Prediction of Young’s modulus of rock materials by multivariate regression analysis and neuro-fuzzy model
Hasan Karakul
AI in Civil Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 3
Young’s modulus is one of the geomechanical properties used in the design phase of different rock engineering applications. Difficulties in sample preparation and the high cost of experimental equipment lead researchers to perform studies on the estimation of Young’s modulus. However, previous studies on this topic are often limited in terms of rock type and/or number of data. Therefore, a comprehensive database covering a wide variety of rock types is needed for reliable estimation of Young’s modulus. To address this deficiency, a large database including Schmidt rebound value, uniaxial compressive strength, and porosity was compiled from the literature to derive equations and models for Young’s modulus estimation. Multivariate regression analysis and adaptive-neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) were used to predict Young’s modulus of rock materials. The reliability of the derived multivariate regression equations was verified using F- and t-tests, and the equations were found to be statistically reliable. The prediction pperformance of multivariate regression analysis and neuro-fuzzy models was compared using root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The ANFIS models yielded considerably lower absolute prediction errors than the regression models. Thus, the neuro‑fuzzy method provided significantly higher prediction accuracy than the multivariate regression approach. The results indicated that the neuro-fuzzy model constructed in this study using the uniaxial compressive strength (σc), Schmidt rebound value (R), and porosity (n) as input parameters yielded the best predictions of E when compared to those predicted in some previous studies.
Young’s modulus / Schmidt rebound value / Porosity / Multivariate regression / Adaptive-neuro-fuzzy inference system
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Deere D.U., Miller R.P. 1966. Engineering classification and index properties for intact rocks. Tech Rep Air Force Weapons Lab, New Mexico (No. AFNL-TR:65–116) |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
ISRM. The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006, 2007ISRM Turkish National Group |
| [18] |
Karakul, H. 2012. Investigation of relationships between strength parameters and P-wave velocity of rocks at different saturation conditions. Dept. of Geological Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (PhD Thesis, in Turkish, unpublished) |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Lundberg S.M, Lee S.-I. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), 30. |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Tsesarsky, M. 1999. Stability of underground openings in jointed chalk rock-A case study from bell shaped caverns, Bet Guvrin National Park. MSc Thesis, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. |
| [37] |
Vasconcelos G., Lourenço P.B., Alves C.S.A., Pamplona, J. 2007. Prediction of the mechanical properties of granites by ultrasonic pulse velocity and Schmidt hammer hardness. In: North American Masonry Conference. pp 981–991. |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |