Compounded risks to beach-nesting seabirds in developed areas: environmental and anthropogenic disturbances at Black Skimmer colonies

Abstract

Wildlife in coastal zones is often affected by anthropogenic and environmental factors that intensify at the interface of land and water. Seabirds are particularly susceptible to disturbances when they breed in large, dense colonies, such as direct harm from extreme weather and interference, or exposure of eggs and chicks to predators due to indirect human activities. All these factors potentially impact the Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger), a seabird that is considered vulnerable in much of its range across the Americas. This study quantified disturbances affecting two skimmer colonies within a Critical Wildlife Area in southwest Florida, a coastal area of rapidly growing human population. Skimmers experienced a wide array of disturbances that caused a total of 195 flushing events, at a rate of almost 2 per hour throughout the 3-month study period. Natural and anthropogenic disturbances were occurring simultaneously and at roughly similar frequencies at the two colonies. Weather and unexplained disturbances caused a higher portion of skimmers to flush at one colony, and weather led to longer flushing events at the other colony. Flushing responses were stronger on weekends at the second colony. Notably, breeding skimmers faced considerable disturbance despite existing within a monitored protected area. Given the overlap of disturbance types across the breeding season, this study demonstrates the need for measures to protect skimmers from anthropogenic and environmental stressors, including further study of how these factors impact reproductive success of colonies. It illustrates the challenges faced by waterbirds around the globe, amid growth in coastal human communities during this era of rapid environmental change.

Keywords

Beach-nesting / Black Skimmer / Disturbance / Florida / Rynchops niger niger / Seabirds

References

[1] AmatJA, MaseroJA. How Kentish Plovers, Charadrius alexandrinus, cope with heat stress during incubation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 2004, 56: 26-33

[2] AshmoleNP. The biology of the wide awake or Sooty Tern Sterna fuscata on Ascension Island. Ibis, 1963, 103b: 297-364

[3] AustinOL Jr. Contributions to the knowledge of the Cape Cod Sterninae. Bullet Northeastern Bird-Band Assoc, 1929, 5: 123-140

[4] BarrJR, GreenMC, DeMasoSJ, HardyTB. Drone surveys do not increase colony-wide flight behaviour at waterbird nesting sites, but sensitivity varies among species. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 3781

[5] BurgerJ. Aggressive behavior of Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger). Behavior, 1981, 76(3–4): 207-222

[6] BurgerJ. Effects of motorboats and personal watercraft on flight over a colony of Common Terns. The Condor, 1998, 100: 528-534

[7] BurgerJ, GochfeldM. The Black Skimmer: Social dynamics of a colonial species. New York: Columbia Univ Press, 1990, 14: 68-71

[8] BurgerJ, GochfeldM. The Common Tern: its breeding biology and social behavior. New York: Columbia Univ Press, 1991, 16: 102-104

[9] CareyMJ. The effects of investigator disturbance on Procellariform seabirds: a review. New Zealand J Zoology, 2009, 36: 2-8

[10] Collier County Shorebird Partnership 2017. Florida Shorebird Alliance. Audubon of Florida, N.D. Web. 11 April. http://flshorebirdalliance.org/partnerships/collier/. Accessed Sept 2019.

[11] DiasMP, MartinR, PearmainEJ, BurfieldIJ, SmallC, PhillipsRA, LascellesB, BorborogluPG, CroxallJP. Threats to seabirds: a global assessment. Biol Cons, 2019, 237: 525-537

[12] ErwinRM. Responses to human intruders by birds nesting in colonies: experimental results and management guidelines. Colon Waterbirds, 1989, 12: 104-108

[13] FleishmanE, MurphyDD, BrussardPF. A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecol Appl, 2000, 10: 569-579

[14] FWC. 2016a. Florida’s Imperiled Species Management Plan. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. https://myfwc.com/media/2030/imperiled-species-management-plan.pdf.

[15] FWC. 2016b. Florida Shorebird Database: Annual Report 2015. Summary of data collected by shorebird alliance partners. Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. http://flshorebirdalliance.org/media/1010/fsd-annualreport2015.pdf. Accessed Sept 2019.

[16] FWC. 2019a. Florida Shorebird Alliance monitoring data at work. Monitoring data retrieved from the Florida Shorebird Database (FSD), July 26, 2019. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida.

[17] FWC. 2019b. Big Marco Pass CWA. Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. https://myfwc.com/conservation/terrestrial/cwa/big-marco-pass/. Accessed 5 Mar 2024.

[18] Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association (FSBPA) (2014) Healthy beaches drive Florida’s economy. https://www.fsbpa.com/documents/EconomicFactSheet2014.pdf. Accessed Sept 2019.

[19] Maslo B, Leu K, Pover T, Weston MA, Gilby BL, Schlacher TA (2019) Optimizing conservation benefits for threatened beach fauna following severe natural disturbances. Sci Total Environ 649:661–671

[20] GissiE, ManeaE, MazarisAD, FraschettiS, AlmpanidouV, BevilacquaS, CollM, GuarnieriG, Lloret-LloretE, PascualM, PetzaD, RilovG, SchonwaldM, StelzenmüllerV, KatsanevakisS. A review of the combined effects of climate change and other localhuman stressors on the marine environment. Science of the TotalEnvironment, 2021, 755: 142564

[21] Global Data (2021) Most Populated States in the United States. https://www.globaldata.com/data-insights/macroeconomic/most-populated-states-in-the-us. Accessed 5 Mar 2024.

[22] GochfeldM. Differences in behavioral responses of young Common Terns and Black Skimmers to intrusion and handling. Colon Waterbirds, 1981, 4: 47-53

[23] Gochfeld M, Burger J, Lefevre KL (2020) Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (S. M. Billerman, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Ithaca. NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.blkski.01.

[24] HuntGL Jr. Influence of food distribution and human disturbance on the reproductive success of Herring Gulls. Ecology, 1972, 53: 1051-1061

[25] HyrenbachKD, VeitRR. Ocean warming and seabird communities of the southern California Current System (1987–98): response at multiple temporal scales. Deep Sea Res Part II, 2003, 50(14–16): 2537-2565

[26] JacksonJA, RoweBE, HetrickMS, SchardienBJ. Site-specific nest defense behavior of black skimmers and least terns. Condor, 1982, 84: 120

[27] KerlingerP, BurgerJ, H., Cordell, K., Cole, D.N., Landres, P., Smith, E.N., Brett, J., Knight, R.L. and Gutzwiller, K. Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research, 1995 Washington DC Island Press

[28] KurryCR, GochfieldM. Human interference and gull predation in cormorant colonies. Biol Cons, 1975, 8: 23-34

[29] LordA, WaasJR, InnesJ, WhittinghamMJ. Effects of human disturbance to nests of northern New Zealand Dotterels. Biol Cons, 2001, 98: 233-240

[30] Manuwal D (1978) Effect of man on marine birds: a review. Pages 140–160 in C. M. Kirkpatrick, (ed) Wildlife and people: Proceedings of the John S. Wright Forestry Conference. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Cooperative Extension Services. Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana

[31] Naples Daily News (2017) Tigertail beach reshaped but in good condition after Irma. https://www.marconews.com/story/news/local/2017/09/25/tigertail-beach-reshaped-but-good-condition-after-irma/677009001/. Accessed Sept 2019.

[32] OllasonJC, DunnetGM. Nest failures in the fulmar: the effect of observers. J Field Ornithol, 1980, 51: 39-54

[33] PalmerR. A behavior study of the Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). Proc Boston Soc Nat History, 1941, 12: 1-119

[34] RodgersJA, SmithHT. Set-back distances to protect nesting bird colonies from human disturbance in Florida. Conserv Biol, 1995, 9: 89-99

[35] RodgersJA, SmithHT. Buffer zone distances to protect foraging and loafing waterbirds from human disturbance in Florida. Wildl Soc Bull, 1997, 25: 139-145

[36] RosenbergKV, DokterAM, BlancherPJ, SauerJR, SmithAC, SmithPA, StantonJC, PanjabiA, HelftL, ParrM, Marra PP. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science, 2019, 366(6461): 120-124

[37] SafinaC, BurgerJ. Effects of human disturbance on reproductive success in the Black Skimmer. The Condor, 1983, 85: 164-171

[38] SandiferPA, Sutton-GrierAE, WardBP. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosyst Serv, 2015, 12: 1-15

[39] SantosCD, CatryT, DiasMP, GranadeiroJP. Global changes in coastal wetlands of importance for non-breeding shorebirds. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 858: 159707

[40] SAS Institute Inc. 2019. JMP Version IV. Cary, NC. 1989-2019.

[41] Sprandel GL, Gore JA, Cobb DT (1997) Winter shorebird survey final performance report. Tallahassee, Florida, Florida Game and Fresh Water Commission, Nongame Wildlife Program, Tallahassee, Florida

[42] TealJM. Nesting success of Egrets and Herons in Georgia. Wilson Bulletin, 1965, 77: 257-263

[43] Van de PolM, EnsBJ, HegD, BrouwerL, KrolJ, MajerM, ExoK-m, Oosterbeek, k., Lok, T., Eising, C.M. and Koffijberg, K. . Do changes in the frequency, magnitude and timing of extreme climatic events threaten the population viability of coastal birds?. J Appl Ecol, 2010, 47: 720-730

[44] VeenJ. Functional and casual aspects of nest distribution in colonies of the Sandwich Tern ( Sterna sandvicensis Lath.). Behavior Supplement, 1977, 20: 1-193

[45] VelandoA, MunillaI. Disturbance to a foraging seabird by seabased tourism: Implications for reserve management in marine protected areas. Biol Cons, 2011, 144: 1167-1174

[46] VieiraBP, FurnessRW, NagerRG. What do we know about Black Skimmers? A review on its annual-cycle and life-history main events. Ardea, 2018, 106: 119-144

[47] WestAD, Goss-CustardJD, StillmanRA, CaldowRWG, DurellS, McGrortyS. Predicting impacts of disturbance on shorebird mortality using a behaviour-based model. Biol Cons, 2002, 106: 319-328

[48] ZalasiewiczJ, WatersCN, EllisEC, HeadMJ, VidasD, SteffenW, ThomasJA, HornE, SummerhayesCP, LeinfelderR, McNeillJR, GałuszkaA, WilliamsM, BarnoskyAD, RichterDD, GibbardPL, SyvitskiJ, JeandelC, CearretaA, CundyAB, FairchildIJ, RoseNL, Ivar do SulJA, ShotykW, TurnerS, WagreichM, ZinkeJ. The Anthropocene: Comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines. Earth’s Future, 2021, 9: e2020EF001896

Funding

Florida Gulf Coast University

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)