Prediction of damage signals at inaccessible locations using a machine learning approach

Abstract

Structures are prone to damage. Identification and localization of damage at its initiation stage are extremely helpful for ensuring safety, economy, and operational benefits. A machine learning (ML) approach is helpful for this purpose, provided that high-quality and sufficient damage signals are available from a variety of locations across the structure. Such signals, generated at damage initiation, are frequently obtained using a non-destructive testing (NDT) technique, such as acoustic emission (AE), which employs the pencil lead break (PLB) method. However, PLB is not possible at inaccessible locations of the structure. Therefore, synthetic experimental signals are required for such locations. Accordingly, the present study aims to generate synthetic experimental signals from numerically simulated AE signals using an artificial neural network (ANN). Here, parameters from numerical signals serve as inputs, and the corresponding parameters of experimental signals are outputs. The most relevant signal parameters are determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). The developed model is found to perform very well, achieving an accuracy of around 99%.

Keywords

Acoustic emission (AE) techniques / Artificial neural network (ANN) / Finite element modelling / Pencil lead break (PLB) test / Aluminum plate

References

[1] Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Beresford R. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2000, 22(5): 717-727

[2] Ahmadi F, Rahbar Ranji A, Nowruzi H. Ultimate strength prediction of corroded plates with center-longitudinal crack using FEM and ANN. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 206 107281

[3] Ai L, Zhang B, Ziehl P. A transfer learning approach for acoustic emission zonal localization on steel plate-like structure using numerical simulation and unsupervised domain adaptation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 192 110216

[4] Alomari MH, Younis O, Hayajneh SMA. A predictive model for solar photovoltaic power using the Levenberg-Marquardt and Bayesian regularization algorithms and real-time weather data. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 2018, 9(1): 347-353

[5] Amozegar M, Khorasani K. An ensemble of dynamic neural network identifiers for fault detection and isolation of gas turbine engines. Neural Networks, 2016, 76: 106-121

[6] Atta M, Abd-Elhady AA, Abu-Sinna A, Sallam HEM. Prediction of failure stages for double lap joints using finite element analysis and artificial neural networks. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 97: 242-257

[7] Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Kiranyaz S, Hussein M, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ. A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 147 107077

[8] Breckenridge FR, Tschiegg CE, Greenspan M. Acoustic emission: Some applications of Lamb’s problem. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975, 57(3): 626-631

[9] Bujuru, K., & Malolan, V. (2023). Acoustic emissions signal parameter selection for training artificial neural network. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. 12 (9). https://www.ijert.org/acoustic-emissions-signal-parameter-selection-for-training-artificial-neural-network

[10] Chandrashekar G, Sahin F. A survey on feature selection methods. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2014, 40(1): 16-28

[11] Cheng L, Sun Q, Yan R, Veljkovic M, Groves RM, Yan R. Deformation stage identification in steel material using acoustic emission with a hybrid denoising method and artificial neural network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2025, 222 111805

[12] Ciaburro G, Iannace G. Machine-learning-based methods for acoustic emission testing: a review. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(20): 10476

[13] Ernst R, Zwimpfer F, Dual J. One sensor acoustic emission localization in plates. Ultrasonics, 2016, 64: 139-150

[14] Gou B, Chen Y, Xu S, Sun J, Lookman T, Salje EK, Ding X. Detecting deformation mechanisms of metals from acoustic emission signals through knowledge-driven unsupervised learning. Nature Communications, 2025, 16(1): 6877

[15] Hamstad, M. A. 2009. Some observations on Rayleigh waves and acoustic emission in thick steel plates. Journal of Acoustic Emission.

[16] Hu L, Feng P, Meng Y, Yang J. Buckling behavior analysis of prestressed CFRP-reinforced steel columns via FEM and ANN. Engineering Structures, 2021, 245 112853

[17] Kalgutkar, A. P., & Banerjee, S. 2022. Semi-analytical finite element method for the analysis of guided wave dispersion in the pre-stressed composite plates. In ASPS Conference Proceedings. 1(5):1413–1421.

[18] Kalogirou SA. Prediction of flat-plate collector performance parameters using artificial neural networks. Solar Energy, 2006, 80(3): 248-259

[19] Kumar A, Guha A, Banerjee S. Improving prediction accuracy for debonding. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2021, 40(3): 54

[20] Kundu A, Sikdar S, Eaton M, Navaratne R. A generic framework for application of machine learning in acoustic emission-based damage identification, 2020, Springer

[21] Kundu T, Pal A, Roy P, Datta AK, Topdar P. Development of a novel real-time AE source localisation technique using ANN for health monitoring of rail section: An experimental study. Structural Health Monitoring, 2024, 23(1): 479-494

[22] Lin L, Chu F. Feature extraction of AE characteristics in offshore structure model using Hilbert-Huang transform. Measurement, 2011, 44(1): 46-54

[23] Mousavi AA, Zhang C, Masri SF, Gholipour G. Damage detection and localization of a steel truss bridge model subjected to impact and white noise excitations using empirical wavelet transform neural network approach. Measurement, 2021, 185 110060

[24] Naresh M, Ramesh M, Kumar V, Pal J, Venkanna J, Jadhav AB. Comparative study of machine learning algorithms for health monitoring of benchmark buildings using multi-domain features. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2025, 26(10): 4303-4313

[25] Neves AC, González I, Leander J, Karoumi R. Structural health monitoring of bridges: A model-free ANN-based approach to damage detection. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2017, 7(5): 689-702

[26] Nguyen TA, Ly HB, Tran VQ. Investigation of ANN architecture for predicting load-carrying capacity of castellated steel beams. Complexity, 2021, 2021 6697923

[27] Ono K, Cho H, Matsuo T. Transfer functions of acoustic emission sensors. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 2008, 26: 72-90

[28] Pal A, Datta AK. Development of smart real-time fault detection approach in railway track deploying a single acoustic emission sensor data. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 2024, 12(7): 8529-8550

[29] Pal A, Datta AK. Temperature-adaptive artificial neural network model for enhanced fault detection in railway tracks using acoustic emission sensor data. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 2026, 41(1): 83-112

[30] Pao CV. Asymptotic behavior of solutions for finite-difference equations of reaction-diffusion. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1989, 144: 206-225

[31] Pollock AA. Acoustic emission inspection, 2003, ASM international

[32] Potočnik P, Misson M, Šturm R, Govekar E, Kek T. Deep feature extraction based on AE signals for the characterization of loaded carbon fiber epoxy and glass fiber epoxy composites. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(4): 1867

[33] Prathuru A, Faisal N, Steel J, Banerjee S. Application of pencil lead break (PLB) point source in the detection of interfacial defects in adhesive bonds. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2022, 41(3): 65

[34] Prosser WH, Hamstad MA, Gary J, O’Gallagher A. Finite element and plate theory modeling ofacoustic emission waveforms. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 1999, 18(3): 83-90

[35] Rather, A. I., Banerjee, S., & Laskar, A. (2024). Acoustic emission entropy: A realtime damage-sensitive metric forassessing bond deterioration in GFRP-reinforced concrete beams. In 51st Annual Review of Progress in QuantitativeNondestructive Evaluation (Vol. 88162, p. V001T09A001). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383833998

[36] Rather AI, Banerjee S, Laskar A. Comprehensive assessment and monitoring of bond deterioration in GFRP-reinforced concrete beams using guided wave and acoustic emission techniques. Structural Health Monitoring, 2025, 24(2): 1101-1121

[37] Roy P, Kiran GB, Saha N, Topdar P. Identification of damaged member in a truss structure using acoustic emission technique aided by SVM. Structural Health Monitoring, 2024,

[38] Saha N, Roy P, Topdar P. Damage detection in composites using non-destructive testing aided by ANN technique: A review. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2023, 36(12): 4997-5033

[39] Saha N, Roy P, Topdar P. Effect of damage initiation in laminated composites using piezoelectric patch: An investigation using AE technique. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2025, 95(8): 188

[40] Santos A, Figueiredo E, Silva MFM, Sales CS, Costa JCWA. Machine learning algorithms for damage detection: Kernel-based approaches. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2016, 363: 584-599

[41] Shahani AR, Setayeshi S, Nodamaie SA, Asadi MA, Rezaie S. Prediction of influence parameters on the hot rolling process using finite element method and neural network. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009, 209(4): 1920-1935

[42] Shen Z, Luo F, Qin Q, Guo L. The metamaterial sensors for multi-parameter measurement in structural health monitoring. Measurement, 2025, 245 116652

[43] Sikdar, S., Mirgal, P., Banerjee, S., & Ostachowicz, W. (2018). Acoustic emission waveform propagation and source localization in advanced sandwich composite structure. In 9th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2018). p. 143. Curran Associates. https://www.ndt.net/?id=23351

[44] Sikdar S, Liu D, Kundu A. Acoustic emission data based deep learning approach for classification and detection of damage-sources in a composite panel. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022, 228 109450

[45] Sikdar S, Ostachowicz W, Pal J. Damage-induced acoustic emission source identification in an advanced sandwich composite structure. Composite Structures, 2018, 202: 860-866

[46] Sudhakaran R, Vel Murugan V, Sivasakthivel PS, Balaji M. Prediction and optimization of depth of penetration for stainless steel gas tungsten arc welded plates using artificial neural networks and simulated annealing algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 22(3–4): 637-649

[47] Taheri E, Esgandarzadeh Fard S, Zandi Y, Samali B. Experimental and numerical investigation of an innovative method for strengthening cold-formed steel profiles in bending throughout finite element modeling and application of neural network based on feature selection method. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(11): 5242

[48] Vashista S, Agrawal A, Kaur R, Singh SK. Acoustic emission active channel intruder detection system based on machine learning. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 2025, 40(1): 1-24

[49] Xie Q, Suvarna M, Li J, Zhu X, Cai J, Wang X. Online prediction of mechanical properties of hot rolled steel plate using machine learning. Materials & Design, 2021, 197 109201

[50] Zhang G, Tang L, Liu Z, Zhou L, Liu Y, Jiang Z. Machine-learning-based damage identification methods with features derived from moving principal component analysis. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2020, 27(21): 1789-1802

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)