Full-Length FUS Protein Condensates Adopt a Domain-Preferential Spatial Architecture

Si-Cheng Tong , Yang Jiang , Yi-Nan Guo , Yong Wang , Li Zhao , Zhong-Yuan Lu

Aggregate ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (12) : e70205

PDF
Aggregate ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (12) :e70205 DOI: 10.1002/agt2.70205
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Full-Length FUS Protein Condensates Adopt a Domain-Preferential Spatial Architecture
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Biomolecular condensates play crucial roles in cellular physiology and are implicated in neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. However, the mechanisms governing their formation and spatial organization remain poorly understood, largely due to technical challenges. Here, using FUS as a paradigmatic system, we reveal how single-protein sequences determine condensate architecture that is intrinsically linked to biological function. We demonstrate a domain-specific preferential distribution organization: the low-complexity domain (LCD), which drives condensate formation, localizes to the inner layer, while the RNA recognition motif (RRM) preferentially occupies the interfacial layer. This spatial arrangement enhances RNA-binding accessibility, suggesting a direct structure–function relationship. We further propose a sequence–structure–function paradigm for biomolecular condensates: through the cooperation emerging from multiple “stickers,” individual domains function as integrated units in shaping the structure and functionality of biomolecular condensates, which may represent a broader mode of protein–protein interaction (PPI) within condensates. Our findings elucidate the evolutionary logic of protein sequences in driving liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and provide a foundation for designing therapeutics targeting aberrant condensates in disease.

Keywords

condensate / FUS / LLPS

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Si-Cheng Tong, Yang Jiang, Yi-Nan Guo, Yong Wang, Li Zhao, Zhong-Yuan Lu. Full-Length FUS Protein Condensates Adopt a Domain-Preferential Spatial Architecture. Aggregate, 2025, 6(12): e70205 DOI:10.1002/agt2.70205

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

B. A. Gibson, L. K. Doolittle, M. W. G. Schneider, et al., “Organization of Chromatin by Intrinsic and Regulated Phase Separation,” Cell 179 (2019): 470–484, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.037.

[2]

A. G. Larson, D. Elnatan, M. M. Keenen, et al., “Liquid Droplet Formation by HP1α Suggests a Role for Phase Separation in Heterochromatin,” Nature 547 (2017): 236–240, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22822.

[3]

S. Sanulli, M. J. Trnka, V. Dharmarajan, et al., “HP1 Reshapes Nucleosome Core to Promote Phase Separation of Heterochromatin,” Nature 575 (2019): 390–394, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1669-2.

[4]

A. Boija, I. A. Klein, B. R. Sabari, et al., “Transcription Factors Activate Genes Through the Phase-Separation Capacity of Their Activation Domains,” Cell 175 (2018): 1842–1855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.042.

[5]

S. Chong, C. Dugast-Darzacq, Z. Liu, et al., “Imaging Dynamic and Selective Low-Complexity Domain Interactions That Control Gene Transcription,” Science 361 (2018): eaar2555, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar2555.

[6]

Y. Lu, T. Wu, O. Gutman, et al., “Phase Separation of TAZ Compartmentalizes the Transcription Machinery to Promote Gene Expression,” Nature Cell Biology 22 (2020): 453–464, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-020-0485-0.

[7]

B. R. Sabari, A. Dall'Agnese, A. Boija, et al., “Coactivator Condensation at Super-Enhancers Links Phase Separation and Gene Control,” Science 361 (2018): eaar3958, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3958.

[8]

X. Su, J. A. Ditlev, E. Hui, et al., “Phase Separation of Signaling Molecules Promotes T Cell Receptor Signal Transduction,” Science 352 (2016): 595–599, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9964.

[9]

W. Xie, L. Lama, C. Adura, et al., “Human cGAS Catalytic Domain Has an Additional DNA-Binding Interface That Enhances Enzymatic Activity and Liquid-Phase Condensation,” Proceedings National Academy of Science of the United States of America 116 (2019): 11946–11955, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905013116.

[10]

S. Wang, T. Dai, Z. Qin, et al., “Targeting Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Promotes Innate Antiviral Immunity by Elevating MAVS Activity,” Nature Cell Biology 23 (2021): 718–732, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00710-0.

[11]

X. Yu, L. Zhang, J. Shen, et al., “The STING Phase-Separator Suppresses Innate Immune Signalling,” Nature Cell Biology 23 (2021): 330–340, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00659-0.

[12]

S. Mehta and J. Zhang, “Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation Drives Cellular Function and Dysfunction in Cancer,” Nature Reviews Cancer 22 (2022): 239–252, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-022-00444-7.

[13]

C. Gao, J. Gu, H. Zhang, et al., “Hyperosmotic-Stress-Induced Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of ALS-Related Proteins in the Nucleus,” Cell Reports 40 (2022): 111086, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111086.

[14]

A. Ishiguro and A. Ishihama, “ALS-Linked TDP-43 Mutations Interfere With the Recruitment of RNA Recognition Motifs to G-Quadruplex RNA,” Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 5982, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33172-5.

[15]

Q. Xu, Y. Ma, Y. Sun, D. Li, X. Zhang, and C. Liu, “Protein Amyloid Aggregate: Structure and Function,” Aggregate 4 (2023): e333, https://doi.org/10.1002/agt2.333.

[16]

B. Wang, L. Zhang, T. Dai, et al., “Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation in Human Health and Diseases,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6 (2021): 290, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00678-1.

[17]

M. Du and Z. J. Chen, “DNA-Induced Liquid Phase Condensation of cGAS Activates Innate Immune Signaling,” Science 361 (2018): 704–709, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1022.

[18]

S. Lu, Q. Ye, D. Singh, et al., “The SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Phosphoprotein Forms Mutually Exclusive Condensates With RNA and the Membrane-Associated M Protein,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 502, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20768-y.

[19]

P. Li, S. Banjade, H. C. Cheng, et al., “Phase Transitions in the Assembly of Multivalent Signalling Proteins,” Nature 483 (2012): 336–340, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10879.

[20]

C. P. Brangwynne, C. R. Eckmann, D. S. Courson, et al., “Germline P Granules Are Liquid Droplets That Localize by Controlled Dissolution/Condensation,” Science 324 (2009): 1729–1732, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172046.

[21]

P. Yang, C. Mathieu, R. M. Kolaitis, et al., “G3BP1 Is a Tunable Switch That Triggers Phase Separation to Assemble Stress Granules,” Cell 181 (2020): 325–345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.046.

[22]

J. Guillen-Boixet, A. Kopach, A. S. Holehouse, et al., “RNA-Induced Conformational Switching and Clustering of G3BP Drive Stress Granule Assembly by Condensation,” Cell 181 (2020): 346–361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.049.

[23]

S. Boeynaems, A. S. Holehouse, V. Weinhardt, et al., “Spontaneous Driving Forces Give Rise to Protein–RNA Condensates With Coexisting Phases and Complex Material Properties,” Proceedings National Academy of Science of the United States of America 116 (2019): 7889–7898, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821038116.

[24]

T. Kaur, M. Raju, I. Alshareedah, R. B. Davis, D. A. Potoyan, and P. R. Banerjee, “Sequence-Encoded and Composition-Dependent Protein-RNA Interactions Control Multiphasic Condensate Morphologies,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 872, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21089-4.

[25]

T. Lu and E. Spruijt, “Multiphase Complex Coacervate Droplets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 2905–2914, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b11468.

[26]

W. Guo, F. Chen, A. B. Kinghorn, et al., “Pentose Sugars Encode Sequence-Dependent DNA-RNA Segregation for Biomimetic Multiphase Condensates,” BioRxiv (2025): 656378.

[27]

S. Ye, A. P. Latham, Y. Tang, et al., “Micropolarity Governs the Structural Organization of Biomolecular Condensates,” Nature Chemical Biology 20 (2024): 443–451, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01477-1.

[28]

M. Farag, S. R. Cohen, W. M. Borcherds, A. Bremer, T. Mittag, and R. V. Pappu, “Condensates Formed by Prion-Like Low-Complexity Domains Have Small-World Network Structures and Interfaces Defined by Expanded Conformations,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 7722, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35370-7.

[29]

M. R. Jensen, M. Zweckstetter, J. R. Huang, and M. Blackledge, “Exploring Free-Energy Landscapes of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins at Atomic Resolution Using NMR Spectroscopy,” Chemical Reviews 114 (2014): 6632–6660, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400688u.

