Textural characteristics of foreshore sediments in Wildwood and Cape May beaches, New Jersey: implications for beach renourishment and habitat restoration
Divomi Balasuriya , Greg Pope , Jesse Kolodin
Anthropocene Coasts ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 24
Wildwood and Cape May beaches in New Jersey are vital for ecological, recreational, and economic reasons. These areas support critical habitats and endangered species that depend on the unique sediment characteristics of the beaches. Economically, Cape May County tourism contributed $7.7 billion in 2023 to the local economy. This study investigates the foreshore sediment textural characteristics and grain size distribution following a renourishment cycle. Sediment samples n = 54 were collected in March (winter) and n = 57 in August (summer) 2024 along cross-shore profiles from the berm crest to the high tide line. The samples were sieved and analyzed for grain size distribution, sorting, skewness, and kurtosis using sieve analysis and GRADISTAT V8.0 software. Results indicate that Wildwood beaches in the winter (pre-nourishment) were very well-sorted fine sand, and in the summer (post-nourishment), well-sorted fine to medium sand. Cape May oceanside was predominantly well-sorted medium sand, symmetrical to coarse skewed in winter and fine skewed in summer. In contrast, Bayside consisted of more poorly sorted coarse sand, including gravel. Results indicate that Wildwood and Cape May Oceanside are depositional environments during both seasons, whereas Cape May Bayside in winter is an erosive setting with sporadic high-energy events and multiple sources of sediments. Ultimately, the long-term nourishment has caused an increase in overall average grain sizes of the beaches, where coastal structures alter the natural sediment transport and wave energy reaching the nearshore, impacting the distribution of sediments. Under modern conditions with decades of future anthropogenic influence, these beaches could demonstrate a greater resilience to erosion, while being more stable. These findings are applicable to future coastal management and habitat restoration projects.
Grain size distribution / Sediment characteristics / Beach renourishment / Coastal management / New Jersey
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Botton ML (2009) The Ecological Importance of Horseshoe Crabs in Estuarine and Coastal Communities: A Review and Speculative Summary. In: Tanacredi, J., Botton, M., Smith, D. (eds) Biology and Conservation of Horseshoe Crabs. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 45–63 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89959-6_3 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Flynn MJ (2011). Sediment characterization of the New Jersey shoreline: Comparison of median grain size distribution from 1950 to 2011. The Richard Stockton College Coastal Research Center. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Hamid N, Setyowati DL, Juhadi N, Priyanto AS, Hardati P, Soleh M, Wijayanti NR, Aroyandini EN (2021) The effect of human activities towards coastal dynamics and sustainable coastal management. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 16(8):1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160809 |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Liu G, Cai F, Qi H, et al (2024) Decadal evolution of a sandy beach adjacent to a river mouth under natural drivers and human impacts. Frontiers in Marine Science 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1384780 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
McBride RA, Anderson JB, Buynevich IV, et al (2013) 10.8 Morphodynamics of Barrier Systems: a synthesis. In: Shroder, J., Sherman, D.J. (Eds.), Treatise on Geomorphology (Coastal and Submarine Geomorphology), 1st edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 166–244 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00279-7 |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
McMaster RL (1954) Petrography and genesis of the New Jersey beach sands. https://doi.org/10.7282/T3SQ90G5 |
| [32] |
McLachlan A, Defeo O, Jaramillo E, Short AD (2012) Sandy beach conservation and recreation: Guidelines for optimising management strategies for multi-purpose use. Ocean Coast Manag 71:256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.10.005 |
| [33] |
Meng Y, Qu Z, Li X, Zhu M, Liang B (2024) An experimental study on the evolution of beach profiles under different beach nourishment methods. Frontiers in Marine Science 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1381937 |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
NOAA Tides & Currents. https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/stationhome.html?id=8536110 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
Perera ULHP, Ratnayake AS, Weerasingha WADB, et al (2023) Grain size distribution of modern beach sediments in Sri Lanka. Anthropocene Coasts 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44218-023-00025-7 |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
Rankin KL, Bruno MS, & Herrington TO (2004). Nearshore currents and sediment transport measured at notched groins. Journal of Coastal Research, 237–254. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25736257 |
| [53] |
Ruessink BG, Ranasinghe R (2014) Beaches. In: Masselink, G., Gehrels, R., (Eds.), Coastal Environments and Global Change, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp 149–176 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119117261.ch7 |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Schroeder TS (1982) Determination of the Immediate Source Areas and Probable Sediment Transport Pathways of New Jersey Beach Sands. Doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228649859.pdf |
| [60] |
Schuster E, The Nature Conservancy, The Nature Conservancy, New Jersey Chapter (2014) Lower Cape May Meadows Ecological Restoration: Analysis of Economic and Social benefits. Accessed 27 March 2025 https://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPractices/Marine/crr/library/Documents/Lower%20Cape%20May%20Meadows%20Ecological%20Restoration%20-%20Analysis%20of%20Economic%20and%20Social%20Benefits.pdf |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
Subramanian M, Sarasamma JD, Mohan V (2025) Grain size distribution of the sediments along the Kollam shoreline, Southwest coast of India. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119x.2025.2472275 |
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
Sugarman PJ, Monteverde DH, Stanford SD, Johnson SW, Stroiteleva Y, Pristas RS, Vandegrift K, Domber SE (2016) Geologic and aquifer map of Cape May County, New Jersey: New Jersey Geological and Water Survey Geologic Map Series GMS 16–1. Accessed 21 March 2025 https://dep.nj.gov/wp-content/uploads/njgws/maps/gmseries/gms16-1.pdf |
| [66] |
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Ecological Services (2006) The Cape May Peninsula is not like the rest of New Jersey. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Accessed 21 March 2025 https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Cape_May_NJ_PDF_508.pdf |
| [67] |
Uda T (2022) Fundamental issues in Japan’s coastal management system for the prevention of beach erosion. Maritime Technology and Research 4(1): 251788. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2022.251788 |
| [68] |
USACE Philadelphia District & Marine Design Center New Jersey Shore Protection, Cape May inlet to the lower township (2024) Philadelphia District & Marine Design Center. Accessed 25 March 2025 https://www.nap.usace.army.mil/Missions/Factsheets/Fact-Sheet-Article-View/Article/490778/new-jersey-shore-protection-cape-may-inlet-to-lower-township/#:~:text=LOCATION:%20The%20project%20is%20located,was%20completed%20in%20January%202024. |
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |