A differentiated approach for justification of advanced manufacturing technologies

Natalia Iakymenko, Erlend Alfnes, Maria Kollberg Thomassen

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2016, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 257-267.

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2016, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 257-267. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-016-0150-9
Article

A differentiated approach for justification of advanced manufacturing technologies

Author information +
History +

Abstract

European companies rely on advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) in order to succeed in an environment of high labour costs, increasing competition and rising customer expectations. AMT implementation is often a high-risk investment. Many companies experience a misalignment between the installed functionality and production needs. There is a need for decision support in order to take into account all possible advantages and disadvantages of the technology implementation, and ensure that the technology meets the requirements of the production processes. In this article, a differentiated technology justification approach is introduced. The approach suggests a combination of strategic, financial and risk justification methods. The recommended number and type of methods depend on the integration level of the technical system under consideration, ranging from stand-alone machines to large and integrated production systems. The approach was developed based on a literature review and a case study. The application of the approach was presented in a case where several types of pipe bending technology were evaluated.

Keywords

Automation / Advanced manufacturing / Technology selection / Technology justification / Pipe bending

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Natalia Iakymenko, Erlend Alfnes, Maria Kollberg Thomassen. A differentiated approach for justification of advanced manufacturing technologies. Advances in Manufacturing, 2016, 4(3): 257‒267 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-016-0150-9

References

[1.]
Chan F, et al. Investment appraisal techniques for advanced manufacturing technology (AMT): a literature review. Integr Manuf Syst, 2001, 12(1): 35-47.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Baldwin J, Lin Z. Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Res Policy, 2002, 31(1): 1-18.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
Goyal S, Grover S. Advanced manufacturing technology effectiveness: a review of literature and some issues. Front Mech Eng, 2012, 7(3): 256-267.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Fulton M, Hon B. Managing advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation in manufacturing SMEs. Int J Product Perform Manag, 2010, 59(4): 351-371.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Kerr C, et al. Key principles for developing industrially relevant strategic technology management toolkits. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 2013, 80(6): 1050-1070.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Small MH, Chen IJ. Economic and strategic justification of AMT inferences from industrial practices. Int J Prod Econ, 1997, 49(1): 65-75.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Small MH, Chen IJ. Investment justification of advanced manufacturing technology: an empirical analysis. J Eng Tech Manag, 1995, 12(1): 27-55.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
Small MH. Planning, justifying and installing advanced manufacturing technology: a managerial framework. J Manuf Technol Manag, 2007, 18(5): 513-537.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Small MH. Justifying investment in advanced manufacturing technology: a portfolio analysis. Ind Manag Data Syst, 2006, 106(4): 485-508.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Small MH, Yasin MM. Developing a framework for the effective planning and implementation of advanced manufacturing technology. Int J Oper Prod Manag, 1997, 17(5): 468-489.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
Suresh NC, Meredith JR. Justifying multimachine systems: an integrated strategic approach. J Manuf Syst, 1985, 4(2): 117-134.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12.]
Meredith JR, Hill MM. Justifying new manufacturing systems: a managerial approach. Sloan Manag Rev, 1987, 28(4): 49-61.
[13.]
Naik B, Chakravarty AK. Strategic acquisition of new manufacturing technology: a review and research framework. Int J Prod Res, 1992, 30(7): 1575-1601.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Slagmulder R, Bruggeman W, van Wassenhove L. An empirical study of capital budgeting practices for strategic investments in CIM technologies. Int J Prod Econ, 1995, 40(2): 121-152.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Karsak E, Tolga E. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments. Int J Prod Econ, 2001, 69(1): 49-64.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
Cescon F. Investment in new manufacturing systems: an Italian-based empirical analysis. Econ Aziend Online, 2010, 1(1): 13-26.
[17.]
Alkaraan F, Northcott D. Strategic capital investment decision-making: a role for emergent analysis tools?: a study of practice in large UK manufacturing companies. Br Account Rev, 2006, 38(2): 149-173.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
Abdel-Kader MG, Dugdale D. Investment in advanced manufacturing technology: a study of practice in large UK companies. Manag Account Res, 1998, 9(3): 261-284.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
Sarkis J, Liles DH. Using IDEF and QFD to develop an organizational decision support methodology for the strategic justification of computer-integrated technologies. Int J Proj Manag, 1995, 13(3): 177-185.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Chuang M, Yang YS, Lin CT. Production technology selection: deploying market requirements, competitive and operational strategies, and manufacturing attributes. Int J Comput Integr Manuf, 2009, 22(4): 345-355.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21.]
Almannai B, Greenough R, Kay J. A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies. Robot Comput Integr Manuf, 2008, 24(4): 501-507.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
Rosenfield DB, Beckman SL. Operations strategy: competing in the 21st century, 2008, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
[23.]
Bolwijn PT, Kumpe T. Manufacturing in the 1990s: productivity, flexibility and innovation. Long Range Plan, 1990, 23(4): 44-57.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24.]
Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R. Operations management, 2010, Harlow: Pearson Education
[25.]
Tracey M, Vonderembse MA, Lim JS. Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance. J Oper Manag, 1999, 17(4): 411-428.
CrossRef Google scholar
[26.]
Efstathiades A, Tassou S, Antoniou A. Strategic planning, transfer and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT). Development of an integrated process plan. Technovation, 2002, 22(4): 201-212.
CrossRef Google scholar
[27.]
Abdel-Kader MG, Dugdale D. Evaluating investments in advanced manufacturing technology: a fuzzy set theory approach. Br Account Rev, 2001, 33(4): 455-489.
CrossRef Google scholar
[28.]
Bayazit O. Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. J Manuf Technol Manag, 2005, 16(7): 808-819.
CrossRef Google scholar
[29.]
Ordoobadi SM, Mulvaney NJ. Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies: system-wide benefits value analysis. J Eng Tech Manag, 2001, 18(2): 157-184.
CrossRef Google scholar
[30.]
Luong LH. A decision support system for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies. Robot Comput Integr Manuf, 1998, 14(1): 45-53.
CrossRef Google scholar
[31.]
Kakati M, Dhar U. Investment justification in flexible manufacturing systems. Eng Costs Prod Econ, 1991, 21(3): 203-209.
CrossRef Google scholar
[32.]
Kaplan RS. Must CIM be justified by faith alone?, 1986, Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University
[33.]
Primrose PL. Investment in manufacturing technology, 1991, London: Chapman & Hall
[34.]
Small MH, Yasin MM. Advanced manufacturing technology: implementation policy and performance. J Oper Manag, 1997, 15(4): 349-370.
CrossRef Google scholar
[35.]
Sambasivarao K, Deshmukh S. A decision support system for selection and justification of advanced manufacturing technologies. Prod Plan Control, 1997, 8(3): 270-284.
CrossRef Google scholar
[36.]
Müller KB. Bending of extruded profiles during extrusion process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2006, 46(11): 1238-1242.
CrossRef Google scholar
[37.]
Groover MP. Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing, 2008, 3 Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Press
[38.]
Slagmulder R, Bruggeman W. Investment justification of flexible manufacturing technologies: inferences from field research. Int J Oper Prod Manag, 1992, 12(7/8): 168-186.
CrossRef Google scholar
[39.]
Lefley F, Sarkis J. Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects inthe US and UK. Int J Prod Res, 1997, 35(2): 341-368.
CrossRef Google scholar
[40.]
Lowe A, Ridgway K, Atkinson H. QFD in new production technology evaluation. Int J Prod Econ, 2000, 67(2): 103-112.
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/