The Role of Signalling Pathways in Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Patryk Skórka , Jakub Piotrowski , Estera Bakinowska , Kajetan Kiełbowski , Andrzej Pawlik

Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 27152

PDF (1959KB)
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) :27152 DOI: 10.31083/RCM27152
Review
review-article
The Role of Signalling Pathways in Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Author information +
History +
PDF (1959KB)

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent hereditary cardiovascular disorder, characterised by left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis. Cardiac fibroblasts, transformed into myofibroblasts, play a crucial role in the development of fibrosis. However, interactions between fibroblasts, cardiomyocytes, and immune cells are considered major mechanisms driving fibrosis progression. While the disease has a strong genetic background, its pathogenetic mechanisms remain complex and not fully understood. Several signalling pathways are implicated in fibrosis development. Among these, transforming growth factor-beta and angiotensin II are frequently studied in the context of cardiac fibrosis. In this review, we summarise the most current evidence on the involvement of signalling pathways in the pathogenesis of HCM. Additionally, we discuss the potential role of monitoring pro-fibrotic molecules in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with HCM.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy / signalling pathways / transforming growth factor-β1 / cardiac fibrosis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Patryk Skórka, Jakub Piotrowski, Estera Bakinowska, Kajetan Kiełbowski, Andrzej Pawlik. The Role of Signalling Pathways in Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2025, 26(2): 27152 DOI:10.31083/RCM27152

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common hereditary cardiovascular disease, characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and myocardial fibrosis [1]. It is estimated that HCM affects 0.2% to 0.5% of the general population [2, 3]. One recent study indicate that the prevalence may be higher than previously thought due to underdiagnosis and the variable expression of genetic mutations [4]. HCM is familial in approximately 60% of cases, with first-degree relatives of affected individuals having a 50% probability of inheriting the condition [5]. This condition follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, whereby a single mutation in one of the genes is sufficient to cause HCM [6]. The disease may manifest at any age, but the clinical symptoms typically emerge during adolescence or early adulthood. In some patients, however, disease progression may be delayed [5]. HCM is associated with an elevated risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), particularly among young athletes, where it is one of the leading causes of SCD [7]. Consequently, HCM represents a significant contributor to hospitalizations and is a risk factor for heart failure in patients with advanced stages of the disease. Despite recent advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic modalities, a significant number of cases remain undiagnosed, thereby complicating the development of effective preventive and therapeutic strategies [8]. The underlying pathogenesis involves mutations in sarcomeric proteins, such as encoding β cardiac myosin heavy chain (MYH7) or encoding cardiac myosin binding protein-C (MYBPC3), which are the most common (up to 70%) and are essential for cardiomyocyte contractility and structural integrity. Furthermore, mutations in non-sarcomeric proteins, including phospholamban (PLN) and filamin C (FLNC), have been identified as significant contributors to HCM [9, 10]. While mutations affecting the sarcomere disrupt cardiomyocyte contractile function [11], mutations occurring outside the sarcomere impact cellular stability and calcium handling, thereby contributing to hypertrophic remodeling and increased arrhythmic risk [10, 12]. Although HCM is primarily considered a disease of the cardiomyocytes, growing evidence suggests that profibrotic signaling is induced early in the disease process [13] (Fig. 1). The extent of fibrosis is closely correlated with disease progression and adverse clinical outcomes in HCM, thereby underscoring fibrosis as an important therapeutic target [14, 15]. This fibrotic remodeling, which arises from both genetic and biomechanical factors, remains a central focus of research efforts aimed at improving prognosis and quality of life in HCM patients. Myocardial fibrosis has a profound impact on the clinical condition of the patient. For instance, fibrosis is associated with the occurrence of arrhythmias. Fibrotic tissue impairs electrical coupling between cardiac cells [16]. Moreover, cardiomyocytes can electrically couple with fibroblasts, which affects conductivity if scar tissue is present in the heart [17]. In this review, we will discuss the current evidence on the genetic effectors and molecular signaling pathways that are involved in the development of myocardial fibrosis in HCM. Proper understanding of these pathways could lead to the development of targeted therapeutics that would suppress or even reverse the process of fibrosis.

2. Pathophysiology and Current Treatment Strategies of HCM

Myocardial fibrosis is a complex and multifactorial process, which can develop after primary inflammatory processes, including cardiac sarcoidosis, acute myocarditis or genetically determined cardiomyopathies [18, 19, 20]. Furthermore, immune dysregulation and chronic inflammation, cardiac damage due to myocardial infarction, or pressure overload are also involved in the process of cardiac fibrosis development [21, 22, 23]. It leads to negative remodeling of the interstitial structure of the myocardium through excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in the cardiac interstitia. Collagen is synthesized most intensively, leading to an increased percentage of collagen fibers throughout the myocardial tissue [24, 25]. Therefore, the ECM plays a key role in regulating cardiac function [21]. Two types of fibrosis predominate in HCM—interstitial-perimyocytic and scar-like (replacement) fibrosis. It is estimated that up to one-third of the myocardium in HCM is covered by fibrosis, leading to asymmetric left ventricular thickening, reduced compliance, and progressive myocardial fibrosis. Furthermore, a degree of left ventricular fibrosis exceeding 20% is considered a high-risk condition associated with significant diastolic dysfunction [26].

Cardiac fibroblasts play a central role in the fibrosis process because they mediate intercellular communication between cardiomyocytes, inflammatory cells, and endothelial cells [27]. The phenotypic change of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts leads to a reduced rate of ECM degradation and increased collagen synthesis [28]. Additionally, the ECM influences cells such as myocytes and macrophages by regulating mechanical tension and controlling the availability of growth factors and matrix proteins [29]. Fibroblast activation occurs through communication between macrophages, fibroblasts, and cardiomyocytes in cardiac tissue, with chemokines and inflammatory cytokines playing a role in inducing this phenotypic change.

The primary factors promoting fibroblast transition include endothelin-1, angiotensin II (Ang II), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-4, IL-1, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). Mouse models have demonstrated that reduced IL-1β levels result in increased TGF-β, which inhibits the induction of myocardial fibrosis, although the exact mechanism remains under investigation [30]. TGF-β isoforms play a key role in the activation of fibroblasts [29]. In the early stages after injury, TGF-β activation has a predominantly anti-inflammatory effect. However, prolonged and excessive activation of this signalling pathway in fibroblasts and mechanically stressed cardiomyocytes leads to myocardial dysfunction [31].

Genes encoding key proteins likely involved in this process are noteworthy. For instance, the type I/II collagen-binding prolargin encoded by PRELP and the COL22A1 gene, which encodes the alpha chain of collagen XXII, expressed in tendon-muscle junctions, are implicated [32]. These mechanisms, involving mitochondrial and cellular stress, contribute to the hypertrophic response in the heart. Although the initiating signalling pathways vary, they converge on common pathways that alter cell metabolism and result in HCM [33].

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and extracellular volume (ECV) may be key indicators in the diagnosis of HCM. Although both indices are highly effective in the assessment of sudden cardiac death, it is LGE that has a stronger association with the risk of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) and diastolic dysfunction [34]. The determined receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve for the extent of LGE in specific left ventricular segments obtained a high area under curve (AUC) value of 0.861 [35]. An even more reliable and repeated instrument in assessing risk classification in HCM based on variability and extent of cardiac scarring is LGE entropy [36]. Similar to the LGE entropy, LGE rate may discover an important role in the surveillance and monitoring of HCM patients [37]. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating LGE in patients with HCM, may contribute to the stratification of protein biomarkers by proteomic profiling [38].

Both pharmacological and invasive treatment strategies are recommended for patients with HCM. In obstructive disease, the primary role of pharmacotherapy is symptom relief [39]. According to the 2024 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES)/Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) guidelines, non-vasodilating beta-blockers are suggested as first-line therapy. Verapamil and diltiazem are alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate beta-blockers. For non-responders, myosin inhibitors such as mavacamten are recommended. Invasive approaches, such as septal reduction therapy, are offered to patients who do not respond to pharmacotherapy [39] (Fig. 2).

