From trade-off to synergy: how nutrient status modulates plant resistance to herbivorous insects?
Zhi-Xing Li , Jin-Fang Tan , Nan Yao , Ruo-Han Xie
Advanced Biotechnology ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : 37
From trade-off to synergy: how nutrient status modulates plant resistance to herbivorous insects?
The principle of the “growth-defense trade-off” governs how plants adjust their growth and defensive strategies in response to external factors, impacting interactions among plants, herbivorous insects, and their natural enemies. Mineral nutrients are crucial in modulating plant growth and development through their bottom-up effects. Emerging evidence has revealed complex regulatory networks that link mineral nutrients to plant defense responses, influencing the delicate balance between growth and defense against herbivores. This review aims to summarize recent advances that elucidate the impact of nutrient availability on plant defense responses. Particularly, we focus on how nutrient status shapes plant resistance to herbivores, delving into the molecular mechanisms underlying this physiological process. Moreover, the interplay between mineral nutrients and various herbivore defense mechanisms, including physical protection, plant hormone signaling, defensive metabolite production, and volatile organic compound emissions that deter herbivores or attract their natural enemies, are discussed. This comprehensive review sets the stage for future investigations into the intricate crosstalk between nutrient signaling and plant defense responses, which serves as a central mechanism to guide sustainable pest management approaches, thereby promoting balanced agroecosystem health and enhancing plant ecosystem productivity and resilience.
| [1] |
Abd el-aziz M, Amin T, El-Barkey N. Macromolecular abnormalities in the adults of the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) induced by larval feeding on irradiated potato tubers. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences A, Entomology. 2008;1: 99–108. |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Ali AH, Abdelrahman M, El-Sayed MA. Alkaloid Role in Plant Defense Response to Growth and Stress. In: Jogaiah S, Abdelrahman M, editors. Bioactive Molecules in Plant Defense: Signaling in Growth and Stress; 2019. pp. 145–158. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Bryant JP, Clausen TP, Reichardt PB, McCarthy MC, Werner RA. Effect of nitrogen fertilization upon the secondary chemistry and nutritional value of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) leaves for the large aspen tortrix (Choristoneura conflictana (Walker)). Oecologia. 1987;73:513–7. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Chen Y. Analyzing Blends of Herbivore-Induced Volatile Organic Compounds With Factor Analysis: Revisiting “Cotton Plant, Gossypium hirsutum L., Defense in Response to Nitrogen Fertilization.” J Econ Entomol. 2013;106:1053–7. |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Connick VJ. The impact of silicon fertilisation on the chemical ecology of grapevine, Vitis vinifera; constitutive and induced chemical defences against arthropod pests and their natural enemies. Charles Sturt University; 2011. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Goussain MM, Prado E, Moraes JC. Effect of silicon applied to wheat plants on the biology and probing behaviour of the greenbug Schizaphis graminum (Rond.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Neotropical Entomology. 2005;34:807–13. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Hall CR, Waterman JM, Vandegeer RK, Hartley SE, Johnson SN. The Role of Silicon in Antiherbivore Phytohormonal Signalling. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01132 |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Hansen AK, Pers D, Russell JA. Chapter Five - Symbiotic solutions to nitrogen limitation and amino acid imbalance in insect diets. In: Oliver KM, Russell JA, editors. Adv In Insect Phys; 2020. pp. 161–205. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Holzmueller EJ, Jose S, Jenkins MA. Influence of calcium, potassium, and magnesium on Cornus florida L. density and resistance to dogwood anthracnose. Plant Soil. 2007;290:189–99. |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
Jin J, Zhao M, Jing T, Zhang M, Lu M, Yu G, Wang J, Guo D, Pan Y, Hoffmann TD, Schwab W, Song C. Volatile compound-mediated plant–plant interactions under stress with the tea plant as a model. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad143. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
Kline DL, Allan SA, Bernier UR, Welch CH. Evaluation of the enantiomers of 1-octen-3-ol and 1-octyn-3-ol as attractants for mosquitoes associated with a freshwater swamp in Florida, U.S.A. Med Vet Entomol. 2007;21:323–31. |
| [53] |
Kong Y, Wang G, Chen X, Li L, Zhang X, Chen S, He Y, Hong G. OsPHR2 modulates phosphate starvation-induced OsMYC2 signalling and resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Plant Cell Environ. 2021;44:3432–44. |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
Le Gall M, Word ML, Thompson N, Beye A, Cease AJ. Nitrogen fertilizer decreases survival and reproduction of female locusts by increasing plant protein to carbohydrate ratio. J Anim Ecol. 2020;89:2214–21. |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
Malook S ul, Xu Y, Qi J, Li J, Wang L, Wu J. Mythimna separata herbivory primes maize resistance in systemic leaves. J Exp Bot. 2021;72:3792–805. |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
Sarwar M. Effects of potassium fertilization on population build up of rice stem borers (lepidopteron pests) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds. 2012;3:6–9. |
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
Xu P, Zhu F, Buss G, Leal W. 1-Octen-3-ol – the attractant that repels. F1000 Research. 2015;4. |
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
|
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |