Use of inverse stability solutions for identification of uncertainties in the dynamics of machining processes

Lutfi Taner Tunc , Orkun Ozsahin

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2018, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 308 -318.

PDF
Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2018, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 308 -318. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-018-0233-x
Article

Use of inverse stability solutions for identification of uncertainties in the dynamics of machining processes

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Research on dynamics and stability of machining operations has attracted considerable attention. Currently, most studies focus on the forward solution of dynamics and stability in which material properties and the frequency response function at the tool tip are known to predict stable cutting conditions. However, the forward solution may fail to perform accurately in cases wherein the aforementioned information is partially known or varies based on the process conditions, or could involve several uncertainties in the dynamics. Under these circumstances, inverse stability solutions are immensely useful to identify the amount of variation in the effective damping or stiffness acting on the machining system. In this paper, the inverse stability solutions and their use for such purposes are discussed through relevant examples and case studies. Specific areas include identification of process damping at low cutting speeds and variations in spindle dynamics at high rotational speeds.

Keywords

Inverse stability / Machining dynamics / High speed milling / Process damping / Spindle dynamics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lutfi Taner Tunc, Orkun Ozsahin. Use of inverse stability solutions for identification of uncertainties in the dynamics of machining processes. Advances in Manufacturing, 2018, 6(3): 308-318 DOI:10.1007/s40436-018-0233-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Taylor FW. On the art of cutting metals, 1907, New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers

[2]

Altintas Y, Budak E. Analytical prediction of stability lobes in milling. Ann CIRP, 1995, 44(1): 357-362.

[3]

Insperger T, Stepan G. Semi-discretization method for delayed systems. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 2002, 55(5): 503-518.

[4]

Tlusty J, Polacek M (1963) The stability of machine tools against self-excited vibrations in machining. Int Res Prod Eng 465–474

[5]

Das MK, Tobias SA. The relation between the static and the dynamic cutting of metals. Int J Mach Tool Des Res, 1967, 763: 89

[6]

Koenigsberger F, Tlusty J. Machine tool structures-Vol. I: stability against chatter, 1967, Oxford: Pergamon Press

[7]

Opitz H, Bernardi F. Investigation and calculation of the chatter behavior of lathes and milling machines. Ann CIRP, 1970, 18: 335-343.

[8]

Sridhar R, Hohn RE, Long GW. A stability algorithm for the general milling process: contribution to machine tool chatter research 7. J Eng Ind, 1968, 90(2): 330-334.

[9]

Minis I, Yanushevsky T, Tembo R, et al. Analysis of linear and nonlinear chatter in milling. Ann CIRP, 1990, 39: 459-462.

[10]

Tlusty J. Analysis of the state of research in cutting dynamics. Ann CIRP, 1978, 27(2): 583-589.

[11]

Sisson TR, Kegg RL. An explanation of low-speed chatter effects. ASME J Eng Ind, 1969, 91: 558-951.

[12]

Wu DW. A new approach of formulating the transfer function for dynamic cutting processes. J Eng Ind, 1984, 111: 37-47.

[13]

Budak E, Tunc LT. A new method for identification and modeling of process damping in machining. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2009, 131(5): 051019.

[14]

Rivin E. Stiffness and damping in mechanical design, 1999, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc..

[15]

Stone BJ. The state of the art in the measurement of the stiffness and damping of rolling element bearings. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 1982, 31: 529-538.

[16]

Harris TA. Rolling bearing analysis, 2001, 4 New York: Wiley

[17]

Lee CW. Vibration analysis of rotors, 1993, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

[18]

Friswell MI, Penny JET, Garvey SD, et al. Dynamics of rotating machines, 2010, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[19]

Jiang JS, Zheng S. A modeling approach for analysis and improvement of spindle-drawbar-bearing assembly dynamics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2010, 50(1): 131-142.

[20]

Kruth JP, Liu AMM, Vanherck P, et al. A strategy for selection of optimal cutting parameter in high-speed milling to avoid chatter vibration. Int J Prod Eng Comput, 2002, 4(5): 35-42.

[21]

Kilic ZM, Iglesias A, Munoa J et al (2010) Investigation of tool wear on the stability of milling process using an inverse method. In: CIRP 2nd international conference on process machine interactions, Vancouver, Canada

[22]

Suzuki N, Kurata Y, Kato T, et al. Identification of transfer function by inverse analysis of self-excited chatter vibration in milling operations. Precis Eng, 2012, 36(4): 568-575.

[23]

Cao Y, Altintas Y. A general method for the modeling of spindle-bearing systems. J Mech Des, 2004, 126(6): 1089.

[24]

Altintas Y, Cao Y. Virtual design and optimization of machine tool spindles. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 2005, 54(1): 379-382.

[25]

Lin CW, Tu JF, Kamman J. An integrated thermo-mechanical-dynamic model to characterize motorized machine tool spindles during very high-speed rotation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2003, 43(10): 1035-1050.

[26]

Tatar K, Gren P. Measurement of milling tool vibrations during cutting using laser vibrometry. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2007, 48: 380-387.

[27]

Rantatalo M, Aidanpaa JO, Göransson B, et al. Milling machine spindle analysis using FEM and non-contact spindle excitation and response measurement. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2007, 47: 1034-1045.

[28]

Zaghbani I, Songmene V. Estimation of machine-tool dynamic parameters during machining operation through operational modal analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2009, 49: 947-957.

[29]

Opitz H, Weck MC (1970) Determination of the transfer function by means of spectral density measurements and its application to dynamic investigation of machine tools under machining conditions. In: Proceedings of the 10th international MTDR conference, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester

[30]

Minis IE, Magrab EB, Pandelidis IO. Improved methods for the prediction of chatter in turning Part 1: determination of structural response parameters. Trans ASME, 1990, 112: 12-20.

[31]

Ozsahin O, Budak E, Ozguven HN. Investigating dynamics of machine tool spindles under operational conditions. Adv Mater Res, 2011, 223: 610-621.

[32]

Bediz B, Kumar U, Schmitz TL, et al. Modeling and experimentation for three-dimensional dynamics of endmills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2012, 53(1): 39-50.

[33]

Ozsahin O, Budak E, Ozguven HN. In-process tool point FRF identification under operational conditions using inverse stability solution. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2015, 89: 64-73.

[34]

Tunç LT, Budak E. Identification and modeling of process damping in milling. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng, 2013, 135(2): 021001.

Funding

TUBITAK(108M340)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

228

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/