Modeling the density gradient of 3D nanofiber scaffolds fabricated by divergence electrospinning

Abstract

Following recent insights on structure-cell-function interactions and the critical role of the extracellular matrix (ECM), the latest biofabrication approaches have increasingly focused on designing materials with biomimetic microarchitecture. Divergence electrospinning is a novel fabrication method for three-dimensional (3D) nanofiber scaffolds. It is introduced to produce 3D nanofiber mats that have numerous applications in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. One of the most important characteristics of 3D nanofiber mats is the density gradient. This study provides a statistical analysis and response surface modeling framework based on experimental data to evaluate the manner by which the geometric designs of double-bevel collectors influence the fiber density gradient. Specifically, variance of analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to identify parameters that had significant effects, and a response surface model embedded with seven location indicators was developed to predict the spatial distribution of fiber density for different collector designs. It was concluded that the collector height, bevel angle, and their interactions were significant factors influencing the density gradient. This study revealed the sensitivity of system configuration and provided an optimization tool for process controllability of microstructure gradients.

Keywords

Electrospinning / 3D nanofiber scaffold / Statistical model / Design of experiments / Response surface method

References

[1] Jin G, He R, Sha B, et al. Electrospun three-dimensional aligned nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C, 2018, 92: 995-1005.

[2] Cui W, Zhou Y, Chang J. Electrospun nanofibrous materials for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Sci Technol Adv Mater, 2010, 11(1): 014108.

[3] Kowalewski TA, Barral S, Kowalczyk T (2009) Modeling electrospinning of nanofibers. In: Proceedings of the IUTAM symposium on modelling nanomaterials and nanosystems, Aalborg, Denmark, 19–22 May 2008, pp 279–292

[4] Šimko M, Lukáš D. Mathematical modeling of a whipping instability of an electrically charged liquid jet. Appl Math Model, 2016, 40(21/22): 9565-9583.

[5] Taylor GI. Electrically driven jets. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1969, 313(1515): 453-475.

[6] Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, et al. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 60(4): 613-621.

[7] Rezvani Z, Venugopal JR, Urbanska AM, et al. A bird’s eye view on the use of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art, emerging directions and future trends. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med, 2016, 12(7): 2181-2200.

[8] Rim NG, Shin CS, Shin H. Current approaches to electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater, 2013, 8(1): 014102.

[9] Park JS. Electrospinning and its applications. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2011, 1(4): 043002-10.1088/2043-6262/1/4/043002.

[10] Jiang T, Carbone EJ, Lo KWH, et al. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers for tissue regeneration. Prog Polym Sci, 2015, 46: 1-24.

[11] Zhou Y, Hu Z, Du D, et al. The effects of collector geometry on the internal structure of the 3D nanofiber scaffold fabricated by divergent electrospinning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 100: 3045-3054.

[12] Zhou Y, Tan GZ (2018) Generation of 3D nanofiber structure by divergence electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffold. In: The 13th international manufacturing science and engineering conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, College Station, Texas, USA

[13] Tan GZ, Zhou Y. Tunable 3D nanofiber architecture of polycaprolactone by divergence electrospinning for potential tissue engineering applications. Nano Micro Lett, 2018, 10(4): 73.

[14] Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 2017, New York: Wiley

[15] Wu CJ, Hamada MS. Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization, 2011, New York: Wiley.

[16] Jeff CFH. Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization, 2009, New York: Wiley.

[17] Becker W, Tarantola S, Deman G. Sensitivity analysis approaches to high-dimensional screening problems at low sample size. J Stat Comput Simul, 2018, 88(11): 2089-2110.

[18] Becker W, Rowson J, Oakley J, et al. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a model of the aortic valve. J Biomech, 2011, 44(8): 1499-1506.

[19] Subia B, Kundu J, Kundu S. Biomaterial scaffold fabrication techniques for potential tissue engineering applications, 2010, London: Tissue Engineering.

[20] Lund AW, Yener B, Stegemann JP, et al. The natural and engineered 3D microenvironment as a regulatory cue during stem cell fate determination. Tissue Eng B Rev, 2009, 15(3): 371-380.

[21] Michel G, Tonon T, Scornet D, et al. The cell wall polysaccharide metabolism of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Insights into the evolution of extracellular matrix polysaccharides in Eukaryotes. New Phytol, 2010, 188(1): 82-97.

