Discriminative Gut Microbial Signatures in Hyperuricemia and Overweight Populations Revealed by Metagenomic Sequencing

Tianqi Chen , Yang Guo , Dong Liang , Da Li , Siyu Xing , Dan Li , Chunhong Zhang , Fengzhong Wang

International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research ›› 2025, Vol. 95 ›› Issue (6) : 42590

PDF (17600KB)
International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research ›› 2025, Vol. 95 ›› Issue (6) :42590 DOI: 10.31083/IJVNR42590
Original Communication
research-article
Discriminative Gut Microbial Signatures in Hyperuricemia and Overweight Populations Revealed by Metagenomic Sequencing
Author information +
History +
PDF (17600KB)

Abstract

Background:

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationships between gut microbiota compositional alterations and chronic metabolic disorders by analyzing taxonomic diversity, community structure, and species-level differences in individuals with hyperuricemia (HUA) and a history of being overweight. Our findings offer novel insights into microbiota-targeted therapeutic strategies for managing metabolic diseases. A total of 144 participants were recruited and divided into three diagnostic categories: healthy controls (HL, n = 29), hyperuricemia group (HU, n = 24), and overweight (OW, n = 91).

Methods:

Comprehensive phenotypic profiles and metagenomes were analyzed for fecal samples from the three groups.

Results:

Significant differences were observed in psychological states and microbial ecology between the metabolic disorder groups (HU and OW) and the control group (HL) (p < 0.05). Both the overweight individuals and those with HUA presented significant changes in gut microbial composition, with reduced α-diversity indices (Shannon index: HU vs HL Mann–Whitney U = 306; p = 0.462; OW vs HL Mann–Whitney U = 1008; p = 0.040; richness index: HU vs HL Mann–Whitney U = 307; p = 0.469; OW vs HL Mann–Whitney U = 1072; p = 0.092) compared to healthy individuals. Moreover, analysis of the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified four discriminatory species in the HU group (Alistipes putredinis, Mediterraneibacter faecis, Streptococcus oralis, and Gemella sanguinis), and five in the OW group (Pantoea endophytica, Pantoea vagans, Phocaeicola coprophilus, Ruminococcus SGB4421, and Klebsiella oxytoca), representing potential biomarkers for the progression of chronic metabolic diseases.

Conclusion:

This study elucidates the characteristics of overweight individuals and those with HUA in terms of phenotypic features and gut microbiota, providing a theoretical reference for gut microbiota-targeted therapies and lifestyle interventions in chronic metabolic diseases.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

overweight / hyperuricemia / metagenomics / gastrointestinal microbiome / risk factors / body mass index

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tianqi Chen, Yang Guo, Dong Liang, Da Li, Siyu Xing, Dan Li, Chunhong Zhang, Fengzhong Wang. Discriminative Gut Microbial Signatures in Hyperuricemia and Overweight Populations Revealed by Metagenomic Sequencing. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 2025, 95(6): 42590 DOI:10.31083/IJVNR42590

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

The global epidemic of metabolic disorders, particularly hyperuricemia (HUA) and overweight/obesity (OB), presents escalating public health challenges. Recent epidemiological data reveal alarming trajectories, with overweight prevalence projected to affect over 4 billion adults by 2035 and HUA rates reaching 15% in urban Chinese populations [1, 2]. These conditions significantly elevate risks for cardiorenal complications, neurodegenerative disorders, and musculoskeletal pathologies [3, 4]. The confluence of genetic predisposition, obesogenic diets, sedentary lifestyles, and circadian disruption creates a perfect storm for metabolic dysregulation.

From a pathogenesis perspective, HUA is a metabolic disorder resulting from disturbed purine metabolism, and an excess production or impaired excretion of uric acid (UA) might be the cause of its development. Most significantly, beyond the purine metabolism, recent findings have indicated that excessive dietary fructose is a potent inducer of hyperuricemia. The characteristic fructose metabolism leads to Adenosine Triphosphate depletion, Adenosine Monophosphate deaminase activation, and hence increased UA production regardless of purine intake [5]. The development of an overweight status relies on the abnormal regulation of energy metabolism. It is determined by an interplay of factors, including genetic predisposition, dietary intake patterns, activity routines [6], and social environment. It is noteworthy that specific similarities in risk factors exist for both metabolic disorders. An unbalanced dietary regimen (e.g., high-purine diet, excessive fructose consumption, excessive alcohol intake, and overconsumption of high-calorie foods) can exacerbate metabolic disturbances through different mechanisms [7, 8]. More ominously, environmental changes brought about by socioeconomic development, including Westernization of food composition [9] and physical inactivity, are driving OB-linked conditions to a high-incidence phase. Many complications (e.g., hypertension [10], atherosclerosis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [11]) have become leading public health concerns. Notably, hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have an intimate bidirectional relationship. Higher serum UA levels have strong associations with the development of MetS components, including hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, in a vicious cycle that accelerates cardiometabolic risk [5].

Recent studies have unveiled the crucial role of the gut microbiota in metabolic regulation [12, 13]. The gut microbiota is closely associated with various human health indicators, including blood glucose levels [14], blood lipid levels [15], and inflammatory factors [16]. It plays a significant role in modulating diseases both within and outside the gut, particularly in OB [17], metabolic syndrome [18], and cardiovascular diseases [19]. In the context of HUA, the intestine is responsible for 30% of UA excretion. Disruption of gut microbiota structure can augment systemic inflammatory responses and UA metabolic derangements by regulating intestinal uricase function and increasing intestinal barrier permeability [20].

Furthermore, high-fructose diets have also been found to adversely alter gut microbiota composition and increase intestinal permeability, which in turn could further increase systemic inflammation and cause UA metabolic disorders [5]. For OB and overweight individuals, gut microbiota also modulates the host’s energy extraction from food, regulates fat storage, and influences the metabolic pathways of weight maintenance. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota can disrupt normal metabolic processes and thus be a causative agent of overweight [21]. These findings provide a crucial theoretical basis for microbiota-based interventions in metabolic diseases. Modulating the microbial composition to enhance the host’s metabolic phenotype has emerged as a promising research direction.

This investigation employs multi-omics approaches to characterize alterations in the gut ecosystem in individuals with HUA and those who are overweight. By integrating deep metagenomic sequencing with comprehensive phenotyping, we delineate microbiota-host interactions underlying metabolic dysregulation and identify candidate species and lifestyles for targeted modulation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Study Design and Participants

Participants were recruited from health examination registers and divided into three groups randomly based on diagnostic criteria (Tables 1,2). The hyperuricemia group (HU, n = 24) was defined as those with more than 420 µmol/L of non-consecutive fasting serum uric acid (SUA) levels (two separate measurements, irrespective of gender and not restricted to body mass index (BMI)), based on the Chinese Guidelines for Hyperuricemia and Gout (2019) [22]. The overweight group (OW, n = 91) comprised subjects with a body mass index (BMI) between 24.0 and 27.9 kg/m2 as per the Obesity Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines (2024 Edition) [23] (regardless of their baseline SUA levels). The healthy controls (HL, n = 29) comprised subjects with a BMI of 18.5–23.9 kg/m2 and free of a history of metabolic diseases. All volunteers provided written informed consent and were excluded in cases of gastrointestinal disease (e.g., Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)), recent antibiotic or probiotic use (within 1 month), cancer, autoimmune disorders, active infection, or pregnancy/lactation. Institutional Review Board of the Naval Special Medical Center approved ethics for this research (Approval No. AF-HEC-017) and the Institute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (Approval No. IFNDLLSC20251030).

2.2 Metadata Collection

Questionnaires collected metadata. We can obtain demographic, dietary, environmental, and lifestyle data from the participants using questionnaires. The survey questionnaires assessed populations’ age, BMI, diet, living habits, and health status (common health problems, sleep quality, medication, and constitution of Traditional Chinese Medicine).

2.3 Gut Microbiome Analysis

The participants themselves collected the stool samples. The samples were picked up by workers within 15 minutes of defecation and transferred to dry ice, where they were stored at –80 °C until DNA extraction. QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract microbiome total DNA from faecal samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples were sent to Majorbio (Shanghai, China) for Metagenomics Sequencing. The metagenomics sequencing process has been described elsewhere [24]. Briefly, libraries were constructed using the TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq2500 sequencer with paired-end 150-bp sequencing, targeting 4G raw data per sample. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were calculated using VEGAN’s diversity function [25]. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was applied to identify the dissimilarities in bacterial species between groups, based on a combination of the Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, followed by LDA for dimensionality reduction and effect size estimation.

2.4 Statistical Analyses

Raw metagenomic reads were quality filtered with FastP (v0.23.2, OpenGene, https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp) to remove poor-quality bases (Q < 20) and host contamination by mapping against the human reference genome GRCh38/hg38 (Genome Reference Consortium, GCF_000001405.40, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_000001405.40). High-quality reads were assembled into contigs with MEGAHIT (v1.2.9, Vicuña & Li labs, https://github.com/voutcn/megahit) under a minimum contig length of 500 bp. Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal (v2.6.3, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, https://github.com/hyattpd/Prodigal) and clustered into a non-redundant gene catalog (95% similarity) using CD-HIT v4.8.1 (Li Lab, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, https://github.com/weizhongli/cdhit/releases/tag/V4.8.1).

Statistical inferences were drawn with SPSS 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.r-project.org). The continuous variables are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges) and were contrasted using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post-hoc Dunn-Bonferroni tests. Comparison of categorical variables was done by using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 Baseline Characteristics of Study Subjects

Comparative analysis revealed varying phenotypic patterns in the study groups (Tables 3,4). HU resulted in major behavioral and physiological deviation from HL, including reduced postprandial intake of fruit (25.0% compliance within 30 minutes versus controls at 15%, p = 0.036), elevated frequency of constipation (12.5% vs 0%, p = 0.040), and elevated depressive symptomatology (37.5% combined mild/moderate frequency vs 3.4%, p = 0.006), and elevated frequency of neuromuscular symptoms such as lower back pain (20.8% vs 3.4%) and loss of memory (20.8% vs 3.4%).

Simultaneously, OW had specific metabolic-behavioral characteristics of decreased physical activity adherence (30.8% sedentary vs 10.3% in controls, p = 0.032), pre-sleep caloric consumption (76.9% vs 55.2%, p= 0.01), disrupted sleep architecture with 13.2% showing poor/inferior quality and zero such cases in controls, and elevated depressive symptomatology (28.6% vs 3.4%, p = 0.009), suggesting coordinated circadian rhythm dysregulation and neuropsychiatric homeostasis.

3.2 Microbial Composition Analysis

At the phylum level, the most dominant phyla in the OW and HU groups and in the normal group were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria. At the species level, the enrichment of Escherichia coli (E. coli), Collinsella aerofaciens, and Phocaeicola plebeius occurred in OW and HU individuals compared to HL (Fig. 1). At the relative abundance level in the OW group, Pantoea endophytica, E. coli, and Bacteroides stercoris increased significantly. On the contrary, Ruminococcus bromii and Roseburia inulinivorans showed a reverse trend. In group HU, Phocaeicola coprocola and Collinsella aerofaciens were most abundant relative, while Bacteroides sterco and Phocaeicola vulgatus were least abundant (Fig. 2).

3.3 Microbial Diversity Analysis

α-diversity metrics (Shannon index: HU vs HL 3.24 ± 0.38 vs 3.31 ± 0.53, Mann-Whitney U = 306, p = 0.462, OW vs HL 3.08 ± 0.61 vs 3.31 ± 0.53, U = 1008, p = 0.040; Richness: HU vs HL 204.79 ± 39.78 vs 219.48 ± 63.73, U = 307, p = 0.469, OW vs HL 199.43 ± 50.53 vs 219.48 ± 63.73, U = 1072, p = 0.092) revealed progressive microbial community simplification in metabolic disorder groups (Fig. 3).

β-diversity analysis further confirmed structural divergence (HU vs HL: PERMANOVA R2 = 0.029, p < 0.05; OW vs HL: PERMANOVA R2 = 0.016, p < 0.01), with principal coordinates separating HU and HL clusters along PCo1 (10.9% and 9.1% variance explained) from the HL (Fig. 4).

3.4 Microbial Differential Analysis

LEfSe analysis established disease-specific biomarkers: compared to the HL, the HU harbored four unique enrichments of Alistipes putredinis, Mediterraneibacter faecis, Streptococcus oralis, and Gemella sanguinis. The OW displayed enteric overgrowth of five differential bacterial species, including Pantoea endophytica, Pantoea vagans, Phocaeicola coprophilus, Ruminococcus SGB4421, and Klebsiella oxytoca (Fig. 5).

4. Discussion

This study contrasted lifestyle factors and gut microbial ecology between HU, OW, and HL. Clinically, both HU and OW cohorts manifested significant metabolic-psychological comorbidities and lifestyle imbalances relative to HL. Gut microbiota analysis demonstrated reduced biodiversity and altered community structures in both groups, highlighting dysbiosis as a potential pathological nexus.

The present study found that the incidence of constipation, lower back pain, memory decline, and depression was significantly increased in individuals with HUA. The underlying mechanisms may be closely related to gut microbiota dysbiosis. The observed reduction in Firmicutes phylum members, key producers of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), likely contributes to impaired intestinal motility through diminished neuroenteric signaling [26]. These changes may reduce intestinal motility, thereby affecting defecation function and potentially leading to constipation [27]. Furthermore, dysbiosis-induced disruption of extra-renal UA excretion pathways may facilitate UA crystallization in synovial tissues, potentially explaining the elevated incidence of lower back pain through localized inflammatory responses [28]. Notably, our results suggest that HUA-associated cognitive impairment may involve dual mechanisms of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress [29]. Serum UA deposition in hippocampal regions appears to promote reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation [30, 31], while enhancing Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and amyloid beta peptide (Aβ) expression [32]. This proinflammatory milieu may induce dendritic retraction in hippocampal pyramidal neurons through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) activation, ultimately compromising spatial reference memory [33]. These neuropathological processes establish plausible links between sustained HUA and progressive cognitive decline.

Overweight individuals have shown significant changes in physical exercise, pre-sleep caloric intake, sleep quality, and depression. Physical exercise is significantly associated with overweight and OB, and the frequency of physical exercise generally has a negative correlation with body weight [34, 35]. Pre-sleep eating is highly likely to lead to weight gain. Maukonen et al. [36] found that late eating has a significant impact on hunger and the levels of leptin, ghrelin, and other appetite-regulating hormones, which in turn affect the body’s energy metabolism and fat storage mechanisms, promoting weight gain. Poor sleep quality is also a significant contributor to being overweight. Itani et al. [37] demonstrated that individuals with less than 6 hours of sleep per day have a 38% higher risk of OB compared to those with normal sleep duration. This is because insufficient sleep disrupts hormonal balance, increasing the secretion of ghrelin—a hormone that promotes appetite—and decreasing the secretion of leptin—a hormone that suppresses appetite, resulting in increased food intake [38]. Notably, this study found that the risk of depression was significantly increased in individuals with HUA and overweight individuals. HUA, as a metabolic disease, may reduce patients’ quality of life, which may trigger a range of physiological and pathological changes, including affecting neurotransmitter metabolism and transmission, thereby interfering with normal brain function and increasing the risk of depression [39]. Similarly, being overweight is typically associated with metabolic disorders, and inflammatory cytokines secreted by adipose tissue can affect the balance of the neuroendocrine system, leading to abnormal neuroregulatory functions and can also induce depressive moods [40].

Gut dysbiosis is a significant pathophysiological process for the development of gastrointestinal motility and metabolic illness. Reduced gut microbiome diversity could impair regular physiological processes, including intestinal barrier integrity, nutrient metabolism, and absorption, and therefore predispose individuals to long-term metabolic illnesses [41, 42, 43]. Le Chatelier et al. [44] showed that low bacterial richness individuals had more extensive OB, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and a more visible inflammatory phenotype. Alpha diversity of gut microbiota was also reduced in the overweight population in the present study. Intestinal barrier function is compromised when diversity is low, and translocation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other structural elements of bacteria through the intestinal barrier is facilitated. This procedure involves inflammatory processes, leading to insulin resistance, which is one of the most significant pathogenic mechanisms of type 2 diabetes and other chronic metabolic diseases [41]. OB and diabetes are two metabolic diseases characterized by insulin resistance and low-grade inflammation. Comparably, reduced gut microbiota diversity may affect metabolism and nutrient uptake. A loss in diversity can lead to reduced production of SCFAs. Thus, energy metabolism is compromised, promoting the accumulation of overweight and OB, and raising the risk of chronic metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease [45].

In the present study, differential analysis revealed a significant enrichment of the bacterial species Klebsiella oxytoca in the overweight population, a finding that has been corroborated in previous research. Klebsiella oxytoca is a human commensal and an opportunistic pathogen that can cause a variety of infections, including antibiotic-associated hemorrhagic colitis (AAHC), urinary tract infections, and bacteremia [46]. A cross-sectional study in mice has shown that OB impairs the host’s defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae. This finding is consistent with the observation that diet-induced OB in mice leads to increased bacterial burden and impaired pulmonary clearance of Klebsiella pneumoniae [47]. Additionally, an experiment investigating the effects of gut microbiota altered by gastric bypass surgery on energy and metabolic control in diet-induced obese (DIO) mice revealed that these changes can influence metabolic outcomes. The gut microbiota altered by gastric bypass surgery may promote thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue and improve metabolic efficiency by reducing fat accumulation in the body and inhibiting the development of overweight or OB. These effects may be mediated by modulating taurine metabolism and activating the intestinal Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) and systemic Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) signaling [48].

The present study found that the relative abundance of Collinsella aerofaciens was the highest in individuals with HUA, which may reveal a potential link with the occurrence of HUA. Some studies have found that an increased abundance of Collinsella aerofaciens may lead to the early disruption of intestinal barrier integrity, thereby improving gut permeability and inducing Interleukin-17A (IL-17A) expression [49]. This can promote the translocation of LPS and other bacterial products [50], which, in turn, induces chronic inflammation and increases the risk of HUA [51]. Additionally, the decrease in gut microbial diversity in patients with HUA and the increased abundance of opportunistic pathogens (E.coli and Collinsella aerofaciens) may lead to elevated UA levels by affecting purine metabolism in the body, thereby promoting the development of HUA and creating a vicious cycle [52].

In patients with HUA, the abundance of four specific bacterial species (Alistipes putredinis, Mediterraneibacter faecis, Streptococcus oralis, and Gemella sanguinis) is remarkably higher compared to controls. Streptococcus oralis is a chief human colonizer of the oral cavity and upper respiratory tract and one of the top HUA community species. It is a key regulator of the mucosal immune response’s response to the microbiota. Streptococcus oralis might regulate inflammation by inhibiting the activity of Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-κB) and inhibiting Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARγ) transcriptional activity by its metabolites, thereby regulating the inflammatory and metabolic pathway. This regulatory function acts as a connector between the host metabolic and immune systems, acting as an intermediary between the two [53]. When the Mediterraneibacter genus has been investigated in different research studies, it was found that Mediterraneibacter tenuis is highly prevalent in RA gut microbiota of patients, and it shows a significant positive correlation with RA clinical indicators, like erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels. Mediterraneibacter tenuis can enhance inflammatory reactions, promote the activation of pro-inflammatory signaling pathways, and lead to decreased IL-10 levels and increased IL-17A levels, thereby disrupting intestinal immune homeostasis in mouse models [54]. Mediterraneibacter faecis is a Gram-positive, strict anaerobic coccus. To date, there are no definite reports of an intimate relationship between Mediterraneibacter faecis and HUA or IBD pathogenesis [55]. Gemella sanguinis is a Gram-positive coccus and opportunistic pathogen that can be found on the mucous membranes of the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary tract in healthy individuals. Underlying heart disease and oral disease are risk factors for infection with Gemella morbillorum, not Gemella sanguinis. The bacterium can cause infections through oral contamination, leading to severe conditions such as sepsis, endocarditis, and meningitis [56]. Some research has shown that when Gemella genus strains isolated from patients with pulp necrosis were planted in germ-free mice, the production of interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) was inhibited [57]. HUA is characteristically associated with low-grade chronic inflammation, which can alter the oral cavity or gut mucosal barriers, making it easier for Gemella sanguinis to penetrate the blood and thereby leading to an increase in Gemella sanguinis counts.

It must be mentioned that one of the main limitations of this study is that our findings are directly derived from an overweight population with hyperuricemia. The results may therefore not apply to patients with other chronic metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus or dyslipidemia, that do not exhibit these specific characteristics.

5. Conclusion

The decrease in gut microbial α-diversity and compositional structure variations (β-diversity modifications) is significantly related to the chronic metabolic disease pathogenesis and development (overweight and HUA). Investigating further their associations may help explain the pathogenesis of chronic metabolic diseases and provide a theoretical basis for the development of new diagnostic methods and therapeutic tools. Conversely, studying the single mechanisms of action of bacterial species associated with overweight and HUA, such as E. coli and Collinsella aerofaciens, in the gut microbiota is promising for identifying new targets for the prevention and treatment of these diseases.

References

[1]

Pasqualotto E, Ferreira ROM, Chavez MP, Hohl A, Ronsoni MF, Pasqualotto T, et al. Effects of once-weekly subcutaneous retatrutide on weight and metabolic markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Metabolism Open. 2024; 24: 100321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2024.100321.

[2]

Piao W, Zhao L, Yang Y, Fang H, Ju L, Cai S, et al. The Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Its Correlates among Adults in China: Results from CNHS 2015-2017. Nutrients. 2022; 14: 4095. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14194095.

[3]

Özalp Kızılay D, Şen S, Ersoy B. Associations Between Serum Uric Acid Concentrations and Cardiometabolic Risk and Renal Injury in Obese and Overweight Children. Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology. 2019; 11: 262–269. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2018.2019.0241.

[4]

Neto A, Fernandes A, Barateiro A. The complex relationship between obesity and neurodegenerative diseases: an updated review. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2023; 17: 1294420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2023.1294420.

[5]

Lubawy M, Formanowicz D. High-Fructose Diet-Induced Hyperuricemia Accompanying Metabolic Syndrome-Mechanisms and Dietary Therapy Proposals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20: 3596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043596.

[6]

Green M, Arora K, Prakash S. Microbial Medicine: Prebiotic and Probiotic Functional Foods to Target Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21: 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082890.

[7]

Zhou M, Huang X, Li R, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Gao X, et al. Association of dietary patterns with blood uric acid concentration and hyperuricemia in northern Chinese adults. Nutrition Journal. 2022; 21: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00789-7.

[8]

Finlayson G. Food addiction and obesity: unnecessary medicalization of hedonic overeating. Nature Reviews. Endocrinology. 2017; 13: 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.61.

[9]

Kopp W. How Western Diet And Lifestyle Drive The Pandemic Of Obesity And Civilization Diseases. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy. 2019; 12: 2221–2236. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S216791.

[10]

Cartland SP, Tamer N, Patil MS, Di Bartolo BA, Kavurma MM. A “Western Diet” promotes symptoms of hepatic steatosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. International Journal of Experimental Pathology. 2020; 101: 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/iep.12369.

[11]

McDonough DJ, Mathew M, Pope ZC, Schreiner PJ, Jacobs DR, Jr, VanWagner LB, et al. Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Physical Activity, Television Viewing, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The CARDIA Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 5603. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175603.

[12]

Ondrussek-Sekac M, Navas-Carrillo D, Orenes-Piñero E. Intestinal microbiota alterations in chronic kidney disease and the influence of dietary components. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2021; 61: 1490–1502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1761771.

[13]

Harris K, Kassis A, Major G, Chou CJ. Is the gut microbiota a new factor contributing to obesity and its metabolic disorders? Journal of Obesity. 2012; 2012: 879151. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/879151.

[14]

Tolhurst G, Heffron H, Lam YS, Parker HE, Habib AM, Diakogiannaki E, et al. Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes. 2012; 61: 364–371. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-1019.

[15]

Jia X, Xu W, Zhang L, Li X, Wang R, Wu S. Impact of Gut Microbiota and Microbiota-Related Metabolites on Hyperlipidemia. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2021; 11: 634780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.634780.

[16]

Wiertsema SP, van Bergenhenegouwen J, Garssen J, Knippels LMJ. The Interplay between the Gut Microbiome and the Immune System in the Context of Infectious Diseases throughout Life and the Role of Nutrition in Optimizing Treatment Strategies. Nutrients. 2021; 13: 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030886.

[17]

Geng J, Ni Q, Sun W, Li L, Feng X. The links between gut microbiota and obesity and obesity related diseases. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie. 2022; 147: 112678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112678.

[18]

Perry RJ, Peng L, Barry NA, Cline GW, Zhang D, Cardone RL, et al. Acetate mediates a microbiome-brain-β-cell axis to promote metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2016; 534: 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18309.

[19]

Oniszczuk A, Oniszczuk T, Gancarz M, Szymańska J. Role of Gut Microbiota, Probiotics and Prebiotics in the Cardiovascular Diseases. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2021; 26: 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041172.

[20]

Wang J, Chen Y, Zhong H, Chen F, Regenstein J, Hu X, et al. The gut microbiota as a target to control hyperuricemia pathogenesis: Potential mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022; 62: 3979–3989. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1874287.

[21]

Corbin KD, Carnero EA, Dirks B, Igudesman D, Yi F, Marcus A, et al. Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial. Nature Communications. 2023; 14: 3161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38778-x.

[22]

Chinese Society of Endocrinology; Chinese Medical Association; Li CG. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of hyperuricemia and gout in China(2019). Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2020; 36: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2020.01.001. (In Chinese)

[23]

Department of Medical Administration, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of obesity (2024 edition). Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery. 2024; 23: 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20241017-00455. (In Chinese)

[24]

Rong H, Xie XH, Zhao J, Lai WT, Wang MB, Xu D, et al. Similarly in depression, nuances of gut microbiota: Evidences from a shotgun metagenomics sequencing study on major depressive disorder versus bipolar disorder with current major depressive episode patients. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2019; 113: 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.03.017.

[25]

Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nature Biotechnology. 2020; 38: 685–688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6.

[26]

Han J, Wang X, Tang S, Lu C, Wan H, Zhou J, et al. Protective effects of tuna meat oligopeptides (TMOP) supplementation on hyperuricemia and associated renal inflammation mediated by gut microbiota. FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2020; 34: 5061–5076. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201902597RR.

[27]

Bharucha AE, Lacy BE. Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Management of Chronic Constipation. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158: 1232–1249.e3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.034.

[28]

Chhana A, Pool B, Callon KE, Tay ML, Musson D, Naot D, et al. Monosodium urate crystals reduce osteocyte viability and indirectly promote a shift in osteocyte function towards a proinflammatory and proresorptive state. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2018; 20: 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1704-y.

[29]

Shao X, Lu W, Gao F, Li D, Hu J, Li Y, et al. Uric Acid Induces Cognitive Dysfunction through Hippocampal Inflammation in Rodents and Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2016; 36: 10990–11005. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1480-16.2016.

[30]

Ko J, Kang HJ, Kim DA, Kim MJ, Ryu ES, Lee S, et al. Uric acid induced the phenotype transition of vascular endothelial cells via induction of oxidative stress and glycocalyx shedding. FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2019; 33: 13334–13345. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201901148R.

[31]

Vannorsdall TD, Kueider AM, Carlson MC, Schretlen DJ. Higher baseline serum uric acid is associated with poorer cognition but not rates of cognitive decline in women. Experimental Gerontology. 2014; 60: 136–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2014.10.013.

[32]

Tian T, Liu XR, Li TT, Nie ZC, Li SJ, Tang Y, et al. Detrimental effects of long-term elevated serum uric acid on cognitive function in rats. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 6732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86279-y.

[33]

Okun E, Barak B, Saada-Madar R, Rothman SM, Griffioen KJ, Roberts N, et al. Evidence for a developmental role for TLR4 in learning and memory. PloS One. 2012; 7: e47522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047522.

[34]

Julian V, Ciba I, Olsson R, Dahlbom M, Furthner D, Gomahr J, et al. Association between Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis and the Physical Activity-Sedentary Profile of Adolescents with Obesity: A Complementary Analysis of the Beta-JUDO Study. Nutrients. 2021; 14: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010060.

[35]

Armstrong A, Jungbluth Rodriguez K, Sabag A, Mavros Y, Parker HM, Keating SE, et al. Effect of aerobic exercise on waist circumference in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews: an Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2022; 23: e13446. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13446.

[36]

Maukonen M, Kanerva N, Partonen T, Männistö S. Chronotype and energy intake timing in relation to changes in anthropometrics: a 7-year follow-up study in adults. Chronobiology International. 2019; 36: 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2018.1515772.

[37]

Itani O, Jike M, Watanabe N, Kaneita Y. Short sleep duration and health outcomes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Sleep Medicine. 2017; 32: 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2016.08.006.

[38]

Jike M, Itani O, Watanabe N, Buysse DJ, Kaneita Y. Long sleep duration and health outcomes: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2018; 39: 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.06.011.

[39]

Lai W, Liao Y, Zhang H, Zhao H, Li Y, Chen R, et al. The trajectory of depressive symptoms and the association with quality of life and suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25: 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06743-1.

[40]

He R, Zheng R, Zheng J, Li M, Wang T, Zhao Z, et al. Causal Association Between Obesity, Circulating Glutamine Levels, and Depression: A Mendelian Randomization Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2023; 108: 1432–1441. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac707.

[41]

Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. 2006; 444: 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05485.

[42]

Hills RD, Jr, Pontefract BA, Mishcon HR, Black CA, Sutton SC, Theberge CR. Gut Microbiome: Profound Implications for Diet and Disease. Nutrients. 2019; 11: 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071613.

[43]

Rodriguez Paris V, Wong XYD, Solon-Biet SM, Edwards MC, Aflatounian A, Gilchrist RB, et al. The interplay between PCOS pathology and diet on gut microbiota in a mouse model. Gut Microbes. 2022; 14: 2085961. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2085961.

[44]

Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013; 500: 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12506.

[45]

Sanna S, van Zuydam NR, Mahajan A, Kurilshikov A, Vich Vila A, Võsa U, et al. Causal relationships among the gut microbiome, short-chain fatty acids and metabolic diseases. Nature Genetics. 2019; 51: 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0350-x.

[46]

Yang J, Long H, Hu Y, Feng Y, McNally A, Zong Z. Klebsiella oxytoca Complex: Update on Taxonomy, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2022; 35: e0000621. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00006-21.

[47]

Mancuso P, Curtis JL, Weitzel AM, Griffin CA, Bouchard B, Freeman CM, et al. Diet-induced obesity in mice impairs host defense against Klebsiella pneumonia in vivo and glucose transport and bactericidal functions in neutrophils in vitro. American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2022; 322: L116–L128. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00008.2021.

[48]

Münzker J, Haase N, Till A, Sucher R, Haange SB, Nemetschke L, et al. Functional changes of the gastric bypass microbiota reactivate thermogenic adipose tissue and systemic glucose control via intestinal FXR-TGR5 crosstalk in diet-induced obesity. Microbiome. 2022; 10: 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01264-5.

[49]

Mistry SK, Greenfeld Z, Morris SM, Jr, Baylis C. The ‘intestinal-renal’ arginine biosynthetic axis in the aging rat. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2002; 123: 1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-6374(02)00003-9.

[50]

Xu D, Lv Q, Wang X, Cui X, Zhao P, Yang X, et al. Hyperuricemia is associated with impaired intestinal permeability in mice. American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2019; 317: G484–G492. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00151.2019.

[51]

Kunitskaia NA, Kozina LS, Utkin AK, Utkina AA. The peculiarities of chronic inflammation in elderly patients with gout and metabolic syndrome. Advances in Gerontology = Uspekhi Gerontologii. 2013; 26: 161–165.

[52]

Park HK, Lee SJ. Treatment of gouty arthritis is associated with restoring the gut microbiota and promoting the production of short-chain fatty acids. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2022; 24: 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02742-9.

[53]

Couvigny B, de Wouters T, Kaci G, Jacouton E, Delorme C, Doré J, et al. Commensal Streptococcus salivarius Modulates PPARγ Transcriptional Activity in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. PloS One. 2015; 10: e0125371. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125371.

[54]

Huang HJ, Liu C, Sun XW, Wei RQ, Liu LW, Chen HY, et al. The rheumatoid arthritis gut microbial biobank reveals core microbial species that associate and effect on host inflammation and autoimmune responses. IMeta. 2024; 3: e242. https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.242.

[55]

Kim JS, Lee KC, Suh MK, Han KI, Eom MK, Lee JH, et al. Mediterraneibacter butyricigenes sp. nov., a butyrate-producing bacterium isolated from human faeces. Journal of Microbiology (Seoul, Korea). 2019; 57: 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-019-8550-8.

[56]

Inoue T, Nishikawa T, Kunimasa K, Tamiya M, Kuhara H, Nishino K, et al. Infectious pericarditis caused by Gemella sanguinis induced by Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): A case report. Respiratory Medicine Case Reports. 2020; 30: 101057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101057.

[57]

Ribeiro Sobrinho AP, de Melo Maltos SM, Farias LM, de Carvalho MAR, Nicoli JR, de Uzeda M, et al. Cytokine production in response to endodontic infection in germ-free mice. Oral Microbiology and Immunology. 2002; 17: 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-302x.2002.170603.x.

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs(S2023KFKT-12)

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2024YFF1107000)

PDF (17600KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/