Experimental study and optimization of cutting parameters in machining of super alloy with hybrid ultrasonic method

Abstract

Super alloys are intensively used in various industries, especially in the aerospace industry, because of their special characteristics. A number of holes are sometimes required to be drilled into super alloys for aircraft at their final stage assembly. In the present study, a hybrid ultrasonic machining method, called rotary ultrasonic machining (RUM), was successfully used in super alloy drilling. The empirical modeling of the process parameters of RUM was performed for the super alloy (Inconel 718) using an experimental design approach, called response surface methodology (RSM). Parameters, namely tool rotation, feed rate, ultrasonic power, and abrasive grit size, were selected as input variables. The others were kept constant. The performance was measured in terms of the machining rate and the surface roughness. The developed models were found to be reliable representatives of the experimental results with prediction errors less than ±5%. Moreover, the feed rate for the quality and productivity aspect was found to be the most critical factor. The optimized values of the machining rate and the surface roughness achieved through a multi-response optimization were 0.9 825 mm³/s and 0.951 μm, respectively.

Keywords

Super alloy / Rotary ultrasonic machining (RUM) / Ultrasonic / Roughness / Machining

References

[1] Davis JR, Associates (2000) ASM specialty handbook: nickel, cobalt, and their alloys. ASM International Handbook Committee

[2] Nalbant M, Altın A, Gokkaya H. The effect of cutting speed and cutting tool geometry on machinability properties of nickel-base Inconel 718 super alloys. Mater Des, 2007, 28: 1334-1338.

[3] Khidhir BA, Mohamed B. Machining of nickel based alloys using different cemented carbide tools. J Eng Sci Technol, 2010, 5: 264-271.

[4] Dreshfiezd RL (1970) Estimation of gamma phase composition in nickel-base superalloys (based on geometric analysis of a four-component phase diagram). Nasa technical note

[5] Zhou J, Bushlya V, Avdovic P, et al. Study of surface quality in high speed turning of Inconel 718 with uncoated and coated CBN tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2012, 58: 141-151.

[6] Bhatt A, Attia H, Vargas R, et al. Wear mechanisms of WC coated and uncoated tools in finish turning of Inconel 718. Tribol Int, 2010, 43: 1113-1121.

[7] Pei ZJ, Ferreira PM, Kapoor SG, et al. Rotary ultrasonic machining for face milling of ceramics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 1995, 35: 1033-1046.

[8] Zhang CL, Feng PF, Wu ZJ, et al. An experimental study on processing performance of rotary ultrasonic drilling of K9 glass. Adv Mater Res, 2011, 230–232: 221-225.

[9] Hu P, Zhang J, Pei ZJ, et al. Modeling of material removal rate in rotary ultrasonic machining: designed experiments. J Mater Process Technol, 2002, 129: 339-344.

[10] Lauwers B, Bleicher F, Haaf P (2010) Investigation of the process-material interaction in ultrasonic assisted grinding of ZrO₂ based ceramic materials. In: proceedings of 4th CIRP international conference on high performance cutting, 24–26 October 2010, pp 59–64

[11] Li ZC, Jiao Y, Deines TW, et al. Rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramic matrix composites: feasibility study and designed experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2005, 45: 1402-1411.

[12] Kataria R, Kumar J, Pabla BS. Experimental investigation into the hole quality in ultrasonic machining of WC-Co composite. Mater Manuf Process, 2015, 30: 921-933.

[13] Singh RP, Singhal S. Investigation of machining characteristics in rotary ultrasonic machining of alumina ceramic. Mater Manuf Process, 2016, 6914(10426914): 1176190

[14] Singh RP, Singhal S (2016) Experimental investigation of machining characteristics in rotary ultrasonic machining of quartz ceramic. J Mater Des Appl 0:1–20

[15] Singh RP, Singhal S (2016) Experimental study on rotary ultrasonic machining of alumina ceramic: microstructure analysis and multi-response optimization. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 0:1–20

[16] Churi NJ, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C. Rotary ultrasonic machining of titanium alloy: effects of machining variables. Mach Sci Technol, 2006, 10: 301-321.

[17] Zou XT. Cutting temperature in rotary ultrasonic machining of titanium: experimental study using novel Fabry-Perot fibre optic sensors. Int J Manuf Res, 2013, 8: 250-261.

[18] Lv D, Tang Y, Wang H, et al. Experimental investigations on subsurface damage in rotary ultrasonic machining of glass BK7. Mach Sci Technol, 2013, 17: 443-463.

[19] Feng Q, Cong WL, Pei ZJ, et al. Rotary ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer: feasibility study. Mach Sci Technol, 2012, 16: 380-398.

[20] Jiao Y, Liu WJ, Pei ZJ, et al. Study on edge chipping in rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramics: an integration of designed experiments and finite element method analysis. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2005, 127: 752-758.

[21] Zhang CL, Feng PF, Pei ZJ, et al. Rotary ultrasonic machining of sapphire: feasibility study and designed experiments. Key Eng Mater, 2013, 589–590: 523-528.

[22] Churi NJ, Pei ZJ, Shorter DC, et al. Rotary ultrasonic machining of silicon carbide: designed experiments. Int J Manuf Technol Manag, 2007, 12: 284-298.

[23] Debnath K, Singh I. Low-frequency modulation-assisted drilling of carbon-epoxy composite laminates. J Manuf Process, 2017, 25: 262-273.

[24] Okamura K, Sasahara H, Segawa T, et al. Low-frequency vibration drilling of titanium alloy. JSME Int J Ser C, 2006, 49: 76-82.

[25] Torres A, Luis CJ, Puertas I. Analysis of the influence of EDM parameters on surface finish, material removal rate, and electrode wear of an Inconel 600 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2015, 80: 123-140.

[26] Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 2008, New York: Wiley

[27] Pi J, Yang G, Ye F. Study on impact stress characteristics in ultrasonic cutting and brittle material removal mechanism. Adv Mater Res, 2013, 753–755: 287-297.

[28] Derringer G, Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol, 1980, 12(4): 214-219.