PDF
Abstract
3D printing in additive manufacturing is considered as one of key technologies to the future high-precision manufacturing in order to benefit diverse industries in building construction, product development, biomedical innovation, etc. The increasing applications of 3D printed components depend primarily on their significant merits of reduced weight, minimum used materials, high precision and shorter production time. Furthermore, it is very crucial that such 3D printed components can maintain the same or even better material performance and product quality as those achieved by conventional manufacturing methods. This study successfully fabricated 3D printed mechanical testing samples of PLA and PLA/wood fibre composites. 3D printing parameters including infill density, layer height and the number of shells were investigated via design of experiments (DoE), among which the number of shells was determined as the most significant factor for maximising tensile strengths of PLA samples. Further, DoE work evaluated the effect of material type (i.e., neat PLA and PLA/wood fibres) and the number of shells on tensile, flexural and impact strengths of material samples. It is suggested that material type is the only predominant factor for maximising all mechanical strengths, which however are consistently lower for PLA/wood fibre composites when compared with those of neat PLA. Increasing the number of shells, on the other hand, has been found to improve almost all strength levels and decrease infill cavities.
Keywords
Additive manufacturing (AM)
/
Poly (lactic acid) (PLA)
/
Wood fibres
/
Polymer composites
/
Design of experiments (DoEs)
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Yu Dong, Jamie Milentis, Alokesh Pramanik.
Additive manufacturing of mechanical testing samples based on virgin poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA/wood fibre composites.
Advances in Manufacturing, 2018, 6(1): 71-82 DOI:10.1007/s40436-018-0211-3
| [1] |
Chen D, Heyer S, Ibbotson S, et al. Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. J Clean Prod, 2015, 107: 615-625.
|
| [2] |
Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 2014, 32: 773-785.
|
| [3] |
Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, et al. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput-Aided Des, 2015, 69: 65-89.
|
| [4] |
Li X, Cui R, Sun L, et al. 3D-printed biopolymers for tissue engineering application. Int J Polym Sci, 2014, 24: 1-13.
|
| [5] |
Patricio T, Domingos M, Gloria A, et al. Characterisation of PCL and PCL/PLA scaffolds for tissue engineering. Procedia CIRP, 2013, 5: 110-114.
|
| [6] |
Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY, et al. Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLA-based Porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2016, 57: 139-148.
|
| [7] |
Rosenzweig DH, Carelli E, Steffen T, et al. 3D-printed ABS and PLA scaffolds for cartilage and mucleus pulposus tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 2015, 16: 15118-15135.
|
| [8] |
Inzana JA, Olvera D, Fuller SM, et al. 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 4026-4034.
|
| [9] |
Bakarich SE, Gorkin IR, Panhuis MIH, et al. Three-dimensional printing fiber reinforced hydrogel composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 15998-16006.
|
| [10] |
Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R, et al. 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des, 2016, 96: 106-114.
|
| [11] |
Suwanprateeb J, Sanngam R, Suvannapruk W, et al. Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3D-printing. J Mater Sci-Mater Med, 2009, 20: 1281-1289.
|
| [12] |
Compton BG, Lewis JA. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 5930-5935.
|
| [13] |
Richter C, Lipson H. Untethered hovering flapping flight of a 3D-printed mechanical insect. Artif Life, 2011, 17: 73-86.
|
| [14] |
Park SH. Robust design and analysis for quality engineering, 1996, London: Chapman & Hall
|
| [15] |
Dong Y, Bhattacharyya D. Effect of clay type, clay/compatibiliser content and matrix viscosity on the mechanical properties of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 2008, 39: 1177-1191.
|
| [16] |
Dong Y, Bickford T, Haroosh HJ, et al. Multi-response analysis in the material characterisation of electrospun poly (lactic acid)/halloysite nanotube composite fibres based on Taguchi design of experiments: fibre diameter, non-intercalation and nucleation effects. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process, 2013, 112: 747-757.
|