State-of-the-art survey on digital twin implementations
Y. K. Liu , S. K. Ong , A. Y. C. Nee
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -23.
Digital twin (DT) has garnered attention in both industry and academia. With advances in big data and internet of things (IoTs) technologies, the infrastructure for DT implementation is becoming more readily available. As an emerging technology, there are both potential and challenges. DT is a promising methodology to leverage the modern data explosion to aid engineers, managers, healthcare experts and politicians in managing production lines, patient health and smart cities by providing a comprehensive and high fidelity monitoring, prognostics and diagnostics tools. New research and surveys into the topic are published regularly, as interest in this technology is high although there is a lack of standardization to the definition of a DT. Due to the large amount of information present in a DT system and the dual cyber and physical nature of a DT, augmented reality (AR) is a suitable technology for data visualization and interaction with DTs. This paper seeks to classify different types of DT implementations that have been reported, highlights some researches that have used AR as data visualization tool in DT, and examines the more recent approaches to solve outstanding challenges in DT and the integration of DT and AR.
Industry 4.0 / Internet of thing (IoT) / Cyber-physical systems / Digital twin (DT) / Augmented reality (AR)
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Luo W, Hu T, Zhu W et al (2018) Digital twin modeling method for CNC machine tool. In: The 15th IEEE international conference on networking, sensing and control (ICNSC 2018), Zhuhai, China, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2018.8361285 |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Soon KH, Khoo VHS (2017) Citygml modelling for Singapore 3D national mapping. In: The 12th 3D geoinfo conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp 37–42. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W7-37-2017 |
| [7] |
Mamatha MN (2019) Design of single patient care monitoring system and robot BT - cyber-physical systems and digital twins. In: The 16th international conference on remote engineering and virtual instrumentation (REV2019), Bengaluru, India, pp 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23162-0_19 |
| [8] |
Doukas C, Maglogiannis I (2012) Bringing IoT and cloud computing towards pervasive healthcare. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing, Palermo, Italy, pp 922–926. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2012.26 |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Shafto M, Conroy M, Doyle R et al (2012) Modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap. Technology Area 11, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, pp 1–38 |
| [11] |
Grieves M (2015) Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. Digital Twin White Paper |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Mourtzis D, Vlachou E, Zogopoulos V et al (2017) Integrated production and maintenance scheduling through machine monitoring and augmented reality: an Industry 4.0 approach. In: IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems (APMS 2017), Hamburg, Germany, pp 354–362 |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Wilhelm J, Beinke T, Freitag M (2020) Improving human-machine interaction with a digital twin adaptive automation in container unloading. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference of dynamics in logistics, Bremen, Germany, pp 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44783-0_49 |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Durão LFCS, Haag S, Anderl R et al. (2018) Digital twin requirements in the context of Industry 4.0. In: IFIP international conference on product lifecycle management (PLM 2018), Turin, Italy, pp 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_19 |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Lu Q, Xie X, Heaton J et al (2020) From BIM towards digital twin: strategy and future development for smart asset management. In: Proceedings of the 10th workshop on service oriented, holonic and multi-agent manufacturing systems for industry of the future (SOHOMA 2020), Paris, France, pp 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27477-1 |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Sivalingam K, Sepulveda M, Spring M et al (2018) A review and methodology development for remaining useful life prediction of offshore fixed and floating wind turbine power converter with digital twin technology perspective. In: The 2nd international conference on green energy and applications (ICGEA 2018), Singapore, pp 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGEA.2018.8356292 |
| [28] |
Negri E, Fumagalli L, Macchi M (2017) A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. In: The 27th international conference on flexible automation and intelligent manufacturing (FAIM 2017), Modena, Italy, pp 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198 |
| [29] |
Scheibmeir J, Malaiya Y (2019) An API development model for digital twins. In: IEEE 19th international conference on software quality, reliability and security companion (QRS-C), Sofia, Bulgaria, pp 518–519. https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C.2019.00103 |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Rodič B (2018) Creating the digital twin with general purpose simulation modelling tools. In: The 2nd international scientific conference on IT, tourism, economics, management and agriculture (ITEMA 2018), Graz, Austria, pp 20–25. https://doi.org/10.31410/itema.2018.20 |
| [34] |
Yun S, Park JH, Kim WT (2017) Data-centric middleware based digital twin platform for dependable cyber-physical systems. In: The 9th international conference on ubiquitous and future networks (ICUFN), Milan, pp 922–926. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2017.7993933 |
| [35] |
Barboza D, De Oliveira W, Saraiva M et al (2019) DEMO: virtual reality digital twin for floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) units. In: The 21st symposium on virtual and augmented reality (SVR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 31–32. https://doi.org/10.5753/svr_estendido.2019.8463 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Ayani M, Ganebäck M, Ng AHC (2018) Digital twin: applying emulation for machine reconditioning. In: The 51st CIRP conference on manufacturing systems, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.139 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
