Costs, Environmental Gains, and Potential for National Self- Sufficiency with Ecological Recycling Agriculture in Sweden— Calculations Based on Case Studies of 30 Farms

Artur Granstedt , Olof Thomsson , Lars Jonasson

Annals of Agri-bio Research ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1) : 158 -181.

PDF (2341KB)
Annals of Agri-bio Research ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1) : 158 -181. DOI: 10.53941/agrbio.2025.1000018
research-article

Costs, Environmental Gains, and Potential for National Self- Sufficiency with Ecological Recycling Agriculture in Sweden— Calculations Based on Case Studies of 30 Farms

Author information +
History +
PDF (2341KB)

Abstract

The need for reduced climate impact in agriculture and an increased interest in self-sufficient food production in Sweden serves as the main background for the study. The study examined if conversion of Swedish agriculture following principles of Ecological Recycling Agriculture (ERA) could be a realistic alternative in addressing both those issues, and what the resulting price for that food would be. Case studies of 30 ERA farms were performed. These farms show substantially lower climate impact compared to the national average, through 75% lower commodity purchases and twice the amount of carbon sequestration in soil thanks to more ley cropping. An alternative diet including less meat and more grain, vegetables and dairy products was defined. Two different methods were used for matching production with consumption. The results are presented in scenarios where different combinations of the farms’ staple food production are upscaled for a Swedish population of 10.5 million inhabitants. Results are presented in kg produced, hectares of arable land, CO2 equivalents, kg of surplus N, and production costs per capita. It is shown that an 80-95% reduction in climate impact is possible, and that it is within range for Sweden to become self-sufficient in staple foods based on the available acreage of arable land by adopting Ecological Recycling Agricultural principles in a manner similar to the studied farms. However, diets need to change in a lacto-vegetarian direction. Production costs would be slightly higher for most products, but consumers’ food expenses could be lower if they also change their diet. Possible political instruments are proposed to realize these scenarios.

Keywords

climate impact / acreage need / nutrient balance / self-sufficiency / production costs / food consumption / ley cropping / carbon sequestration / organic / agriculture

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Artur Granstedt, Olof Thomsson, Lars Jonasson. Costs, Environmental Gains, and Potential for National Self- Sufficiency with Ecological Recycling Agriculture in Sweden— Calculations Based on Case Studies of 30 Farms. Annals of Agri-bio Research, 2025, 30(1): 158-181 DOI:10.53941/agrbio.2025.1000018

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Allen, M. R., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Shine, K. P., Reisinger, A., Pierrehumbert, R. T. and Forster, P. M. (2016). New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat. Clim. Change 6: 773. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2998.

[2]

Berglund, M., Cederberg, C., Clason, C., Henriksson, M. and Törner, L. (2009). Jordbrukets Klimatpåverkan—Underlag för att Beräkna Växthusgasutsläpp på Gårdsnivå och Nulägesanalyser av Exempelgårdar. Delrapport i JOKER-Projektet. Hushållnings-sällskapet Halland. Available online: http://hs-n.hush.se/attachments/82/2888.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

[3]

Blomhoff, R. Andersen, R., Arnesen, E.K., Christensen, J.J., Eneroth, H., Erkkola, M., Gudanaviciene, I., Halldorsson, T.I., Høyer-Lund, A., Lemming, E.W., Meltzer, H.M., Pitsi, T., Schwab, U., Siksna, I., Thorsdottir, I. and Trolle, E. (2023). Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. Available online: https://pub.norden.org/nord2023-003/nord2023-003.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2025).

[4]

Cederberg, C., Persson, M., Schmidt, S., Hedenius, F. and Wood, R. (2019). Beyond the borders—Burdens of Swedish food consumption due to agrochemicals, greenhouse gas emissions and land use change. JCLP J. Clean. Prod. 214: 644-652.

[5]

COP26 The Glasgow Climate Pact. (2021). Available online: https://ukcop26.org/the-conference/cop26-outcomes/ (accessed on 12 June 2025).

[6]

Fauré A., Dawkins, E., Wood, R., Finnveden, G., Palm, V., Persson, L. and Schmidt, S. (2019). Environmental pressure from Swedish consumption—The largest contributing producer countries, products and services. J. Clean. Prod. 231: 698-713.

[7]

Folkhälsomyndigheten. (2024). En hållbar och hälsosam livsmedelskonsumtion (A healthy and sustainable food consumption). Available online: https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publikationer-och-material/publikationsarkiv/e/en-hallbar-och-halsosam-livsmedelskonsumtion-aterredovis ning-av-regeringsuppdrag/ (accessed on 28 April 2025). (In Swedish)

[8]

Formas. (2010). Jordbruk Som Håller i Längden (Long Term Sustainable Agriculture). Stockholm: Formas Fokuserar. Available online: https://www.formas.se/download/18.462d60ec167c69393b9a1d0/1549956100364/jordbruk_som_haller_i_langden.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2022). (In Swedish)

[9]

Goodla, SLU, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Lärarhandledning (Teachers Guidance). Available online: https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/inst/mom/collaboration/goodla/handledningar/lararhandl_naturbete.pdf (accessed 12 June 2025). (In Swedish).

[10]

Granstedt, A. (1992). Case studies on the flow and supply of nitrogen in alternative farming in Sweden. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 9: 15-63.

[11]

Granstedt, A., Thomsson, O. and Schneider, T. (2005). Environmental impacts of Eco- Local Food systems. Baltic Ecological Agriculture and Society (BERAS) Nr 5. CUL, Center for of Sustainable Agriculture. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Available online: www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/centrb/epok/aldre-bilder-och-dokument/publikationer/ekolantbruk46.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2022).

[12]

Granstedt, A., Schneider, T., Seuri, P. and Thomsson, O. (2008). Ecological Recycling Agriculture to Reduce Nutrient Pollution to the Baltic Sea. J. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 26: 279-307.

[13]

Granstedt, A. and Seuri, P. (2013). Conversion to Ecological Recycling Agriculture and Society Environmental, Economic and Sociological Assessments and Scenarios. In Granstedt, A., Seuri, P., (Eds.), COMREC Studies on Environmental Development 8, BERAS Implementation Report 3. Huddinge: Södertörn University.

[14]

Granstedt, A. and Thomsson, O. (2022). Sustainable Agriculture and Self-Sufficiency in Sweden—Calculation of Climate Impact and Acreage Need Based on Ecological Recycling Agriculture Farms. Sustainability 14: 5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105834.

[15]

Jordbruksverket. (2008). Kartläggning av Mark Som Tagits ur Produktion. Rapport 2008:7. Available online: www2.jordbruksverket.se/webdav/files/SJV/trycksaker/Pdf_rapporter/ra08_7.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2022) (In Swedish)

[16]

Jordbruksverket. (2019a). Plan för Odlingslandskapets Biologiska Mångfald— Ett Samverkansprojekt Inom Miljömålsrådet. Available online: https://www2.jordbruksverket.se/download/18.36d57baa168c704154d46f04/1549611543321/ra19_1.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2022). (In Swedish)

[17]

Jordbruksverket. (2019b). Jordbruket i Siffror. Available online: https://jordbruketisiffror.wordpress.com/2019/07/31/det-fanns-526-tusen-hektar-slatterangar-ar-1927-ar-2019-ar-arealen-12-tusen-hektar-men-den-har-mer-an-fordubblats-sedan-ar-2003/ (accessed on 25 April 2025). (In Swedish)

[18]

Jordbruksverket. (2020). Jordbruksstatistisk Sammanställning 2020. Available online: https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2020-08-14-jordbruksstatistisk-sammanstallning-2020 (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

[19]

Jordbruksverket. (2021). Kort om Statistiken. Available online: https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2021-03-16-livsmedelskonsumtion-av-animalier.-preliminara-uppgifter-2020#h-Kortomstatistiken (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

[20]

Jordbruksverket. (2022). EAA—Ekonomisk kalkyl för jordbrukssektorn 2022. JO0205. Available online: https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2023-10-05-eaa---ekonomisk-kalkyl-for-jordbrukssektorn-2022 (accessed on 19 April 2024).

[21]

Kätterer, T. and Bolinder, M. A. (2024). Response of maize yield to changes in soil organic matter in a Swedish long-term experiment. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 75: e13482. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13482.

[22]

Karlsson, J. O. (2022). Livestock as resource users and landscape managersA food systems perspective (No. 2022:19)[Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25926.14403.

[23]

Kjaergaard, T. (1994). The Danish Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[24]

Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund, L.R.F. (2019). Ökad Försörjningstrygghet Avseende Livsmedel, sid 18. Available online: www.lrf.se/politikochpaverkan/foretagarvillkor-och-konkurrenskraft/nationell-livsmedelsstrategi/sjalvforsorjning/forsorjningstrygghet/ (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

[25]

Linderholm, K. (2018). Sveriges Självförsörjningsgrad—Energi Till Människor och Motorer Från Svenskt Jordbruk 2017-2018; Borlänge: Silvbergs Miljöteknik AB. Available online: https://silvberg.se/Rapporter/ (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

[26]

Lynch, J., Cain, M., Pierrehumbert, R. and Allen, M. (2020). Demonstrating GWP*: A means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and long-lived climate pollutants. Environ. Res. Lett. 15: 044023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7e.

[27]

Naturvårdssverket. (2018, April). Beskrivning av SASMEn ekonomisk optimeringsmodell över jordbrukssektorn i Sverige. Rapport 6815. Available online: Naturvardsverket.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1606842&dswid=-3522 (accessed on 19 April 2024). (In Swedish)

[28]

Naturvårdsverket. Sweden’s, Climate Act and Climate, Policy Framework. (2025). Available online: https://www.naturvardsverket.se/en/international/swedish-environmental-work/swedens-climate-act-and-climate-policy-framework/ (accessed on 25 April 2025).

[29]

Nordic Council of Ministers. (2023). Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023. Available online: https://pub.norden.org/nord2023-003/about-this-publication (accessed on 26 May 2024).

[30]

Our World in Data. Arable land use per person. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/arable-land-use-per-person?country=OWID_WRL-Europe+and+Central+Asia+%28WB%29-SWE-OWID_EU27 (accessed on 26 May 2024).

[31]

Poeplau, C., Bolinder, M. A., Eriksson, J., Lundblad, M. and Kätterer, T. (2015). Positive trends in organic carbon storage in Swedish agricultural soils due to unexpected socio- economic drivers. Biogeosciences 12: 3241-3251.

[32]

Röös, E. (2019). Kor Och Klimat. SLU, EPOK— Centrum för Ekologisk Produktion och Konsumtion Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet. Available online: https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/centrb/epok/dokument/koroklimat_web.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

[33]

Saxe, H., Meinert Larsen, T. and Mogensen, L. (2013). The global warming potential of two healthy Nordic diets compared with the average Danish diet. Clim. Chang. 116: 249-262.

[34]

Statistics, Sweden. (2000). Land Cover 2000, Sweden. Available online: https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/environment/land-use/other-statistics-on-land-use/pong/tables-and-graphs/marktackedata/land-cover-2000-sweden/ (accessed on 24 March 2022).

[35]

Statistics, Sweden. (2020). Agricultural Statistics 2020 Including Food Statistics—Tables. Available online: https://jordbruksverket.se/download/18.78dd5d7d173e2fbbcda98893/1597390150166/JS_2020.pdf(accessed on 29 March 2022).

[36]

van der Werf, H. M. G., Trydeman Knudsen, M. and Cederberg, C., (2020). Towards better representation of organic agriculture in life cycle assessment. Nat. Sustain. 3: 419-425.

[37]

Van Selm, B., Frehner, A., de Boer, I. J. M., van Hal, O., Hijbeek, R., van Ittersum, M. K., Talsma, E. F., Lesschen, J. P., Hendriks, C. M. J., Herrero, M. and van Zanten, H. H. E. (2022). Circularity in animal production requires a change in the EAT-Lancet diet in Europe. Nat. Food 3: 66-73.

[38]

Verksamt. Different VAT rates. Available online: https://verksamt.se/en/taxes-contributions/vat/vat-rates (accessed on 25 April 2025).

[39]

Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., Jonell, M., Clark, M., Gordon, L. J., Fanzo, J., Hawkes, C., Zurayk, R., Rivera, J. A., De Vries, W., Sibanda, L. M., ··· Christopher, J. L. M. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393: 447-492.

[40]

Wirsenius. (2019). Utsläpp av Växthusgaser Från Svensk Produktion Och Konsumtion av Mat år 2045. Chalmers Tekniska Högskola. Available online: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/515057/file/515057_Fulltext.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

[41]

WWF. (2015). Naturbetesprojekt. Långsiktiga Effekter av 25 års Arbete. (Natural Pastures Project). Available online: https://media.wwf.se/uploads/2019/01/wwfs-naturbetesprojekt-2015-rapport-14-3890.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2025). (In Swedish)

[42]

WWF. (2021). Marknadsundersökning Grönt ljus i Köttguiden. Rapport 2021-11-12. (Marketassessment Green Light in the Meat Guide). Available online: https://www.wwf.se/pressmeddelande/wwfs-kottguide-rott-ljus-for-svensk-kyckling-4116966/ (accessed on 24 March 2022). (In Swedish)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2341KB)

150

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/