Real-time process control of powder bed fusion by monitoring dynamic temperature field

Xiao-Kang Huang, Xiao-Yong Tian, Qi Zhong, Shun-Wen He, Chun-Bao Huo, Yi Cao, Zhi-Qiang Tong, Di-Chen Li

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2020, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 380-391.

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2020, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 380-391. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-020-00317-y
Article

Real-time process control of powder bed fusion by monitoring dynamic temperature field

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the uniformity of the temperature field during sintering to improve part performance. A temperature-field monitoring system is established based on an infrared thermal imager and the temperature field data obtained during the sintering of a part can be measured in real time. The relationship among the sintering temperature field, sintering process parameters, and part performance is established experimentally. Subsequently, a temperature field monitoring and analysis system is constructed, and various sintering temperature-field control strategies are established for various part sizes. Finally, a dynamic control strategy for controlling the temperature field during sintering is proposed, experimentally validated, and fully integrated into a developed powder bed fusion (PBF) equipment. For eight-shaped standard parts, the range of sintering temperature field is optimized from 44.1 °C to 19.7 °C, whereas the tensile strength of the parts increased by 15.4%. For large-size H parts, localized over burning is eliminated and the final quality of the part is optimized. This strategy is critical for the optimization of the PBF process for large-sized parts, in particular in the large-sized die manufacturing industry, which offers promise in the optimization of part performance.

Keywords

Powder bed fusion (PBF) / Sintering temperature field / Monitoring system / Infrared thermal imager

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiao-Kang Huang, Xiao-Yong Tian, Qi Zhong, Shun-Wen He, Chun-Bao Huo, Yi Cao, Zhi-Qiang Tong, Di-Chen Li. Real-time process control of powder bed fusion by monitoring dynamic temperature field. Advances in Manufacturing, 2020, 8(3): 380‒391 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00317-y

References

[1.]
Bidare P, Bitharas I, Ward RM, et al. Laser powder bed fusion at sub-atmospheric pressures. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2018, 130/131: 65-72.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B, et al. Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2017, 121: 22-36.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
Josupeit S, Ordia L, Schmid H. Modelling of temperatures and heat flow within laser sintered part cakes. Addit Manuf, 2016, 12: 189-196.
[4.]
Ganci M, Zhu W, Buffa G, et al. A macroscale FEM-based approach for selective laser sintering of thermoplastics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 91: 3169-3180.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Setti GDO, Lopes Da Silva JV, De Oliveira MF, et al. Surface methods for monitoring the densification of parts in the selective laser sintering process. Rapid Prototyp J, 2014, 20: 157-163.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Bai J, Zhang B, Song J, et al. The effect of processing conditions on the mechanical properties of polyethylene produced by selective laser sintering. Polym Test, 2016, 52: 89-93.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Song JL, Li YT, Deng QL, et al. Rapid prototyping manufacturing of silica sand patterns based on selective laser sintering. J Mater Process Technol, 2007, 187/188: 614-618.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
Brajlih T, Paulic M, Irgolic T, et al. Study of the complementary usages of selective laser sintering during the high volume production of plastic parts. Rapid Prototyp J, 2016, 22: 735-742.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Van Hooreweder B, Kruth J. High cycle fatigue properties of selective laser sintered parts in polyamide 12. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 2014, 63: 241-244.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Xing J, Sun W, Rana RS. 3D modeling and testing of transient temperature in selective laser sintering (SLS) process. Optik, 2013, 124: 301-304.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
Wegner A, Witt G (2011) Process monitoring in laser sintering using thermal imaging. In: The 22nd annual international solid freedom fabrication symposium-an additive manufacturing conference, Austin, TX
[12.]
Wegner A, Witt G (2015) Understanding the decisive thermal processes in laser sintering of polyamide 12. In: Proceedings of the polymer processing society 30th annual meeting, Cleveland, Ohio. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918511
[13.]
Wroe WW, Gladstone J, Phillips T, et al. In-situ thermal image correlation with mechanical properties of nylon-12 in SLS. Rapid Prototyp J, 2016, 22(5): 794-800.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Abdelrahman M, Starr TL. Quality certification and control of polymer laser sintering: layerwise temperature monitoring using thermal imaging. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2016, 84: 831-842.
[15.]
Zeng K, Pal D, Stucker B (2012) A review of thermal analysis methods in laser sintering and selective laser melting. In: The 23rd annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium—an additive manufacturing conference, Austin, TX, pp 796–814
[16.]
Kim H, Lin Y, Tseng TB. A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J, 2018, 24: 645-669.
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
The National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program)(2015AA042503)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/