Experimental and numerical investigation of the abrasive waterjet machining of aluminum-7075-T6 for aerospace applications

Joseck Nyaboro, Mahmoud Ahmed, Hassan El-Hofy, Mohamed El-Hofy

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 286-303.

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 286-303. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-020-00338-7
Article

Experimental and numerical investigation of the abrasive waterjet machining of aluminum-7075-T6 for aerospace applications

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The machining of hard-to-cut materials with a high degree of precision and high surface quality is one of the most critical considerations when fabricating various state-of-the-art engineered components. In this investigation, a comprehensive three-dimensional model was developed and numerically simulated to predict kerf profiles and material removal rates while drilling the aluminum-7075-T6 aerospace alloy. Kerf profile and material removal prediction involved three stages: jet dynamic flow modeling, abrasive particle tracking, and erosion rate prediction . Experimental investigations were conducted to validate the developed model. The results indicate that the jet dynamic characteristics and flow of abrasive particles alter the kerf profiles, where the top kerf diameter increases with increasing jet pressure and standoff distance. The kerf depth and hole aspect ratio increase with jet pressure, but decrease with standoff distance and machining time. Cross-sectional profiles were characterized by progressive edge rounding and parabolic shapes. Defects can be minimized by utilizing high jet pressure and small standoff distance. The material removal rate increases with increasing jet pressure, abrasive particle size, and exposure time, but decreases with increasing standoff distance.

Keywords

Non-traditional machining / Abrasive waterjet machining / Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) / Erosion modeling / Kerf characteristics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Joseck Nyaboro, Mahmoud Ahmed, Hassan El-Hofy, Mohamed El-Hofy. Experimental and numerical investigation of the abrasive waterjet machining of aluminum-7075-T6 for aerospace applications. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(2): 286‒303 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00338-7

References

[1.]
Folkes J (2009) Waterjet—an innovative tool for manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 209(20): 6181–6189
[2.]
Liu HT. Waterjet technology for machining fine features pertaining to micromachining. J Manuf Process, 2010, 12(1): 8-18.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
Liu PH (2015) Abrasive-waterjet machining of most materials from macro to micro scales. In: Proceedings of the TechConnect World Innovation Conference and Expo, Washington, DC, USA, 39–42
[4.]
Shanmugam DK, Masood SH. An investigation on kerf characteristics in abrasive waterjet cutting of layered composites. J Mater Process Technol, 2009, 209(8): 3887-3893.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Arola D, Ramulu M. Material removal in abrasive waterjet machining of metals a residual stress analysis. Wear, 1997, 211(2): 302-310.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Boud F, Carpenter C, Folkes J, Shipway PH. Abrasive waterjet cutting of a titanium alloy: The influence of abrasive morphology and mechanical properties on workpiece grit embedment and cut quality. J Mater Process Technol, 2010, 210(15): 2197-2205.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Billingham J, Miron CB, Axinte DA, et al. Mathematical modelling of abrasive waterjet footprints for arbitrarily moving jets: Part II—overlapped single and multiple straight paths. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2013, 68(1): 30-39.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
Anwar S, Axinte DA, Becker AA. Finite element modelling of abrasive waterjet milled footprints. J Mater Process Technol, 2013, 213(89): 180-193.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Kumar A, Singh H, Kumar V. Study the parametric effect of abrasive water jet machining on surface roughness of Inconel 718 using RSM-BBD techniques. Mater Manuf Process, 2018, 33(13): 1483-1490.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Haghbin AN, Khakpour A. Measurement of abrasive particle velocity and size distribution in high pressure abrasive slurry and water micro-jets using a modified dual disc anemometer. J Mater Process Technol, 2018, 263(76): 164-175.
[11.]
Liu H, Wang J, Kelson N, et al. A study of abrasive waterjet characteristics by CFD simulation. J Mater Process Technol, 2004, 153/154(1/3): 488-493.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12.]
Prisco U, D’Onofrio MC. Three-dimensional CFD simulation of two-phase flow inside the abrasive water jet cutting head. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech, 2008, 9(5): 300-319.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13.]
Long X, Ruan X, Liu Q, et al. Numerical investigation on the internal flow and the particle movement in the abrasive waterjet nozzle. Powder Technol, 2017, 314: 635-640.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Narayanan C, Balz R, Weiss DA, et al. Modelling of abrasive particle energy in water jet machining. J Mater Process Technol, 2013, 213(12): 2201-2210.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Wang J. Predictive depth of jet penetration models for abrasive waterjet cutting of alumina ceramics. Int J Mech Sci, 2007, 49(3): 306-316.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
Nouraei H, Kowsari K, Samareh B, et al. Calibrated CFD erosion modeling of abrasive slurry jet micro-machining of channels in ductile materials. J Manuf Process, 2016, 23(45): 90-101.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17.]
Messa GV, Malavasi S. The simulation of abrasive jet impingement tests in the simulation of abrasive jet impingement tests. Wear, 2016, 370/371(7): 59-72.
[18.]
Haghbin N, Spelt JK, Papini M. Abrasive waterjet micro-machining of channels in metals: Comparison between machining in air and submerged in water. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2015, 88(25): 108-117.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
Lv Z, Hou R, Tian Y, et al. Investigation on flow field of ultrasonic-assisted abrasive waterjet using CFD with discrete phase model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 96(1/4): 963-972.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Wang J. A new model for predicting the depth of cut in abrasive waterjet contouring of alumina ceramics. J Mater Process Technol, 2009, 209(5): 2314-2320.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21.]
Momber AW. Deformation and fracture of rocks due to high-speed liquid impingement. Int J Fract, 2004, 130(3): 683-704.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
ANSYS Inc (US) (2018) ANSYS fluent theory guide, 15317
[23.]
Alexander AJ, Morsi SA. An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems. J Fluid Mech, 1972, 78(8): 256-280.
[24.]
Parsi M, Najmi K, Najafifard FS, et al. A comprehensive review of solid particle erosion modeling for oil and gas wells and pipelines applications. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 2014, 21: 850-873.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25.]
Vieira RE, Mansouri A, Mclaury BS, et al. Experimental and computational study of erosion in elbows due to sand particles in air flow. Powder Technol, 2016, 288(25): 339-353.
CrossRef Google scholar
[26.]
Oka YI, Yoshida T. Practical estimation of erosion damage caused by solid particle impact Part 2: mechanical properties of materials directly associated with erosion damage. Wear, 2005, 259(4): 102-109.
CrossRef Google scholar
[27.]
Desale GR, Gandhi BK, Jain SC. Particle size effects on the slurry erosion of aluminium alloy (AA 6063). Wear, 2009, 266(11/12): 1066-1071.
CrossRef Google scholar
[28.]
Kowsari K, Nouraei H, James DF, et al. Abrasive slurry jet micro-machining of holes in brittle and ductile materials. J Mater Process Technol, 2014, 214(9): 1909-1920.
CrossRef Google scholar
[29.]
Oka YI, Okamura K, Yoshida T. Practical estimation of erosion damage caused by solid particle impact: Part 1: Effects of impact parameters on a predictive equation. Wear, 2005, 259(1/6): 95-101.
CrossRef Google scholar
[30.]
Huang C, Chiovelli S, Minev P, et al. A comprehensive phenomenological model for erosion of materials in jet flow. Powder Technol, 2008, 187(3): 273-279.
CrossRef Google scholar
[31.]
Messa GV, Malavasi S. The effect of sub-models and parameterizations in the simulation of abrasive jet impingement tests. Wear, 2017, 370/371(115): 59-72.
CrossRef Google scholar
[32.]
Giurgiutiu V (2016) Structural health monitoring of aerospace composites. Academic Press, pp 33–52
[33.]
Nyaboro JN, Ahmed MA, El-Hofy H, et al. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of the abrasive waterjet drilling of carbon fiber reinforced polymers. J Manuf Process, 2020, 58: 551-562.
CrossRef Google scholar
[34.]
Kang C, Liu H, Li X, et al. A numerical and experimental study of oblique impact of ultra-high pressure abrasive water jet. Adv Mech Eng, 2016, 8(3): 1-14.
[35.]
Anirban G, Barron RM, Balachandar R. Numerical simulation of high-speed turbulent water jets in air. J Hydraul Res, 2010, 48(1): 119-124.
CrossRef Google scholar
[36.]
Field JE, Lesser MB. On the mechanics of high speed liquid jets. Proc R Soc London A Math Phys Sci, 1977, 357(16): 143-162.
[37.]
Nouraei H, Kowsari K, Papini M, et al. Operating parameters to minimize feature size in abrasive slurry jet micro-machining. Precis Eng, 2016, 44: 109-123.
CrossRef Google scholar
[38.]
Hashish M, du Plessis MP. Prediction equations relating high velocity jet cutting performance to stand off distance and multipasses. J Eng Ind, 1979, 101(3): 311.
CrossRef Google scholar
[39.]
Ulas C, Hascalik A. A study on surface roughness in abrasive waterjet machining process using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method. J Mater Process Technol, 2008, 202(1/3): 574-582.
[40.]
Kowsari K, Nouhi A, Hadavi V, et al. Prediction of the erosive footprint in the abrasive jet micro-machining of flat and curved glass. Tribol Int, 2017, 106(3/6): 101-108.
CrossRef Google scholar
[41.]
Li H, Lee A, Fan J, et al. On DEM-CFD study of the dynamic characteristics of high speed micro-abrasive air jet. Powder Technol, 2014, 267(29): 161-179.
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in the scope of the Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/