West TD, Blackburn M (2017) Is digital thread/digital twin affordable? A systemic assessment of the cost of DoD’s latest manhattan project. In: Complex adaptive systems conference with theme: engineering cyber physical systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.003 |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Uhlemann THJ, Lehmann C, Steinhilper R (2017) The digital twin: realizing the cyber-physical production system for Industry 4.0. In: The 24th CIRP conference on life cycle engineering, Kamakura, Japan, pp 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152 |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Botkina D, Hedlind M, Olsson B et al (2018) Digital twin of a cutting tool. In: The 51st CIRP conference on manufacturing systems, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.178 |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Brenner B, Hummel V (2017) Digital twin as enabler for an innovative digital shopfloor management system in the ESB logistics learning factory at Reutlingen-University. In: The 7th conference on learning factories (CLF 2017), Darmstadt, Germany, pp 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.039 |
| [60] |
Xiang F, Zhang Z, Zuo Y et al (2019) Digital twin driven green material optimal-selection towards sustainable manufacturing. In: The 52nd CIRP conference on manufacturing systems (CMS), Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp 1290–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.015 |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
Banerjee A, Dalal R, Mittal S et al (2017) Generating digital twin models using knowledge graphs for industrial production lines. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on web science conference (WebSci’17), New York, USA, pp 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3162383 |
| [65] |
Zhao G, Cao X, Xiao W et al (2019) Digital twin for NC machining using complete process information expressed by STEP-NC standard. In: Proceedings of the 2019 4th international conference on automation, control and robotics engineering (CACRE 2019), Shenzhen, China, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351917.3351979 |
| [66] |
Vachalek J, Bartalsky L, Rovny O et al (2017) The digital twin of an industrial production line within the Industry 4.0 concept. In: The 21st international conference on process control (PC), Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, pp 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1109/PC.2017.7976223 |
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
Uhlemann THJ, Schock C, Lehmann C et al (2017) The digital twin: demonstrating the potential of real time data acquisition in production systems. In: The 7th conference on learning factories (CLF 2017), 4–5 April 2017, Darmstadt, Germany, pp 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.043 |
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
Zhang M, Zuo Y, Tao F (2018) Equipment energy consumption management in applications. In: IEEE 15th international conference on networking, sensing and control (ICNSC), Zhuhai, China, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2018.8361272 |
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
Werner A, Zimmermann N, Lentes J (2019) Approach for a holistic predictive maintenance strategy by incorporating a digital twin. In: The 25th international conference on production research manufacturing innovation: cyber physical manufacturing, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp 1743–1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.265 |
| [83] |
Wagner C, Grothoff J, Epple U et al (2017) The role of the Industry 4.0 asset administration shell and the digital twin during the life cycle of a plant. In: The 22nd IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), Limassol, Cyprus, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247583 |
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
Kazmi SMA (2019) Methodology for validating mechatronic digital twin. Dissertation, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland |
| [93] |
Schroeder G, Steinmetz C, Pereira CE et al (2016) Visualising the digital twin using web services and augmented reality. In: IEEE the 14th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France, pp 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2016.7819217 |
| [94] |
Wu P, Qi M, Gao L et al (2019) Research on the virtual reality synchronization of workshop digital twin. In: IEEE the 8th joint international information technology and artificial intelligence conference (ITAIC), Chongqing, China, pp 875–879. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITAIC.2019.8785552 |
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
Zhu Z, Liu C, Xu X (2019) Visualisation of the digital twin data in manufacturing by using augmented reality. In: The 52nd CIRP conference on manufacturing systems (CMS), Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp 898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.223 |
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
Revetria R, Tonelli F, Damiani L et al (2019) A real-time mechanical structures monitoring system based on digital twin, IOT and augmented reality. In: 2019 Spring simulation conference (SpringSim), University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpringSim.2019.8732917 |
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
Leskovsky R, Kucera E, Haffner O et al (2020) Proposal of digital twin platform based on 3D rendering and IIoT principles using virtual/augmented reality. In: 2020 Cybernetics & informatics (K&I), Velké Karlovice, Czech Republic, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/KI48306.2020.9039804 |
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
Rabah S, Assila A, Khouri E et al (2018) Towards improving the future of manufacturing through digital twin and augmented reality technologies. In: The 28th international conference on flexible automation and intelligent manufacturing (FAIM 2018), Columbus, Ohio, USA, pp 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.070 |
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
Müller F, Deuerlein C, Koch M (2021) Cyber-physical-system for representing a robot end effector. Procedia CIRP 100:307–312 |
| [106] |
Glaessgen EH, Stargel DS (2012) The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. air force vehicles. In: The 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818 |
| [107] |
Frontoni E, Loncarski J, Pierdicca R et al (2018) Cyber physical systems for Industry 4.0: towards real time virtual reality in smart manufacturing. In: International conference augmented reality, virtual reality, and computer graphics, Otranto, Italy, pp 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95282-6_31 |
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
OPC Foundation (2015) Unified architecture. OPC Foundation. https://opcfoundation.org/about/opc-technologies/opc-ua/. Accessed: 03 April 2020 |
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
Liu C, Huot S, Diehl J et al (2012) Evaluating the benefits of real-time feedback in mobile augmented reality with hand-held devices. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’12), Austin, Texas, USA, pp 2973–2976. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208706 |
| [120] |
Samini A, Palmerius KL (2016) A study on improving close and distant device movement pose manipulation for hand-held augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on virtual reality software and technology (VRST’16), Munich, Germany, pp 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993369.2993380 |
| [121] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |