Tillage force and disturbance characteristics of different geometric-shaped subsoilers via DEM

Abstract

With the increased use of agricultural machinery in field operations, soil compaction has become increasingly severe, and the plough pan has become deeper. Subsoiling is an excellent way to address this problem. However, it is limited by high energy consumption, which is closely related to tillage force. To investigate the effect of the geometric shape of shanks and tines on tillage force and soil disturbance in loam, a layered soil model in accordance with the actual conditions was established and five different subsoilers were simulated via discrete element modeling. The results indicated that the shank impacted soil disturbance and tine impacted tillage force. The draft force of curved shank and chisel tine was 8% less than that of the straight shank and sweep tine. The straight shank and sweep tine produced a larger furrow profile and a higher furrow width. The subsoiler with curved shank and chisel tine (C-C) exhibited the lowest specific resistance (12.87, 17.52, 19.46 and 21.18 kN/m² in the 30, 35, 40 and 45 cm tillage depth, respectively) considering the draft force and soil disturbance characteristics. Hence, these results will facilitate in the selection of a suitable subsoiler and design of new subsoilers with lower energy consumption requirements for loam areas worldwide.

Keywords

Subsoiler / Discrete element method (DEM) / Tillage force / Soil disturbance / Soil compaction

References

[1] Spoor G, Tijink FG, Weisskopf P. Subsoil compaction: risk, avoidance, identification and alleviation. Soil Tillage Res, 2003, 73: 175-182.

[2] Håkansson I. Subsoil compaction caused by heavy vehicles—a long-term threat to soil productivity. Soil Tillage Res, 1994, 29: 105-110.

[3] Alakukku L, Weisskopf P, Chamen WC, et al. Prevention strategies for field traffic-induced subsoil compaction: a review. Soil Tillage Res, 2003, 73: 145-160.

[4] Shah AN, Tanveer M, Shahzad B, et al. Soil compaction effects on soil health and cropproductivity: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2017, 24: 10056-10067.

[5] Shahrayini E, Fallah M, Shabanpour M, et al. Investigation of soil compaction on yield and agronomic traits of wheat under saline and non-saline soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2018, 64: 1329-1340.

[6] Lipiec J, Medvedev VV, Birkas M, et al. Effect of soil compaction on root growth and crop yield in Central and Eastern Europe. Int Agrophysics, 2003, 17: 61-69.

[7] Chen G, Weil RR. Penetration of cover crop roots through compacted soils. Plant Soil, 2010, 331: 31-43.

[8] Kulkarni SS, Bajwa SG, Huitink G. Investigation of the effects of soil compaction in cotton. Trans ASABE, 2010, 53: 667-674.

[9] Akinci I, Cakir E, Topakci M, et al. The effect of subsoiling on soil resistance and cotton yield. Soil Tillage Res, 2004, 77: 203-210.

[10] Cai H, Ma W, Zhang X, et al. Effect of subsoil tillage depth on nutrient accumulation, root distribution, and grain yield in spring maize. Crop J, 2014, 2: 297-307.

[11] Alesso CA, Masola MJ, Carrizo ME, et al. Spatial variability of short-term effect of tillage on soil penetration resistance. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2019, 65: 822-832.

[12] Godwin RJ. A review of the effect of implement geometry on soil failure and implement forces. Soil Tillage Res, 2007, 97: 331-340.

[13] Ogbeche OS, Idowu MS. Design steps of narrow tillage tools for draught reduction and increased soil disruption—a review. Nature, 2016, 18: 91-102.

[14] Askari M, Shahgholi G. The effect of tine, wing, operating depth and speed on the draft requirement of subsoil tillage tines. Res Agric Eng, 2017, 63: 160-167.

[15] Weill A (2015) A guide to successful subsoiling. CETAB+ Victoriav. http://www.cetab.org/publications

[16] Nichols ML, Reaves CA. Soil reaction to subsoiling equipment. Agric Eng, 1958, 39: 340-343.

[17] Upadhyaya SK, Williams TH, Kemble LJ, et al. Energy requirements for chiseling in coastal plain soils. Trans ASAE, 1984, 27(6): 1643-1649.

[18] Raper RL. Subsoiler shapes for site-specific tillage. Appl Eng Agric, 2005, 21: 25-30.

[19] Harrison HP, Licsko ZJ. Soil reacting forces for models of three bentleg plows. Soil Tillage Res, 1989, 15: 125-135.

[20] Raper RL. Force requirements and soil disruption of straight and bentleg subsoilers for conservation tillage systems. Appl Eng Agric, 2005, 21: 787-794.

[21] Spoor G, Godwin RJ. An experimental investigation into the deep loosening of soil by rigid tines. J Agric Eng Res, 1978, 23: 243-258.

[22] Liu J, Wang X, Li H, et al. Optimization of structural parameters of subsoiler based on soil disturbance and traction resistance. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2017, 48: 60-67.

[23] Askari M, Shahgholi G, Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y. New wings on the interaction between conventional subsoiler and paraplow tines with the soil: effects on the draft and the properties of soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2019, 65: 88-100.

[24] Payne PCJ. The relationship between the mechanical properties of soil and the performance of simple cultivation implements. J Agric Eng Res, 1956, 1: 23-50.

[25] Zhang R, Han D, He Y, et al. Drag reduction and wear resistance mechanisms of a bionic shovel by discrete element method simulation. Simulation, 2019, 95: 231-239.

[26] Momozu M, Oida A, Yamazaki M, et al. Simulation of a soil loosening process by means of the modified distinct element method. J Terramech, 2002, 39: 207-220.

[27] Tamás K, Jóri IJ, Mouazen AM. Modelling soil-sweep interaction with discrete element method. Soil Tillage Res, 2013, 134: 223-231.

[28] Solhjou A, Fielke JM, Desbiolles JMA, et al. Soil translocation by narrow openers with various bent leg geometries. Biosyst Eng, 2014, 127: 41-49.

[29] Li B, Liu FY, Mu JY, et al. Distinct element method analysis and field experiment of soil resistance applied on the subsoiler. Int J Agric Biol Eng, 2014, 7: 54-59.

[30] Ucgul M, Fielke JM, Saunders C. 3D DEM tillage simulation: validation of a hysteretic spring (plastic) contact model for a sweep tool operating in a cohesionless soil. Soil Tillage Res, 2014, 144: 220-227.

[31] Hang C, Gao X, Yuan M, et al. Discrete element simulations and experiments of soil disturbance as affected by the tine spacing of subsoiler. Biosyst Eng, 2016, 54: 1-10.

[32] Barr J, Fielke J. Discrete element modelling of narrow point openers to improve soil disturbance characteristics of no-till seeding systems. ASABE Int Meet, 2016, 2016: 1-14.

[33] Ucgul M, Saunders C, Fielke JM. Discrete element modelling of top soil burial using a full scale mouldboard plough under field conditions. Biosyst Eng, 2017, 160: 140-153.

[34] Ucgul M, Saunders C. Simulation of tillage forces and furrow profile during soil-mouldboard plough interaction using discrete element modelling. Biosyst Eng, 2020, 190: 58-70.

[35] Lysych MN. Review of numerical methods for modeling the interaction of soil environments with the tools of soil tillage machines. J Phys Conf Ser, 2019, 1399: 1-8.

[36] Bartenev IM, Lysych MN, Shabanov ML, et al. Comparative studies of physical models of soil implemented by the method of discrete elements (DEM) on the example of a simple loosening tillage tool. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 2019, 39: 21-29.

[37] Zeng Z, Ma X, Chen Y, et al. Modelling residue incorporation of selected chisel ploughing tools using the discrete element method (DEM). Soil Tillage Res, 2020, 197: 1-14.

[38] Godwin RJ, Spoor G. Soil failure with narrow tines. J Agric Eng Res, 1977, 22: 213-228.

[39] Wu K, Zhao R. Soil texture classification and its application in China. Acta Pedol Sin, 2018, 56(1): 227-241.

[40] Gorucu S, Khalilian A, Han YJ, et al. An algorithm to determine the optimum tillage depth from soil penetrometer data in coastal plain soils. Appl Eng Agric, 2006, 22: 625-631.

[41] Gorucus S, Khalilian A, Han YJ et al (2001) Variable-depth tillage based on geo-referenced soil compaction data in coastal plain soils. In 2001 ASAE Annual Meeting, Sacramento, CA, USA

[42] Ucgul M, Fielke JM, Saunders C. Three-dimensional discrete element modelling of tillage: Determination of a suitable contact model and parameters for a cohesionless soil. Biosyst Eng, 2014, 121: 105-117.

[43] Shmulevich I, Asaf Z, Rubinstein D. Interaction between soil and a wide cutting blade using the discrete element method. Soil Tillage Res, 2007, 97: 37-50.

[44] Huan YX, Huang CG, Yuan MC, et al. Discrete element simulation and experiment on disturbance behavior of subsoiling. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2016, 47: 80-88.

[45] Barr JB, Fielke J, Desbiolles J (2017) A new method of quantifying discrete element method predicted furrow profiles of narrow point openers. In 2017 ASAE Annual Meeting, Washington, USA

[46] Kushwaha RL, Zhang ZX. Evaluation of factors and current approaches related to computerized design of tillage tools: a review. J Terramech, 1998, 35: 69-86.

[47] Ahmadi I. Effect of soil, machine, and working state parameters on the required draft force of a subsoiler using a theoretical draft-calculating model. Soil Res, 2017, 55: 389-400.

[48] Celik A, Raper RL. Design and evaluation of ground-driven rotary subsoilers. Soil Tillage Res, 2012, 124: 203-210.

[49] Sun J, Wang Y, Ma Y, et al. DEM simulation of bionic subsoilers (tillage depth > 40 cm) with drag reduction and lower soil disturbance characteristics. Adv Eng Softw, 2018, 119: 30-37.

[50] Hasimu A, Chen Y. Soil disturbance and draft force of selected seed openers. Soil Tillage Res, 2014, 140: 48-54.

[51] Hamza MA, Riethmuller GP, Anderson WK. Experimental subsoiling by in-line shallow and deep tines. Soil Res, 2013, 51: 477-483.

[52] Lisowski A, Klonowski J, Green O, et al. Duckfoot tools connected with flexible and stiff tines: three components of resistances and soil disturbance. Soil Tillage Res, 2016, 158: 76-90.

Funding

the National Key R & D Program of China(2017YFD0701103)