Mechanical properties of U-0.95 mass fraction of Ti alloy quenching and aging treatment: a first principles study

Abstract

First principles plane wave pseudopotential method was executed to calculate the mechanical properties with respect to the uranium-0.95 mass fraction of titanium (U-0.95 mass fraction of Ti) alloy for quenching and aging, including the elastic modulus, the value of shear modulus to bulk modulus (G/B) and the ideal tensile strength. The further research has also been done about the crack mechanism through Griffith rupture energy. These results show that the elastic moduli are 195.1 GPa for quenching orthorhombic α´ phase and 201.8 GPa for aging formed Guinier-Preston (G.P) zones, while G/B values are 0.67 and 0.56, respectively. With the phase change of uranium-titanium (U-Ti) alloy via the quenching treatment, the ideal tensile strength is diverse and distinct with different crystal orientations of the anisotropic α´ phase. Comparison of quenching and short time aging treatment, both of the strength and toughness trend to improve slightly. Further analysis about electronic density of states (DOS) in the electronic scale indicates that the strength increases continuously while toughness decreases with the aging proceeding. The equilibrium structure appears in overaging process, as a result of decomposition of metastable quenching α´ phase. Thereby the strength and toughness trend to decrease slightly. Finally, the ideal fracture energies of G.P zones and overaging structure are obtained within the framework of Griffith fracture theory, which are 4.67 J/m² and 3.83 J/m², respectively. These results theoretically demonstrate strengthening effect of quenching and aging heat treatment on U-Ti alloy.

Keywords

U-0.95 mass fraction of Ti alloy / First principles / Elastic modulus / Ideal tensile strength / Electronic structure / Griffith ruptures energy

References

[1] Baschwitz R, Colombie M, Foure M. Etude du revenue des phases orthorhombiques metastables d’all-iages uranium-titane tetrant 4, 8 et 9, 5 at% de titane. J Nucl Mater, 1968, 28: 246-256.

[2] Federer JI (1969) Effect of alloy additions and heat treatments on the mechanical properties of U-0.5Ti alloy. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Contract Report, Tenn, Report No. ORNL-TM-2482

[3] Harding AG, Waldron MB (1958) Transformation in uranium alloys with high solute solubility in the B. C. C. gamma phase, part I. Preliminary observations on the “banded structure” produced by non equilibrium transformations in uranium alloys. Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, Report No. AERE-M/R-2673

[4] Anagnostides M, Colombie M, Monti H. Metastable phase in the alloys uranium-niobium. J Nucl Mater, 1964, 11: 67-76.

[5] Douglass DL. The structure and mechanical properties of uranium-titanium martensites. Trans ASM, 1961, 53: 307-319.

[6] Anagnostidis M, Baschwitz R, Colombie M. Phase metastables dans les alliages uranium-titane. Mem Sci Rev Met, 1966, 63: 163-168.

[7] Speer JG, Edmonds DV. Aging of α _a ^’ martensite in U-0.77Ti. Acta Mater, 1999, 47(7): 2197-2205.

[8] Yakel HL (1969) A Fortran-language program for plotting stereographic projections of lattice plane normals and directions. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Contract Report, Tenn, Report No. W-7405-ENG-26

[9] Hatt BA, Roberts JA. The ω-phase in zirconium base alloys. Acta Mater, 1960, 8: 575-584.

[10] Hatt BA. The orientation relationship between the gamma and alpha structures in uranium-zirconium alloys. J Nucl Mater, 1966, 19: 133-141.

[11] Stelly M (1972) Precipitation isotherme dans des alliages d’uranium-cinetique de precipitation. Commissariat a l’Energie, Atomique, Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires, Saclay, Report No. CEA-R-4326

[12] Skriver HL, Andersen OK, Johansson B. Calculated bulk properties of the actinide metals. Phys Rev Lett, 1978, 41: 42-45.

[13] Wills JM, Eriksson O. Crystal structure stabilities and electronic structure for the light actinides Th, Pa and U. Phys Rev B, 1992, 45: 13879-13890.

[14] Söderlind P, Eriksson O, Johansson B, et al. Electronic properties of f-electron metals using the generalized gradient approximation. Phys Rev B, 1994, 50: 7291-7294.

[15] Söderlind P. First-principles elastic and structural properties of uranium metal. Phys Rev B, 2002, 66: 085113.

[16] Hohenberg PC, Kohn W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev, 1964, 136: B864-B871.

[17] Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev, 1965, 140: A1133-A1138.

[18] Kresse G, Furthmuller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54(16): 11169-11186.

[19] Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865-3868.

[20] Vanderbilt D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys Rev B, 1990, 41: 7892-7895.

[21] Hill R. The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proc Phys Soc, 1952, 65: 349-354.

[22] Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B, 1976, 13: 5188-5192.

[23] Krenn CR, Roundy D, Morris JW. Ideal strengths of bcc metals. Mater Sci Eng A, 2001, 319–321: 111-114.

[24] Clatterbuck DM, Chrzan DC, Morris JW. The ideal strength of iron in tension and shear. Acta Mater, 2003, 51: 2271-2283.

[25] Chatterjee A, Niwa S, Mizukami F. Structure and property correlation for Ag deposition on α-Al₂O₃: a first principle study. J Mol Graphics Model, 2005, 23: 447-456.

[26] Gong HR. Electronic structure and related properties of Pd/TiAl membranes. Intermetallics, 2009, 17: 562-567.