Time-variant reliability analysis of a continuous system with strength deterioration based on subset simulation

Abstract

To conduct a reliability analysis for mechanical components, it is necessary to consider the combined influence of strength deterioration and dynamic loads. An efficient method based on subset simulation is proposed in this paper to analyze time-variant reliability by considering the strength deterioration of mechanical components in a continuous system. A gamma process is used to describe the deterioration of system strength. A model for time-variant reliability considering strength deterioration is constructed for a continuous system. A representative example and tubular cantilever structure are assessed to demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method. The reliability probability examples were analyzed using a first-order reliability method and benchmark results for the proposed method were derived using direct Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The results of the proposed method and MCS are consistent, indicating that the proposed method is an effective reliability analysis method for evaluating small failure probabilities in a continuous system subjected to strength deterioration and dynamic loads.

Keywords

Time-variant reliability / Strength deterioration / Subset simulation (SS) / Continuous system

References

[1.] Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Mariniello A. Effects of the axial force eccentricity on the time-variant structural reliability of agingcross-sections subjected to chloride-induced corrosion. Eng Struct, 2017, 130: 261-274.

[2.] Huang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. A new direct second-order reliability analysis method. Appl Math Model, 2018, 55: 68-80.

[3.] Zhu SP, Huang HZ, Peng WW, et al. Probabilistic physics of failure-based framework for fatigue life prediction of aircraft gas turbine discs under uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2016, 146: 1-12.

[4.] Mori Y, Ellingwood BR. Reliability-based service-life assessment of aging concrete structures. J Struct Eng, 1993, 119(5): 1600-1621.

[5.] Li CQ. Computation of the failure probability of deteriorating structural systems. Comput Struct, 1995, 56(6): 1073-1079.

[6.] Ciampoli M. Time dependent reliability of structural systems subject to deterioration. Comput Struct, 1998, 67(1–3): 29-35.

[7.] Li Q, Wang C, Ellingwood BR. Time-dependent reliability of aging structures in the presence of non-stationary loads and degradation. Struct Saf, 2015, 52: 132-141.

[8.] Rice SO. Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst Tech J, 1944, 23(3): 282-332.

[9.] Andrieu-Renaud C, Sudret B, Lemaire M. The PHI2 method: a way to compute time-variant reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2004, 84(1): 75-86.

[10.] Zhang XJ, Xie LY, Wu Y, et al. Modeling for time-variant reliability of mechanism. Adv Mater Res, 2010, 118–120: 621-624.

[11.] Li CC, Kiureghian AD. Optimal discretization of random fields. J Eng Mech, 1993, 119(6): 1136-1154.

[12.] Au SK, Beck JL. Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probab Eng Mech, 2001, 16(4): 263-277.

[13.] Au SK, Beck JL. Subset simulation and its application to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis. J Eng Mech, 2003, 129(8): 901-917.

[14.] Vahdatirad MJ, Andersen LV, Ibsen LB, et al. Stochastic dynamic stiffness of a surface footing for offshore wind turbines: implementing a subset simulation method to estimate rare events. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2014, 65: 89-101.

[15.] Norouzi M, Nikolaidis E. Integrating subset simulation with probabilistic re-analysis to estimate reliability of dynamic systems. Struct Multidiscip Optim, 2013, 48(3): 533-548.

[16.] Song SF, Lu ZZ, Qiao HW. Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2009, 94(2): 658-665.

[17.] Bourinet JM, Deheeger F, Lemaire M. Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines. Struct Saf, 2011, 33(6): 343-353.

[18.] Zuev KM, Beck JL, Au SK, et al. Bayesian post-processor and other enhancements of subset simulation for estimating failure probabilities in high dimensions. Comput Struct, 2012, 92–93: 283-296.

[19.] Li HS, Ma YZ, Cao ZJ. A generalized subset simulation approach for estimating small failure probabilities of multiple stochastic responses. Comput Struct, 2015, 153: 239-251.

[20.] Wang Z, Mourelatos ZP, Li J, et al. Time-dependent reliability of dynamic systems using subset simulation with splitting over a series of correlated time intervals. J Mech Des, 2014, 136(6): 061008.

[21.] Yu S, Wang ZL. A novel time-variant reliability analysis method based on failure processes decomposition for dynamic uncertain structures. J Mech Des, 2018, 140(5): 051401.

[22.] Yu S, Wang ZL, Meng DB. Time-variant reliability assessment for multiple failure modes and temporal parameters. Struct Multidiscip Optim, 2018, 58(4): 1705-1717.

[23.] Abdel-Hameed M. A gamma wear process. IEEE Trans Reliab, 1975, 24(2): 152-153.

[24.] Van Noortwijk JM. A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2009, 94(1): 2-21.

[25.] Ellingwood BR, Mori Y. Probabilistic methods for condition assessment and life prediction of concrete structures in nuclear power plants. Nucl Eng Des, 1993, 142(2–3): 155-166.

[26.] Cinlar E, Osman E, Bazant ZP. Stochastic process for extrapolating concrete creep. J Eng Mech Div, 1977, 103(6): 1069-1088.

[27.] Hoffmans GJCM, Pilarczyk KW. Local scour downstream of hydraulic structures. J Hydraul Eng, 1995, 121(4): 326-340.

[28.] Van Noortwijk JM, Klatter HE. Optimal inspection decisions for the block mats of the eastern-scheldt barrier. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 1999, 65: 203-211.

[29.] Papaioannou I, Betz W, Zwirglmaier K, et al. MCMC algorithms for subset simulation. Probab Eng Mech, 2015, 41: 89-103.

[30.] Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, et al. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys, 1953, 21: 1087-1092.

[31.] Zhao YG, Ono T. A general procedure for first/second-order reliability method (FORM/SORM). Struct Safe, 1999, 21(2): 95-112.

[32.] Baumgärtner A, Binder K. Applications of the Monte Carlo method in statistical physics, 1987, Berlin: Springer

[33.] Zhang YM, He XD, Liu QL, et al. Robust reliability design of banjo flange with arbitrary distribution parameters. J Press Vessel Technol, 2005, 127(4): 408-413.

[34.] O’Connor AN. Probability distributions used in reliability engineering, 2011, Maryland: University of Maryland

[35.] Bellman RE. Adaptive control processes: a guided tour, 1961, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

[36.] International Organization for Standards ISO 6336-2-2006 calculation of load capacity of sour and helical gears-part 2: calculation of surface durability (pittings), 2006, Switzerland: International Organization for Standards

[37.] Au SK, Wang Y. Engineering risk assessment with subset simulation, 2014, New Jersey: Wiley/Blackwell.

[38.] Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind N. Methods of structural safety, 1986, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

[39.] Du XP, Chen W. Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design. J Mech Des, 1999, 122(4): 385-394.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809(U1708254)