A strategy to control microstructures of a Ni-based superalloy during hot forging based on particle swarm optimization algorithm

Dong-Dong Chen , Yong-Cheng Lin , Xiao-Min Chen

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2019, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 238 -247.

PDF
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2019, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 238 -247. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-019-00259-0
Article

A strategy to control microstructures of a Ni-based superalloy during hot forging based on particle swarm optimization algorithm

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this study, a strategy based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is developed to control the microstructures of a Ni-based superalloy during hot forging. This strategy is composed of three parts, namely, material models, optimality criterions, and a PSO algorithm. The material models are utilized to predict microstructure information, such as recrystallization volume fraction and average grain size. The optimality criterion can be determined by the designed target microstructures and random errors. The developed strategy is resolved using the PSO algorithm, which is an intelligent optimal algorithm. This algorithm does not need a derivable objective function, which renders it suitable for dealing with the complex hot forging process of alloy components. The optimal processing parameters (deformation temperature and strain rate) are obtained by the developed strategy and validated by the hot forging experiments. Uniform and fine target microstructures can be obtained using the optimized processing parameters, which indicates that the developed strategy is effective for controlling the microstructural evolution during the hot forging of the studied superalloy.

Keywords

Processing parameters / Microstructure / Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm / Superalloy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dong-Dong Chen, Yong-Cheng Lin, Xiao-Min Chen. A strategy to control microstructures of a Ni-based superalloy during hot forging based on particle swarm optimization algorithm. Advances in Manufacturing, 2019, 7(2): 238-247 DOI:10.1007/s40436-019-00259-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lin YC, Chen XM. A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater Des, 2011, 32(4): 1733-1759.

[2]

Alabort E, Reed RC, Barba D. Combined modelling and miniaturised characterisation of high-temperature forging in a nickel-based superalloy. Mater Des, 2018, 160: 683-697.

[3]

He DG, Lin YC, Tang Y, et al. Influences of solution cooling on microstructures, mechanical properties and hot corrosion resistance of a nickel-based superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A, 2019, 746: 372-383.

[4]

Seret A, Moussa C, Bernacki M, et al. On the coupling between recrystallization and precipitation following hot deformation in a γγ′ nickel-based superalloy. Metall Mater Trans A, 2018, 49: 4199-4213.

[5]

Momeni A, Abbasi SM, Morakabati M, et al. A comparative study on the hot working behavior of Inconel 718 and ALLVAC 718 plus. Metall Mater Trans A, 2017, 48(3): 1216-1229.

[6]

He DG, Lin YC, Huang J, et al. EBSD study of microstructural evolution in a nickel-base superalloy during two-pass hot compressive deformation. Adv Eng Mater, 2018, 20(7): 1800129.

[7]

He DG, Lin YC, Jiang XY, et al. Dissolution mechanisms and kinetics of δ phase in an aged Ni-based superalloy in hot deformation process. Mater Des, 2018, 156: 262-271.

[8]

Arun Babu K, Mandal S, Kumar A, et al. Characterization of hot deformation behaviour of alloy 617 through kinetic analysis, dynamic material modeling and microstructural studies. Mater Sci Eng A, 2016, 664: 177-187.

[9]

Pradhan SK, Mandal S, Athreya CN, et al. Influence of processing parameters on dynamic recrystallization and the associated annealing twin boundary evolution in a nickel base superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A, 2017, 700: 49-58.

[10]

Zhang C, Zhang LW, Shen WF, et al. The processing map and microstructure evolution of Ni-Cr-Mo-based C276 superalloy during hot compression. J Alloys Compd, 2017, 728: 1269-1278.

[11]

He DG, Lin YC, Wang LH. Microstructural variations and kinetic behaviors during meta dynamic recrystallization in a nickel base superalloy with pre-precipitated δ phase. Mater Des, 2019, 165: 107584.

[12]

He DG, Lin YC, Wang LH. Influences of pre-precipitated δ phase on microstructures and hot compressive deformation features of a nickel-based superalloy. Vacuum, 2019, 161: 242-250.

[13]

Nakhaie D, Benhangi PH, Fazeli F, et al. Controlled forging of a Nb containing microalloyed steel for automotive applications. Metall Mater Trans A, 2012, 43(13): 5209-5217.

[14]

Liu RQ, Kumar A, Chen ZZ, et al. A predictive machine learning approach for microstructure optimization and materials design. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 1-12.

[15]

Malas JC, Frazier WG, Venugopal S, et al. Optimization of microstructure development during hot working using control theory. Metall Mater Trans A, 1997, 28(9): 1921-1930.

[16]

Venugopal S, Medina EA, Malas JC, et al. Optimization of microstructure during deformation processing using control theory principles. Scr Mater, 1997, 36(3): 347-353.

[17]

Feng JP, Luo ZJ. A method for the optimal control of forging process variables using the finite element method and control theory. J Mater Process Technol, 2000, 108(1): 40-44.

[18]

He XM, Yu ZQ, Lai XM. Robust parameters control methodology of microstructure for heavy forgings based on Taguchi method. Mater Des, 2009, 30(6): 2084-2089.

[19]

Meyer DG, Wadley HNG. Model-based feedback control of deformation processing with microstructure goals. Metall Trans B, 1993, 24(2): 289-300.

[20]

Recker D, Franzke M, Hirt G. Fast models for online-optimization during open die forging. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 2011, 60(1): 295-298.

[21]

Lin YC, Chen DD, Chen MS, et al. A precise BP neural network-based online model predictive control strategy for die forging hydraulic press machine. Neural Comput Appl, 2018, 29(9): 585-596.

[22]

Padhi SK, Sahu RK, Mahapatra SS, et al. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters using a fuzzy inference system coupled with Taguchi philosophy. Adv Manuf, 2017, 5(3): 231-242.

[23]

Sahu PK, Kumari K, Pal S, et al. Hybrid fuzzy-grey-Taguchi based multi weld quality optimization of Al/Cu dissimilar friction stir welded joints. Adv Manuf, 2016, 4(3): 237-247.

[24]

Quan GZ, Zhang L, An C, et al. Multi-variable and bi-objective optimization of electric upsetting process for grain refinement and its uniform distribution. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2018, 19(6): 859-872.

[25]

Lodh A, Biswas A, Das S. Modelling hot strength behaviour of steel. Ironmak Steelmak, 2015, 42(4): 290-301.

[26]

Chen DD, Lin YC, Zhou Y, et al. Dislocation substructures evolution and an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system model for constitutive behavior of a Ni-based superalloy during hot deformation. J Alloy Compd, 2017, 708: 938-946.

[27]

He DG, Lin YC, Chen J, et al. Microstructural evolution and support vector regression model for an aged Ni-based superalloy during two-stage hot forming with stepped strain rates. Mater Des, 2018, 154: 51-62.

[28]

Lou Y, Ke CX, Li LX. Accurately predicting high temperature flow stress of AZ80 magnesium alloy with particle swarm optimization-based support vector regression. Appl Math Inf Sci, 2013, 7: 1093-1102.

[29]

Irani R, Nasimi R, Shahbazian M. Approximate predictive control of a distillation column using an evolving artificial neural network coupled with a genetic algorithm. Energ Source Part A, 2015, 37(5): 518-535.

[30]

Wang Y, Li B, Weise T, et al. Self-adaptive learning based particle swarm optimization. Inf Sci, 2011, 180: 4515-4538.

[31]

Xu G. An adaptive parameter tuning of particle swarm optimization algorithm. Appl Math Comput, 2013, 219: 4560-4569.

[32]

Ren C, An N, Wang J, et al. Optimal parameters selection for BP neural network based on particle swarm optimization: A case study of wind speed forecasting. Knowl Based Syst, 2014, 56: 226-239.

[33]

Juang CF, Hsiao CM, Hsu CH. Hierarchical cluster-based multispecies particle-swarm optimization for fuzzy-system optimization. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2010, 18: 14-26.

[34]

Moharam A, El-Hosseini MA, Ali HA. Design of optimal PID controller using hybrid differential evolution and particle swarm optimization with an aging leader and challengers. Appl Soft Comput, 2016, 38: 727-737.

[35]

Lmalghan R, Rao K, ArunKumar S, et al. Machining parameters optimization of AA6061 using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2018, 19(5): 695-704.

[36]

Yu Q, Wang KS. A hybrid point cloud alignment method combining particle swarm optimization and iterative closest point method. Adv Manuf, 2014, 2: 32-38.

[37]

Lin YC, Chen XM, Wen DX, et al. A physically-based constitutive model for a typical nickel-based superalloy. Comput Mater Sci, 2014, 83: 282-289.

[38]

Lin YC, He DG, Chen MS, et al. Study of flow softening mechanisms of a nickel-based superalloy with δ phase. Arch Metall Mater, 2016, 61(3): 1537-1546.

[39]

Chen XM, Lin YC, Wen DX, et al. Dynamic recrystallization behavior of a typical nickel-based superalloy during hot deformation. Mater Des, 2014, 57: 568-577.

[40]

Nickabadi A, Ebadzadeh MM, Safabakhsh R. A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive inertia weight. Appl Soft Comput, 2011, 11(4): 3658-3670.

[41]

Yang C, Gao W, Liu N, et al. Low-discrepancy sequence initialized particle swarm optimization algorithm with high-order nonlinear time-varying inertia weight. Appl Soft Comput, 2015, 29: 386-394.

[42]

Eberhart RC, Shi YH (2000) Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the congress on evolutionary computation, La Jolla, California, July 16–19, pp 84–88

[43]

Chen MS, Yuan WQ, Li HB, et al. Modeling and simulation of dynamic recrystallization behaviors of magnesium alloy AZ31B using cellular automaton method. Comput Mater Sci, 2017, 136: 163-172.

[44]

Chen MS, Yuan WQ, Li HB, et al. New insights on the relationship between flow stress softening and dynamic recrystallization behavior of magnesium alloy AZ31B. Mater Charact, 2019, 147: 173-183.

[45]

Yang XM, Guo HZ, Yao ZK, et al. Hot deformation behavior and processing parameter optimization of BT25y alloy with an initial equiaxed microstructure using processing map. Rare Metals, 2018, 37: 778-788.

[46]

Najafi SZ, Momeni A, Jafarian HR, et al. Recrystallization, precipitation and flow behavior of D3 tool steel under hot working condition. Mater Charact, 2017, 132: 437-447.

[47]

Wen DX, Lin YC, Li XH, et al. Hot deformation characteristics and dislocation substructure evolution of a nickel-base alloy considering effects of δ phase. J Alloys Compd, 2018, 764: 1008-1020.

[48]

Lin YC, Wen DX, Chen XM, et al. A novel unified dislocation density based model for hot deformation behavior of a nickel-based superalloy under dynamic recrystallization conditions. Appl Phys A, 2016, 122(9): 805.

[49]

Lin YC, He DG, Chen MS, et al. EBSD analysis of evolution of dynamic recrystallization grains and δ phase in a nickel-based superalloy during hot compressive deformation. Mater Des, 2016, 97: 13-24.

[50]

Lin YC, Wu XY, Chen XM, et al. EBSD study of a hot deformed nickel-based superalloy. J Alloys Compd, 2015, 640: 101-113.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809(51775564)

Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan Province(2016JJ1017)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

252

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/