[22] Alberts B, Bray D, Hopkin K, et al. Essential cell biology, 2013, New York: Garland Science.

[23] Ahn H, Kim KJ, Park SY, et al. 3D braid scaffolds for regeneration of articular cartilage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2014, 34: 37-46.

[24] Tamayol A, Akbari M, Annabi N, et al. Fiber-based tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Biotechnol Adv, 2013, 31(5): 669-687.

[25] Younesi M, Islam A, Kishore V, et al. Tenogenic induction of human MSCs by anisotropically aligned collagen biotextiles. Adv Func Mater, 2014, 24(36): 5762-5770.

[26] Pedde RD, Mirani B, Navaei A, et al. Emerging biofabrication strategies for engineering complex tissue constructs. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(19): 1606061.

[27] Cui L, Zhang N, Cui W, et al. A novel nano/micro-fibrous scaffold by melt-spinning method for bone tissue engineering. J Bionic Eng, 2015, 12(1): 117-128.

[28] Puppi D, Mota C, Gazzarri M, et al. Additive manufacturing of wet-spun polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Microdevice, 2012, 14(6): 1115-1127.

[29] Jun Y, Kang E, Chae S, et al. Microfluidic spinning of micro-and nano-scale fibers for tissue engineering. Lab Chip, 2014, 14(13): 2145-2160.

[30] Khalili S, Nouri Khorasani S, Razavi M, et al. Nanofibrous scaffolds with biomimetic structure. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2018, 106(2): 370-376.

[31] Choi JS, Lee SJ, Christ GJ, et al. The influence of electrospun aligned poly (epsilon-caprolactone)/collagen nanofiber meshes on the formation of self-aligned skeletal muscle myotubes. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(19): 2899-2906.

[32] Yeo M, Kim GH. Anisotropically aligned cell-laden nanofibrous bundle fabricated via cell electrospinning to regenerate skeletal muscle tissue. Small, 2018, 14(48): 1803491.

[33] Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, et al. Electrospun poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(34): 4532-4539.

[34] Gnavi S, Fornasari B, Tonda-Turo C, et al. In vitro evaluation of gelatin and chitosan electrospun fibres as an artificial guide in peripheral nerve repair: a comparative study. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2018, 12(2): 679-694.

[35] Kitsara M, Agbulut O, Kontziampasis D, et al. Fibers for hearts: a critical review on electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2017, 48: 20-40.

[36] Sahoo S, Ouyang H, Goh JCH, et al. Characterization of a novel polymeric scaffold for potential application in tendon/ligament tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 2006, 12(1): 91-99.

[37] Vaquette C, Sudheesh Kumar P, Petcu EB, et al. Combining electrospinning and cell sheet technology for the development of a multiscale tissue engineered ligament construct (TELC). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2018, 106(1): 399-409.

[38] Shalumon K, Sheu C, Chen CH, et al. Multi-functional electrospun antibacterial core-shell nanofibrous membranes for prolonged prevention of post-surgical tendon adhesion and inflammation. Acta Biomater, 2018, 72: 121-136.

[39] Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C, et al. A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(6): 599-609.

[40] Girão AF, Semitela Â, Ramalho G, et al. Mimicking nature: fabrication of 3D anisotropic electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Compos B Eng, 2018, 154: 99-107.

[41] Therapeutic Category, and Segment Forecasts, 2018–2025 (2017) Regenerative medicine market analysis by product (therapeutics {primary cell-based, stem cell-based, immunotherapies, and gene therapies}, tools, banks, and services). Grand View Research

[42] Tseng Q, Duchemin-Pelletier E, Deshiere A, et al. Spatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell–cell junction positioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2012, 109(5): 1506-1511.

[43] Geckil H, Xu F, Zhang X, et al. Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine, 2010, 5(3): 469-484.

[44] He J, Qin T, Liu Y, et al. Electrospinning of nanofibrous scaffolds with continuous structure and material gradients. Mater Lett, 2014, 137: 393-397.

[45] Samavedi S, Horton CO, Guelcher SA, et al. Fabrication of a model continuously graded co-electrospun mesh for regeneration of the ligament–bone interface. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7(12): 4131-4138.

[46] Singh M, Dormer N, Salash JR, et al. Three-dimensional macroscopic scaffolds with a gradient in stiffness for functional regeneration of interfacial tissues. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010, 94(3): 870-876.