Effect of back pressure on the grinding performance of abrasive suspension flow machining

Ming-Hui Fang , Tao Yu , Feng-Feng Xi

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 143 -157.

PDF
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 143 -157. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-021-00372-z
Article

Effect of back pressure on the grinding performance of abrasive suspension flow machining

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Abrasive suspension flow machining (ASFM) is an advanced finishing method that uses an abrasive suspension slurry for grinding and chamfering as well as the finishing of inaccessible components. This study examines the effect of back pressure on the grinding characteristics of an abrasive suspension flow during the grinding of slender holes. A numerical model was developed to simulate the abrasive suspension flow in a slender hole and was verified experimentally using injector nozzle grinding equipment under different grinding pressures and back pressures. It is shown that the ASFM with back pressure not only eliminates the cavitation flow in the spray hole, but also increases the number of effective abrasive particles and the flow coefficient. Increasing the back pressure during the grinding process can increase the Reynolds number of the abrasive suspension flow and reduce the thickness of the boundary layer in the slender hole. Moreover, increasing the back pressure can improve the flow rate of the injector nozzle and its grinding performance.

Keywords

Abrasive suspension flow machining (ASFM) / Back pressure / Injector nozzle / Grinding performance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ming-Hui Fang, Tao Yu, Feng-Feng Xi. Effect of back pressure on the grinding performance of abrasive suspension flow machining. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(1): 143-157 DOI:10.1007/s40436-021-00372-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Brar BS, Walia RS, Singh VP. Electrochemical-aided abrasive flow machining (ECA2FM) process: a hybrid machining process. Int J Manuf Technol, 2015, 79: 329-342.

[2]

Tsai FC, Yan BH, Kuan CY, et al. A Taguchi and experimental investigation into the optimal processing conditions for the abrasive jet polishing of SKD61 mold steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2008, 48: 932-945.

[3]

Cai HX, Liu W. A prediction method for the precision of extrusion grinding of a needle valve body. Prod Eng Res Devel, 2017, 11: 295-305.

[4]

Fang MH, Yu T, Jeff X. An experimental investigation of abrasive suspension flow machining of injector nozzle based on orthogonal test design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 110: 1071-1082.

[5]

Qiu T, Song X, Lei Y, et al. Effect of back pressure on nozzle inner flow in fuel injector. Fuel, 2016, 173: 79-89.

[6]

Payri R, Garcia JM, Salvador FJ, et al. Using spray momentum flux measurements to understand the influence of diesel nozzle geometry on spray characteristics. Fuel, 2005, 84: 551-561.

[7]

He ZX, Zhong WJ, Wang Q, et al. Effect of nozzle geometrical and dynamic factors on cavitating and turbulent flow in a diesel multi-hole injector nozzle. Int J Therm Sci, 2013, 70: 132-143.

[8]

Desantes JM, Payri R, Salvador FJ, et al. Influence of cavitation phenomenon on primary break-up and spray behavior at stationary conditions. Fuel, 2010, 89: 3033-3041.

[9]

Som S, Ramirez AI, Longman DE, et al. Effect of nozzle orifice geometry on spray, combustion, and emission characteristics under diesel engine conditions. Fuel, 2011, 90(3): 1267-1276.

[10]

Serras-Pereira J, Romunde Z, Aleiferis PG, et al. Cavitation, primary break-up and flash boiling of gasoline, isooctane and n-pentane with a real-size optical direct-injection nozzle. Fuel, 2010, 89(9): 2592-2607.

[11]

Bai Y, Fan LY, Ma XZ, et al. Effect of injector parameters on the injection quantity of common rail injection system for diesel engines. Int J Automot Technol, 2016, 17(4): 567-579.

[12]

Payri R, Gimeno J, Venegas O, et al. Effect of partial needle lift on the nozzle flow in diesel fuel injectors. Atomization Spray, 2012, 22(8): 687-714.

[13]

Lee CH. Effect of nozzle orifice diameter on diesel spray tip penetration according to various spray models for CFD simulation with widely varying back pressure. Int J Automot Technol, 2017, 18(2): 317-325.

[14]

Singh S, Shan HS. Development of magneto abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2002, 42: 953-959.

[15]

Hu GH, Zhu WH, Cai HX, et al. Mathematical model for abrasive suspension jet cutting based on orthogonal test design. J Shanghai Univ (Engl Edn), 2009, 13: 37-44.

[16]

Jain VK. Magnetic field assisted abrasive based micro-/nano-finishing. J Mater Process Technol, 2009, 209: 6022-6038.

[17]

Petare AC, Jain NK. A critical review of past research and advances in abrasive flow finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 97: 741-782.

[18]

Pang KL, Nguyen T, Fan JM, et al. Machining of micro-channels on brittle glass using an abrasive slurry jet. Key Eng Mater, 2010, 443: 639-644.

[19]

Wang J, Nguyen T, Pang KL. Mechanisms of microhole formation on glasses by an abrasive slurry jet. J Appl Phys, 2009.

[20]

Tzeng HJ, Yan BH, Hsu RT, et al. Self-modulating abrasive medium and its application to abrasive flow machining for finishing micro channel surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2007, 32: 1163-1169.

[21]

Pang KL, Nguyen T, Fan JM, et al. Modelling of the micro-channelling process on glasses using an abrasive slurry jet. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2012, 53: 118-126.

[22]

Zhou X, Xi F. Modeling and predicting surface roughness of the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2002, 42: 969-977.

[23]

Wang AC, Liu CH, Liang KZ, et al. Study of the rheology and the finishing behavior of abrasive gels in abrasive flow machining. J Mech Sci Technol, 2007, 21: 1593-1598.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

139

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/