REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Strategies

Hejin Zhang , Shiqi Zhang , Hangxiu Che , Yiwen Wan , Hanyu Gao , Dongyuan Yao

Journal of Integrative Neuroscience ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2) : 45114

PDF (3742KB)
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2) :45114 DOI: 10.31083/JIN45114
Review
review-article
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Strategies
Author information +
History +
PDF (3742KB)

Abstract

Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterized by the loss of muscle atonia during rapid eye movement sleep, leading individuals to physically act out their dreams, often resulting in injuries. This condition is linked to SubCoeruleus nucleus dysfunction (homologous to the sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus in rodents) and related neural circuits. Despite its profound impact on patient safety and quality of life, the role of environmental and lifestyle factors in RBD pathogenesis remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, we conducted a review of observational and interventional studies published between 2000 and 2025, using PubMed, Web of Science databases, and ScienceDirect. After systematic screening, 129 studies were selected, covering pathophysiological mechanisms, biomarkers, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic interventions. Emerging evidence suggests that early detection through biomarkers and neuroimaging, combined with targeted therapeutic interventions, may help delay or prevent progression to more severe neurodegenerative diseases. This review underscores significant advances in identifying RBD biomarkers and targeted interventions, while highlighting the critical need for future research on modifiable environmental and lifestyle risk factors to guide preventive strategies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

REM sleep behavior disorder / neurodegenerative diseases / α-synucleinopathies / biomarkers / pathogenesis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hejin Zhang, Shiqi Zhang, Hangxiu Che, Yiwen Wan, Hanyu Gao, Dongyuan Yao. REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Strategies. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 2026, 25(2): 45114 DOI:10.31083/JIN45114

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

The human sleep cycle, a fundamental aspect of daily physiological rhythms, is conventionally divided into rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM sleep. During REM sleep, the brain is remarkably active and often accompanied by vivid dreams, while the body experiences reduced muscle tone. This muscle atonia is crucial for REM sleep, and its disruption can result in dreaming-enacting behaviors such as vocalizations and twitches that mirror dream content, potentially resulting in REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) [1, 2, 3].

RBD is categorized into idiopathic (iRBD) and secondary RBD (sRBD), with the latter being associated with neurological disorders or medications such as antidepressants. Globally, the prevalence of RBD in the general population ranges from 0.5% to 1.25%, while in older individuals, the rate doubles to approximately 2% [4]. Although the exact pathogenesis of RBD has not been fully elucidated, it is widely recognized that it primarily involves dysfunction in the pontine and midbrain regions of the brainstem. In addition, environmental risk factors (occupational hazards such as fine particulate matter in the air with a diameter of 2.5 µm or less (PM2.5), pesticides, or heavy metals) may also exacerbate neurodegenerative processes through mechanisms such as oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, which may promote the pathogenesis of RBD [5].

This review aims to provide an integrative overview of RBD pathophysiology, explore potential biomarkers for early detection, and discuss the latest therapeutic strategies to mitigate the impact on patients’ quality of life.

2. Methods

For this narrative review, a comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Web of Science (https://webofscience.com), and ScienceDirect (https://www.sciencedirect.com/), for articles published between 2000 and 2025. Key search terms included “REM sleep behavior disorder”, “pathogenesis”, “biomarkers”, and “therapeutic strategies”. The selection focused on original research and review articles, emphasizing scholarly relevance. The authors examined the included papers for their relevance to the narrative review, resulting in the inclusion of 129 publications. Although earlier works (pre-2000) provide seminal observations on REM sleep atonia circuitry and parasomnia phenomenology, these foundational findings have since been summarized and expanded in more recent reviews. Consequently, limiting the reference search to 2000–2025 captures the consolidated evidence while avoiding redundancy.

3. Generation of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep

During REM sleep, cholinergic neurons in the pontine reticular formation and midbrain exhibit heightened activity [6]. Glutamatergic neurons in a small pontine nucleus located ventral to the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDT) play a key role in muscle atonia. In rats, this nucleus is termed the sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus (SLD), while in humans, it corresponds to the SubCoeruleus (SubC) nucleus [7]. In rats and mice, the absence of glutamatergic neurons or impairment of their neurotransmission in SLD leads to the loss of muscle atonia and the emergence of abnormal RBD-like behaviors during REM sleep [8, 9]. Recent studies have demonstrated that SLD glutamatergic neurons play a critical role in maintaining muscle atonia during REM sleep [8, 10]. Beyond atonia, these neurons are now also recognized as the key trigger of REM sleep themselves. Crucially, a pontine-medullary loop involving reciprocal connections between corticotropin-releasing hormone binding protein (CRHBP)-expressing glutamatergic neurons and Nos1-expressing neurons in the dorsomedial medulla (dorsal paragigantocellular nucleus/prepositus hypoglossal nucleus, DPGi/Pr) constitutes a core circuit for REM sleep induction and maintenance. Optogenetic activation of this loop potently initiates REM sleep, while its inhibition suppresses REM episodes [11]. In addition to the SLD (a REM-on region), the pontomesencephalic junction, the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG), the adjoining lateral pontine tegmentum (LPT), and the lateral hypothalamus (LH) contain numerous REM-off neurons that inhibit REM sleep [12]. The subset of “REM-off” γ-aminobutyric acid-ergic (GABAergic) neurons in the vlPAG/LPT inhibits REM-on neurons, thereby suppressing the transition from non-REM to REM sleep and shortening REM episode duration. When the activity of REM-off neurons in the vlPAG/LPT diminishes and is deactivated, this inhibition is lifted, allowing SLD glutamatergic activity to be restored, thereby initiating REM sleep [12, 13, 14, 15].

The vlPAG/LPT GABAergic neurons also project to multiple other regions, including the LDT and locus coeruleus (LC), both of which are involved in regulating REM sleep. Notably, REM sleep inhibition has been observed following the activation of vlPAG/LPT GABAergic terminals in the LH [12]. Additionally, most orexin (Orx)-producing neurons in the LH inhibit REM sleep by activating vlPAG/LPT neurons, which suppress REM sleep initiation [13]. However, approximately 8% of these neurons may promote or stabilize REM sleep by directly influencing the SLD, thereby highlighting their dual regulatory role [13].

4. Pathology of RBD

The pathology of RBD is multifactorial, arising from dysregulation of brainstem nuclei that control REM sleep atonia, frequently associated with α-synucleinopathy, and occasionally with focal structural lesions. The following sections detail the neural circuit dysfunctions, protein aggregation mechanisms, and structural pathologies implicated in RBD.

4.1 Dysfunction of the REM Sleep Atonia Circuit

The fundamental mechanism of RBD involves the disruption of brainstem-to-spinal cord pathways that maintain muscle paralysis during REM sleep. Recent studies have shown that projections from glutamatergic neurons in the SubC nucleus (equivalent to the SLD in mice) to the ventromedial medulla (VMM) and spinal cord form the basis of REM sleep atonia in skeletal muscles [13]. Tracing studies have confirmed that glutamatergic neurons in the directly project to GABAergic and glycinergic (Gly) neurons in the VMM, inducing glycine-mediated spinal cord postsynaptic inhibition of motoneurons. Additionally, glutamatergic neurons in the SubC nucleus directly project to layer VII of the spinal cord, which contains GABAergic/glycinergic interneurons [14, 16].

The specific loss or inactivation of GABAergic/Gly neurons in the VMM results in REM sleep without atonia, characterized by exaggerated phasic twitching and involuntary motor activity. Furthermore, experiments in mice have shown that the absence of glutamatergic neurons in the SLD or disrupted glutamatergic neurotransmission from SLD neurons can lead to REM sleep without atonia and dream-enacting behaviors [8, 9, 16]. Therefore, the core pathophysiological mechanism underlying RBD involves the disruption of the descending SLD-VMM-spinal cord pathway, leading to a failure of glycinergic/GABAergic inhibition of motor neurons during REM sleep. Neurodegeneration involving glutamatergic SubC nucleus and/or GABAergic/glycinergic medullary neurons may disrupt these inhibitory systems, ultimately compromising the ability to induce muscle relaxation during REM sleep [17]. Thus, the core pathophysiological mechanism underlying RBD involves the disruption of the descending SLD-VMM-spinal cord pathway, leading to a failure of glycinergic/GABAergic inhibition of motor neurons during REM sleep (Fig. 1).

4.2 Aggregation of α-synuclein

α-synuclein (α-syn) pathology is a major contributor to RBD, often preceding overt neurodegeneration and spreading through peripheral and brainstem pathways.

Peripheral α-syn accumulation may serve as an early site of pathology, with spread to the central nervous system (CNS) via neural and circulatory routes. Red blood cells (RBCs) serve as the primary source of peripheral α-syn, and recent pathological and imaging evidence suggest that its initial aggregation may begin in peripheral organs before spreading to the brain. Impairment in peripheral clearance systems can contribute to inefficient α-syn removal and greater deposition. Peripheral α-syn released from RBCs may spread to the CNS in a prion-like manner from peripheral sites [18].

Gastrointestinal biopsies show that abnormal α-syn aggregation is detected in 24% of colon biopsy samples from patients with iRBD [19, 20]. Enteroendocrine cells secrete α-syn, which may be taken up by presynaptic neurons of the sympathetic nerves in the lateral horn of the spinal cord and can then undergo retrograde transport to the brainstem or higher brain regions such as the thalamus or cerebral cortex. This process leads to the formation of α-syn aggregates [21]. α-syn pathology can also spread to the pelvic plexus, pelvic ganglia, and sacral parasympathetic nucleus, resulting in impaired rectal function [22]. Additionally, up to 82% of patients with iRBD tested positive for α-syn in a recent skin biopsy [23]. α-syn aggregates have been observed in approximately half of the submandibular and labial salivary gland samples from patients with iRBD [24, 25]. The frequent involvement of the submandibular gland, submandibular ganglion, and salivatory nucleus suggests that an ascending craniofacial parasympathetic pathway may play a role in α-syn progression [22].

The precise causal link between α-syn pathology and RBD symptomatology is hypothesized to involve the targeted disruption of key brainstem nuclei governing REM sleep atonia. The injection of preformed α-syn protofibrils into the SLD induces degeneration of SLD neurons, leading to widespread dissemination of α-syn pathology accompanied by RBD-like behaviors in mice [13]. This suggests that α-syn accumulation in the SLD may contribute to RBD pathogenesis.

As neuropathological aggregates propagate rostrally through the brainstem, they ultimately infiltrate the SLD in rats (homologous to the SubCoeruleus, SubC, in humans), which is a core component of the REM sleep regulatory circuit [26]. This nucleus contains a population of glutamatergic “REM-on” neurons that, during normal REM sleep, become active and send excitatory projections to glycinergic/GABAergic premotor neurons in the ventral medulla and spinal cord. This excitatory drive is essential for inducing hyperpolarization and atonia in somatic motoneurons. The accumulation of α-syn pathology within the SLD/SubC and its connected circuitry, potentially through α-syn oligomer-mediated neuroimmune inflammation mechanisms, is proposed to impair the function of these critical glutamatergic neurons. This dysfunction disrupts the excitatory command to the medullary/spinal inhibitory interneurons, resulting in a failure to suppress motor activity during REM sleep and the characteristic dream-enactment behaviors of RBD [27].

In RBD patients, α-syn aggregates have been detected in the olfactory mucosa using assays such as real-time quinacrine-induced conversion (RT-QuIC), suggesting that α-syn pathology may originate in peripheral tissues like the nasal epithelium before spreading centrally [28]. These anomalies are closely linked to RBD and broader sleep disorders, suggesting that individuals exposed to PM2.5 air pollution may face an increased risk of developing RBD [29]. Collectively, these findings establish a strong link between RBD and widespread α-syn neuropathology.

In addition, several pathways have been identified to facilitate α-syn entry into the CNS, including olfactory, vagus, and blood-borne routes. α-syn spreads from the nasal cavity to the brain via two primary routes: (1) through the olfactory nerve to the olfactory bulb (OB), subsequently spreading to other brain regions, including the limbic system and possibly the temporal lobe; and (2) via nasal entry affecting the enteric nervous system, with α-syn propagating retrogradely along the vagus nerve to the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus [22, 30]. Beyond the vagal pathway, other routes of α-syn oligomers transport should not be overlooked. Complement receptor 1, a component of the peripheral blood system, promotes α-syn pathology by exacerbating its phosphorylation and aggregation in vitro through its transmembrane domain (CR1-TM) [31]. Additionally, high blood cholestanol levels can activate the asparagine endopeptidase, inducing α-syn fragmentation and aggregation [32]. Elevated plasma α-syn oligomers have been detected in patients with RBD, and α-syn is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier [33]. Circulating α-syn in plasma may thus induce central nervous system pathology.

In summary, when α-syn propagation reaches key brainstem nuclei regulating REM sleep (particularly the SLD), it disrupts glutamatergic projections to inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord. This impairs glycinergic/GABAergic neurotransmission required for muscle atonia during REM sleep, leading to pathological motor activation and RBD symptom manifestation.

4.3 Focal Ischemic, Inflammatory, Degenerative, or Demyelinating Lesions in the Brainstem, Cortical, and Subcortical Structures

Non-α-syn etiologies such as vascular, inflammatory, or demyelinating lesions in REM-regulating regions can also lead to RBD, underscoring the anatomical vulnerability of these pathways. The brainstem plays a crucial role in regulating REM sleep and muscle atonia. Lesions in the pontine and midbrain tegmentum, particularly within key REM-regulating nuclei, can disrupt normal REM sleep processes, contributing to RBD [34]. Dysfunction of pontine tegmental neurons can disrupt descending projections to spinal motor neurons, leading to the abnormal loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep [35].

In recent years, an increasing number of case reports have demonstrated that acute-onset RBD is closely associated with focal lesions in the pontine tegmentum caused by ischemia, tumors, hemorrhage, demyelination, or inflammation [36]. For example, lesions in the right pontine tegmentum cause RBD, characterized by the loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep and dream-enacting behaviors. In one case, a right pontine infarct led to RBD symptoms that were alleviated by clonazepam [37]. Similarly, ischemic stroke affecting the left rostrodorsal pons can disrupt the LC and LPT regions, interfering with REM sleep pathways and visual processing [38].

Acute encephalitis affecting the brainstem can also lead to inflammatory lesions in the dorsomedial pontine tegmentum characterized by inflammatory infiltration, neuronal loss, and gliosis. Patients with such lesions often develop RBD, supporting the hypothesis that inflammatory damage in this region can induce acute RBD [39]. Furthermore, in patients with multiple system atrophy associated with RBD, degeneration of the pedunculopontine (PPN) and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei results in the depletion of cholinergic neurons, which is considered a key pathological feature of RBD [40]. Similarly, demyelinating lesions in the dorsal pontine region can disrupt pathways that regulate skeletal muscle tone and movement suppression during REM sleep, resulting in the loss of muscle atonia [41].

Although less frequently implicated than in the brainstem, cortical lesions can also affect sleep regulation. Inflammatory demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, can lead to lesions in white and grey matter, including regions involved in sleep control [42]. Degenerative changes in subcortical structures, such as the thalamus, putamen, and amygdala, have been observed in patients with RBD. These regions are involved in motor control and emotional regulation during sleep [43]. Neurodegeneration in brainstem nuclei such as the substantia nigra, PPN, and LC may disrupt REM sleep atonia mechanisms, contributing to abnormal motor activation and the hallmark dream-enactment behaviors of RBD [43].

In summary, RBD pathogenesis may result from structural impairments within critical neural networks spanning the brainstem nuclei and cortico-subcortical pathways. These neuroanatomical components, which are essential for mediating muscle atonia during REM sleep, can be compromised by various pathological mechanisms, including ischemic damage, inflammatory processes, neurodegenerative changes, and demyelinating disorders.

5. Diseases Associated With RBD

Longitudinal cohort studies indicate that a significant proportion (81%–91%) of patients with iRBD develop definitive neurodegenerative diseases or mild cognitive impairment within 14 years of follow-up [44]. RBD has been recognized as an early manifestation of several neurodegenerative diseases, particularly disorders associated with α-synucleinopathies, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA) [45]. Additionally, emerging research has demonstrated that sleep disorders contribute to neurodegeneration, as prolonged sleep deprivation induces a proinflammatory response, which plays a critical role in disease progression [46].

5.1 Parkinson’s Disease

During REM sleep, sleep disruption and neural inflammation may lead to an imbalance between the production and clearance of α-syn, promoting the formation of oligomers, amyloidogenic fibers, and ultimately Lewy bodies from soluble monomeric α-syn [47]. Furthermore, experimental findings have demonstrated that inoculation of α-syn fibrils in the gastrointestinal tract can induce pathological propagation to the brain and compromised peripheral clearance can lead to α-syn accumulation systemically [18]. Additionally, defects in the dopaminergic system have been observed in patients with iRBD, and brain imaging studies have identified abnormal dopamine transporter protein activity, which increases the risk of progression to PD in these patients [48]. Taken together, this evidence supports the conclusion that iRBD may contribute to PD development. This emphasizes the need for more in-depth studies on RBD and its relationship with neurodegenerative diseases to better understand their early biological hallmarks and identify potential targets for early intervention.

Body-first PD (RBD-positive at the onset of motor symptoms) and brain-first PD (RBD-negative at the onset of motor symptoms) have been distinguished using RBD as a clinical identifier [49]. In body-first PD, pathological α-syn initially originates in the enteric nervous system and gradually spreads to the autonomic and central nervous systems [50]. Emerging evidence indicates that α-syn propagation from the periphery (e.g., the gut) to the brain is a critical process associated with an increased risk of PD, as α-syn deposits have been found in peripheral tissues of patients with Lewy body diseases. Moreover, organs with extensive neural connections, like the gut, may serve as an initiation site for α-syn pathology [18]. In contrast, in brain-first PD, α-syn pathology often originates in regions such as OB or the amygdala, serving as a critical starting point for subsequent spread to other brain areas, including the substantia nigra pars compacta [50]. Neuroimaging studies suggest that substantial volume loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta can be detected even in early stages of PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1), supporting its involvement in early α-syn pathology, particularly in brain-first PD [51].

Patients with body-first PD typically exhibit more prominent autonomic symptoms, including upright hypotension and constipation, more frequent pathological aggregation of α-syn in peripheral tissues, and greater involvement of the brainstem and autonomic nervous system in imaging studies. These patients also show more symmetrical loss of striatal dopaminergic, more pronounced olfactory dysfunction, and even more distributed motor symptoms. By contrast, brain-first PD presents with opposing clinical and imaging features. Before the onset of motor symptoms, patients with brain-first PD show only mild cortical metabolic changes [19]. Most diffusion-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies confirm that patients with body-first PD have a higher degree of microstructural brainstem damage than patients with brain-first PD [52].

In investigating the progression of iRBD to PD, research identified common and distinct genetic factors for both disorders (Fig. 2). Genome-wide association studies have identified five genetic loci associated with RBD, primarily involving the autophagy-lysosome pathway [53]. A high proportion of patients with iRBD diagnosed via polysomnography carry pathogenic glucocerebrosidase (GBA) variants, providing strong evidence of a link between GBA genetic variants and RBD [54]. Mutations in the GBA gene impair lysosomal glucocerebrosidase activity, potentially disrupting lysosomal degradation and leading to α-syn accumulation [52]. Patients carrying pathogenic GBA variants typically exhibit traits of body-first PD [52]. Impaired synuclein alpha/α-syn (SNCA) catabolism further exacerbates toxic oligomer formation [55]. Although SNCA variant carriers are relatively evenly distributed between the two PD subtypes, patients with leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) mutations predominantly exhibit brain-first PD features [52].

However, not all patients with PD develop RBD, as disease manifestation varies among individuals. The prevalence of RBD in patients with PD is approximately 40% [56]. Differences in affected brain regions and genetic factors may explain why some patients do not develop RBD [19, 49, 54]. Furthermore, disease subtypes and progression patterns influence RBD occurrence in PD [3, 57]. Clinical heterogeneity suggests that PD comprises multiple subtypes, with some forms predominantly affecting motor pathways while sparing sleep regulation centres [57]. Additionally, symptom timelines vary; RBD may emerge before, during, or after the onset of motor symptoms, meaning some patients develop RBD later in the disease course [3].

5.2 Dementia With Lewy Bodies

iRBD is considered an important pre-clinical indicator of PD and DLB. Long-term follow-up studies indicate that approximately 95% of patients with iRBD will eventually be diagnosed with DLB and PD, with each occurring at roughly equal rates (45%), while an additional 5% develop MSA [58, 59]. DLB and PD are often discussed together because of their overlapping pathological features, both involving dopaminergic innervation loss in the nigrostriatal pathway, as observed on dopamine transporter imaging. However, patients with DLB exhibit a more uniform and symmetrical reduction in dopaminergic activity across the putamen and caudate nuclei. As PD progresses, the dopaminergic deficit becomes increasingly symmetric, making dopamine imaging patterns resemble those seen on DLB [60].

The association between DLB and iRBD primarily highlights marked cognitive decline, particularly in attention and executive function, as assessed by specific tests such as the Trail Making Test B and immediate recall in word lists. In contrast, iRBD-associated PD manifests as early impairments in a broader range of cognitive domains, including attention, executive function, memory, and visuospatial abilities [61]. Patients with DLB and RBD may exhibit a ‘bottom-up’ disease progression pattern, in which α-syn pathology initially affects the brainstem before spreading to cortical regions, resembling the trajectory observed in PD [62]. Variations in the 5 region of the SNCA gene and mutations in the GABA gene may increase neuronal sensitivity to α-syn, thereby facilitating RBD progression to DLB by altering gene expression or splicing [63]. Variations in the 5 region of the SNCA gene may increase neuronal sensitivity to α-syn, potentially influencing the progression from RBD to DLB through altered gene expression or splicing. Although dysfunction of GABAergic neurotransmission has been implicated in RBD, the role of specific GABA-related genetic mutations in disease progression remains to be clarified [64, 65].

5.3 Multiple System Atrophy

MSA is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a heterogeneous combination of autonomic failure, cerebellar syndrome, and Parkinsonian features that respond poorly to levodopa and pyramidal signs [66]. Patients presenting primarily with Parkinsonian features are classified as MSA-P, typically characterized by striatal degeneration, whereas individuals with predominant cerebellar ataxia are classified as MSA-C, commonly associated with olivopontocerebellar atrophy [67].

The development of RBD in MSA occurs when pathological changes affect the LDT, PPN, and LC [68]. Study indicates that RBD is highly prevalent in MSA, with up to 90% of patients experiencing RBD at some stage of the disease course. No significant difference in prevalence has been observed between MSA-P and MSA-C subtypes [69]. However, RBD preceding motor symptom onset tends to be more severe in patients with MSA-C than in patients with RBD developing later in the disease course [70].

The pre-RBD patients develop RBD before MSA, and MSA tends to initially present with autonomic dysfunction (e.g., orthostatic hypotension, urinary issues), rather than typical motor symptoms of Parkinsonism. These patients are more likely to develop stridor, pyramidal signs, and urinary dysfunction at an earlier stage, and tend to have a shorter overall disease duration [71]. The post-RBD patients develop RBD after the onset of MSA, typically following the emergence of autonomic or motor symptoms [71]. Compared with the post-RBD patients, the pre-RBD patients have a lower incidence of typical motor symptoms of Parkinsonism not only at disease onset but also throughout the disease course [71]. The SNCA gene encodes α-syn, a presynaptic protein involved in synaptic vesicle regulation and neurotransmitter release. Recent studies indicate that carrying SNCA gene is a shared genetic risk factor for RBD and MSA, while GBA mutations are strongly associated with RBD and PD, but less so with MSA [64, 72].

6. Biomarker Detection and Targeted Therapy

Current understanding remains limited by the inability to predict or differentiate specific phenotypic transformations in individuals with iRBD. The duration of RBD varies considerably, with some patients progressing within months while others remain stable for decades [45]. Addressing this challenge requires targeted therapies leveraging biomarkers identified in prior studies. A summary of key candidate biomarkers categorized by their biological or clinical nature is provided in Table 1. (Ref. [64, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86]). The following sections explore the most extensively researched markers in this context.

6.1 Alpha-synuclein

Alpha-syn plays a central role in RBD pathogenesis, and its aberrant aggregation is a key indicator of disease progression. Current therapeutic approaches increasingly focus on preventing the early stages of protein aggregation, particularly protofibril formation [87].

In vitro studies have demonstrated that 4-arylidene curcumin and bis-chalcone polyphenols effectively inhibit α-syn aggregation and promote the disaggregation of preformed fibrils [88, 89]. Moreover, the combined application of polyphenolic acid hybrids and xanthones has shown efficacy in disaggregating existing α-syn oligomers, presenting promising avenues for early intervention [90].

Recent investigations into the gut microbiome suggest that oral administration of resveratrol-selenium peptide nanocomposites can modulate specific bacterial taxa, such as Desulfovibrio, potentially reducing α-syn aggregation and offering new therapeutic strategies [91]. Additionally, the small peptide Tat-βsyn-degron, which targets α-syn, has been shown to reduce its levels and aggregation, improving bradykinesia, tremor, balance, and coordination of patients [92].

The peripheral clearance mechanisms play an important role in α-syn homeostasis by removing it from the blood circulation, and impairment in peripheral clearance can lead to α-syn accumulation in peripheral sites, which may spread to the CNS via blood or neural pathways, contributing to neuronal damage and PD [18].

Accurate detection of α-syn aggregation is essential for predicting and diagnosing RBD and associated diseases. Notably, specific α-syn forms in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been identified as diagnostic markers for PD and RBD [93]. Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging offers potential for localizing and quantifying drug targets, monitoring therapeutic efficacy, and imaging at the molecular level, PET tracers require higher selectivity owing to the coexistence and co-localization of α-syn with amyloid-β and Tau fibers [94]. Additionally, RT-QuIC and the α-synuclein seeded amplification assay (αSyn-SAA) enable the detection of α-syn aggregation [95].

These advancements in understanding and detecting α-syn aggregation have not only improved the prediction of RBD progression but have also contributed to the development of novel therapeutic interventions.

6.2 Neurofilament Light Chain

Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a cytoskeletal protein predominantly expressed in large-calibre myelinated axons, has provided valuable insights into neuronal injury mechanisms. Its detection in CSF offers promising avenues for diagnosing and monitoring neurodegenerative disorders [96]. A recent study investigated the potential of plasma NfL levels and cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging as predictors of phenotypic transformation in patients with iRBD. Baseline plasma NfL levels were significantly elevated in patients with RBD and MSA. The sensitivity and specificity of NfL concentrations exceeding 21.3 pg/mL in predicting the transformation of iRBD to MSA were 100% and 94.3%, respectively. Thus, elevated plasma NfL levels are associated with conversion to MSA, whereas decreased cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake is indicative of conversion to Lewy body dementia [73, 97].

Moreover, neither olfactory nociceptive sensitization nor a quantitative assessment of striatal dopamine uptake appears to reliably predict phenotypic transition, contradicting previous studies [98, 99]. This challenges the conventional view of these biomarkers and underscores the need to refine and optimize existing biomarker combinations. Based on these findings, controlling plasma NfL levels may be a feasible therapeutic approach for RBD. For instance, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to reduce NfL release following nerve injury. Similarly, neuroprotective agents such as butylphthalide, which mitigate oxidative stress and inflammation, may help lower NfL levels and slow disease progression.

As research advances, NfL has emerged as a key biomarker for predicting and monitoring various neurological disorders. Recent studies have emphasized several detection assays, including traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and single-molecule array (Simoa) technologies [100, 101]. These techniques have not only improved the early diagnosis and monitoring of neurological disorders but have also enhanced our understanding of the role of NfL in neuropathology. Investigating NfL as a biomarker paves the way for early diagnosis and treatment of RBD while establishing a scientific foundation for understanding the interplay between sleep disorders and cognitive function.

6.3 Intensity of Muscle Activity During REM Sleep

In patients with iRBD, REM sleep without atonia (RWA) has been established as a reliable electrophysiological biomarker for predicting phenotypic conversion to synucleinopathy [102]. The current assessment protocol uses video-polysomnography (vPSG) combined with advanced computer algorithms to accurately calculate the percentage of submental muscles and bilateral upper limb muscles (flexor digitorum superficialis) containing excessive electromyography (EMG) activity, which has been rigorously developed and widely accepted by the international RBD research group [103]. Compared with single-channel monitoring, multi-channel monitoring can provide more comprehensive muscle activity information in the diagnosis of RBD, significantly improve the accuracy of diagnosis, and ensure accurate identification of RBD patients. Continuous advances in technology have further optimized the RWA analysis process. The introduction of deep learning algorithms enables RWA analysis to achieve a high degree of agreement with expert visual scoring, while significantly reducing the analysis time, which strongly promotes the widespread application of this technology in clinical practice [104, 105]. In one study, 221 consecutive patients with clinically suspected RBD underwent DAT single photon emission CT (SPECT) and vPSG. vPSG confirmed 176 patients with RBD, and most RWA parameters were significantly correlated with Dopamine Transporter Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (DAT-SPECT) ratios. Therefore, the range of RWA values is important to estimate whether patients are in the early, middle, or late prodromal phase of α-synucleinopathy, providing them with important information about the time before possible conversion [106]. In terms of clinical application, RWA is emerging as a key stratification tool in neuroprotective trials. A study has found that different types of RWA can be used as biomarkers for the transformation of iRBD into neurodegenerative diseases. The predictive value was highest when phasic and tonic RWA were present together [102]. Collectively, RWA quantification through standardized multimodal assessment provides a robust framework for stratifying phenoconversion risk and guiding early intervention in iRBD patients on the synucleinopathy continuum.

6.4 Genetic Markers: SNCA and GBA

In addition to the molecular and electrophysiological biomarkers discussed above, genetic factors play a crucial role in the pathogenesis and progression of RBD. Genome-wide association studies and single-gene mutation analyses have identified several genetic variants associated with synucleinopathies and increased risk of developing RBD. Notably, variants in the SNCA gene, which encodes alpha-synuclein, and the GBA gene, encoding glucocerebrosidase, are among the most well-established genetic markers.

The SNCA Antisense RNA 1 (SNCA-AS1) variant (rs3756059) has been implicated through genome-wide association study (GWAS) and colocalization analyses, highlighting the role of SNCA in RBD and its progression to PD, DLB, or MSA [64]. Similarly, GBA pathogenic variants (such as L444P, c.84insG, and others) are strongly associated with the presence of RBD in Parkinson’s disease patients, further supporting the link between lysosomal dysfunction and alpha-synuclein aggregation [74]. These genetic biomarkers not only enhance our understanding of RBD etiology but also offer potential targets for personalized therapeutic strategies.

6.5 Others

Recent research trends show a shift from the traditional detection of RWA to the collaborative application of multi-dimensional indicators to improve the ability of early diagnosis and pathological mechanism analysis. At the REM sleep microarchitecture level, refined electroencephalography (EEG) oscillation analysis revealed the core features of brain stem-thalamo-cortical circuit dysregulation: proportion of phasic REM in iRBD patients is significantly increased, indicating excessive activation of the motor commands system, while the density of sawtooth waves and the abnormal correlation between sawtooth waves and ponto-geniculo-occipital waves in PD-RBD patients reflect the dysfunction of thalamo-cortical information integration. These findings confirm that REM sleep disorders in RBD not only involve muscle tone loss and dream behavior interpretation but also extend to specific electrophysiological characteristics [107]. Such microstructure parameters can be obtained by secondary mining of PSG data, which has high specificity and clinical practicability.

At the level of cortical degeneration, cortical mean diffusivity (cMD) derived from diffusion MRI, as a new imaging marker, is significantly more sensitive to neuronal microstructure damage than traditional cortical thickness measurement. A study has shown that the cMD values of PD-RBD patients are increased in the left superior temporal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, precuneus, and the right middle frontal gyrus, postcentral gyrus, and paracentral lobule [108]. In addition, although prolonged REM latency is not a specific marker of α-synucleinopathy, its association with increased CSF tau/β-amyloid and decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor suggests its predictive value for the pathology of RBD comorbid with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [109]. To overcome the limitations of a single marker, future studies can adopt multimodal integration strategies (such as combining electrophysiological and imaging indicators). This research paradigm, from microscopic oscillation to macroscopic cortical diffusion, from local neural circuits to multi-system interaction, will provide a new path for the accurate classification of RBD and the early intervention of neurodegeneration.

7. Treatment of RBD

Symptomatic treatment for RBD is crucial for preventing sleep-related falls or injuries; however, only a limited number of patients with RBD seek medical attention. Current treatment guidelines include two main categories: nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions. Nonpharmacological approaches primarily involve comprehensive environmental modification and safety counselling to reduce injury risk, which are the cornerstone of non-pharmacological management. Recommended measures involve placing mattresses on the floor or lowering the bed height, padding furniture edges, securing windows, and removing potential hazards (such as sharp objects and fragile items) before bedtime [110]. It is also advised to maintain a certain distance from the bed partner or even sleep in separate rooms for safety [111]. Beyond environmental adjustments, establishing good sleep hygiene is important. This includes maintaining a regular sleep schedule (adhering to fixed bedtimes and wake-up times), and avoiding napping, compensating for sleep, or lying in bed for extended periods while awake. Incorporating moderate physical activity, such as daily mindful movement exercises or aerobic exercise for about an hour, may also be beneficial for overall sleep quality [112]. For anxiety and psychological burden associated with RBD, relaxation techniques like progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and mindfulness practices (e.g., breath watching and body scanning) can help patients relax and reduce excessive focus on symptoms. Although psychotherapy (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, CBT) has been explored, current evidence for its efficacy in reducing RBD symptoms remains limited [113].

A summary of pharmacological treatments is shown in Table 2 (Ref. [114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119]). Pharmacological treatment includes first-line agents such as clonazepam and melatonin, as well as additional agents, including pramipexole, ramelteon, rotigotine [3, 120], and clonazepam, a benzodiazepine, enhances the activity of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, leading to chloride influx, neuronal hyperpolarization, and inhibition of postsynaptic potentials. This process suppresses central nervous system activity, producing anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, and muscle relaxant properties. Clonazepam effectively reduces RBD symptoms by inhibiting electromyographic activity during REM sleep, with reported clinical efficacy rates up to 90% [114]. However, it may cause side effects, including falls and related injuries [121].

Melatonin is an endogenous hormone that regulates the sleep-wake cycle and modulates muscle tone during sleep by enhancing GABAergic inhibitory effects [122]. Experimental studies confirm its efficacy in reducing clinical behavioral manifestations and muscle tone during REM sleep. Moreover, melatonin has a more favorable safety and tolerability profile than does clonazepam [115]. Schaefer et al. [123] found that prolonged-release melatonin improved RBD symptoms coexisting with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, neither clonazepam nor melatonin significantly alters sleep architecture [124].

Recent studies suggest that prazosin, an α1-adrenergic antagonist, may be effective in treating high doses of melatonin-resistant RBD, though no reduction in dream-enacting behaviors was observed. A potential synergistic effect of prazosin in combination with melatonin cannot be excluded [125]. Dopamine receptor agonists, such as pramipexole, ramelteon, and rotigotine, have also demonstrated efficacy in alleviating RBD symptoms. Existing studies hypothesize that these agents modulate the basal ganglia on the pudendal nucleus or are related to the degradation of the basal ganglia occurring in conjunction with damage to the pudendal nucleus [116]. Further research suggests that dopaminergic dysfunction may play a critical role in the pathophysiology of RBD [117].

Nonetheless, the role of dopamine agonists in ameliorating the symptoms of RBD remains controversial. Short- to medium-term randomized clinical trials involving small cohorts have reported variable efficacy for rivastigmine, memantine, 5-hydroxytryptophan, and the herbal medicine yokukansan. Additionally, the excitatory effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as paroxetine, on serotonin receptors may influence cortical functions related to mood and sleep regulation, although no direct experimental evidence supports their role in RBD treatment. However, previous studies suggest that paroxetine improves sleep quality and depressive symptoms in patients with comorbid sleep disorders [126]. Trazodone, a medication widely used for treating insomnia and other symptoms, has demonstrated sedative effects and potential benefits in improving early symptoms of attention deficit disorders, REM sleep abnormalities, concussion, and olfactory memory deficits [127]. Its role in modulating early tau pathology suggests it may slow disease progression. This highlights the need for further research into the interaction between RBD and tau proteins, particularly in validating the predictive role of tau proteins in phenotypic transitions [128]. Barrow and Vendrame [129] recently reported significant clinical improvement in three iRBD cases following trazodone treatment, reinforcing its potential therapeutic role. Further details on pharmacological treatments are summarized in Table 2.

It is noteworthy that although the aforementioned medications demonstrate efficacy in treating RBD, further research is needed to elucidate their mechanisms of action and optimize treatment regimens. Long-term, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are essential for evaluating symptomatic and preventive therapies. Additionally, patient-specific factors, such as comorbid sleep disorders (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome), should be carefully considered to ensure timely intervention. Until RBD symptoms are effectively controlled, cohabitating partners may need to sleep in separate rooms for safety. Future studies should explore novel medications and innovative therapies to provide safer and more effective treatment options for patients with RBD.

8. Strengths and Limitations

We reviewed literature on RBD published between 2000 and 2025, providing an integrated overview of its pathophysiological mechanisms, biomarkers used for early detection, and therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive approach might deepen the understanding of RBD’s intricate relationship with neurodegenerative disorders and underscores the importance of early intervention strategies. Special emphasis was placed on key biomarkers such as α-syn and NfL, which are essential for the early diagnosis and monitoring of RBD progression. Additionally, the review provided a thorough exploration of therapeutic interventions, including pharmacological (melatonin, clonazepam, and trazodone) and non-pharmacological methods, thus addressing critical aspects of clinical management. Despite these strengths, the review has some limitations. The literature search was restricted to studies published from the year 2000 onwards to focus on contemporary evidence, which may have excluded some earlier seminal works. In addition, it exclusively included literature published in English, potentially overlooking important contributions published in other languages. Moreover, the analysis was confined to PubMed and Web of Science databases, which might restrict the comprehensiveness and depth of the review. Future research should aim to incorporate additional databases and diverse data sources to mitigate these limitations.

9. Conclusions

RBD is increasingly recognized as a prodromal stage for neurodegenerative diseases, and (e.g., α-syn, NfL, and tau proteins) plasma and CSF biomarker assessment holds promise for early diagnosis. Technological advancements, such as RT-QuIC and Simoa, have further improved biomarker detection sensitivity. Nevertheless, these advances, including RT-QuIC, show particular promise for early RBD diagnosis and synucleinopathy detection.

Furthermore, this review emphasizes the need for future research to explore multimodal biomarker combinations—integrating neuroimaging, fluid biomarkers, and electrophysiological signals—to enhance diagnostic accuracy and prognosis. Clinical trials targeting environmental risk reduction, such as air pollution and occupational exposure interventions, should also be prioritized to assess their preventive potential.

Regarding pharmacotherapy, clonazepam and melatonin remain first-line treatments for RBD; however, treatment strategies must be individualized to account for disease complexity, comorbidities, and potential side effects. As research progresses, further exploration of therapeutic targets and biomarker-driven interventions will be crucial in refining management strategies for RBD.

References

[1]

Sateia MJ. International classification of sleep disorders-third edition: highlights and modifications. Chest. 2014; 146: 1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0970.

[2]

Antelmi E, Lippolis M, Biscarini F, Tinazzi M, Plazzi G. REM sleep behavior disorder: Mimics and variants. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2021; 60: 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101515.

[3]

Dauvilliers Y, Schenck CH, Postuma RB, Iranzo A, Luppi PH, Plazzi G, et al. REM sleep behaviour disorder. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2018; 4: 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0016-5.

[4]

Lyu Z, Zheng S, Zhang X, Mai Y, Pan J, Hummel T, et al. Olfactory impairment as an early marker of Parkinson’s disease in REM sleep behaviour disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2021; 92: 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325361.

[5]

Song J, Han K, Wang Y, Qu R, Liu Y, Wang S, et al. Microglial Activation and Oxidative Stress in PM2.5-Induced Neurodegenerative Disorders. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2022; 11: 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081482.

[6]

Boucetta S, Cissé Y, Mainville L, Morales M, Jones BE. Discharge profiles across the sleep-waking cycle of identified cholinergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic neurons in the pontomesencephalic tegmentum of the rat. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2014; 34: 4708–4727. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2617-13.2014.

[7]

Clément O, Sapin E, Bérod A, Fort P, Luppi PH. Evidence that neurons of the sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus triggering paradoxical (REM) sleep are glutamatergic. Sleep. 2011; 34: 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/34.4.419.

[8]

Valencia Garcia S, Libourel PA, Lazarus M, Grassi D, Luppi PH, Fort P. Genetic inactivation of glutamate neurons in the rat sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus recapitulates REM sleep behaviour disorder. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2017; 140: 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww310.

[9]

Torontali ZA, Fraigne JJ, Sanghera P, Horner R, Peever J. The Sublaterodorsal Tegmental Nucleus Functions to Couple Brain State and Motor Activity during REM Sleep and Wakefulness. Current Biology: CB. 2019; 29: 3803–3813.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.026.

[10]

Wen YJ, Yang WJ, Guo CN, Qiu MH, Kroeger D, Niu JG, et al. Pontine control of rapid eye movement sleep and fear memory. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2023; 29: 1602–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.14123.

[11]

Kashiwagi M, Beck G, Kanuka M, Arai Y, Tanaka K, Tatsuzawa C, et al. A pontine-medullary loop crucial for REM sleep and its deficit in Parkinson’s disease. Cell. 2024; 187: 6272–6289.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.046.

[12]

Zhao YN, Jiang JB, Tao SY, Zhang Y, Chen ZK, Qu WM, et al. GABAergic neurons in the rostromedial tegmental nucleus are essential for rapid eye movement sleep suppression. Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 7552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35299-x.

[13]

Vetrivelan R, Bandaru SS. Neural Control of REM Sleep and Motor Atonia: Current Perspectives. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2023; 23: 907–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-023-01322-x.

[14]

Lu J, Sherman D, Devor M, Saper CB. A putative flip-flop switch for control of REM sleep. Nature. 2006; 441: 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04767.

[15]

Kaur S, Thankachan S, Begum S, Liu M, Blanco-Centurion C, Shiromani PJ. Hypocretin-2 saporin lesions of the ventrolateral periaquaductal gray (vlPAG) increase REM sleep in hypocretin knockout mice. PloS One. 2009; 4: e6346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006346.

[16]

Krenzer M, Anaclet C, Vetrivelan R, Wang N, Vong L, Lowell BB, et al. Brainstem and spinal cord circuitry regulating REM sleep and muscle atonia. PloS One. 2011; 6: e24998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024998.

[17]

Högl B, Arnulf I, Bergmann M, Cesari M, Gan-Or Z, Heidbreder A, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder: Past, present, and future. Journal of Sleep Research. 2022; 31: e13612. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13612.

[18]

Kim S, Kwon SH, Kam TI, Panicker N, Karuppagounder SS, Lee S, et al. Transneuronal Propagation of Pathologic α-Synuclein from the Gut to the Brain Models Parkinson’s Disease. Neuron. 2019; 103: 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.035.

[19]

Horsager J, Knudsen K, Sommerauer M. Clinical and imaging evidence of brain-first and body-first Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiology of Disease. 2022; 164: 105626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105626.

[20]

Leclair-Visonneau L, Clairembault T, Coron E, Le Dily S, Vavasseur F, Dalichampt M, et al. REM sleep behavior disorder is related to enteric neuropathology in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017; 89: 1612–1618. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004496.

[21]

Horsager J, Andersen KB, Knudsen K, Skjærbæk C, Fedorova TD, Okkels N, et al. Brain-first versus body-first Parkinson’s disease: a multimodal imaging case-control study. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2020; 143: 3077–3088. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa238.

[22]

Cersosimo MG, Benarroch EE. Autonomic involvement in Parkinson’s disease: pathology, pathophysiology, clinical features and possible peripheral biomarkers. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2012; 313: 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.09.030.

[23]

Al-Qassabi A, Tsao TS, Racolta A, Kremer T, Cañamero M, Belousov A, et al. Immunohistochemical Detection of Synuclein Pathology in Skin in Idiopathic Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder and Parkinsonism. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2021; 36: 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28399.

[24]

Vilas D, Iranzo A, Tolosa E, Aldecoa I, Berenguer J, Vilaseca I, et al. Assessment of α-synuclein in submandibular glands of patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a case-control study. The Lancet. Neurology. 2016; 15: 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00080-6.

[25]

Iranzo A, Borrego S, Vilaseca I, Martí C, Serradell M, Sánchez-Valle R, et al. α-Synuclein aggregates in labial salivary glands of idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Sleep. 2018; 41: zsy101. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy101.

[26]

Fraigne JJ, Torontali ZA, Snow MB, Peever JH. REM Sleep at its Core - Circuits, Neurotransmitters, and Pathophysiology. Frontiers in Neurology. 2015; 6: 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00123.

[27]

Stefani A, Antelmi E, Arnaldi D, Arnulf I, During E, Högl B, et al. From mechanisms to future therapy: a synopsis of isolated REM sleep behavior disorder as early synuclein-related disease. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2025; 20: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-025-00809-0.

[28]

Kuzkina A, Roessle J, Seger A, Panzer C, Kohl A, Maltese V, et al. Combining skin and olfactory α-synuclein seed amplification assays (SAA)-towards biomarker-driven phenotyping in synucleinopathies. NPJ Parkinson’s Disease. 2023; 9: 79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00519-8.

[29]

Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Kulesza R, Greenough GP, García-Rojas E, Revueltas-Ficachi P, Rico-Villanueva A, et al. Fall Risk, Sleep Behavior, and Sleep-Related Movement Disorders in Young Urbanites Exposed to Air Pollution. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD. 2023; 91: 847–862. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220850.

[30]

Shen Y, Yu WB, Shen B, Dong H, Zhao J, Tang YL, et al. Propagated α-synucleinopathy recapitulates REM sleep behaviour disorder followed by parkinsonian phenotypes in mice. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2020; 143: 3374–3392. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa283.

[31]

Yang Y, Chen S, Gao Y, Huang L, Liu Z, Liu C, et al. Complement Receptor 1 Is a Potential Extracerebral Factor Promoting α-Synuclein Pathology. Molecular Neurobiology. 2025; 62: 4605–4616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-024-04561-2.

[32]

Yu T, Nie S, Bu L, Liu M, He J, Niu X, et al. Cholestanol accelerates α-synuclein aggregation and spreading by activating asparagine endopeptidase. JCI Insight. 2023; 8: e165841. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.165841.

[33]

Murros KE, Huynh VA, Takala TM, Saris PEJ. Desulfovibrio Bacteria Are Associated With Parkinson’s Disease. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2021; 11: 652617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.652617.

[34]

Yuan T, Zuo Z, Xu J. Neuroanatomical Localization of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder in Human Brain Using Lesion Network Mapping. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2023; 24: 247–258. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2022.0712.

[35]

Zhang L, Xu Y, Zhuang J, Peng H, Wu H, Zhao Z, et al. Metabolic abnormality of pontine tegmentum in patients with REM sleep behavior disorder analyzed using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2016; 148: 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.07.002.

[36]

Iranzo A, Tolosa E, Gelpi E, Molinuevo JL, Valldeoriola F, Serradell M, et al. Neurodegenerative disease status and post-mortem pathology in idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: an observational cohort study. The Lancet. Neurology. 2013; 12: 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70056-5.

[37]

Xi Z, Luning W. REM sleep behavior disorder in a patient with pontine stroke. Sleep Medicine. 2009; 10: 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2007.12.002.

[38]

Geddes MR, Tie Y, Gabrieli JDE, McGinnis SM, Golby AJ, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Altered functional connectivity in lesional peduncular hallucinosis with REM sleep behavior disorder. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 2016; 74: 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.015.

[39]

Mathis J, Hess CW, Bassetti C. Isolated mediotegmental lesion causing narcolepsy and rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder: a case evidencing a common pathway in narcolepsy and rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2007; 78: 427–429. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.099515.

[40]

Boeve BF, Silber MH, Saper CB, Ferman TJ, Dickson DW, Parisi JE, et al. Pathophysiology of REM sleep behaviour disorder and relevance to neurodegenerative disease. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2007; 130: 2770–2788. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm056.

[41]

Tippmann-Peikert M, Boeve BF, Keegan BM. REM sleep behavior disorder initiated by acute brainstem multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2006; 66: 1277–1279. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000208518.72660.ff.

[42]

Veauthier C. Sleep disorders in multiple sclerosis. Review. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2015; 15: 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-015-0546-0.

[43]

Boucetta S, Salimi A, Dadar M, Jones BE, Collins DL, Dang-Vu TT. Structural Brain Alterations Associated with Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder in Parkinson’s Disease. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 26782. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26782.

[44]

Högl B, Stefani A, Videnovic A. Idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder and neurodegeneration - an update. Nature Reviews. Neurology. 2018; 14: 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.157.

[45]

Postuma RB, Iranzo A, Hu M, Högl B, Boeve BF, Manni R, et al. Risk and predictors of dementia and parkinsonism in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder: a multicentre study. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2019; 142: 744–759. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz030.

[46]

Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Olson EJ, Shepard JW, Silber MH, Ferman TJ, et al. Insights into REM sleep behavior disorder pathophysiology in brainstem-predominant Lewy body disease. Sleep Medicine. 2007; 8: 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2006.08.017.

[47]

Du XY, Xie XX, Liu RT. The Role of α-Synuclein Oligomers in Parkinson’s Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21: 8645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228645.

[48]

Iranzo A, Santamaría J, Valldeoriola F, Serradell M, Salamero M, Gaig C, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging deficit predicts early transition to synucleinopathy in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Annals of Neurology. 2017; 82: 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25026.

[49]

Berg D, Borghammer P, Fereshtehnejad SM, Heinzel S, Horsager J, Schaeffer E, et al. Prodromal Parkinson disease subtypes - key to understanding heterogeneity. Nature Reviews. Neurology. 2021; 17: 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00486-9.

[50]

Borghammer P, Van Den Berge N. Brain-First versus Gut-First Parkinson’s Disease: A Hypothesis. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2019; 9: S281–S295. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-191721.

[51]

Ziegler DA, Wonderlick JS, Ashourian P, Hansen LA, Young JC, Murphy AJ, et al. Substantia nigra volume loss before basal forebrain degeneration in early Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurology. 2013; 70: 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.597.

[52]

Borghammer P, Horsager J, Andersen K, Van Den Berge N, Raunio A, Murayama S, et al. Neuropathological evidence of body-first vs. brain-first Lewy body disease. Neurobiology of Disease. 2021; 161: 105557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105557.

[53]

Nalls MA, Blauwendraat C, Vallerga CL, Heilbron K, Bandres-Ciga S, Chang D, et al. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. The Lancet. Neurology. 2019; 18: 1091–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30320-5.

[54]

Krohn L, Ruskey JA, Rudakou U, Leveille E, Asayesh F, Hu MTM, et al. GBA variants in REM sleep behavior disorder: A multicenter study. Neurology. 2020; 95: e1008–e1016. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010042.

[55]

Ho PWL, Leung CT, Liu H, Pang SYY, Lam CSC, Xian J, et al. Age-dependent accumulation of oligomeric SNCA/α-synuclein from impaired degradation in mutant LRRK2 knockin mouse model of Parkinson disease: role for therapeutic activation of chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). Autophagy. 2020; 16: 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2019.1603545.

[56]

Oltra J, Campabadal A, Segura B, Uribe C, Marti MJ, Compta Y, et al. Disrupted functional connectivity in PD with probable RBD and its cognitive correlates. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 24351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03751-5.

[57]

Poewe W. Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neurology. 2008; 15: 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02056.x.

[58]

Schenck CH, Boeve BF, Mahowald MW. Delayed emergence of a parkinsonian disorder or dementia in 81% of older men initially diagnosed with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a 16-year update on a previously reported series. Sleep Medicine. 2013; 14: 744–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2012.10.009.

[59]

Iranzo A, Fernández-Arcos A, Tolosa E, Serradell M, Molinuevo JL, Valldeoriola F, et al. Neurodegenerative disorder risk in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder: study in 174 patients. PloS One. 2014; 9: e89741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089741.

[60]

Borghammer P, Okkels N, Weintraub D. Parkinson’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies: One and the Same. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2024; 14: 383–397. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-240002.

[61]

Arnaldi D, Mattioli P, Famà F, Girtler N, Brugnolo A, Pardini M, et al. Stratification Tools for Disease-Modifying Trials in Prodromal Synucleinopathy. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2022; 37: 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28785.

[62]

Dugger BN, Boeve BF, Murray ME, Parisi JE, Fujishiro H, Dickson DW, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and subtypes in autopsy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2012; 27: 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.24003.

[63]

Chia R, Sabir MS, Bandres-Ciga S, Saez-Atienzar S, Reynolds RH, Gustavsson E, et al. Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture. Nature Genetics. 2021; 53: 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00785-3.

[64]

Krohn L, Heilbron K, Blauwendraat C, Reynolds RH, Yu E, Senkevich K, et al. Genome-wide association study of REM sleep behavior disorder identifies polygenic risk and brain expression effects. Nature Communications. 2022; 13: 7496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34732-5.

[65]

Krohn L, Öztürk TN, Vanderperre B, Ouled Amar Bencheikh B, Ruskey JA, Laurent SB, et al. Genetic, Structural, and Functional Evidence Link TMEM175 to Synucleinopathies. Annals of Neurology. 2020; 87: 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25629.

[66]

Giannini G, Provini F, Cortelli P, Calandra-Buonaura G. REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder in Multiple System Atrophy: From Prodromal to Progression of Disease. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021; 12: 677213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.677213.

[67]

Lin JY, Zhang LY, Cao B, Wei QQ, Ou RW, Hou YB, et al. Sleep-related symptoms in multiple system atrophy: determinants and impact on disease severity. Chinese Medical Journal. 2020; 134: 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001211.

[68]

St Louis EK, McCarter SJ, Boeve BF, Silber MH, Kantarci K, Benarroch EE, et al. Lesional REM sleep behavior disorder localizes to the dorsomedial pons. Neurology. 2014; 83: 1871–1873. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000978.

[69]

Wu DD, Su W, Li SH, He J, Li K, Chen HB, et al. A Questionnaire-Based Study on Clinical REM Sleep Behavior Disorder and Subtypes in Multiple System Atrophy. European Neurology. 2021; 84: 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517149.

[70]

Zhang L, Hou Y, Li C, Wei Q, Ou R, Liu K, et al. Longitudinal evolution of sleep disturbances in early multiple system atrophy: a 2-year prospective cohort study. BMC Medicine. 2023; 21: 454. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03176-z.

[71]

Giannini G, Mastrangelo V, Provini F, Droghini A, Cecere A, Barletta G, et al. Progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy presenting with REM behavior disorder. Neurology. 2020; 94: e1828–e1834. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009372.

[72]

Tseng FS, Foo JQX, Mai AS, Tan EK. The genetic basis of multiple system atrophy. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2023; 21: 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03905-1.

[73]

Zhang X, Ma L, Liang D, Song B, Chen J, Huang Y, et al. Neurofilament Light Protein Predicts Disease Progression in Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2023; 13: 485–499. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223519.

[74]

Thaler A, Bregman N, Gurevich T, Shiner T, Dror Y, Zmira O, et al. Parkinson’s disease phenotype is influenced by the severity of the mutations in the GBA gene. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2018; 55: 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.05.009.

[75]

Iranzo A, Fairfoul G, Ayudhaya ACN, Serradell M, Gelpi E, Vilaseca I, et al. Detection of α-synuclein in CSF by RT-QuIC in patients with isolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a longitudinal observational study. The Lancet. Neurology. 2021; 20: 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30449-X.

[76]

Bellomo G, De Luca CMG, Paoletti FP, Gaetani L, Moda F, Parnetti L. α-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assays for Diagnosing Synucleinopathies: The Way Forward. Neurology. 2022; 99: 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200878.

[77]

Delva A, Pelletier A, Somerville E, Montplaisir J, Gagnon JF, Kollmorgen G, et al. Plasma pTau181 and amyloid markers predict conversion to dementia in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2025; 148: 2049–2059. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf003.

[78]

Li M, Wang L, Liu JH, Zhan SQ. Relationships between Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Clinical Assessments, Biomarkers, and Treatment. Chinese Medical Journal. 2018; 131: 966–973. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.229886.

[79]

Chahine LM, Brumm MC, Caspell-Garcia C, Oertel W, Mollenhauer B, Amara A, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging predicts clinically-defined α-synucleinopathy in REM sleep behavior disorder. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2021; 8: 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51269.

[80]

Beauchamp LC, Dore V, Villemagne VL, Xu S, Finkelstein D, Barnham KJ, et al. Using 18F-AV-133 VMAT2 PET Imaging to Monitor Progressive Nigrostriatal Degeneration in Parkinson Disease. Neurology. 2023; 101: e2314–e2324. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207748.

[81]

Holtbernd F, Gagnon JF, Postuma RB, Ma Y, Tang CC, Feigin A, et al. Abnormal metabolic network activity in REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology. 2014; 82: 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000130.

[82]

Zhou L, Li G, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Chen Z, Zhang L, et al. Increased free water in the substantia nigra in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2021; 144: 1488–1497. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab039.

[83]

Lancione M, Donatelli G, Del Prete E, Campese N, Frosini D, Cencini M, et al. Evaluation of iron overload in nigrosome 1 via quantitative susceptibility mapping as a progression biomarker in prodromal stages of synucleinopathies. NeuroImage. 2022; 260: 119454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119454.

[84]

Singh A, Williams S, Calabrese A, Riha R. Tonic REM sleep muscle activity is the strongest predictor of phenoconversion risk to neurodegenerative disease in isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder. Journal of Sleep Research. 2023; 32: e13792. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13792.

[85]

Roascio M, Canessa A, Trò R, Mattioli P, Famà F, Giorgetti L, et al. Phase and amplitude electroencephalography correlations change with disease progression in people with idiopathic rapid eye-movement sleep behavior disorder. Sleep. 2022; 45: zsab232. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsab232.

[86]

Feng H, Chen L, Liu Y, Chen X, Wang J, Yu MWM, et al. Rest-Activity Pattern Alterations in Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder. Annals of Neurology. 2020; 88: 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25853.

[87]

Miglis MG, Adler CH, Antelmi E, Arnaldi D, Baldelli L, Boeve BF, et al. Biomarkers of conversion to α-synucleinopathy in isolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder. The Lancet. Neurology. 2021; 20: 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00176-9.

[88]

Liu W, Zhang W, Xing LZ, Zhao YD, Xu J, Li RJ, et al. 4-Arylidene curcumin derivatives in vitro inhibit α-Synuclein aggregation and disaggregate the preformed fibril. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2023; 96: 117529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2023.117529.

[89]

Jiang B, Han F, Lü MH, Wang ZP, Liu W, Zhang YX, et al. Bis-chalcone polyphenols with potential preventive and therapeutic effects on PD: Design, synthesis and in vitro disaggregation activity against α-synuclein oligomers and fibrils. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2022; 239: 114529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114529.

[90]

Han F, Jiang B, Lü MH, Wang ZP, Liu W, Zhang YX, et al. Hybrids of polyphenolic acids and xanthone, the potential preventive and therapeutic effects on PD: Design, synthesis, in vitro anti-aggregation of α-synuclein, and disaggregation against the existed α-synuclein oligomer and fibril. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2022; 66: 116818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116818.

[91]

Li C, Wang N, Zheng G, Yang L. Oral Administration of Resveratrol-Selenium-Peptide Nanocomposites Alleviates Alzheimer’s Disease-like Pathogenesis by Inhibiting Aβ Aggregation and Regulating Gut Microbiota. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2021; 13: 46406–46420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c14818.

[92]

Jin JW, Fan X, Del Cid-Pellitero E, Liu XX, Zhou L, Dai C, et al. Development of an α-synuclein knockdown peptide and evaluation of its efficacy in Parkinson’s disease models. Communications Biology. 2021; 4: 232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01746-6.

[93]

Zheng H, Xie Z, Zhang X, Mao J, Wang M, Wei S, et al. Investigation of α-Synuclein Species in Plasma Exosomes and the Oligomeric and Phosphorylated α-Synuclein as Potential Peripheral Biomarker of Parkinson’s Disease. Neuroscience. 2021; 469: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.06.033.

[94]

Xiang J, Zhang Z, Wu S, Ye K. Positron emission tomography tracers for synucleinopathies. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2025; 20: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-024-00787-9.

[95]

Luan M, Sun Y, Chen J, Jiang Y, Li F, Wei L, et al. Diagnostic Value of Salivary Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion in Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple System Atrophy. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2022; 37: 1059–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28976.

[96]

Petzold A. Neurofilament phosphoforms: surrogate markers for axonal injury, degeneration and loss. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2005; 233: 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.015.

[97]

Park DG, Kim JY, Kim MS, Kim MH, An YS, Chang J, et al. Neurofilament light chain and cardiac MIBG uptake as predictors for phenoconversion in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder. Journal of Neurology. 2023; 270: 4393–4402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11785-0.

[98]

Wang C, Chen F, Li Y, Liu J. Possible predictors of phenoconversion in isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2022; 93: 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-328062.

[99]

Arnaldi D, Chincarini A, Hu MT, Sonka K, Boeve B, Miyamoto T, et al. Dopaminergic imaging and clinical predictors for phenoconversion of REM sleep behaviour disorder. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2021; 144: 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa365.

[100]

Olsson B, Portelius E, Cullen NC, Sandelius Å Zetterberg H, Andreasson U, et al. Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein Levels With Cognition in Patients With Dementia, Motor Neuron Disease, and Movement Disorders. JAMA Neurology. 2019; 76: 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3746.

[101]

Wilson D, Chan D, Chang L, Mathis R, Verberk I, Montalban X, et al. Development and multi-center validation of a fully automated digital immunoassay for neurofilament light chain: toward a clinical blood test for neuronal injury. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2024; 62: 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0518.

[102]

Nepozitek J, Dostalova S, Dusek P, Kemlink D, Prihodova I, Ibarburu Lorenzo Y Losada V, et al. Simultaneous tonic and phasic REM sleep without atonia best predicts early phenoconversion to neurodegenerative disease in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep. 2019; 42: zsz132. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsz132.

[103]

Nepozitek J, Varga Z, Dostalova S, Perinova P, Keller J, Robinson S, et al. Magnetic susceptibility changes in the brainstem reflect REM sleep without atonia severity in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder. NPJ Parkinson’s Disease. 2023; 9: 112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00557-2.

[104]

Frauscher B, Gabelia D, Biermayr M, Stefani A, Hackner H, Mitterling T, et al. Validation of an integrated software for the detection of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Sleep. 2014; 37: 1663–1671. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4076.

[105]

Mancini R, Mattioli P, Famà F, Giorgetti L, Calizzano F, Nikolic M, et al. Automatic quantification of REM sleep without atonia reliably identifies patients with REM sleep behavior disorder: a possible screening tool? Neurological Sciences: Official Journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2024; 45: 4837–4846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07532-6.

[106]

Kunz D, Stotz S, de Zeeuw J, Papakonstantinou A, Dümchen S, Haberecht M, et al. Prognostic biomarkers in prodromal α-synucleinopathies: DAT binding and REM sleep without atonia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2023; 94: 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330048.

[107]

Nicolas J, Comperat L, Fort P, Cheylus A, Ricordeau F, Bastuji H, et al. REM sleep microstructure alterations in REM sleep behavior disorder: beyond muscle tone. Sleep. 2025; zsaf158. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf158.

[108]

Pardo J, Montal V, Campabadal A, Oltra J, Uribe C, Roura I, et al. Cortical Macro- and Microstructural Changes in Parkinson’s Disease with Probable Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2024; 39: 814–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.29761.

[109]

Knudsen K, Fedorova TD, Hansen AK, Sommerauer M, Otto M, Svendsen KB, et al. In-vivo staging of pathology in REM sleep behaviour disorder: a multimodality imaging case-control study. The Lancet. Neurology. 2018; 17: 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30162-5.

[110]

Li SX, Wing YK, Lam SP, Zhang J, Yu MWM, Ho CKW, et al. Validation of a new REM sleep behavior disorder questionnaire (RBDQ-HK). Sleep Medicine. 2010; 11: 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2009.06.008.

[111]

Olson EJ, Boeve BF, Silber MH. Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder: demographic, clinical and laboratory findings in 93 cases. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2000; 123 ( Pt 2): 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.2.331.

[112]

Voysey ZJ, Barker RA, Lazar AS. The Treatment of Sleep Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Neurotherapeutics: the Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2021; 18: 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00959-7.

[113]

Ouellet MC, Morin CM. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia associated with traumatic brain injury: a single-case experimental design. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007; 88: 1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.006.

[114]

Gilat M, Marshall NS, Testelmans D, Buyse B, Lewis SJG. A critical review of the pharmacological treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder in adults: time for more and larger randomized placebo-controlled trials. Journal of Neurology. 2022; 269: 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10353-0.

[115]

McGrane IR, Leung JG, St Louis EK, Boeve BF. Melatonin therapy for REM sleep behavior disorder: a critical review of evidence. Sleep Medicine. 2015; 16: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2014.09.011.

[116]

Albin RL, Koeppe RA, Chervin RD, Consens FB, Wernette K, Frey KA, et al. Decreased striatal dopaminergic innervation in REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology. 2000; 55: 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.9.1410.

[117]

Aurora RN, Zak RS, Maganti RK, Auerbach SH, Casey KR, Chowdhuri S, et al. Best practice guide for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine: JCSM: Official Publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2010; 6: 85–95.

[118]

Hicks JA, Argyropoulos SV, Rich AS, Nash JR, Bell CJ, Edwards C, et al. Randomised controlled study of sleep after nefazodone or paroxetine treatment in out-patients with depression. The British Journal of Psychiatry: the Journal of Mental Science. 2002; 180: 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.6.528.

[119]

Ringman JM, Simmons JH. Treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder with donepezil: a report of three cases. Neurology. 2000; 55: 870–871. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.6.870.

[120]

Que Z, Zheng C, Zhao Z, Weng Y, Zhu Z, Zeng Y, et al. The treatment efficacy of pharmacotherapies for rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder with polysomnography evaluation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2022; 8: e11425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11425.

[121]

Dokkedal-Silva V, Kim LJ, Morelhão PK, Galduróz JCF, Tufik S, Andersen ML. Use of clonazepam in REM sleep behavior disorder: association with fall-related injuries and alternative treatments. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine: JCSM: Official Publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2020; 16: 655–656. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8308.

[122]

Roguski A, Rayment D, Whone AL, Jones MW, Rolinski M. A Neurologist’s Guide to REM Sleep Behavior Disorder. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020; 11: 610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00610.

[123]

Schaefer C, Kunz D, Bes F. Melatonin Effects in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Associated with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Case Series. Current Alzheimer Research. 2017; 14: 1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205014666170523094938.

[124]

Mogavero MP, Ferri R, Marelli S, Lanza G, Terzaghi M, Castelnuovo A, et al. Polysomnographic features associated with clonazepam and melatonin treatment in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder: Time for new therapeutic approaches? CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2024; 30: e14569. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.14569.

[125]

Cho Y, Iliff JJ, Lim MM, Raskind M, Peskind E. A case of prazosin in treatment of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine: JCSM: Official Publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2024; 20: 319–321. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.10888.

[126]

Kowalska M, Nowaczyk J, Fijałkowski Ł Nowaczyk A. Paroxetine-Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Action. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041662.

[127]

Zheng Y, Lv T, Wu J, Lyu Y. Trazodone changed the polysomnographic sleep architecture in insomnia disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12: 14453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18776-7.

[128]

de Oliveira P, Cella C, Locker N, Ravindran KKG, Mendis A, Wafford K, et al. Improved Sleep, Memory, and Cellular Pathological Features of Tauopathy, Including the NLRP3 Inflammasome, after Chronic Administration of Trazodone in rTg4510 Mice. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2022; 42: 3494–3509. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2162-21.2022.

[129]

Barrow J, Vendrame M. Treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder with trazodone: report of 3 cases. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine: JCSM: Official Publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2024; 20: 821–823. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.10970.

PDF (3742KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/