Conservation versus commodification: synthesizing stakeholders’ perceptions of the blue carbon credit ecosystem

Farhah N. Rosli , Raja Yana , Mohammad Rozaimi

Anthropocene Coasts ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 34

PDF
Anthropocene Coasts ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 34 DOI: 10.1007/s44218-025-00105-w
Topical Communications
brief-report

Conservation versus commodification: synthesizing stakeholders’ perceptions of the blue carbon credit ecosystem

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Conservation of blue carbon (BC) ecosystems, consisting of both the vegetation and the subsoil thereof, has historically lagged behind terrestrial forests due in part to their scientific, socio-economic, and political incongruities. Private buy-in and a whole-of-society approach is necessary to catalyze conservation. However, the involvement of diverse stakeholders begs the question: is conservation their true aim? Or has the commodification of carbon formed a disconnect between monetization and protection of BC ecosystems? In this paper, we present a conceptual link among stakeholders of BC projects and their roles across the project stages, synthesized from semi-structured interviews among actors within the BC credit ecosystem. Thirteen stakeholder categories are identified, with involvement spanning eight project stages from pre-feasibility studies to carbon credit retirement. Stakeholders closer to the supply-side of credits are more aware of conservation but need further awareness of the carbon credit cycle and vice versa for the demand-side. Overall, our findings indicate that conservation is secondary to commodification for most stakeholders. The project developer is the main actor that interacts with and is cognizant of the roles of other stakeholders, thereby having decision-making power in steering participation levels of other stakeholders. It became apparent that the project developer has broad-reaching consequences over the outcomes of the carbon project, implying that their perceptions and receptions regarding commodification versus conservation matters the most. We put forth the following recommendations for better governance of BC projects, amongst others: establishment of nationwide legal frameworks, improved participation of local communities, and institutional accreditation of stakeholders.

Keywords

Carbon projects / Carbon markets / Nature-based solutions / Payment for ecosystem services / Project lifecycle

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Farhah N. Rosli, Raja Yana, Mohammad Rozaimi. Conservation versus commodification: synthesizing stakeholders’ perceptions of the blue carbon credit ecosystem. Anthropocene Coasts, 2025, 8(1): 34 DOI:10.1007/s44218-025-00105-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adhikari B, Maskey G, Khatri D. REDD+ and community forestry in Nepal: strengthening or paralysing decentralised governance?. J Forest Livelihood, 2018, 16(1): 35-55.

[2]

Ayostina I, Napitupulu L, Robyn B, Maharani C, Murdiyarso D. Network analysis of blue carbon governance process in Indonesia. Mar Policy, 2022.

[3]

Badgley G, Freema J, Hamman JJ, Haya B, Trugman AT, Anderegg WRL, Cullenward D. Systematic over-crediting in California’s forest carbon offsets program. Glob Chang Biol, 2022, 28(4): 1433-1445.

[4]

Barbier EB, Cox M. Does economic development lead to mangrove loss? A cross-country analysis. Contemp Econ Policy, 2008, 21(4): 418-432.

[5]

Betz R, Michaelowa A, Castro P, Kotsch R, Mehling M, Michaelowa K, Baranzini A. The carbon market challenge. Cambridge University Press, 2022.

[6]

Black SJ (2018) Carbon markets under the Kyoto protocol: lessons learned for building an international carbon market under the Paris agreement. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/650081545377054720/Carbon-Markets-Under-the-Kyoto-Protocol-Lessons-Learned-for-Building-an-International-Carbon-Market-Under-the-Paris-Agreement

[7]

Broughel J (2023) The dangers of government efforts to monetize nature. Forbes. Retrieved 10 June 2025 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesbroughel/2023/08/10/the-dangers-of-government-efforts-to-monetize-nature/

[8]

Chartier A, Demaze M. Hybridizations and reconfigurations in the roles of actors in voluntary carbon offsetting. Local Environ, 2022, 27(8): 1007-1028.

[9]

Dahdouh-Guebas F, Ajonina GN, Amir AA, Andradi-Brown DA, Aziz I, Balke T, Barbier EB, Cannicci S, Cragg SM, Cunha-Lignon M, Curnick DJ, Duarte CM, Duke NC, Endsor C, Fratini S, Feller IC, Fromard F, Hugé J, Huxham M, Kairo JG, Kajita T, Kathiresan K, Koedam N, Lee SY, Lin H-J, Mackenzie JR, Mangora MM, Marchand C, Meziane T, Minchinton TE, Pettorelli N, Polanía J, Polgar G, Poti M, Primavera J, Quarto A, Rog SM, Satyanarayana B, Schaeffer-Novelli Y, Spalding M, Van der Stocken T, Wodehouse D, Yong JWH, Zimmer M, Friess DA. Public perceptions of mangrove forests matter for their conservation. Front Mar Sci, 2020, 7: 603651.

[10]

Delacote P, L’Horty T, Kontoleon A, West TAP, Creti A, Filewod B, LeVelly G, Guizar-Coutiño A, Groom B, Elias M. Strong transparency required for carbon credit mechanisms. Nat Sustain, 2024, 7(6): 706-713.

[11]

Dixit S, Bardiya S. Carbon trading in developing economies: challenges, opportunities, and best practices. Int J Multidiscp Res, 2024, 6(6): 1-5.

[12]

Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci, 2011, 4(5): 293-297.

[13]

Duncan C, Primavera JH, Hill NAO, Wodehouse DCJ, Koldewey HJ. Potential for return on investment in rehabilitation-oriented blue carbon projects: accounting methodologies and project strategies. Front Forests Glob Change, 2022, 4: 775341.

[14]

Ewane EB, Selvam PP, Al-Mealla R, Watt MS, Arachchige PSP, Bomfim B, Wan MohdJaafar WS, Salehian S, Ali T, Manickam N, Abdullah MM, Westover S, Mohan M. Mangrove-based carbon market projects: what stakeholders need to address during pre-feasibility assessment. J Environ Manage, 2025, 374: 124074.

[15]

Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace (2025) State of the voluntary carbon market 2025. Forest Trends Association, Washington, DC. https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/2025-state-of-the-voluntary-carbon-market/

[16]

Friess DA, Gatt YM, Ahmad R, Brown BM, Sidik F, Wodehouse D. Achieving ambitious mangrove restoration targets will need a transdisciplinary and evidence-informed approach. One Earth, 2022, 5(5): 456-460.

[17]

Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?. Field Methods, 2006, 18(1): 59-82.

[18]

Hajjar R, Molnar A (2015) Decentralization and community based approaches. In: Forests, business and sustainability (pp. 132–152). Taylor and Francis. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315771397-8/decentralization-community-based-approaches-reem-hajjar-augusta-molnar

[19]

Hamilton SE, Friess DA. Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012. Nat Clim Chang, 2018, 8(3): 240-244.

[20]

He Y, Hu Y, Xie S, Li C, Xu M, Chen X (2022) Risk and impacts associated with marine carbon sink projects: an example from Guangdong, China. J Coast Res 39(2). https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-22-00041.1

[21]

Ingalls ML, Dwyer MB. Missing the forest for the trees? Navigating the trade-offs between mitigation and adaptation under REDD. Clim Change, 2016, 136(2): 353-366.

[22]

Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (2024) Core carbon principles assessment framework: version 1.1. https://icvcm.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CCP-Book-V1.1-FINAL-LowRes-15May24.pdf

[23]

International Finance Corporation (2023) Deep blue: opportunities for blue carbon finance in coastal ecosystems. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC. https://www.ifc.org/content/dam/ifc/doc/2023-delta/deep-blue-opportunities-for-blue-carbon-finance-in-coastal-ecosystems-optimized.pdf

[24]

Jaffer S, Dales M, Ferris P, Swinfield T, Sorensen D, Message R, Keshav S, Madhavapeddy A (2024) Global, robust and comparable digital carbon assets. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.1458

[25]

Jennerjahn, TC, Ardli, ER, Boy J, Heyde J, Lukas MC, Nordhaus I, Sastranegara MH, Máñez KS, & Yuwono E (2021) Mangrove ecosystems under threat in Indonesia. In: Jennerjahn TC, Rixen T, Irianto HE, Samiaji J (eds) Science for the Protection of Indonesian Coastal Ecosystems (SPICE), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 251–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815050-4.00004-3

[26]

Johnson TP (2014) Snowball sampling: introduction. In: Wiley StatsRef: statistics reference online. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat05720

[27]

Koh LP, Zeng Y, Sarira TV, Siman K. Carbon prospecting in tropical forests for climate change mitigation. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 1271.

[28]

Kumari P, Singh JK, Pathak B (2020) Potential contribution of multifunctional mangrove resources and its conservation. In: Patra JK, Mishra RR, Thatoi H (eds) Biotechnological Utilization of Mangrove Resources Academic Press, Oxford, pp 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819532-1.00001-9

[29]

Lee SL, Chee SY, Huxham M, Jamilah M, Choo J, Kaur CR, Amir AA, Ooi JLS, Rozaimi M, Omar H, Sharma S, Moritz M, Then AYH. Blue carbon ecosystems in Malaysia – status, threats, and the way forward for research and policy. J Environ Dev, 2025, 34(1): 225-265.

[30]

Li M, Trencher G, Asuka J. The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: a mismatch between discourse, actions and investments. PLoS One, 2022, 17(2): e0263596.

[31]

Macreadie PI, Nielsen DA, Kelleway JJ, Atwood TB, Seymour JR, Petrou K, Connolly RM, Thomson ACG, Trevathan-Tackett SM, Ralph PJ. Can we manage coastal ecosystems to sequester more blue carbon?. Front Ecol Environ, 2017, 15(4): 206-213.

[32]

Macreadie PI, Robertson AI, Spinks B, Adams MP, Atchison JM, Bell-James J, Bryan BA, Chu L, Filbee-Dexter K, Drake L, Duarte CM, Friess DA, Gonzalez F, Grafton RQ, Helmstedt KJ, Kaebernick M, Kelleway J, Kendrick GA, Kennedy H, Lovelock CE, Megonigal JP, Maher DT, Pidgeon E, Rogers AA, Sturgiss R, Trevathan-Tackett SM, Wartman M, Wilson KA, Rogers K. Operationalizing marketable blue carbon. One Earth, 2022, 5(5): 485-492.

[33]

Males J, Michaelowa A, Honegger M, Poralla M, Winkler M, Dalfiume S, Nayak A (2023) International carbon markets for carbon dioxide removal. PLoS Climate 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000118

[34]

Maron M, von Hase A, Quétier F, Sonter LJ, Theis S, zu Ermgassen SOSE. Biodiversity offsets, their effectiveness and their role in a nature positive future. Nat Rev Biodivers, 2025.

[35]

Martin-Ortega J, Mesa-Jurado MA, Pineda-Vazquez M, Novo P (2019) Nature commodification: ‘a necessary evil’? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches. Ecosyst Serv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100926

[36]

McLeod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S, Salm R, Björk M, Duarte CM, Lovelock CE, Schlesinger WH, Silliman BR. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ, 2011, 9(10): 552-560.

[37]

Michaelowa A, Shishlov I, Brescia D. Evolution of international carbon markets: lessons for the Paris agreement. Wires Clim Change, 2019, 10(6): e613.

[38]

Miller MA, Tonoto P. Leveraging plural valuations of mangroves for climate interventions in Indonesia. Sustain Sci, 2023, 18(3): 1533-1547.

[39]

Nellemann C, Corcoran E, Duarte CM, Valdés L, De Young C, Fonseca L, Grimsditch G (2009) Blue carbon. A rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal

[40]

Nijamdeen TWGFM, Peruzzo S, Kodikara KAS, Ratsimbazafy HA, Nijamdeen TWGFA, Thahira T, Sajeevan T, Kugathasan D, Hugé J, Dahdouh-Guebas F. Stakeholder perceptions in mangrove management in the Jaffna Peninsula, Sri Lanka. Forest Policy Econ, 2024, 164: 103236.

[41]

Parker L (2010). Climate change and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS): looking to 2020. In: The European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme: climate and aviation considerations, pp 1–28. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R41049.pdf

[42]

Pendleton L, Donato DC, Murray BC, Crooks S, Jenkins WA, Sifleet S, Craft C, Fourqurean JW, Kauffman JB, Marba N, Megonigal P, Pidgeon E, Herr D, Gordon D, Baldera A. Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS One, 2012, 7(9): e43542.

[43]

Perera NS, Costa MDP, Macreadie PI, Wartman M. Trends in market-based blue carbon projects. Sustain Dev, 2024.

[44]

Rau EP, Gross J, Coomes DA, Swinfield T, Madhavapeddy A, Balmford A, Keshav S. Mitigating risk of credit reversal in nature-based climate solutions by optimally anticipating carbon release. Carbon Manag, 2024, 15(1): 2390854.

[45]

Rozaimi M, Zainee NFA, Raynusha C, Arina N, Hidayah N, Hengjie T, Tangang F. Carbon and nitrogen deposits of macroalgal origin on a tropical seagrass meadow. Ecosyst Health Sustain, 2024, 10: 0157.

[46]

Scheidel A, Work C. Forest plantations and climate change discourses: new powers of ‘green’ grabbing in Cambodia. Land Use Policy, 2018, 77: 9-18.

[47]

Schlosser W, Schlosser B. Carbon as a commodity, retention as a service. J for Bus Res, 2023, 2(1): 68-84.

[48]

Schneider L, La Hoz Theuer S. Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris agreement. Clim Policy, 2018, 19(3): 386-400.

[49]

Schwerdtner Manez K, Clifton J. Biodiversity credits: a new currency to support nature conservation?. Oryx, 2025.

[50]

Scorzelli R, Murgante B, Manganelli B, Scorza F (2024) SEEA and ecosystem services accounting: a promising framework for territorial governance innovation. In: Lecture notes in civil engineering, pp 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54096-7_8

[51]

Seddon N. Harnessing the potential of nature-based solutions for mitigating and adapting to climate change. Science, 2022, 376(6600): 1410-1416.

[52]

Smessaert J, Missemer A, Levrel H. The commodification of nature, a review in social sciences. Ecol Econ, 2020, 172: 106624.

[53]

Smits M. The new (fragmented) geography of carbon market mechanisms: governance challenges from Thailand and Vietnam. Glob Environ Polit, 2017, 17(3): 69-90.

[54]

Sundstrom A. Understanding illegality and corruption in forest governance. J Environ Manage, 2016, 181: 779-790.

[55]

Swinfield T, Toye Scott E (2025) Scientific credibility for high-integrity voluntary carbon markets. Cambridge Open Engage. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-f0j70-v2

[56]

The Economist (2017) Defining emerging markets. Retrieved 3 March 2025 from https://www.economist.com/special-report/2017/10/05/defining-emerging-markets

[57]

Vanderklift MA, Marcos-Martinez R, Butler JRA, Coleman M, Lawrence A, Prislan H, Steven ADL, Thomas S. Constraints and opportunities for market-based finance for the restoration and protection of blue carbon ecosystems. Mar Policy, 2019, 107: 103429.

[58]

Vanderklift MA, Herr D, Lovelock CE, Murdiyarso D, Raw JL, Steven ADL. A guide to international climate mitigation policy and finance frameworks relevant to the protection and restoration of blue carbon ecosystems. Front Mar Sci, 2022, 9: 872064.

[59]

Verra (2022) VCS program guide (version 4.1). https://stg.verra.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/VCS-Program-Guide-v4.2.pdf

[60]

World Bank (2024) State and trends of carbon pricing 2024

[61]

World Economic Forum (2020) What are carbon credits and how can they help fight climate change? Retrieved 3 March 2025 from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/11/carbon-credits-what-how-fight-climate-change/

[62]

World Wildlife Fund (2020) First things first: avoid, reduce … and only after that–compensate. Retrieved 2 March 2025 from https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?362819/First-Things-First-Avoid-Reduce--and-only-after-thatCompensate

[63]

Yang X, Zhang C, Yang Y, Wang W, Wagan ZA. A new risk measurement method for China’s carbon market. Int J Finance Econ, 2020, 27(1): 1280-1290.

[64]

Zimmer M, Ajonina GN, Amir AA, Cragg SM, Crooks S, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Duke NC, Fratini S, Friess DA, Helfer V, Huxham M, Kathiresan K, Kodikara KAS, Koedam N, Lee SY, Mangora MM, Primavera J, Satyanarayana B, Yong JWH, Wodehouse D. When nature needs a helping hand: different levels of human intervention for mangrove (re-) establishment. Front Forests Glob Change, 2022, 5: 784322.

Funding

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia(GUP-2023-014)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

164

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/