[30]

R. Damman, S. Schutz, Y. Luo, M. Weingarth, R. Sprangers, and M. Baldus, “Atomic-Level Insight Into mRNA Processing Bodies by Combining Solid and Solution-State NMR Spectroscopy,” Nature Communications 10 (2019): 4536, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12402-3.

[31]

M. Kar, F. Dar, T. J. Welsh, et al., “Phase-Separating RNA-Binding Proteins Form Heterogeneous Distributions of Clusters in Subsaturated Solutions,” Proceedings National Academy of Science of the United States of America 119 (2022): e2202222119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202222119.

[32]

A. S. Holehouse, G. M. Ginell, D. Griffith, and E. Boke, “Clustering of Aromatic Residues in Prion-Like Domains Can Tune the Formation, State, and Organization of Biomolecular Condensates,” Biochemistry 60 (2021): 3566–3581, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00465.

[33]

E. W. Martin, A. S. Holehouse, I. Peran, et al., “Valence and Patterning of Aromatic Residues Determine the Phase Behavior of Prion-Like Domains,” Science 367 (2020): 694–699, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8653.

[34]

Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, “Liquid Phase Condensation in Cell Physiology and Disease,” Science 357 (2017): eaaf4382, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4382.

[35]

S. F. Banani, H. O. Lee, A. A. Hyman, and M. K. Rosen, “Biomolecular Condensates: Organizers of Cellular Biochemistry,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 18 (2017): 285–298, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.7.

[36]

S. Alberti, A. Gladfelter, and T. Mittag, “Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates,” Cell 176 (2019): 419–434, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035.

[37]

T. Mittag and R. V. Pappu, “A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Phase Separation and Addressing Open Questions and Challenges,” Molecular Cell 82 (2022): 2201–2214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.018.

[38]

A. C. Murthy, G. L. Dignon, Y. Kan, et al., “Molecular Interactions Underlying Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of the FUS Low-Complexity Domain,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 26 (2019): 637–648, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0250-x.

[39]

A. S. Singatulina, L. Hamon, M. V. Sukhanova, et al., “PARP-1 Activation Directs FUS to DNA Damage Sites to Form PARG-Reversible Compartments Enriched in Damaged DNA,” Cell Reports 27 (2019): 1809–1821, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.031.

[40]

M. Farag, W. M. Borcherds, A. Bremer, T. Mittag, and R. V. Pappu, “Phase Separation of Protein Mixtures Is Driven by the Interplay of Homotypic and Heterotypic Interactions,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 5527, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41274-x.

[41]

F. Luo, X. Gui, H. Zhou, et al., “Atomic Structures of FUS LC Domain Segments Reveal Bases for Reversible Amyloid Fibril Formation,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 25 (2018): 341–346, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-018-0050-8.

[42]

R. F. Berkeley, M. Kashefi, and G. T. Debelouchina, “Real-Time Observation of Structure and Dynamics During the Liquid-to-Solid Transition of FUS LC,” Biophysical Journal 120 (2021): 1276–1287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.008.

[43]

Z. Monahan, V. H. Ryan, A. M. Janke, et al., “Phosphorylation of the FUS Low-Complexity Domain Disrupts Phase Separation, Aggregation, and Toxicity,” EMBO Journal 36 (2017): 2951–2967, https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201696394.

[44]

A. Bah and J. D. Forman-Kay, “Modulation of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Function by Post-Translational Modifications,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 291 (2016): 6696–6705, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R115.695056.

[45]

M. Li, G. Chen, and Z. Zhang, “Modeling the Effects of Phosphorylation on Phase Separation of the FUS Low-Complexity Domain,” Biophysical Journal 122 (2023): 2636–2645, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2023.05.018.

[46]

T. A. Shelkovnikova, H. K. Robinson, J. A. Southcombe, N. Ninkina, and V. L. Buchman, “Multistep Process of FUS Aggregation in the Cell Cytoplasm Involves RNA-Dependent and RNA-Independent Mechanisms,” Human Molecular Genetics 23 (2014): 5211–5226, https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu243.

[47]

F. Svetoni, P. Frisone, and M. P. Paronetto, “Role of FET Proteins in Neurodegenerative Disorders,” RNA Biology 13 (2016): 1089–1102, https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2016.1211225.

[48]

B. R. Levone, S. C. Lenzken, M. Antonaci, et al., “FUS-Dependent Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation Is Important for DNA Repair Initiation,” Journal of Cell Biology 220 (2021): e202008030, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202008030.

[49]

Y. Li, R. Tian, H. Shi, J. Xu, T. Wang, and J. Liu, “Protein Assembly: Controllable Design Strategies and Applications in Biology,” Aggregate 4 (2023): e317, https://doi.org/10.1002/agt2.317.

[50]

M. Altmeyer, K. J. Neelsen, F. Teloni, et al., “Liquid Demixing of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Is Seeded by Poly(ADP-Ribose),” Nature Communications 6 (2015): 8088, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9088.

[51]

F. E. Loughlin, P. J. Lukavsky, T. Kazeeva, et al., “The Solution Structure of FUS Bound to RNA Reveals a Bipartite Mode of RNA Recognition With Both Sequence and Shape Specificity,” Molecular Cell 73 (2019): 490–504, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.012.

[52]

T. Yoshizawa, R. Ali, J. Jiou, et al., “Nuclear Import Receptor Inhibits Phase Separation of FUS Through Binding to Multiple Sites,” Cell 173 (2018): 693–705, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.003.

[53]

L. Guo, H. J. Kim, H. Wang, et al., “Nuclear-Import Receptors Reverse Aberrant Phase Transitions of RNA-Binding Proteins With Prion-Like Domains,” Cell 173 (2018): 677–692, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.002.

[54]

G. Tesei, T. K. Schulze, R. Crehuet, and K. Lindorff-Larsen, “Accurate Model of Liquid–Liquid Phase Behavior of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins From Optimization of Single-Chain Properties,” Proceedings National Academy of Science of the United States of America 118 (2021): e2111696118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111696118.

[55]

J. Wang, J. M. Choi, A. S. Holehouse, et al., “A Molecular Grammar Governing the Driving Forces for Phase Separation of Prion-Like RNA Binding Proteins,” Cell 174 (2018): 688–699, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006.

[56]

A. C. Murthy, W. S. Tang, N. Jovic, et al., “Molecular Interactions Contributing to FUS SYGQ LC-RGG Phase Separation and Co-Partitioning With RNA Polymerase II Heptads,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 28 (2021): 923–935, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00677-4.

[57]

F. M. Kelley, A. Ani, E. G. Pinlac, et al., “Controlled and Orthogonal Partitioning of Large Particles Into Biomolecular Condensates,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 3521, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58900-5.

[58]

N. A. Erkamp, M. Farag, Y. Qiu, et al., “Differential Interactions Determine Anisotropies at Interfaces of RNA-Based Biomolecular Condensates,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 3463, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58736-z.

[59]

F. M. Kelley, B. Favetta, R. M. Regy, J. Mittal, and B. S. Schuster, “Amphiphilic Proteins Coassemble Into Multiphasic Condensates and Act as Biomolecular Surfactants,” Proceedings National Academy of Science of the United States of America 118 (2021): e2109967118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109967118.

[60]

M. V. Sukhanova, R. O. Anarbaev, E. A. Maltseva, D. Pastre, and O. I. Lavrik, “FUS Microphase Separation: Regulation by Nucleic Acid Polymers and DNA Repair Proteins,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23 (2022): 13200, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113200.

[61]

G. Raos and G. Allegra, “Chain Collapse and Phase Separation in Poor-Solvent Polymer Solutions: A Unified Molecular Description,” Journal of Chemical Physics 104 (1996): 1626–1645, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470750.

[62]

J. M. Choi, A. A. Hyman, and R. V. Pappu, “Generalized Models for Bond Percolation Transitions of Associative Polymers,” Physical Review E 102 (2020): 042403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.042403.

[63]

A. Bremer, M. Farag, W. M. Borcherds, et al., “Deciphering How Naturally Occurring Sequence Features Impact the Phase Behaviours of Disordered Prion-Like Domains,” Nature Chemistry 14 (2022): 196–207, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00840-w.

[64]

D. T. Murray, M. Kato, Y. Lin, et al., “Structure of FUS Protein Fibrils and Its Relevance to Self-Assembly and Phase Separation of Low-Complexity Domains,” Cell 171 (2017): 615–627, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.048.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Aggregate published by SCUT, AIEI, and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/