering thermal gradients in selective laser melting by pre-heating the baseplate. Solid Free Fabr Symp Proc 24:131–139 |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Druzgalski CL, Ashby A, Guss G et al (2020) Process optimization of complex geometries using feed forward control for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 34:101169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101169 |
| [30] |
Mazzoleni L, Demir AG, Caprio L et al (2019) Real-time observation of melt pool in selective laser melting: spatial, temporal and wavelength resolution criteria. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 69(4):1179–1190 |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Mercelis P, Kruth JP, Van Vaerenbergh J (2007) Feedback control of selective laser melting. Proc 15th Int Symp Electromachining, ISEM 2007, pp 421–426 |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker RE et al (2020) Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9(1):16–30 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Adnan M, Lu Y, Jones A et al (2018) Application of the fog computing paradigm to additive manufacturing process monitoring and control. T Emerg Telecommun T 29(4):1–14 |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Spierings AB, Levy G (2009) Comparison of density of stainless steel 316L parts produced with selective laser melting using different powder grades. 20th Annu Int Solid Free Fabr Symp SFF, pp 342–353 |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |