Autonomous post-typhoon structural inspection and damage assessment: an agentic AI and aerial robotics-enabled model

Abstract

The increasing frequency and intensity of typhoons in recent years due to climate change has heightened the need for rapid post-disaster assessment. Inspection of post-typhoon damage is required to assess damages to critical infrastructure and facilitate disaster management. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are commonly used for the recognition of post-typhoon damage. However, existing UAVs require either to be manually teleoperated or to follow a pre-programmed flight path, which is significantly limited in terms of rapid or adaptive post-typhoon inspection. To address this critical limitation, this study introduces a novel agentic AI and aerial robotics-enabled model designed for autonomous inspection operations. We propose a three-layered conceptual framework that closes the perception–cognition–action loop, thereby enabling goal-directed mission reasoning. This framework is operationalized as the Agentic AI and UAV-enabled Autonomous Inspection and Assessment System (AAUIAS)—a comprehensive cyber-physical system architecture. Within this architecture, the core agentic AI layer independently performs world modeling, real-time damage assessment, and dynamic path replanning. The proposed model and system were evaluated through high-fidelity simulations of a typhoon-impacted urban environment. Results demonstrate that AAUIAS reduces overall inspection time by 34.5%–40.2% relative to conventional approaches, achieves robust dynamic obstacle avoidance, and intelligently prioritizes critical damage sites. This preliminary work contributes a conceptual model and system architecture, supported by simulation-based evidence, for transforming UAVs into proactive intelligent agents, thereby advancing the state of the art in autonomous disaster response and resilient infrastructure management.

Keywords

Agentic AI / Autonomous UAVs / Post-typhoon inspection / Structural damage assessment / Robotic simulation

References

[1] Agrawal, A., Cleland-Huang, J., & Steghöfer, J. P. (2020). Model-driven requirements for humans-on-the-loop multi-uav missions. In 2020 IEEE Tenth International Model-Driven Requirements Engineering (MoDRE) (pp. 1–10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MoDRE51215.2020.00007

[2] Bolat FÇ, Avci MC. Development and validation of a human-machine interface for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) control via hand gesture teleoperation. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 273 126828

[3] Bonanni, L., Meli, D., Castellini, A., & Farinelli, A. (2025). Monte Carlo tree search with velocity obstacles for safe and efficient motion planning in dynamic environments. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2501.09649. http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09649

[4] Calegari R, Ciatto G, Mascardi V, Omicini A. Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: A systematic literature review. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2021, 35(1 Article 1

[5] Chan PW, Choy CW, Chiu YY, He J. Observational study of Super Typhoon Saola in 2023 when it was close to Hong Kong. Weather, 2025, 808): 258-265

[6] Chen Y, Liu X, Zhu B, Zhu D, Zuo X, Li Q. UAV image-based 3D reconstruction technology in landslide disasters: A review. Remote Sensing, 2025, 17(17): 3117

[7] Chicaiza, F. A., Slawiñski, E., Moya, V., Carvajal, C. P., Varela-Aldás, J., & Ayala-Chauvin, M. (2025). Bilateral Rate/Position Delayed Teleoperation Control for UAVs: A Performance Evaluation. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) (pp. 139–145). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO64737.2025.11124949

[8] Endsley MR. From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human–automation research. Human Factors, 2017, 5915-27

[9] Gohari A, Ahmad AB, Rabiu L, Rahim RBA, Supa'at ASM, Elamin NIM, Muqaibel AH. A systematic review of the UAV technology usage in ASEAN. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2024, 5: 1036-1058

[10] Hamburger R, Kijewski-Correa T. Computer vision-enabled roof subassembly damage detection from hurricanes using aerial reconnaissance imagery. Natural Hazards Review, 2025, 26(1 04024057

[11] Han R, Chen S, Wang S, Zhang Z, Gao R, Hao Q, Pan J. Reinforcement learned distributed multi-robot navigation with reciprocal velocity obstacle shaped rewards. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 73): 5896-5903

[12] Hashim HA. Advances in UAV avionics systems architecture, classification and integration: A comprehensive review and future perspectives. Results in Engineering, 2025, 25 103786

[13] Hevner A, Chatterjee S. Design science research in information systems. Design research in information systems: Theory and practice. 2010Springer US922

[14] Jozi D, Shirzad-Ghaleroudkhani N, Luhadia G, Abtahi S, Gül M. Rapid post-disaster assessment of residential buildings using unmanned aerial vehicles. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 111 104707

[15] Kostopoulos G, Gkamas V, Rigou M, Kotsiantis S. Agentic AI in education: State of the art and future directions. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 1-1

[16] Lee J, Song J, Koo J, Choi S, Hwang J, Hasnain Saif SM, Li Y, Li J, Yoo J, Lee G, Seok M, Yoon S. Agentic built environments: A review. Energy and Buildings, 2025, 346 116159

[17] Li H, Madhukumar H, Methley N, Chen X, Wu Y, Parra-Ullauri J, Sharma V, Lee J, Koblitz AR, Andrews M, Liu S, Deng Y, Kolawole OY, Tassi A, Simeonidou D. Future factories with 6G: Agentic AI and cyber-physical digital twins. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2025

[18] Li X, Shi W, Zhang H, Peng C, Wu S, Tong W. The agentic-AI core: An AI-empowered mission-oriented core network for next-generation mobile telecommunications. Engineering. 2025

[19] Li X, Wang A. Forest pest monitoring and early warning using UAV remote sensing and computer vision techniques. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 401

[20] Liang X, Sheng L, Cai J. Contexts matter: Robot-aware 3D human motion prediction for agentic AI-empowered human-robot collaboration. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2025, 68 103591

[21] Liu W, Ren Y, Guo R, Kong VW, Hung AS, Zhu F, Zhang F. Slope inspection under dense vegetation using LiDAR-based quadrotors. Nature Communications, 2025, 161 7411

[22] Liu Y, Chua DK, Yeoh JK. Automated engineering analysis of crack mechanisms on building facades using UAVs. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 103 112176

[23] Lyu C, Lin S, Lynch A, Zou Y, Liarokapis M. UAV-based deep learning applications for automated inspection of civil infrastructure. Automation in Construction, 2025, 177 106285

[24] Miron Y, Navon D, Goldfracht Y, Castro DD, Klein I. Decentralized and asymmetric multi-agent learning in construction sites. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2024, 5: 1587-1599

[25] Mishra LN, Senapati B. Retail resilience engine: An agentic AI model for building reliable retail systems with test-driven development approach. IEEE Access, 2025, 131-1

[26] Murugesan S. The rise of agentic AI: Implications, concerns, and the path forward. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2025, 40(2): 8-14

[27] Pang T, Wang X, Basheer S, Guild R. Landcover-based detection of rapid impacts of extreme storm on coastal landscape. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 932 173099

[28] Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007, 24(3): 45-77

[29] Rahman A, Banerjee S, Kundu A. Path planning in disaster management scenarios. Communications in computer and information science. 2025Springer Vol. 2224

[30] Rakshith A. Voice-enabled agentic AI for autonomous supply chains: SAP execution with generative interfaces. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 2025, 10(57s): 1221-1230

[31] Ren Y, Liu Y, Ji T, Xu X. AI agents and agentic AI–navigating a plethora of concepts for future manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2025, 83: 126-133

[32] Schaefer M, Teeuw R, Day S, Zekkos D, Weber P, Meredith T, Van Westen CJ. Low-cost UAV surveys of hurricane damage in Dominica: Automated processing with co-registration of pre-hurricane imagery for change analysis. Natural Hazards, 2020, 101(3): 755-784

[33] Tang M, Wang C, Yu L, Li H. Rapid pre-typhoon safety inspection system for improving construction site resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 104 104372

[34] Tariq MU, Saqib SM, Mazhar T, Khan MA, Shahzad T, Hamam H. Edge-enabled smart agriculture model: Integrating IoT, lightweight deep learning, and agentic AI for context-aware farming. Results in Engineering, 2025, 28 107342

[35] Tulu BB, Teshome F, Ampatzidis Y, Hailegnaw NS, Bayabil HK. AgriSenAI: Automating UAV thermal and multispectral image processing for precision agriculture. SoftwareX, 2025, 30 102083

[36] Walsh KJ, McBride JL, Klotzbach PJ, Balachandran S, Camargo SJ, Holland G, Sugi M. Tropical cyclones and climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2016, 7(1): 65-89

[37] Wang C, Tang Y, Kassem MA, Chen Z. UAV application for typhoon damage assessment in construction sites. Applied Sciences, 2022, 1213 6293

[38] Wu, A. (2011). Guaranteed avoidance of unpredictable, dynamically constrained obstacles using velocity obstacle sets [Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT DSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67197

[39] Wu L, Lu W, Zou Y, An H, Wang B. Agentic artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) for just-in-time (JIT) logistics and supply chain: a case of modular construction. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 2026

[40] Zhang C, Zou Y, Wang F, Dimyadi J. Automated UAV image-to-BIM registration for planar and curved building façades using structure-from-motion and 3D surface unwrapping. Automation in Construction, 2025, 174 106148

[41] Zhang D, Tron R. Safe and stable teleoperation of quadrotor UAVs under haptic shared autonomy. Autonomous Robots, 2025, 4914

Funding

Lingnan University(SDS25A9)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)