3. Genetic Basis of HCM and Its Impact on Fibrosis

HCM is an example of single-gene disorder, characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. Genetic mutations disrupt the structure and functionality of the myocardium, exerting a profound influence on the fibrotic processes that define disease progression [15]. The primary genetic contributors to HCM are mutations in sarcomere proteins, particularly those in the MYH7 and MYBPC3 genes, which are the most frequently implicated genes across global HCM populations [40]. These genes encode β-myosin heavy chain and myosin-binding protein C, respectively, both of which are essential for the contractile function and structural stability of cardiomyocytes [41]. It has been observed by several authors that patients with HCM and sarcomere mutations exhibit more fibrosis than those who tested negative for genetic mutations [42, 43]. MYH7 mutations have the effect of disrupting normal sarcomere function, thereby impairing the force generation necessary for effective heart contractions. This mechanical disruption results in an increased mechanical load on the myocardium, which in turn activates profibrotic signaling pathways, including TGF-β and Ang II, that promote fibroblast activation and excessive collagen deposition within the ECM [44]. This fibrotic process not only increases myocardial stiffness but also disrupts normal electrical conduction, thereby contributing to arrhythmic risks in patients with HCM [45]. Mutations in MYBPC3 similarly contribute to fibrosis through a different mechanism. The disruption of sarcomere organization and induction of cellular stress, particularly oxidative stress, that occurs as a result of MYBPC3 haploinsufficiency has been identified as a known promoter of fibrotic remodeling. This process results in the secretion of cytokines that enhance fibroblast proliferation, thereby increasing ECM deposition and further contributing to myocardial rigidity and impaired relaxation [46, 47]. In summary, the aforementioned sarcomeric protein mutations result in a cycle of cellular stress and fibrotic remodeling, which has been linked to adverse clinical outcomes in HCM patients.

Non-sarcomeric genetic mutations play a substantial role in the fibrotic processes observed in HCM, influencing cellular stability, calcium homeostasis, and overall myocardial function [48]. Mutations in the PLN gene affect calcium cycling by impairing the reuptake of calcium into the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which results in elevated cytoplasmic calcium concentrations [49, 50]. This dysregulation of calcium handling not only disrupts cardiomyocyte relaxation but also activates profibrotic pathways [51]. An increase in cytoplasmic calcium is associated with the activation of the TGF-β pathway [52], which enhances fibroblast differentiation and collagen production, resulting in a stiffer and less compliant myocardium. The role of FLNC mutations serves to underscore the significance of non-sarcomeric factors in HCM fibrosis [53, 54, 55]. FLNC plays a pivotal role in maintaining cytoskeletal integrity. Mutations in FLNC, therefore, compromise this structural framework, creating instability within the cardiomyocytes [56]. This instability results in increased mechanical stress, which activates integrin-related signaling pathways that stimulate fibroblast activation and collagen synthesis [57]. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that FLNC mutations interact with ECM components, thereby reinforcing fibrosis by sustaining collagen production and enhancing myocardial stiffness [58, 59]. This increased fibrotic remodeling due to non-sarcomeric mutations highlights the complex genetic mechanisms contributing to fibrosis in HCM and identifies potential therapeutic targets for modulating fibrosis in affected individuals.

4. Cellular Mechanisms of Fibrosis in HCM

Cardiac fibrosis is a pathological process characterised by the excessive deposition of ECM proteins in response to pathophysiological stimuli, leading to scarring of heart tissue. Patients with HCM experience significant levels of cardiac fibrosis, which can result in diastolic dysfunction [26]. One of the primary drivers of fibrosis is fibroblast activation. Fibroblasts transform into myofibroblasts, producing an excess of ECM. The interaction between cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, such as through the TGF-β pathway, promotes progressive fibrosis and reduces the flexibility and contractile function of the heart [60, 61]. Concurrently, cardiomyocytes respond to the stress of cardiac hypertrophy by releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines that influence fibroblast activity [62]. Understanding the regulatory processes governing fibroblast activation in HCM could help mitigate cardiac fibrosis and support the development of effective medical interventions to prevent adverse outcomes in patients [63].

The cellular mechanisms of fibrosis in HCM involve intricate interactions between cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and immune system cells. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) is a process in which endothelial cells transform into mesenchymal cells, promoting fibrosis [64]. In HCM, EndoMT contributes to increased numbers of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts within cardiac tissue. It is suggested that factors such as TGF-β and hypoxia induce EndoMT, leading to elevated ECM production and advancing fibrosis [65]. Furthermore, cells undergoing EndoMT exhibit altered gene expression, which affects their function and interactions with other cardiac cells [66].

Cells of the immune system, such as macrophages and lymphocytes, also play an important role in fibrosis processes in HCM [67]. In patients with HCM and acute clinical worsening, myocardial biopsy often demonstrates inflammatory infiltration that is associated with necrosis of myocytes [22]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-1β, and IL-6 are markedly elevated in various myocardial pathological conditions associated with fibrosis. A clinical study has shown a correlation between elevated levels of these cytokines and fibrosis-related endpoints [68]. TNF-α facilitates fibrogenic activation of immune cell populations within injured myocardium. In mice overexpressing TNF-α, the fibrogenic actions of TNF-α in the myocardium have been partly attributed to the expansion of cardiac mast cells [69]. The precise role of neutrophils in HCM remains to be determined. However, it is established that these cells release pro-inflammatory factors and enzymes, such as myeloperoxidase and acid phosphatase, which can directly damage the myocardium. This leads to irregular thickening of fibers and contributes to ECM degradation and fibroblast activation [70]. The prolonged presence of neutrophils can result in chronic inflammation, which subsequently facilitates the development of HCM. Understanding the cellular mechanisms leading to fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy will allow the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Interactions between cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, EndoMT and the role of immune cells are important areas of research that can contribute to the understanding and treatment of this complex disease.

5. Key Signaling Pathways in HCM-related Fibrosis

5.1 TGF-β Signaling Pathway

When discussing tissue fibrosis and signaling pathways, it is crucial to focus on TGF-β and its downstream elements. This molecule signals through TGF-β receptors, promoting intracellular canonical signalling via Smads. These proteins mediate the downstream effects of TGF-β. Upon ligand binding, Sma and Mad related protein (SMAD)3 and SMAD4 are phosphorylated and interact with SMAD4. The resulting complex enters the nucleus to induce gene expression. SMAD7 acts as a negative regulator of this pathway [71]. By acting on fibroblasts, TGF-β stimulates the expression of collagens and inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases, thereby increasing ECM stability. Additionally, this pro-fibrotic molecule affects immune cells, contributing to fibrosis formation. For instance, TGF-β enhances macrophage presence and their pro-fibrotic responses [72].

Several studies have investigated the relationship between TGF-β and cardiac hypertrophy. The use of TGF-β neutralising antibodies in mice treated with cyclosporin A to induce HCM has been associated with significantly reduced ventricular thickness, a lower presence of fibrosis, and decreased rates of non-myocyte proliferation. These findings confirm the important role of TGF-β in the pathogenesis of HCM [73]. Immunohistochemical analyses of the hearts of larger animals with HCM also show a greater presence of TGF-β [74]. More recently, a large-scale proteomic study demonstrated that the TGF-β protein is upregulated in the blood of patients with HCM [75]. Furthermore, the expression of SMAD2 and SMAD3, which are considered as downstream pro-fibrotic elements of TGF-β, are increased in cardiac samples of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy [76].

Huang et al. [77] recently examined TGF-β-related genes in single-cell RNA sequencing and transcriptome datasets of heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy. The analyses revealed that TGF-β pathways are stimulated in cells affected by heart failure. Furthermore, researchers analysed differentially expressed genes in the dataset of cardiac hypertrophy, identifying aberrant expression of several in this cohort. Six hub genes (ADAMTS2, TANC2, MRC2, DYNLL1, OTUD1, and EGR1) were identified as potential therapeutic targets for heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy. Notably, some of these genes were significantly associated with cardiac fibrosis. For instance, early growth response 1 (EGR1) is a pro-fibrotic molecule implicated in the fibrosis of various tissues [78, 79]. TGF-β can stimulate the expression of EGR1 through a SMAD-independent mechanism mediated by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [80]. Importantly, EGR1 has been shown to enhance the expression of fibrosis-associated genes, including Tgf-β3, Pdgf-a, Pdgf-b, and Col1α2. In cardiac fibrosis, EGR1 mediates pro-fibrotic alterations as a downstream element of Ang II [81]. EGR1 appears to be a significant fibrotic stimulator in the heart. A recent study by Laggner et al. [82] confirmed that it is upregulated in hearts with right ventricular hypertrophy due to pulmonary hypertension.

Apart from EGR1, TGF-β is associated with other molecules closely related to cardiac fibrosis. Lysine oxidase (LOX) is an enzyme that catalyses the oxidative deamination of lysine and hydroxylysine residues in collagen. This process initiates inter- and intramolecular covalent cross-linking, altering collagen stiffness. TGF-β upregulates the expression of LOX in cardiac fibrosis [83], thereby influencing cardiac cross-linking. In patients with obstructive HCM who underwent surgical myomectomy, collagen levels were significantly higher than in a control group composed of accident victims. Additionally, tissue samples from patients with HCM showed increased LOX expression, which correlated with the presence of collagen fibres [84].

Recently, TGF-β has been linked to the activity of endothelin-1, a molecule associated with pathological changes in HCM [85, 86]. In rat cardiomyocytes, endothelin-1 promotes the expression of TGF-β1-3, along with TGF-β protein production and secretion. It may also affect cardiac fibroblasts, inducing pro-fibrotic changes. In the same study, Liu et al. [87] analysed data from human samples and found that only TGF-β2 and TGF-β3 genes were upregulated in human tissues. Furthermore, the researchers observed increased expression of the anti-fibrotic gene SMAD7, a negative regulator of TGF-β signalling. Hypothetically, this upregulation could represent a compensatory mechanism aimed at mitigating fibrotic alterations in cardiac tissue. In another study, the expression of SMAD7 was reduced in patients with obstructive HCM [76].

Recently, significant attention has been directed toward regulatory mechanisms that mediate gene expression. These epigenetic mechanisms often involve non-coding RNA, such as microRNA (miRNA). These small molecules, typically about 20 nucleotides in length, bind to their target mRNA to suppress translation. The importance of miRNAs was highlighted in 2024 when the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology was awarded to the discoverers of these molecules [88].

More than 10 years ago, Bagnall et al. [89] analyzed the miRNA profile in a double mutant mouse HCM model. Among their findings, the authors observed that microRNA- 1 (miR-1) expression was reduced to a pre-disease state. This finding aligns with more recent research. Specifically, TGF-β receptor 1 was identified as a target of miR-1-5p, and reduced expression of this miRNA was also found in animal models of right ventricular hypertrophy [90]. The downregulation of miR-1 could result in an increased presence of TGF-β receptors, thus amplifying the pro-fibrotic processes observed in hypertrophy.

Monitoring TGF-β could potentially serve as a tool for evaluating the prognosis of patients with HCM. In a study by Shimada et al. [91], the researchers demonstrated that upregulated TGF-β pathways were associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with HCM. In another study, researchers employed proteomic analyses to develop a diagnostic panel for distinguishing patients with HCM who had a history of MACEs. In total, 571 proteins were differentially regulated in HCM patients with and without a history of MACEs. A diagnostic model comprising 29 proteins, including TGF-β, achieved an area under the curve of 0.82 [92]. Additionally, monitoring the circulating TGF-β was suggested to indicate the possible occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients with HCM undergoing surgical treatment [93].

5.2 Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosteron System (RAAS)

The effect of Ang II on cardiac hypertrophy depends on the activation of specific receptors. Activation of the pro-hypertrophic Ang type 1 receptor stimulates phosphorylase C, promotes protein kinase C, and mobilises Ca2+ ions. This cascade activates nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase and alters cardiomyocyte metabolism, ultimately leading to pathological cardiac hypertrophy [94]. Interestingly, Ang II enhances the expression of connective tissue growth factor, an ECM protein, while downregulating epidermal growth factor receptor expression. This regulation is mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), a member of the MAPK pathway [95]. An important mechanism has been observed in a mouse model, where Ang II and phenylephrine infusion resulted in greater upregulation of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor expression in myofibroblasts than in cardiomyocytes. The study also suggested that IGF-1 attenuates interstitial myocardial fibrosis by downregulating the expression of rho-associated coiled-coil containing kinase (ROCK)2-mediated α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and Akt signalling pathways [96].

Another mechanism contributing to myocardial fibrosis involves the effect of Ang II on the upregulation of wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 3a (WNT3a) in cardiomyocytes. This promotes the paracrine transformation of fibroblasts, enhancing fibrosis through increased expression of α-SMA and fibronectin [97]. The Ang II/WNT/β-catenin regulatory pathway, which is influenced by protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7), is particularly important. Reduced PRMT7 expression was observed in cardiomyocytes subjected to continuous Ang II infusion in an animal model. The study suggested that PRMT7-mediated methylation of axin stabilises axin and β-catenin, leading to β-catenin degradation and inhibiting Ang II-induced negative cardiac remodelling [98].

The literature demonstrates conflicting results on the efficacy of RAAS inhibition in reducing cardiac fibrosis in patients with HCM [99]. Recently, the phase 2b clinical trial investigated the use of valsartan (AngII receptor blocker) showed improved cardiac functionality and structure in patients with early stage HCM [100]. However, according to the VANISH trial, valsartan was not effective in patients with subclinical HCM [101].

5.3 JAK/STAT Pathway

The interaction of a ligand with its corresponding receptor activates the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling pathway. This leads to autophosphorylation of the JAK kinase, which is bound to the receptor, by phosphorylating its tyrosine residue. STAT3 is subsequently phosphorylated, causing it to dissociate and form a dimer. These STAT3 dimers regulate transcription by binding to promoters in the cell nucleus. Because this pathway is activated by factors promoting fibroblast activation—such as endothelin-1, Ang II, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), PDGF, TGF-β1, and IL-6—it plays a critical role in cardiac fibrosis and may contribute significantly to HCM pathology [102]. High levels of IL-6 during cardiopulmonary bypass likely contribute to myocardial fibrosis through JAK/STAT activation [103].

Interestingly, the peptide hormone Elabela inhibited myocardial fibrosis in mouse models by suppressing the IL-6/STAT3 signalling pathway and activating the cystine–glutamate antiporter xCT/glutathione peroxidase pathway [104]. Obesity and diet are also significant factors influencing HCM progression. Animal studies have shown that a high-fat, corn oil-rich diet that induces a type 2 diabetes phenotype promotes left ventricular collagen synthesis. This occurs through increased IL-6 and reactive oxygen species synthesis, activating the JAK1/STAT3/Ang II/TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway [105].

Furthermore, adipose tissue in obese individuals leads to elevated levels of the adipokine resistin, which promotes fibroblast differentiation by activating the JAK2/STAT3 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK-cJun) pathways. This, in turn, drives the expression of numerous ECM proteins, contributing to chronic cardiac fibrosis, particularly in overweight and diabetic individuals [106]. Aerobic training over a 28-day period has been shown to inhibit negative myocardial remodelling via miR-574-3p in animal models, which suppresses IL-6 [107]. miR-326, inhibits myocardial hypertrophy by downregulating the JAK/STAT and MAPK signalling pathways. These miRNA molecules may have significant roles in HCM progression and represent potential therapeutic targets [108]. Women with HCM experience significantly greater age-related deterioration in heart function after menopause than men of the same age group [109]. Protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7) is an important factor in this pathology. Reduced PREMT7 expression in the cardiomyocytes of postmenopausal women diminishes the alleviation of inflammation and oxidative stress associated with menopause. PRMT7, through STAT3 activation, induces the expression of SOCS3, a direct inhibitor of the JAK/STAT pathway [110]. STAT3 regulates the expression of Collagen-IV (Col-IV) which is linked to interstitial fibrosis. STAT3/Col-IV expression has been shown to be different between HCM patients with different phenotypes of fibrosis [111]. Table 1 (Ref. [73, 76, 84, 99, 100, 101, 111]) presents a summary of the potential involvement of TGF-β, RAAS and JAK/STAT in HCM and cardiac fibrosis.

5.4 WNT/β-catenin Pathway

The WNT/β-catenin pathway is a central signalling pathway involved in cardiac fibrosis through the activation of cardiac fibroblasts [112]. While this pathway plays an essential role in the reparative phase following myocardial infarction, prolonged profibrotic effects can lead to negative outcomes, such as HCM progression [113]. The importance of this pathway was demonstrated in a rat study using a WNT/β-catenin/c-Myc/cyclin D1 pathway antagonist, which reduced the expression of these proteins and decreased levels of collagen-I/-III (Col-I/-III), vimentin, and α-SMA. Additionally, inhibition of negative cardiac remodelling was observed [114].

WNT3a and WNT5a are key ligands promoting this pathway, although they act through different mechanisms. WNT3a facilitates the nuclear translocation of β-catenin by inhibiting Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β (GSK3β), allowing the activation of T-cell factor (TCF)/lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) transcription and genes such as AXIN2 and TCF7. By contrast, WNT5a does not inhibit GSK3β; instead, it leads to IL-6 production and activates the JNK, ERK1/2, and activator protein 1 (AP1) pathways, which are unaffected by WNT3a [115].

The profibrotic response can be further enhanced by the synergistic effects of WNT3a and TGF-β through the promotion of IL-11 synthesis. Additionally, TGF-β1 enhances WNT3a expression by regulating the ALK5/Smad2/3 axis, which increases c-Myc expression—a process also promoted by WNT/β-catenin [116]. Interestingly, WNT5a can inhibit TGF-β-induced Col- I synthesis.

In mice with myocardial infarction, collagen synthesis was inhibited by circNSD1 knockdown. CircNSD1 acts as a sponge for miRNA-429-3p, and its knockdown reduces sulfatase1(SULF1) expression and WNT/β-catenin activation, thereby inhibiting collagen synthesis in myofibroblasts [117]. Another molecule of interest is circular RNA ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 1 (circARAP1), which promotes the miR-379-5p/Krüppel-like factor 9 (KLF9)/WNT/β-catenin axis [118]. The use of inhibitors such as pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate in rat models has shown decreased levels of TNF-α, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines, and inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin/GSK3β and nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathways [119]. A substance with high clinical potential is the porcupine inhibitor CGX1321. In mouse and rat models, CGX1321 significantly reduced fibrosis and myocardial hypertrophy while improving right ventricular function by reducing the expression of Fos like antigen 1 (FOSL1), WNT3a, and WNT5a, thereby inhibiting both canonical and non-canonical pathways [120, 121].

Doxorubicin has been shown to activate the WNT/β-catenin pathway, along with the RAAS components, including renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1). This activity can be mitigated by infliximab [122].

A potential protein enhancing the production of fibrosis-associated compounds, such as α-SMA, Col-I, and fibronectin, is neuroepithelial cell-transforming gene 1 protein (NET1). In a mouse model, upregulated NET1 formed a complex with GSK3β phosphatase, enabling the creation of the NET1-GSK3β-β-catenin complex. This complex promotes β-catenin nuclear transport, preventing ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation [123].

Finally, inhibition of Col-I/III and α-SMA expression in a mouse model was mediated by downregulated dedicator of cytokinesis 2 (DOCK2), which led to suppression of the WNT/β-catenin pathway [124].

5.5 MAPK Pathway

Molecules belonging to the MAPK family play a significant role in negative cardiac remodelling. These include kinases such as ERK1/2, p38MAPK, and JNK1/2 [125]. Suppression of ERK in a mouse model of cardiomyopathy inhibited myocardial fibrosis [126]. One mechanism for the inhibition of cardiac fibroblasts involves SO2-induced sulphenylation of ERK1/2 [127]. Additionally, the use of ERK1/2 inhibitors may counteract the profibrotic effects elicited by the TNF family member CD137 [128]. Myocardial fibrosis can also be mitigated through inhibition of the ERK1/2-matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP- 9) axis via activation of the G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor 30 [129].

The SerpinE2 protein exhibits antagonistic effects, interacting with membrane proteins such as low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LPR1) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) to activate ERK1/2 and β-catenin, thereby increasing collagen production [130]. Activation of the ERK1 pathway can also occur via cytokine receptor-like factor 1, whose elevated expression was observed in TGF-β1-stimulated human cardiac fibroblasts [131].

The p38MAPK plays a crucial role in cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy. Inhibition of this kinase reduces cardiac hypertrophy and preserves collagen synthesis in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes and IGF-1-induced fibroblasts [132]. In septic mice, α1-adrenergic receptor (α1-AR) agonists in the cardiac endothelium inhibit cardiac remodelling. Activation of the α1-AR receptor promotes protein kinase C, leading to ERK1/2 activation, while inhibiting the p38MAPK pathway, which is activated through toll-like receptor 4 by lipopolysaccharides [133].

Interestingly, p38MAPK activation leads to a decrease in Cx43, a protein required for normal myocardial function, disrupting the balance between microtubule depolymerisation and polymerisation in the myocardium [134]. IL-17 regulates p38MAPK, promoting negative cardiac remodelling by upregulating C-C motif ligand 2 (CCL2) and activating AP-1 via the adaptor protein 1 (Act1)/TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6)/p38MAPK pathway [135]. JNK1/2 also contributes to the synthesis of profibrotic factors through the transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1-p38 (TAK1-p38)/JNK1/2 regulatory axis. Ubiquitin-specific protease 19 negatively affects this axis by inhibiting the transition of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts [136]. Similarly, zinc finger protein zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20 (ZBTB20) may inhibit fibrosis after myocardial infarction by targeting the TNF-α/apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1)/JNK1/2 pathway, exerting an anti-apoptotic effect [137].

In HCM, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis demonstrates significant dysregulation of the MAPK pathway [138]. Furthermore, dysregulation of MAPK signalling is associated with the worsening of heart failure [139].

6. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and HCM

In the previous sections, we have focused on the genetic background of HCM pathogenesis and the potential involvement of signaling pathways in hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis. Recently, there is growing attention towards mitochondrial dysfunction as a pathogenic element in the occurrence of HCM. Analyses of the HCM cardiac samples demonstrate impaired energy metabolism. Diseased hearts show signs of disrupted fatty acid metabolism, with reduced expression of enzymes involved in metabolism and transport of acylcarnitines. Moreover, the state of HCM is associated with impaired structure of mitochondria and their ability to perform oxidative phosphorylation, together with reduced levels of ATP, thus demonstrating energy deprivation [33]. In addition, HCM hearts show alterations in the expression of enzymes involved in the mitochondrial transport of Ca2+, which is also involved in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production [140]. Consequently, disturbances in mitochondrial functionality are considered to be involved in HCM. Perhaps, mitochondrial abnormalities are also linked with the processes of cardiac fibrosis. Tian et al. [141] showed that stimulation of cardiac fibroblasts with TGF-β also affects fatty acid oxidation and changes in the expression of enzymes involved in the metabolism of acylcarnitines. Moreover, the authors observed a reduced expression of voltage-dependent anion-selective channel 1 (VDAC-1), a mitochondrial protein that forms a complex with CPT1a mediating acylcarnitines formation, which is thought to also contribute to fatty acid transport. Overexpression of VDAC-1 was found to suppress cardiac fibrosis development [141]. In a recent study, Qian and colleagues [142] showed that using isoflavone compound counteracts mitochondrial dysfunction and alleviates cardiac fibrosis. Thus, improving mitochondrial abnormalities could suppress the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of HCM and cardiac fibrosis.

7. Modern and Future Therapies in HCM

As previously mentioned, either pharmacological therapy or invasive procedures can be performed in patients with HCM. Pharmacological treatment represents an initial approach in these patients. Recent investigations focus on studying a relatively novel class of therapeutics – myosin inhibitors. An animal study demonstrated mavacamten to suppress cardiac contractility and reduce left ventricle wall thickness. Importantly, if administered early, the drug significantly reduced fibrotic changes in the cardiac tissues. However, administration of the therapeutic in advanced hypertrophy did not reduce fibrotic lesions [143]. Thus, by modulating fibrotic mechanisms, the drug can reduce the risk of developing arrhythmias [16] and further deteriorating heart functionality. The EXPLORER-HCM phase 3 clinical trial proved the efficacy of mavacamten in obstructive HCM, as the drug improved left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and NYHA class, compared to placebo [144]. In 2022, mavacamten was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat patients with obstructive HCM [145]. A recently published meta-analysis that analyzed 3 randomized controlled trials comparing mavacamten and placebo supports the benefits of myosin inhibition, but warrants further research regarding the issue of treatment-emergent adverse events [146]. Aficamten, a next-generation myosin inhibitor [147], is currently being investigated in patients with HCM. The most recent clinical trials demonstrated the beneficial effects of aficamten in patients with obstructive [148, 149] and nonobstructive HCM [150].

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offer an interesting insight into the pathophysiology of cardiac diseases and potential therapeutic methods. Fibroblasts can be obtained and switched towards iPSCs, which then can be differentiated into cardiomyocytes or other cellular lineages. We have discussed the potential benefits of iPSCs in myocardial infarction in a previous paper [151]. This method is exciting for studying the pathogenesis of diseases, as it is possible to use patient-derived iPSCs and differentiate them towards cardiomyocytes. For instance, Shiba et al. [152] generated iPSCs using peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with a DSG2 mutation, which was associated with cardiomyopathy. Researchers then introduced the proper gene to the iPSCs through the adeno-associated viruses. Gene replacement improved the contraction force of the three-dimensional (3D) self-organized tissue rings, thus demonstrating enormous potential in iPSCs. iPSCs are also being used to study cardiac hypertrophy. Rosales and Lizcano [153] studied iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and identified histone demethylase JMJD2A as a probable enzyme involved in the development of hypertrophy. In the context of this review, iPSC models could be implemented to study signaling pathways or molecules implemented in the development of HCM or HCM-associated cardiac fibrosis.

8. Conclusions

HCM is a disease with a complex pathogenesis, involving a genetic background and the activity of several signalling pathways. Aberrant activity of these cascades is associated with pro-fibrotic changes in cardiac tissue, contributing to the progression of heart failure, the occurrence of MACEs, and a generally poor prognosis. We are currently in an era of large-scale transcriptomic and proteomic studies, which broadly and comprehensively analyse the dysregulated expression of genes and proteins in patients with HCM. These studies have identified hub genes associated with the pathogenesis of HCM, highlighting potential therapeutic targets. Several signalling pathways are implicated in cardiac fibrosis, with the TGF-β cascade being the most widely known and investigated. Current evidence supports the role of TGF-β in the fibrotic changes observed in HCM. However, further studies are needed to explore differences between animal and human findings, as upregulated isoforms appear to vary between species. Importantly, monitoring the levels or expression of pro-fibrotic pathways could improve our ability to estimate prognosis in patients with HCM.

References

[1]

Teekakirikul P, Padera RF, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: translating cellular cross talk into therapeutics. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2012; 199: 417–421. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201207033.

[2]

Dungu JN, Hardy-Wallace A, Dimarco AD, Savage HO. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Current Heart Failure Reports. 2024; 21: 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-024-00654-0.

[3]

Santos Mateo JJ, Sabater Molina M, Gimeno Blanes JR. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Medicina Clinica. 2018; 150: 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2017.09.013.

[4]

Semsarian C, Ingles J, Maron MS, Maron BJ. New perspectives on the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015; 65: 1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.019.

[5]

Ho CY, Day SM, Ashley EA, Michels M, Pereira AC, Jacoby D, et al. Genotype and Lifetime Burden of Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Insights from the Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry (SHaRe). Circulation. 2018; 138: 1387–1398. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033200.

[6]

Marian AJ, Braunwald E. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Circulation Research. 2017; 121: 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311059.

[7]

D’Ascenzi F, Valentini F, Pistoresi S, Frascaro F, Piu P, Cavigli L, et al. Causes of sudden cardiac death in young athletes and non-athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis: Sudden cardiac death in the young. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022; 32: 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2021.06.001.

[8]

Teekakirikul P, Zhu W, Huang HC, Fung E. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Overview of Genetics and Management. Biomolecules. 2019; 9: 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9120878.

[9]

Lopes LR, Ho CY, Elliott PM. Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: established and emerging implications for clinical practice. European Heart Journal. 2024; 45: 2727–2734. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae421.

[10]

Walsh R, Buchan R, Wilk A, John S, Felkin LE, Thomson KL, et al. Defining the genetic architecture of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: re-evaluating the role of non-sarcomeric genes. European Heart Journal. 2017; 38: 3461–3468. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw603.

[11]

Litt MJ, Ali A, Reza N. Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis and Management. Vascular Health and Risk Management. 2023; 19: 211–221. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S365001.

[12]

Bueno Marinas M, Cason M, Bariani R, Celeghin R, De Gaspari M, Pinci S, et al. A Comprehensive Analysis of Non-Desmosomal Rare Genetic Variants in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Integrating in Padua Cohort Literature-Derived Data. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25: 6267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25116267.

[13]

Corrado D, Zorzi A, Cipriani A, Bauce B, Bariani R, Brunetti G, et al. Scarring/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. European Heart Journal Supplements: Journal of the European Society of Cardiology. 2023; 25: C144–C154. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad017.

[14]

Maron BA, Wang RS, Carnethon MR, Rowin EJ, Loscalzo J, Maron BJ, et al. What Causes Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy? The American Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 179: 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.017.

[15]

Coleman JA, Doste R, Ashkir Z, Coppini R, Sachetto R, Watkins H, et al. Mechanisms of ischaemia-induced arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a large-scale computational study. Cardiovascular Research. 2024; 120: 914–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvae086.

[16]

Nguyen MN, Kiriazis H, Gao XM, Du XJ. Cardiac Fibrosis and Arrhythmogenesis. Comprehensive Physiology. 2017; 7: 1009–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c160046.

[17]

Wang Y, Li Q, Tao B, Angelini M, Ramadoss S, Sun B, et al. Fibroblasts in heart scar tissue directly regulate cardiac excitability and arrhythmogenesis. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2023; 381: 1480–1487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh9925.

[18]

Ammirati E, Frigerio M, Adler ED, Basso C, Birnie DH, Brambatti M, et al. Management of Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: An Expert Consensus Document. Circulation. Heart Failure. 2020; 13: e007405. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007405.

[19]

Sharma R, Kouranos V, Cooper LT, Metra M, Ristic A, Heidecker B, et al. Management of cardiac sarcoidosis. European Heart Journal. 2024; 45: 2697–2726. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae356.

[20]

Scheel PJ, 3rd, Cartella I, Murray B, Gilotra NA, Ammirati E. Role of genetics in inflammatory cardiomyopathy. International Journal of Cardiology. 2024; 400: 131777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131777.

[21]

Neff LS, Bradshaw AD. Cross your heart? Collagen cross-links in cardiac health and disease. Cellular Signalling. 2021; 79: 109889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109889.

[22]

Frustaci A, Verardo R, Caldarulo M, Acconcia MC, Russo MA, Chimenti C. Myocarditis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients presenting acute clinical deterioration. European Heart Journal. 2007; 28: 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl525.

[23]

Guo X, Zhang J, Huang M, Song C, Nie C, Zheng X, et al. Systemic inflammation is associated with myocardial fibrosis in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. ESC Heart Failure. 2024; 10.1002/ehf2.15109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15109.

[24]

Díez J, González A, Kovacic JC. Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis in Nonischemic Heart Disease, Part 3/4: JACC Focus Seminar. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020; 75: 2204–2218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.019.

[25]

Maruyama K, Imanaka-Yoshida K. The Pathogenesis of Cardiac Fibrosis: A Review of Recent Progress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23: 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052617.

[26]

Galati G, Leone O, Pasquale F, Olivotto I, Biagini E, Grigioni F, et al. Histological and Histometric Characterization of Myocardial Fibrosis in End-Stage Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Clinical-Pathological Study of 30 Explanted Hearts. Circulation. Heart Failure. 2016; 9: e003090. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003090.

[27]

Venugopal H, Hanna A, Humeres C, Frangogiannis NG. Properties and Functions of Fibroblasts and Myofibroblasts in Myocardial Infarction. Cells. 2022; 11: 1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091386.

[28]

Czubryt MP, Hale TM. Cardiac fibrosis: Pathobiology and therapeutic targets. Cellular Signalling. 2021; 85: 110066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110066.

[29]

Bowers SLK, Meng Q, Molkentin JD. Fibroblasts orchestrate cellular crosstalk in the heart through the ECM. Nature Cardiovascular Research. 2022; 1: 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44161-022-00043-7.

[30]

Correction to: Interleukin-1β Disruption Protects Male Mice From Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Pathogenesis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2023; 12: e027720. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027720.

[31]

Frangogiannis NG. Transforming growth factor-β in myocardial disease. Nature Reviews. Cardiology. 2022; 19: 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00646-w.

[32]

Chaffin M, Papangeli I, Simonson B, Akkad AD, Hill MC, Arduini A, et al. Single-nucleus profiling of human dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nature. 2022; 608: 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04817-8.

[33]

Ranjbarvaziri S, Kooiker KB, Ellenberger M, Fajardo G, Zhao M, Vander Roest AS, et al. Altered Cardiac Energetics and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2021; 144: 1714–1731. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053575.

[34]

Levine J, Collins JD, Ogele E, Murtagh G, Carr JC, Bonow RO, et al. Relation of Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Extracellular Volume Fraction to Ventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 131: 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.040.

[35]

Barbosa AR, Almeida J, Guerreiro C, Teixeira P, Ladeiras Lopes R, Dias Ferreira N, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement location assessed by magnetic resonance and arrhythmogenic risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia. 2020; 39: 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2019.12.009.

[36]

Zhao X, Jin F, Wang J, Zhao X, Wang L, Wei H. Entropy of left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement and its prognostic value in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy a new CMR assessment method. International Journal of Cardiology. 2023; 373: 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.11.017.

[37]

Aquaro GD, Todiere G, Barison A, Grigoratos C, Parisella ML, Adami M, et al. Prognostic Role of the Progression of Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2024; 211: 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.11.003.

[38]

Lander BS, Zhao Y, Hasegawa K, Maurer MS, Tower-Rader A, Fifer MA, et al. Comprehensive Proteomics Profiling Identifies Patients With Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Population. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022; 9: 839409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.839409.

[39]

Ommen SR, Ho CY, Asif IM, Balaji S, Burke MA, Day SM, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024; 149: e1239–e1311. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001250.

[40]

Ommen SR, Semsarian C. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a practical approach to guideline directed management. Lancet (London, England). 2021; 398: 2102–2108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01205-8.

[41]

Akhtar M, Elliott P. The genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Global Cardiology Science & Practice. 2018; 2018: 36. https://doi.org/10.21542/gcsp.2018.36.

[42]

Vullaganti S, Levine J, Raiker N, Syed AA, Collins JD, Carr JC, et al. Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients With and Without Sarcomere Gene Mutations. Heart, Lung & Circulation. 2021; 30: 1496–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2021.04.008.

[43]

Neubauer S, Kolm P, Ho CY, Kwong RY, Desai MY, Dolman SF, et al. Distinct Subgroups in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the NHLBI HCM Registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019; 74: 2333–2345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1057.

[44]

Marian AJ. Molecular Genetic Basis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation Research. 2021; 128: 1533–1553. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318346.

[45]

Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang J, Ta S, Zhao J, Yao L, et al. Clinical phenotypic characteristics in patients carrying MYH7-R143Q mutation with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2024; 49: 102164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102164.

[46]

Moore J, Emili A. Mass-Spectrometry-Based Functional Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Technologies and Their Application for Analyzing Ex Vivo and In Vitro Models of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 13644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413644.

[47]

Pei J, Schuldt M, Nagyova E, Gu Z, El Bouhaddani S, Yiangou L, et al. Multi-omics integration identifies key upstream regulators of pathomechanisms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy due to truncating MYBPC3 mutations. Clinical Epigenetics. 2021; 13: 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-021-01043-3.

[48]

Langa P, Shafaattalab S, Goldspink PH, Wolska BM, Fernandes AA, Tibbits GF, et al. A perspective on Notch signalling in progression and arrhythmogenesis in familial hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2023; 378: 20220176. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0176.

[49]

Mazzarotto F, Girolami F, Boschi B, Barlocco F, Tomberli A, Baldini K, et al. Defining the diagnostic effectiveness of genes for inclusion in panels: the experience of two decades of genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at a single center. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2019; 21: 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0046-0.

[50]

Robinson P, Liu X, Sparrow A, Patel S, Zhang YH, Casadei B, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations increase myofilament Ca2+ buffering, alter intracellular Ca2+ handling, and stimulate Ca2+-dependent signaling. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2018; 293: 10487–10499. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.002081.

[51]

Parisi V, Chiti C, Graziosi M, Pasquale F, Ditaranto R, Minnucci M, et al. Phospholamban Cardiomyopathy: Unveiling a Distinct Phenotype Through Heart Failure Stages Progression. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2022; 15: e014232. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014232.

[52]

Gibb AA, Lazaropoulos MP, Elrod JW. Myofibroblasts and Fibrosis: Mitochondrial and Metabolic Control of Cellular Differentiation. Circulation Research. 2020; 127: 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316958.

[53]

Verdonschot JAJ, Vanhoutte EK, Claes GRF, Helderman-van den Enden ATJM, Hoeijmakers JGJ, Hellebrekers DMEI, et al. A mutation update for the FLNC gene in myopathies and cardiomyopathies. Human Mutation. 2020; 41: 1091–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.24004.

[54]

Ader F, De Groote P, Réant P, Rooryck-Thambo C, Dupin-Deguine D, Rambaud C, et al. FLNC pathogenic variants in patients with cardiomyopathies: Prevalence and genotype-phenotype correlations. Clinical Genetics. 2019; 96: 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13594.

[55]

Gómez J, Lorca R, Reguero JR, Morís C, Martín M, Tranche S, et al. Screening of the Filamin C Gene in a Large Cohort of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients. Circulation. Cardiovascular Genetics. 2017; 10: e001584. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001584.

[56]

Zhou X, Fang X, Ithychanda SS, Wu T, Gu Y, Chen C, et al. Interaction of Filamin C With Actin Is Essential for Cardiac Development and Function. Circulation Research. 2023; 133: 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.322750.

[57]

Schänzer A, Schumann E, Zengeler D, Gulatz L, Maroli G, Ahting U, et al. The p.Ala2430Val mutation in filamin C causes a “hypertrophic myofibrillar cardiomyopathy”. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 2021; 42: 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-021-09601-1.

[58]

Zhou Y, Chen Z, Zhang L, Zhu M, Tan C, Zhou X, et al. Loss of Filamin C Is Catastrophic for Heart Function. Circulation. 2020; 141: 869–871. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044061.

[59]

Gaudreault N, Ruel LJ, Henry C, Schleit J, Lagüe P, Champagne J, et al. Novel filamin C (FLNC) variant causes a severe form of familial mixed hypertrophic-restrictive cardiomyopathy. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part a. 2023; 191: 1508–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.63169.

[60]

Schlittler M, Pramstaller PP, Rossini A, De Bortoli M. Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Perspective from Fibroblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 14845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914845.

[61]

Liu X, Yin K, Chen L, Chen W, Li W, Zhang T, et al. Lineage-specific regulatory changes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy unraveled by single-nucleus RNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics. Cell Discovery. 2023; 9: 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-022-00490-3.

[62]

Jiang W, Xiong Y, Li X, Yang Y. Cardiac Fibrosis: Cellular Effectors, Molecular Pathways, and Exosomal Roles. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021; 8: 715258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.715258.

[63]

Alexanian M, Przytycki PF, Micheletti R, Padmanabhan A, Ye L, Travers JG, et al. A transcriptional switch governs fibroblast activation in heart disease. Nature. 2021; 595: 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03674-1.

[64]

Kovacic JC, Dimmeler S, Harvey RP, Finkel T, Aikawa E, Krenning G, et al. Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019; 73: 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.089.

[65]

Zeng H, Pan T, Zhan M, Hailiwu R, Liu B, Yang H, et al. Suppression of PFKFB3-driven glycolysis restrains endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrotic response. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022; 7: 303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01097-6.

[66]

Docshin P, Bairqdar A, Malashicheva A. Interplay between BMP2 and Notch signaling in endothelial-mesenchymal transition: implications for cardiac fibrosis. Stem Cell Investigation. 2023; 10: 18. https://doi.org/10.21037/sci-2023-019.

[67]

Lafuse WP, Wozniak DJ, Rajaram MVS. Role of Cardiac Macrophages on Cardiac Inflammation, Fibrosis and Tissue Repair. Cells. 2020; 10: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10010051.

[68]

Frangogiannis NG. Cardiac fibrosis. Cardiovascular Research. 2021; 117: 1450–1488. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa324.

[69]

Zhang W, Chancey AL, Tzeng HP, Zhou Z, Lavine KJ, Gao F, et al. The development of myocardial fibrosis in transgenic mice with targeted overexpression of tumor necrosis factor requires mast cell-fibroblast interactions. Circulation. 2011; 124: 2106–2116. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.052399.

[70]

Ozyilmaz S, Akgul O, Uyarel H, Pusuroglu H, Gul M, Satilmisoglu MH, et al. The importance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia: Orgao Oficial Da Sociedade Portuguesa De Cardiologia = Portuguese Journal of Cardiology: an Official Journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology. 2017; 36: 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2016.09.014.

[71]

Hu HH, Chen DQ, Wang YN, Feng YL, Cao G, Vaziri ND, et al. New insights into TGF-β/Smad signaling in tissue fibrosis. Chemico-biological Interactions. 2018; 292: 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.07.008.

[72]

Frangogiannis N. Transforming growth factor-β in tissue fibrosis. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2020; 217: e20190103. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20190103.

[73]

Teekakirikul P, Eminaga S, Toka O, Alcalai R, Wang L, Wakimoto H, et al. Cardiac fibrosis in mice with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is mediated by non-myocyte proliferation and requires Tgf-β. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2010; 120: 3520–3529. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI42028.

[74]

Cheng WC, Lawson C, Liu HH, Wilkie L, Dobromylskyj M, Luis Fuentes V, et al. Exploration of Mediators Associated with Myocardial Remodelling in Feline Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Animals: an Open Access Journal from MDPI. 2023; 13: 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132112.

[75]

Shimada YJ, Raita Y, Liang LW, Maurer MS, Hasegawa K, Fifer MA, et al. Comprehensive Proteomics Profiling Reveals Circulating Biomarkers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. Heart Failure. 2021; 14: e007849. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007849.

[76]

Zhang Z, Zhang F, Zhang M, Xue H, Fan L, Weng Y. The role of SMAD signaling in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: an immunohistopathological study in pediatric and adult patients. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 3706. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30776-9.

[77]

Huang K, Wu H, Xu X, Wu L, Li Q, Han L. Identification of TGF-β-related genes in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure based on single cell RNA sequencing. Aging. 2023; 15: 7187–7218. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204901.

[78]

Livingston MJ, Zhang M, Kwon SH, Chen JK, Li H, Manicassamy S, et al. Autophagy activates EGR1 via MAPK/ERK to induce FGF2 in renal tubular cells for fibroblast activation and fibrosis during maladaptive kidney repair. Autophagy. 2024; 20: 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2023.2281156.

[79]

Shi Z, Liu J, Zhao Y, Yang L, Cai Y, Zhang P, et al. ASXL1 mutations accelerate bone marrow fibrosis via EGR1-TNFA axis-mediated neoplastic fibrocyte generation in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Haematologica. 2023; 108: 1359–1373. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.280320.

[80]

Bhattacharyya S, Chen SJ, Wu M, Warner-Blankenship M, Ning H, Lakos G, et al. Smad-independent transforming growth factor-beta regulation of early growth response-1 and sustained expression in fibrosis: implications for scleroderma. The American Journal of Pathology. 2008; 173: 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2008.080382.

[81]

Ma ZG, Yuan YP, Fan D, Zhang X, Teng T, Song P, et al. IRX2 regulates angiotensin II-induced cardiac fibrosis by transcriptionally activating EGR1 in male mice. Nature Communications. 2023; 14: 4967. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40639-6.

[82]

Laggner M, Oberndorfer F, Golabi B, Bauer J, Zuckermann A, Hacker P, et al. EGR1 Is Implicated in Right Ventricular Cardiac Remodeling Associated with Pulmonary Hypertension. Biology. 2022; 11: 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050677.

[83]

González-Santamaría J, Villalba M, Busnadiego O, López-Olañeta MM, Sandoval P, Snabel J, et al. Matrix cross-linking lysyl oxidases are induced in response to myocardial infarction and promote cardiac dysfunction. Cardiovascular Research. 2016; 109: 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv214.

[84]

Bi X, Song Y, Song Y, Yuan J, Cui J, Zhao S, et al. Collagen Cross-Linking Is Associated With Cardiac Remodeling in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021; 10: e017752. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017752.

[85]

Tanaka A, Yuasa S, Mearini G, Egashira T, Seki T, Kodaira M, et al. Endothelin-1 induces myofibrillar disarray and contractile vector variability in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2014; 3: e001263. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001263.

[86]

Wang Y, Tang Y, Zou Y, Wang D, Zhu L, Tian T, et al. Plasma level of big endothelin-1 predicts the prognosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. International Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 243: 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.162.

[87]

Liu Y, Afzal J, Vakrou S, Greenland GV, Talbot CC, Jr, Hebl VB, et al. Differences in microRNA-29 and Pro-fibrotic Gene Expression in Mouse and Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2019; 6: 170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00170.

[88]

THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE. 2024. Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/ (Accessed: 10 October 2024).

[89]

Bagnall RD, Tsoutsman T, Shephard RE, Ritchie W, Semsarian C. Global microRNA profiling of the mouse ventricles during development of severe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and heart failure. PloS One. 2012; 7: e44744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044744.

[90]

Connolly M, Garfield BE, Crosby A, Morrell NW, Wort SJ, Kemp PR. miR-1-5p targets TGF-βR1 and is suppressed in the hypertrophying hearts of rats with pulmonary arterial hypertension. PloS One. 2020; 15: e0229409. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229409.

[91]

Shimada YJ, Raita Y, Liang LW, Maurer MS, Hasegawa K, Fifer MA, et al. Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Proteomics Profiling. Circulation. Genomic and Precision Medicine. 2022; 15: e003546. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003546.

[92]

Lee C, Liang LW, Hasegawa K, Maurer MS, Tower-Rader A, Fifer MA, et al. Signaling Pathways Associated With Prior Cardiovascular Events in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2024; 30: 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.07.010.

[93]

Guo Y, Wu X, Zheng X, Lu J, Wang S, Huang X. Usefulness of Preoperative Transforming Growth Factor-Beta to Predict New Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Ventricular Septal Myectomy in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 120: 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.252.

[94]

Bhullar SK, Dhalla NS. Angiotensin II-Induced Signal Transduction Mechanisms for Cardiac Hypertrophy. Cells. 2022; 11: 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11213336.

[95]

Liu X, Lin L, Li Q, Ni Y, Zhang C, Qin S, et al. ERK1/2 communicates GPCR and EGFR signaling pathways to promote CTGF-mediated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy upon Ang-II stimulation. BMC Molecular and Cell Biology. 2019; 20: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-019-0202-7.

[96]

Ock S, Ham W, Kang CW, Kang H, Lee WS, Kim J. IGF-1 protects against angiotensin II-induced cardiac fibrosis by targeting αSMA. Cell Death & Disease. 2021; 12: 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03965-5.

[97]

Zhao Y, Wang C, Wang C, Hong X, Miao J, Liao Y, et al. An essential role for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in mediating hypertensive heart disease. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8: 8996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27064-2.

[98]

Ahn BY, Jeong MH, Pyun JH, Jeong HJ, Vuong TA, Bae JH, et al. PRMT7 ablation in cardiomyocytes causes cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis through β-catenin dysregulation. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS. 2022; 79: 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-04097-x.

[99]

Akhtar H, Al Sudani H, Hussein M, Farhan MUN, Elkholy K. Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibition on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, Diastolic Function, and Functional Status in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022; 14: e26642. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26642.

[100]

Ho CY, Day SM, Axelsson A, Russell MW, Zahka K, Lever HM, et al. Valsartan in early-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nature Medicine. 2021; 27: 1818–1824. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01505-4.

[101]

Vissing CR, Axelsson Raja A, Day SM, Russell MW, Zahka K, Lever HM, et al. Cardiac Remodeling in Subclinical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiology. 2023; 8: 1083–1088. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2808.

[102]

Chakraborty D, Šumová B, Mallano T, Chen CW, Distler A, Bergmann C, et al. Activation of STAT3 integrates common profibrotic pathways to promote fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis. Nature Communications. 2017; 8: 1130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01236-6.

[103]

Liu H, Zhang Y, Wu Z, Zhang L. Identification of IL-6 as a potential mediator of the myocardial fibrosis that occurs in response to surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in children with Tetralogy of Fallot. Cardiology in the Young. 2022; 32: 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951121001803.

[104]

Zhang Z, Tang J, Song J, Xie M, Liu Y, Dong Z, et al. Elabela alleviates ferroptosis, myocardial remodeling, fibrosis and heart dysfunction in hypertensive mice by modulating the IL-6/STAT3/GPX4 signaling. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2022; 181: 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.01.020.

[105]

Eid RA, Alkhateeb MA, El-Kott AF, Eleawa SM, Zaki MSA, Alaboodi SA, et al. A high-fat diet rich in corn oil induces cardiac fibrosis in rats by activating JAK2/STAT3 and subsequent activation of ANG II/TGF-1β/Smad3 pathway: The role of ROS and IL-6 trans-signaling. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2019; 43: e12952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12952.

[106]

Singh R, Kaundal RK, Zhao B, Bouchareb R, Lebeche D. Resistin induces cardiac fibroblast-myofibroblast differentiation through JAK/STAT3 and JNK/c-Jun signaling. Pharmacological Research. 2021; 167: 105414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105414.

[107]

Chen QY, Jiang YN, Guan X, Ren FF, Wu SJ, Chu MP, et al. Aerobic Exercise Attenuates Pressure Overload-Induced Myocardial Remodeling and Myocardial Inflammation via Upregulating miR-574-3p in Mice. Circulation. Heart Failure. 2024; 17: e010569. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.010569.

[108]

Zhang J, Wei X, Zhang W, Wang F, Li Q. MiR-326 targets MDK to regulate the progression of cardiac hypertrophy through blocking JAK/STAT and MAPK signaling pathways. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2020; 872: 172941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.172941.

[109]

Ghiselli L, Marchi A, Fumagalli C, Maurizi N, Oddo A, Pieri F, et al. Sex-related differences in exercise performance and outcome of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2020; 27: 1821–1831. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319886961.

[110]

Ahn BY, Zhang Y, Wei S, Jeong Y, Park DH, Lee SJ, et al. Prmt7 regulates the JAK/STAT/Socs3 signaling pathway in postmenopausal cardiomyopathy. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2024; 56: 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01193-3.

[111]

Maron BA, Wang RS, Shevtsov S, Drakos SG, Arons E, Wever-Pinzon O, et al. Individualized interactomes for network-based precision medicine in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with implications for other clinical pathophenotypes. Nature Communications. 2021; 12: 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21146-y.

[112]

Hu HH, Cao G, Wu XQ, Vaziri ND, Zhao YY. Wnt signaling pathway in aging-related tissue fibrosis and therapies. Ageing Research Reviews. 2020; 60: 101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2020.101063.

[113]

Lofrumento F, Irrera N, Licordari R, Perfetti S, Nasso E, Liotta P, et al. Off-Target Effects of P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors: Focus on Early Myocardial Fibrosis Modulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 17546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417546.

[114]

Zhang Y, Lu F. Molecular mechanism of triptolide in myocardial fibrosis through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal: SCJ. 2024; 58: 2295785. https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2023.2295785.

[115]

Działo E, Rudnik M, Koning RI, Czepiel M, Tkacz K, Baj-Krzyworzeka M, et al. WNT3a and WNT5a Transported by Exosomes Activate WNT Signaling Pathways in Human Cardiac Fibroblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20: 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061436.

[116]

Li T, Weng X, Cheng S, Wang D, Cheng G, Gao H, et al. Wnt3a upregulation is involved in TGFβ1-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Cytokine. 2021; 138: 155376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155376.

[117]

Ji DN, Jin SD, Jiang Y, Xu FY, Fan SW, Zhao YL, et al. CircNSD1 promotes cardiac fibrosis through targeting the miR-429-3p/SULF1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2024; 45: 2092–2106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-024-01296-7.

[118]

Li X, Guo L, Wang J, Yang X. Pro-fibrotic and apoptotic activities of circARAP1 in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. European Journal of Medical Research. 2023; 28: 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01001-0.

[119]

Liu JJ, Shentu LM, Ma N, Wang LY, Zhang GM, Sun Y, et al. Inhibition of NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin/GSK3β Signaling Pathways Ameliorates Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy and Fibrosis in Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced Type 1 Diabetic Rats. Current Medical Science. 2020; 40: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-020-2144-x.

[120]

Wu H, Tang LX, Wang XM, Li LP, Chen XK, He YJ, et al. Porcupine inhibitor CGX1321 alleviates heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in mice by blocking WNT signaling. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2023; 44: 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-022-01025-y.

[121]

Nayakanti SR, Friedrich A, Sarode P, Jafari L, Maroli G, Boehm M, et al. Targeting Wnt-ß-Catenin-FOSL Signaling Ameliorates Right Ventricular Remodeling. Circulation Research. 2023; 132: 1468–1485. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321725.

[122]

Mohamed HE, Askar ME, Shaheen MA, Salama AE, Idris RA, Younis NN. Infliximab substantially re-silenced Wnt/β-catenin signaling and ameliorated doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in rats. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology. 2023; 37: e23312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23312.

[123]

Li T, Xiong X, Wang Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Zhang M, et al. Neuroepithelial cell-transforming 1 promotes cardiac fibrosis via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. iScience. 2023; 26: 107888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107888.

[124]

Hu G, Chen J, Chen M, Yang K, Wang Y, Ma Z, et al. Silencing DOCK2 Attenuates Cardiac Fibrosis Following Myocardial Infarction in Mice Via Targeting PI3K/Akt and Wnt/β-Catenin Pathways. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2024. (online ahead of print)

[125]

Zhang Z, Yang Z, Wang S, Wang X, Mao J. Targeting MAPK-ERK/JNK pathway: A potential intervention mechanism of myocardial fibrosis in heart failure. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie. 2024; 173: 116413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116413.

[126]

Tang SG, Liu XY, Ye JM, Hu TT, Yang YY, Han T, et al. Isosteviol ameliorates diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats by inhibiting ERK and NF-κB signaling pathways. The Journal of Endocrinology. 2018; 238: 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-17-0681.

[127]

Ge M, Zhang L, Du J, Jin H, Lv B, Huang Y. Sulfenylation of ERK1/2: A novel mechanism for SO2-mediated inhibition of cardiac fibroblast proliferation. Heliyon. 2024; 10: e34260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34260.

[128]

Zang G, Chen Y, Guo G, Wan A, Li B, Wang Z. Protective Effect of CD137 Deficiency Against Postinfarction Cardiac Fibrosis and Adverse Cardiac Remodeling by ERK1/2 Signaling Pathways. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 2024; 83: 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000001549.

[129]

Wang X, Ma J, Zhang S, Li Z, Hong Z, Jiang L, et al. G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor 30 Reduces Transverse Aortic Constriction-Induced Myocardial Fibrosis in Aged Female Mice by Inhibiting the ERK1/2 -MMP-9 Signaling Pathway. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021; 12: 731609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.731609.

[130]

Li C, Lv LF, Qi-Li MG, Yang R, Wang YJ, Chen SS, et al. Endocytosis of Peptidase Inhibitor SerpinE2 promotes Myocardial Fibrosis through activating ERK1/2 and β-catenin Signaling Pathways. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022; 18: 6008–6019. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.67726.

[131]

Luo S, Yang Z, Chen R, You D, Teng F, Yuan Y, et al. Cytokine receptor-like factor 1 (CRLF1) promotes cardiac fibrosis via ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B. 2023; 24: 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2200506.

[132]

Huang KW, Wang IH, Fu P, Krum H, Bach LA, Wang BH. Insulin-like growth factor-1 directly affects cardiac cellular remodelling via distinct pathways. International Journal of Cardiology. Heart & Vasculature. 2021; 36: 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100852.

[133]

Tian T, Yu Q, Yang D, Zhang X, Zhang C, Li J, et al. Endothelial α1-adrenergic receptor activation improves cardiac function in septic mice via PKC-ERK/p38MAPK signaling pathway. International Immunopharmacology. 2024; 141: 112937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112937.

[134]

Huang X, Bai X, Yi J, Hu T, An L, Gao H. The activation of P38MAPK Signaling Pathway Impedes the Delivery of the Cx43 to the Intercalated Discs During Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2024; 17: 1140–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-024-10515-9.

[135]

Du S, Li Z, Xie X, Xu C, Shen X, Wang N, et al. IL-17 stimulates the expression of CCL2 in cardiac myocytes via Act1/TRAF6/p38MAPK-dependent AP-1 activation. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 2020; 91: e12840. https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.12840.

[136]

Miao R, Lu Y, He X, Liu X, Chen Z, Wang J. Ubiquitin-specific protease 19 blunts pathological cardiac hypertrophy via inhibition of the TAK1-dependent pathway. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2020; 24: 10946–10957. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15724.

[137]

Li F, Yang Y, Xue C, Tan M, Xu L, Gao J, et al. Zinc Finger Protein ZBTB20 protects against cardiac remodelling post-myocardial infarction via ROS-TNFα/ASK1/JNK pathway regulation. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2020; 24: 13383–13396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15961.

[138]

Gong J, Shi B, Yang P, Khan A, Xiong T, Li Z. Unveiling Immune Infiltration Characterizing Genes in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Through Transcriptomics and Bioinformatics. Journal of Inflammation Research. 2024; 17: 3079–3092. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S454446.

[139]

Lumish HS, Liang LW, Hasegawa K, Maurer MS, Fifer MA, Reilly MP, et al. Prediction of worsening heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using plasma proteomics. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2023; 109: 1837–1843. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322644.

[140]

Paar V, Haslinger M, Krombholz-Reindl P, Pittner S, Neuner M, Jirak P, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is characterized by alterations of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter complex proteins: insights from patients with aortic valve stenosis versus hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023; 14: 1264216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1264216.

[141]

Tian G, Zhou J, Quan Y, Kong Q, Li J, Xin Y, et al. Voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) overexpression alleviates cardiac fibroblast activation in cardiac fibrosis via regulating fatty acid metabolism. Redox Biology. 2023; 67: 102907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2023.102907.

[142]

Qian L, Xu H, Yuan R, Yun W, Ma Y. Formononetin ameliorates isoproterenol induced cardiac fibrosis through improving mitochondrial dysfunction. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie. 2024; 170: 116000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.116000.

[143]

Green EM, Wakimoto H, Anderson RL, Evanchik MJ, Gorham JM, Harrison BC, et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of sarcomere contractility suppresses hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in mice. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2016; 351: 617–621. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3456.

[144]

Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, Abraham TP, Masri A, Garcia-Pavia P, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England). 2020; 396: 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X.

[145]

Administration UFaD. FDA approves new drug to improve heart function in adults with rare heart condition. 2022. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-new-drug-improve-heart-function-adults-rare-heart-condition (Accessed: 11 November 2024).

[146]

Ismayl M, Abbasi MA, Marar R, Geske JB, Gersh BJ, Anavekar NS. Mavacamten Treatment for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2023; 48: 101429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101429.

[147]

Chuang C, Collibee S, Ashcraft L, Wang W, Vander Wal M, Wang X, et al. Discovery of Aficamten (CK-274), a Next-Generation Cardiac Myosin Inhibitor for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2021; 64: 14142–14152. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01290.

[148]

Maron MS, Masri A, Choudhury L, Olivotto I, Saberi S, Wang A, et al. Phase 2 Study of Aficamten in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023; 81: 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.020.

[149]

Maron MS, Masri A, Nassif ME, Barriales-Villa R, Arad M, Cardim N, et al. Aficamten for Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2024; 390: 1849–1861. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2401424.

[150]

Masri A, Sherrid MV, Abraham TP, Choudhury L, Garcia-Pavia P, Kramer CM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten in Symptomatic Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Results From the REDWOOD-HCM Trial, Cohort 4. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2024; 30: 1439–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.02.020.

[151]

Bakinowska E, Kiełbowski K, Boboryko D, Bratborska AW, Olejnik-Wojciechowska J, Rusiński M, et al. The Role of Stem Cells in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25: 3901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073901.

[152]

Shiba M, Higo S, Kondo T, Li J, Liu L, Ikeda Y, et al. Phenotypic recapitulation and correction of desmoglein-2-deficient cardiomyopathy using human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Human Molecular Genetics. 2021; 30: 1384–1397. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddab127.

[153]

Rosales W, Lizcano F. The Histone Demethylase JMJD2A Modulates the Induction of Hypertrophy Markers in iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes. Frontiers in Genetics. 2018; 9: 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00014.

PDF (1959KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/