Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Deciphering Cardiovascular Complications in Systemic Sclerosis

Abstract

Cardiac manifestations in systemic sclerosis (SSc) are variable and are associated with a poor prognosis, frequently resulting in impaired right ventricular function and heart failure. A high proportion of patients with SSc experience pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), interstitial lung disease, or myocardial involvement, all of which can lead to exercise intolerance. In this context, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a useful tool for diagnosing exercise intolerance, elucidating its pathophysiology, and assessing its prognosis. CPET can also identify patients with SSc at higher risk of developing PAH. Despite its utility, current guidelines for CPET do not include the evaluation of patients with SSc, nor do standard SSc management guidelines consider CPET in the clinical work-up. This review summarizes the development, supporting evidence, and application of CPET in assessing cardiac involvement in patients with SSc.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

cardiopulmonary exercise testing / pulmonary arterial hypertension / heart failure / systemic sclerosis

1. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Systemic Sclerosis

1.1 Introduction

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a noninvasive technique for assessing functional capacity and characterizing exercise limitations [1], providing critical insights into exercise physiology [2]. To ensure the accuracy of results, CPET should be performed in centers that adhere to stringent standards for conducting the examination and evaluating outcomes [3, 4]. This testing modality not only assesses functional capacity and detects both symptomatic and asymptomatic exercise intolerance [5, 6], but can also determine the severity of the disease and distinguish between different causes of dyspnea and exercise impairment [5, 7]. The indications for CPET in clinical practice have expanded significantly over the last decades [8]. Previously confined primarily to in the management heart failure [9], where it delivers substantial diagnostic and prognostic information [10, 11], its use is now broader, reflecting its growing importance in clinical settings.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe connective tissue disease (CTD) inflammatory disease characterized by vascular dysfunction and excessive fibrosis. Its clinical manifestations vary from limited skin involvement to life-threatening effects on internal organs, particularly the heart, kidneys and lungs [12]. The European Clinical Trials and Research Group reports that cardiac causes account for 26% of SSc disease-related mortality [13]. The true prevalence of cardiac involvement in SSc remains elusive, hindered by the absence of a consensus definition and the challenges associated with detecting subclinical cardiac conditions [14].

1.2 Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis

There are many cardiovascular manifestations of SSc, which can be categorized as primary or secondary (Fig. 1). Primary manifestations include systolic and diastolic dysfunction, predominantly stemming from myocardial fibrosis, autonomic neuropathy, and small vessel disease affecting the pericardium, myocardium, coronary arteries, valvular structures, and the conduction system [15]. Secondary manifestations are often complications arising from pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), interstitial lung disease (ILD), renal failure, amyloidosis, or other systemic complications of SSc [16, 17].

The pathogenesis of primary cardiac involvement is not well understood, and likely encompasses microvascular injury, vasoconstriction, chronic ischemia-reperfusion damage, cardiac inflammation, and fibrosis [17]. These different potential pathophysiological mechanisms may lead to various clinical presentations including myocardial inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, restrictive cardiomyopathy, systolic and/or diastolic ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, valvular regurgitation, coronary artery disease, rhythm and conduction disturbances, and pericardial disease (both effusion and fibrosis) [15].

Primary myocardial involvement in SSc is often clinically occult, yet it carries a poor prognosis when symptomatic [18]. This involvement may result from damage to the microvascular bed, which leads to repeated focal ischemic injuries and irreversible myocardial fibrosis [19], or from a primary systemic myositic disease [20]. The most recognized classical presentation of myocardial involvement in SSc is left ventricular systolic dysfunction [21]. However, diastolic dysfunction, as detected by tissue-doppler echocardiography or speckle-tracking analysis is also prevalent and indicative of a poor prognosis [22, 23]. An observational study of 153 SSc patients identified that 23% exhibited defined left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, a condition predictive of mortality risk [24]. In another study [25], among a cohort of 333 SSc patients, diastolic dysfunction was present in 17% at baseline and increased to 29% over a 3.4-year follow-up, with affected patients experiencing over a 4-fold increase in mortality compared to patients without diastolic dysfunction at baseline.

Notably, PAH is a severe chronic disease characterized by a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance exceeding 2 Wood Units. PAH harbors a poor prognosis and frequently results in impaired right ventricular function and heart failure [26]. Patients with SSc are particularly vulnerable to developing PAH, with a prevalence of SSc-associated PAH ranging from 5% to 12% [27, 28, 29]. Moreover, many patients with SSc exhibit ILD, with or without accompanying PAH [30]. This ILD can further complicate the clinical picture by contributing to myocardial involvement and diastolic dysfunction [31].

Collectively, these observations underscore the significant prevalence of clinical or subclinical cardiac involvement in SSc patients, which often results in exercise intolerance. In this context, CPET emerges as a valuable diagnostic tool, helping to elucidate the pathophysiological underpinnings of these cardiac issues. This review aims to summarize the development and the evidence supporting the application of CPET in assessing heart involvement in patients with SSc.

2. Literature Review

2.1 Exercise Intolerance and Differential Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Causes of Functional Impairment in SSc

Exercise intolerance is a common complication in SSc, primarily driven by myocardial involvement, PAH, ILD or overlap between these conditions. CPET offers an objective and quantitative evaluation of a subject’s functional capacity. This testing enables a deeper understanding of how various cardiopulmonary diseases individual impact exercise performance [11].

In 1996, Schwaiblmair et al. [32] conducted CPET on 78 patients with SSc (mean duration of disease of 8.2 years), 43% of whom were symptomatic for exertion dyspnea. The patients exhibited a reduced maximum exercise capacity, including a slight decline in maximum oxygen consumption (VO₂ max) and anaerobic threshold (AT). Notably, those with diffuse cutaneous SSc experienced significantly lower VO₂ max levels. Moreover, they reported an increased physiological dead space over tidal volume ratio (Vd/Vt) and an increase in alveolar-arterial oxygen (O₂) difference at end-exercise [P(A-a)O₂], potentially indicative of changes in the alveolar epithelium mainly due to alveolitis, fibrosis, and pulmonary edema. The authors concluded that CPET findings differ between patients with diffuse and limited skin involvement, and that in patients with lung disease, both the Vd/Vt and the P(A-a)O₂ increase during exercise.

Sudduth et al. [33] reached similar conclusions analyzing a small cohort of 15 patients with SSc. Among the cohort, 11 patients completed CPET and exhibited low O₂ pulse (5.1 \pm 0.4 mL O₂/beat) and reduced O₂ consumption at AT (VO₂ at AT/VO₂ max predicted 0.21 \pm 0.02), consistent with circulatory impairment during exercise. Among these, nine were predominantly limited by circulatory issues, and four of these had pulmonary vascular disease, as indicated by impaired gas exchange. In 2 of these 11 patients arterial oxygen desaturation was present. These findings suggest that in SSc patients capable of maximal effort, circulatory impairment appears to be more important in reducing exercise tolerance than lung involvement.

More recently Cuomo et al. [34] studied 46 SSc patients undergoing exercise, along with 23 sex and age matched healthy volunteers. Patients with SSc exhibit significantly compromised cardiovascular and respiratory metrics during exercise, as evidenced by a a significantly lower VO₂ max. Specifically, 93.5% of patients have a VO₂ max below 80% of the predicted value, with a mean of 58.44% \pm 12.28 in SSc patients versus 89.78% \pm 8.19 in volunteers (p 0.0001). Additionally, these patients demonstrated a significantly decreased O₂ pulse (7.21 mL/beat \pm 1.54 versus 12.24 mL/beat \pm 3.06, p 0.0001), a significantly reduced ventilatory volume (43.65 L/min \pm 10.77 versus 63.51 L/min \pm 20.66, p 0.0001), and a significantly lower AT in relation to the predicted VO₂max (39.83% \pm 8.68 versus 58.31% \pm 6.5, p 0.0001). Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between impaired exercise performance (expressed as VO₂ max adjusted for body weight) and the severity of heart involvement (p = 0.001), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (p = 0.009), severity of lung involvement (p = 0.013), and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score (p = 0.016).

Yiu et al. [23] demonstrated that subtle myocardial dysfunction, assessed by speckle tracking strain analysis, is associated with lower functional capacity. In a study assessing 113 SSc patients, the authors found that subtle left ventricular contraction abnormalities could be detected before any changes were noted in routine global echocardiographic parameters. These early contraction abnormalities were found to be independently associated with patient’s functional capacity as evaluated by CPET. The study further demonstrated significant correlations between left ventricle global longitudinal and circumferential strains and the predicted VO₂ max, independent of age, SSc subtype, and lung function. This observation thus provides direct evidence that even early-stage, subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction significantly contributes to functional capacity impairment in SSc. These findings suggest that impaired exercise performance in SSc is a multifactorial condition.

To date, evidence for CPET to distinguish among the various causes of exercise impairment in SSc remains limited. In a small study involving 19 SSc patients, Walkey et al. [35] attempted to assess if CPET in conjunction with right-heart catheterization (RHC), could differentiate between different sources of exercise limitation. These included pulmonary vascular limitations, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, ventilatory limitations (such as restrictive lung disease), or deconditioning/cardiovascular limitation. Patients with pulmonary vasculopathy showed reduced maximal VO₂ and AT, along with a high ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO₂), without evidence of pulmonary venous hypertension during RHC, demonstrated by a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) below 18 mmHg. Conversely, diastolic dysfunction was identified in patients with analogous CPET findings, echocardiographic documentation of preserved ejection fraction, and RHC indicating exercise peak PCWP at or above 18 mmHg and a pulmonary artery diastolic pressure to-PCWP gradient 5 mmHg or less. Ventilatory limitation were identified in patients with a low VO₂ peak and a limited breathing reserve. Cardiovascular dysfunction was suspected in cases of a low VO₂ peak without signs of ventilatory, pulmonary vascular, or left ventricular impairment at CPET or RHC, coupled with abnormalities on a resting echocardiogram. Finally, deconditioning was defined when other causes of exercise limitation were ruled out, but CPET still demonstrated a low peak VO₂. Each of these different causes of exercise limitation were represented in the study population. The authors conclude that traditional methods such as physical examination, pulmonary function test (PFT), imaging, or echocardiography alone are insufficient to reliably predict the etiology of exercise limitation, which can be more accurately determined through the combined use of CPET/RHC.

Dumitrescu et al. [36] attempted to determine if CPET is able to distinguish signs of pulmonary vasculopathy from other causes of exercise limitation in a relatively larger population of 30 SSc patients). However, only patients without previously diagnosed cardiac or pulmonary impairment were included in the study cohort, making the classification process for distinguishing the different causes of exercise limitation less clear.

A larger population of SSc patients evaluated by CPET was described by Boutou et al. [37] in 2016. They assessed the prevalence and potential causes of limited exercise capacity in a population of 78 clinically stable SSc patients with perceived exertional dyspnea or reduced physical performance. They categorized patients into 4 groups: normal exercise capacity or subnormal exercise capacity (not limited by evident heart or lung disease), patients with respiratory limitations, those with left ventricular dysfunction, and finally those with pulmonary vasculopathy. Table 1 (Ref. [37]) summarizes the 4-gropus categorization of SSc patients.

In the study, an equal percentage of patients (32.1%) were identified with pulmonary vasculopathy or exhibited normal/subnormal exercise capacity [37]. Additionally, 25.6% presented with left ventricular dysfunction, while 10.2% faced respiratory limitations. Differentiating patients with pulmonary vasculopathy from others proved challenging, as the end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PETCO₂) at peak VO₂ was not distinctive enough to discriminate it from left ventricular dysfunction. Therefore, differentiation from the latter group relied on observing a decrease in PETCO₂ from rest to AT. The authors conclude that in patients with SSc, combining CPET gas exchange pattern assessment with baseline measurements can effectively differentiate the causes of exercise limitation.

Recently, the combination of CPET with other diagnostic tools has been defined as “complex CPET” [38]. This integrated approach significantly enhances the pathophysiological insights provided by standard CPET. Complex CPET can be categorized into three levels based on the invasiveness of the methods used alongside it: non-invasive complex CPET, minimally invasive complex CPET, and invasive complex CPET. Non-invasive complex CPET may include additions such as non-invasive cardiac output determination, transthoracic echocardiography, thoracic ultrasound or lung diffusion analysis. Minimally invasive complex CPET might incorporate esophageal balloon recordings or serial arterial blood sampling. Invasive complex CPET involves more intrusive procedures, such as the insertion of a Swan-Ganz catheter in the pulmonary artery.

In 2021, Brown et al. [39] conducted a study using complex CPET cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-augmented CPET (CMR-CPET). Their objective was to more accurately determine the causes of exercise intolerance in SSc using CMR-CPET. They compared SSc patients (with and without PAH) to healthy controls and patients with PAH from other causes. This comparison aimed to investigate the specific contributions of SSc and PAH to exercise intolerance. By combining CPET-derived VO₂ and CMR-derived cardiac output, they calculated the arteriovenous O₂ content gradient (\mathrm{\Delta }avO₂), a marker of tissue oxygen extraction. All patients had a reduced peak VO₂ compared to healthy subjects (p 0.022). Specifically, SSc patients had low peak \mathrm{\Delta }avO₂ compared to healthy controls (p 0.03), even those without PAH. Conversely, all patients with PAH, regardless of their underlying cause, showed reduced peak cardiac output compared to healthy controls and SSc patients without PAH (p 0.006). Additionally, higher hemoglobin levels were associated with higher peak \mathrm{\Delta }avO₂ independent of disease type (p = 0.025), and higher myocardial T1 was associated with lower peak stroke volume (p = 0.011). The study concluded that CMR-CPET provides valuable insights into the underlying causes of exercise intolerance in different types of SSc. In particular, evaluation of peak \mathrm{\Delta }avO₂ offers new understanding regarding the role of skeletal muscle in the reduced exercise tolerance among patients with SSc.

2.2 Screening for PAH in SSc

PAH associated with CTD, particularly SSc, is reported in 5% to 19% of patients [14, 27, 40]. The prognosis is even worse than that of the idiopathic form of PAH [41]. Furthermore, PAH is a common cause of SSc-related death, accounting for around 30% of deaths among patients with SSc [42]. The survival rate for SSc patients who develop PAH is alarmingly low, with only a 52% three-year survival rate [43]. Early intervention in PAH patients can lead to improved outcomes, whereas delayed treatment is associated with clinical deterioration [44] and a markedly reduced life expectancy compared to those whose PAH is detected early [45]. Thus, early disease detection is crucial for initiating timely and effective therapy, which is the most important prognostic factor [46, 47]. For this reason, the latest guidelines suggest that patients with SSc must be screened annually for the development of PAH [26], underscoring the necessity of vigilant monitoring to manage this severe complication effectively.

The gold standard for the diagnosis of PAH is RHC [26], but there remains a need for reliable non-invasive methods to detect it in early stages. Echocardiography is currently recommended as a screening tool for PAH [26]. However, its effectiveness for early detection in SSc patients with is limited, with a study showing it has only moderate sensitivity (71%) and specificity (69%) [48].

To improve early detection, the Diagnosis and Early Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial HypEnsion ConnECTed to Systemic Sclerosis (DETECT) algorithm was developed, which includes an initial step directing patients to echocardiography based on a composite score from other variables. These variables include forced vital capacity, lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, presence of telangiectasias, presence of anti-centromere antibodies, serum urate levels, N-terminal pro brain-natriuretic-peptide (BNP), and right axis deviation on electrocardiogram. This tool demonstrates a very high sensitivity (96%) in this setting [40], but its specificity is relatively low (48%). Consequently, while the DETECT score efficiently identifies most patients at risk, its low specificity results in a high number of unnecessary RHC [40], indicating a need for more precise non-invasive diagnostic approaches.

The most recent guidelines recommend the use of the DETECT algorithm for SSc patients who have had the disease for at least three years. This strategy is intended to identify asymptomatic patients with PAH and is designated as a class I recommendation [26] Furthermore, the guidelines suggest that assessing the risk of PAH in SSc patients, particularly based on symptoms such as breathlessness, should involve a combination of evaluations. These include echocardiograms, PFTs, and biomarkers like BNP or N-terminal proBNP. This approach is categorized as a class IIa recommendation [26], emphasizing its importance in early detection and management of PAH in this patient population.

In 2017, Dumitrescu et al. [49] proposed the use of CPET as a novel tool to better select patients with SSc at higher risk for PAH, potentially necessitating RHC. They enrolled 173 patients with SSc who did not have a confirmed diagnosis of PAH, but were clinically suspected of having the condition, either based on symptoms or pathological findings from non-invasive testing including echocardiography. These patients underwent both CPET on cycle-ergometer and RHC. The study found that RHC confirmed PAH in 48 patients, and CPET parameters significantly correlated with pulmonary hemodynamics. Specifically, peak VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ ratio showed the strongest correlations with pulmonary arterial pressure, transpulmonary pressure gradient, and pulmonary vascular resistance. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that certain CPET parameters exhibited both high sensitivity and specificity for PAH detection. Notably, peak VO₂ had a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 74.8%, while the equivalent for carbon dioxide (EQCO₂) showed a sensitivity of 79.2% and specificity of 82.9%, indicating high diagnostic accuracy. In their cohort, a peak VO₂ greater than 18.7 mL/kg/min ruled out PAH with a negative predictive value of 1.0. Conversely a nadir VE/VCO₂ ratio above 45.5 indicated PAH with a positive predictive value of 1.0. Dumitrescu et al. conclude that CPET is a valuable non-invasive method for the detection of SSc-associated PAH that may be particularly useful in reducing unnecessary RHC procedures. This approach not only aids in early detection but also enhances the management of patients by potentially avoiding invasive testing where it may not be needed.

Years after the work by Dumitrescu et al. [49], both Santaniello et al. in 2020 [50] and Bellan et al. in 2021 [51] further substantiated the value of CPET in identifying SSc patients at risk for PAH. First, Santaniello’s group enrolled 314 SSc patients, utilizing the DETECT algorithm, (including steps 1 and 2, combined with echocardiography) which identified 96 patients as positive and were referred for CPET prior to RHC. Their findings highlighted the VE/VCO₂ slope. Their findings highlighted in predicting PAH at RHC, exhibiting a median of specificity 0.778 and positive predictive value of 0.636. Next, Bellan and colleagues [51] recruited 131 patients, including 112 with CTD without PAH, and 8 with CTD and PAH. They also evaluated a cohort of 11 patients with PAH stemming from other etiologies. RHC was performed to confirm the PAH diagnosis in patients suspected of having the condition based on findings from clinical evaluation and echocardiography. In CTD patients, CPET parameters yielding optimal diagnostic results for PAH were: VO₂ max \le14.1 mL/kg/min (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.845, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.767–0.904, p 0.001), VE/VCO₂ slope >33.96 (AUC: 0.888, 95% CI: 0.817–0.938, p 0.001) and basal PETCO₂ \le27.2 mmHg (AUC: 0.792, 95% CI: 0.709–0.861, p 0.001). A composite score including all three identified parameters demonstrated even better diagnostic performance. Moreover, these parameters were comparable among CTD patients with PAH and patients with PAH of different etiologies. Both studies concluded that CPET could effectively reduce the number of unnecessary invasive procedures and enhance the identification of PAH among SSc patients, demonstrating CPET’s critical role in the non-invasive diagnostic landscape for this patient population.

A recent study from 2023 involving a small cohort of 52 patients with SSc examined PAH screening [52]. The study used cycle-ergometer CPET which suggested PAH in 16 patients. Of these, resting RHC confirmed PAH in 5 patients, while exercise RHC confirmed it in an additional 7 patients. This resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% when CPET was combined with both rest and exercise RHC. In contrast, the DETECT score identified 10 patients with potential PAH, of whom only 3 were confirmed by RHC, showing a guideline-based diagnostic algorithm sensitivity of 70%. Thus, CPET, in conjunction with exercise RHC, could potentially diagnosis PAH earlier than the established screening tools.

The latest guidelines on pulmonary hypertension (PH) [26] recommend CPET within the diagnostic algorithm to evaluate suspected causes or, once the diagnosis is established, to determine prognosis. The guidelines recommend annual screening for PAH in SSc patients regardless of symptoms, emphasizing that early intervention improves outcomes. The existing screening protocols include combinations of clinical variables, biomarkers, PFT, and echocardiography. Despite the potential of CPET as an insightful and promising tool, its use in screening for PAH in SSc patients is currently recommended only for symptomatic individuals. In such cases, exercise echocardiography, CPET, or CMR may be considered to support the decision-making process regarding the need for RHC. This recommendation is classified as a Class IIb, indicating a less definitive benefit, and level of evidence C, reflecting a lower degree of certainty due to limited data.

A summary of studies evaluating role of CPET in PAH screening is provided in Table 2 (Ref. [49, 50, 51, 52]).

2.3 Prognostic Role of CPET

Several studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of CPET in patients with SSc [53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58]. In particular, utilizing the peak VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ slope enables survival prediction in patients with SSc. In a cohort of 210 patients [53] followed for up to 10 years, the presence of PAH (p = 0.007), a 6-minute walking test distance 413 meters (p = 0.003), a peak VO₂ 15.6 mL\cdotkg^-1\cdotmin^-1 and a VE/VCO₂ slope >35 were all negative prognostic predictors.

Hemelein et al. [54] conducted a study to assess CPET’s capacity in monitoring the progression and development of SSc, and its correlation with prognosis. The study prospectively tracked 29 SSc patients with standard follow-up plus CPET for a mean of 3.7 years. The findings indicated that traditional clinical parameters, resting lung function, and echocardiographic measures did not predict the development of endpoints associated with a poor prognosis. However, distinct CPET parameters showed significant prognostic value. Specifically, baseline VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ were correlated with a reduction in forced vital capacity, indicating lung function deterioration. The AT was linked to the development of digital ulcers, a common complication in SSc, while VE/VCO₂ was associated with increases in pulmonary arterial pressure, suggesting that several CPET parameters can discriminate between SSc patients with or without adverse outcomes.

In fact, CPET variables have been shown to predict prognosis in patients with PAH [55]. In particular, VO₂ has provided useful information for further stratification of patients with PAH [56]. On this basis, the aforementioned CPET parameters (peak VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ slope) have been included in the last guidelines on PH, in a three-strata model for comprehensive risk assessment [26]. Despite this, the applicability of CPET’s prognostic value to patients with PAH secondary to SSc remains uncertain. In 2012, Deboeck et al. [57] demonstrated that the prognostic utility of CPET variables may differ according to the etiology of PAH. They reported that, in a cohort of 136 patients with PAH, peak VO₂, VE/VCO₂ slope, and VE/VCO₂ at AT were predictive of mortality for the 85 patients with idiopathic PAH but were less accurate for the 51 patients with PAH associated to other diseases, including 19 patients with SSc. These data contrast with findings from a larger population [53] study on 210 SSc patients, 52 of whom had PH, including a subgroup of 38 with PAH. Patients with PH underwent RHC; subgroups analysis confirmed the prognostic strength of CPET parameters across all subgroups. Indeed, the peak VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ slope demonstrated prognostic value in all patients with SSc, including those with PH.

The prognostic role of CPET in SSc patients without baseline PH was recently investigated by Bournia et al. [58]. This study involved 62 SSc patients who underwent CPET, PFT and echocardiography at baseline, followed by PFTs every three years for approximately a decade. Baseline respiratory peak VO₂ was able to predict PFT deterioration—a decline in forced vital capacity \ge10% or a combined decline in forced vital capacity of 5%–9% plus a decrease in diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon dioxide \ge15% during follow-up—after adjusting for age, sex, and smoking status (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.874, 95% CI = 0.779–0.979, p = 0.021). Moreover, a lower baseline peak VO₂ was associated with a higher risk for death (HR = 0.861, 95% CI: 0.739–1.003, p = 0.054). Thus, it seems reasonable that even in the absence of baseline PH, CPET parameters may predict clinical deterioration and mortality risk in SSc patients.

3. Conclusions

Cardiovascular involvement is prevalent in SSc. Despite this, current guidelines for CPET [2, 8, 59] do not specifically recommend its use for evaluating patients with SSc. Similarly, guideline recommendations for SSc management do not include CPET in the clinical work-up [12, 60, 61]. However, CPET provides a comprehensive evaluation and represents a promising tool for pathophysiological evaluation, screening for complications, risk stratification, and follow-up in SSc patients. Additionally, it can provide valuable endpoints for clinical trials. The potential roles of CPET in the context of SSc are listed in Table 3.

Therefore, most of the aforementioned results need to be confirmed in larger cohorts of patients and through adequately powered multicenter studies. This is necessary to revise the current indications and to extend the application of CPET to CTD.

References

[1] American Thoracic Society, American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2003; 167: 211–277. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.167.2.211

[2] Balady GJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, Myers J, Coke L, Fletcher GF, et al. Clinician’s Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010; 122: 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181e52e69

[3] Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer W, Psietsema K, Sun XG, et al. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation: Including Pathophysiology and Clinical Applications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Fifth Edition: Philadephia, USA. 2011.

[4] Mezzani A. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Basics of Methodology and Measurements. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2017; 14: S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-997FR

[5] Datta D, Normandin E, ZuWallack R. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the assessment of exertional dyspnea. Annals of Thoracic Medicine. 2015; 10: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.151438

[6] Giubertoni A, Cumitini L, Fodra S, Giordano A, Avenoso D, Patti G. Ten questions about cardiopulmonary exercise testing: all that the cardiologist dares or dares not to ask. Giornale Italiano Di Cardiologia (2006). 2024; 25: 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1714/4269.42464

[7] Toma N, Bicescu G, Enache R, Dragoi R, Cinteza M. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in differential diagnosis of dyspnea. Maedica. 2010; 5: 214–218.

[8] Pritchard A, Burns P, Correia J, Jamieson P, Moxon P, Purvis J, et al. ARTP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing 2021. BMJ Open Respiratory Research. 2021; 8: e001121. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001121

[9] McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. European Heart Journal. 2021; 42: 3599–3726. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368

[10] Mapelli M, Salvioni E, Mattavelli I, Vignati C, Galotta A, Magrì D, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and heart failure: a tale born from oxygen uptake. European Heart Journal Supplements: Journal of the European Society of Cardiology. 2023; 25: C319–C325. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad057

[11] Corrà U, Agostoni PG, Anker SD, Coats AJS, Crespo Leiro MG, de Boer RA, et al. Role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in clinical stratification in heart failure. A position paper from the Committee on Exercise Physiology and Training of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2018; 20: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.979

[12] Del Galdo F, Lescoat A, Conaghan PG, Ananyeva LP, Balbir-Gurman A, Bertoldo E, et al. OP0234 2023 Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2017; 76: 1327–1339. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209909

[13] Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M, Airò P, Cozzi F, Carreira PE, et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010; 69: 1809–1815. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.114264

[14] Desai CS, Lee DC, Shah SJ. Systemic sclerosis and the heart: current diagnosis and management. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2011; 23: 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0b013e32834b8975

[15] Giucă A, Gegenava T, Mihai CM, Jurcuţ C, Săftoiu A, Gȋrniţă DM, et al. Sclerodermic Cardiomyopathy-A State-of-the-Art Review. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2022; 12: 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030669

[16] Lambova S. Cardiac manifestations in systemic sclerosis. World Journal of Cardiology. 2014; 6: 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.993

[17] Varga J, Lee DC. Getting to the heart of the matter: detecting and managing cardiac complications in systemic sclerosis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2019; 78: 1452–1453. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216115

[18] Caforio ALP, Adler Y, Agostini C, Allanore Y, Anastasakis A, Arad M, et al. Diagnosis and management of myocardial involvement in systemic immune-mediated diseases: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease. European Heart Journal. 2017; 38: 2649–2662. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx321

[19] Venalis P, Kumánovics G, Schulze-Koops H, Distler A, Dees C, Zerr P, et al. Cardiomyopathy in murine models of systemic sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.). 2015; 67: 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38942

[20] Carette S, Turcotte J, Mathon G. Severe myositis and myocarditis in progressive systemic sclerosis. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1985; 12: 997–999.

[21] Allanore Y, Meune C, Vonk MC, Airo P, Hachulla E, Caramaschi P, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with left ventricular dysfunction in the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) database of patients with systemic sclerosis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010; 69: 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.103382

[22] Meune C, Avouac J, Wahbi K, Cabanes L, Wipff J, Mouthon L, et al. Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis assessed by tissue-doppler echocardiography during routine care: A controlled study of 100 consecutive patients. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2008; 58: 1803–1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23463

[23] Yiu KH, Schouffoer AA, Marsan NA, Ninaber MK, Stolk J, Vlieland TV, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction assessed by speckle-tracking strain analysis in patients with systemic sclerosis: relationship to functional capacity and ventricular arrhythmias. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2011; 63: 3969–3978. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30614

[24] Hinchcliff M, Desai CS, Varga J, Shah SJ. Prevalence, prognosis, and factors associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2012; 30: S30–S37.

[25] Tennøe AH, Murbræch K, Andreassen JC, Fretheim H, Garen T, Gude E, et al. Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Predicts Mortality in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018; 72: 1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.068

[26] Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, Badagliacca R, Berger RMF, Brida M, et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. The European Respiratory Journal. 2023; 61: 2200879. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00879-2022

[27] Avouac J, Airò P, Meune C, Beretta L, Dieude P, Caramaschi P, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis in European Caucasians and metaanalysis of 5 studies. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2010; 37: 2290–2298. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.100245

[28] Mukerjee D, St George D, Coleiro B, Knight C, Denton CP, Davar J, et al. Prevalence and outcome in systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: application of a registry approach. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2003; 62: 1088–1093. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.62.11.1088

[29] Hachulla E, Gressin V, Guillevin L, Carpentier P, Diot E, Sibilia J, et al. Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: a French nationwide prospective multicenter study. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2005; 52: 3792–3800. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21433

[30] Galluccio F, Walker UA, Nihtyanova S, Moinzadeh P, Hunzelmann N, Krieg T, et al. Registries in systemic sclerosis: a worldwide experience. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2011; 50: 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq355

[31] Kahan A, Allanore Y. Primary myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2006; 45 Suppl 4: iv14–iv17. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel312

[32] Schwaiblmair M, Behr J, Fruhmann G. Cardiorespiratory responses to incremental exercise in patients with systemic sclerosis. Chest. 1996; 110: 1520–1525. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.6.1520

[33] Sudduth CD, Strange C, Cook WR, Miller KS, Baumann M, Collop NA, et al. Failure of the circulatory system limits exercise performance in patients with systemic sclerosis. The American Journal of Medicine. 1993; 95: 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(93)90311-c

[34] Cuomo G, Santoriello C, Polverino F, Ruocco L, Valentini G, Polverino M. Impaired exercise performance in systemic sclerosis and its clinical correlations. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 2010; 39: 330–335. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009740903555358

[35] Walkey AJ, Ieong M, Alikhan M, Farber HW. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with right-heart catheterization in patients with systemic sclerosis. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2010; 37: 1871–1877. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.091424

[36] Dumitrescu D, Oudiz RJ, Karpouzas G, Hovanesyan A, Jayasinghe A, Hansen JE, et al. Developing pulmonary vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis, detected with non-invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. PloS One. 2010; 5: e14293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014293

[37] Boutou AK, Pitsiou GG, Siakka P, Dimitroulas T, Paspala A, Sourla E, et al. Phenotyping Exercise Limitation in Systemic Sclerosis: The Use of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Respiration; International Review of Thoracic Diseases. 2016; 91: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442888

[38] Agostoni P, Dumitrescu D. How to perform and report a cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with chronic heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology. 2019; 288: 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.053

[39] Brown JT, Kotecha T, Steeden JA, Fontana M, Denton CP, Coghlan JG, et al. Reduced exercise capacity in patients with systemic sclerosis is associated with lower peak tissue oxygen extraction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance-augmented cardiopulmonary exercise study. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Official Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2021; 23: 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00817-1

[40] Coghlan JG, Denton CP, Grünig E, Bonderman D, Distler O, Khanna D, et al. Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014; 73: 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203301

[41] Ruiz-Cano MJ, Escribano P, Alonso R, Delgado J, Carreira P, Velazquez T, et al. Comparison of baseline characteristics and survival between patients with idiopathic and connective tissue disease-related pulmonary arterial hypertension. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation: the Official Publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2009; 28: 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2009.02.016

[42] Steen VD, Medsger TA. Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972-2002. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2007; 66: 940–944. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.066068

[43] Lefèvre G, Dauchet L, Hachulla E, Montani D, Sobanski V, Lambert M, et al. Survival and prognostic factors in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2013; 65: 2412–2423. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38029

[44] Galiè N, Rubin L, Hoeper M, Jansa P, Al-Hiti H, Meyer G, et al. Treatment of patients with mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension with bosentan (EARLY study): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2008; 371: 2093–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60919-8

[45] Humbert M, Yaici A, de Groote P, Montani D, Sitbon O, Launay D, et al. Screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis: clinical characteristics at diagnosis and long-term survival. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2011; 63: 3522–3530. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30541

[46] Kovacs G, Maier R, Aberer E, Brodmann M, Graninger W, Kqiku X, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy may be safe and effective in patients with systemic sclerosis and borderline pulmonary artery pressure. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2012; 64: 1257–1262. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.33460

[47] Humbert M, Sitbon O, Yaïci A, Montani D, O’Callaghan DS, Jaïs X, et al. Survival in incident and prevalent cohorts of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The European Respiratory Journal. 2010; 36: 549–555. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00057010

[48] Hao Y, Thakkar V, Stevens W, Morrisroe K, Prior D, Rabusa C, et al. A comparison of the predictive accuracy of three screening models for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2015; 17: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0517-5

[49] Dumitrescu D, Nagel C, Kovacs G, Bollmann T, Halank M, Winkler J, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for detecting pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2017; 103: 774–782. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309981

[50] Santaniello A, Casella R, Vicenzi M, Rota I, Montanelli G, De Santis M, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in a combined screening approach to individuate pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2020; 59: 1581–1586. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez473

[51] Bellan M, Giubertoni A, Piccinino C, Buffa M, Cromi D, Sola D, et al. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Is an Accurate Tool for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Scleroderma Related Diseases. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2021; 14: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14040342

[52] Sánchez-Aguilera Sánchez-Paulete P, Lázaro Salvador M, Berenguel Senén A, Méndez Perles C, Rodríguez Padial L. Role of cardiopulmonary exercise test in early diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma patients. Medicina Clinica. 2023; 160: 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2022.07.012

[53] Ewert R, Ittermann T, Habedank D, Held M, Lange TJ, Halank M, et al. Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with systemic sclerosis. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2019; 19: 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-1003-7

[54] Hemelein RA, Lajkó I, Baráth K, Varga J, Ágoston G, Hulló D, et al. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary exercise test in the prediction of disease progression in systemic sclerosis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2021; 39 Suppl 131: 94–102. https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/tktu8v

[55] Puente-Maestu L, Palange P, Casaburi R, Laveneziana P, Maltais F, Neder JA, et al. Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: an official ERS statement. The European Respiratory Journal. 2016; 47: 429–460. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00745-2015

[56] Badagliacca R, Rischard F, Giudice FL, Howard L, Papa S, Valli G, et al. Incremental value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation: the Official Publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2022; 41: 780–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.02.021

[57] Deboeck G, Scoditti C, Huez S, Vachiéry JL, Lamotte M, Sharples L, et al. Exercise testing to predict outcome in idiopathic versus associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. The European Respiratory Journal. 2012; 40: 1410–1419. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00217911

[58] Bournia VK, Kallianos A, Panopoulos S, Gialafos E, Velentza L, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and prognosis in patients with systemic sclerosis without baseline pulmonary hypertension: a prospective cohort study. Rheumatology International. 2022; 42: 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04937-w

[59] Glaab T, Taube C. Practical guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults. Respiratory Research. 2022; 23: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01895-6

[60] Hachulla E, Agard C, Allanore Y, Avouac J, Bader-Meunier B, Belot A, et al. French recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2021; 16: 322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01844-y

[61] Pellar RE, Pope JE. Evidence-based management of systemic sclerosis: Navigating recommendations and guidelines. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2017; 46: 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.12.003