Incidence, Associated Factors, and Outcomes of Nosocomial Infections in Adult Patients Supported by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background:

This study aimed to investigate the incidence, associated factors, and outcomes of nosocomial infections (NIs) among adult patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

Methods:

This retrospective study included 97 adult patients who underwent VA-ECMO between July 2020 and January 2025. All patients were treated in a single-center intensive care unit (ICU). The incidence, pathogen characteristics, associated factors, and outcomes of NIs were analyzed.

Results:

A total of 61 (62.89%) patients developed NIs. Acinetobacter baumannii was identified as the major pathogen. The hospital mortality rate for patients receiving VA-ECMO with NIs was 49.18%. A long ECMO duration (odds ratio (OR) = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.51; p = 0.013), blood transfusion (OR = 7.45, 95% CI: 1.89–29.28; p = 0.004), a long central venous catheterization (CVC) duration (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01–1.27; p = 0.041), and long ICU stay (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07–1.22; p < 0.001) were factors significantly associated with NIs. The occurrence of adverse events was positively related to that of death (OR = 11.85, 95% CI: 4.52–31.08; p < 0.001). A restricted cubic spline (RCS) revealed that when the ICU stay exceeded 24.13 days, the risk of NIs increased dramatically (p for nonlinearity = 0.036).

Conclusions:

NIs are common in ICU patients supported by VA-ECMO. Acinetobacter baumannii was identified as the most common microorganism associated with NI. Longer ECMO and CVC durations, blood transfusions, and a longer ICU stay were associated with NIs. The occurrence of adverse events early in the ICU increased the risk of death in ECMO-supported patients.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

venoarterial ECMO / nosocomial infections / mortality

1. Introduction

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving medical intervention used for patients with refractory cardiopulmonary failure, providing cardiac and respiratory support by oxygenating the blood outside the body [1]. ECMO was first implemented in the early 1970s by Robert Bartlett. Since then, the application of ECMO has increased dramatically [2, 3]. Recently, the application of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has also increased substantially [4]. Because of underlying critical illness, multiple invasive procedures and devices, and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays, patients supported by VA-ECMO are exposed to a wide range of adverse outcomes [5, 6].

Nosocomial infections (NIs) acquired during VA-ECMO are among the most common adverse outcomes, with an overall incidence ranging from 23% to 64% in patients receiving VA-ECMO support [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. NIs contribute to longer hospital stays, lower survival rates, and delayed cardiopulmonary recovery. Therefore, the identification of associated factors associated with NIs is critical for effective and targeted intervention to reduce in-hospital mortality. A meta-analysis revealed that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), ECMO support, and ICU stay contributed to the risk of NIs [12]. While NIs is a known serious complication during VA-ECMO, a comprehensive understanding of their associated factors and associations with patient outcomes is still in need. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (1) elucidate the incidence of NIs, (2) identify the characteristics of microorganisms, and (3) explore the associated factors for NIs and in-hospital mortality in patients receiving VA-ECMO support at our center.

2. Methods

2.1 Setting and Study Design

This study was performed in the ICU of a single center. Data from patients who received ECMO therapy were retrieved from the electronic medical records system and reviewed by an attending physician. The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Bengbu Medical University (Protocol No. 2025 [039]).

2.2 Study Population

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) received VA-ECMO support between July 2020 and January 1, 2025, and (2) received VA-ECMO support for \ge48 hours. Patients were excluded if one of the following conditions was met: (1) age 18 years old, (2) incomplete data, (3) had any infection before receiving ECMO support, (4) patients who died within the first 48 hours, or (5) received venovenous (V-V) ECMO or combined VA and V-V ECMO.

2.3 Procedures and Management of VA-ECMO

Critical care specialists and cardiologists were responsible for the timing of VA-ECMO initiation and weaning. These specialists performed the procedures for implantation, daily management, and weaning according to the recommendations of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). The femoral vein and femoral artery are the sites of cannulation in our center. For patients undergoing VA-ECMO cannulation, prophylactic antibiotic therapy was administered as a single intravenous injection of a second-generation cephalosporin at the time of ECMO implantation. Subsequently, depending on serum lactate levels and organ function, the ECMO flow rate was adjusted to ensure adequate tissue perfusion. To maintain the activated clotting time within 180–220 seconds, a standardized heparin anticoagulation protocol was used.

2.4 Definition

The definition of NIs was derived from the criteria established by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1988 [13]. The occurrence of NIs was evaluated in instances where the initiation of VA-ECMO occurred more than 24 hours prior and within 48 hours subsequent to the discontinuation of VA-ECMO. Specifically, the following types of infections were considered: respiratory tract infection (RTI), blood stream infection (BSI), urinary tract infection (UTI), and surgical site infection (SSI). RTI was suspected if at least one of the following clinical manifestations was detected: a temperature of \ge38.0 °C or 36.0 °C, a leukocyte count >12 \times 10⁹/L or 4 \times 10⁹/L, purulent excretion from the lower respiratory tract, positive sputum culture, and new or persistent pulmonary infiltrates observed on chest imaging. BSI is characterized as the detection of bacterial or fungal pathogens in one or more blood cultures. UTI is characterized by the manifestation of clinical symptoms or indicators, alongside positive outcomes from routine urinalysis, coupled with a confirmed positive urine culture. SSI is identified as an infection affecting the dermal layer, subcutaneous tissue, or muscle that arises within 30 days post-surgery. This condition is marked by one or more of the following: purulent discharge from the surgical site drainage, affirmative culture results from the drainage fluid, or a diagnosis of infection made by the surgeon through clinical assessment.

During VA-ECMO application, adverse events included neurological complications such as cerebral haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy; cardiovascular events like malignant arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, and septic shock; as well as gastrointestinal bleeding, limb ischaemic necrosis, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

2.5 Data Collection

The following information was recorded retrospectively for each patient: demographic data, including age, sex, height, weight, diagnosis, previous medical history, and personal history. We also collected scores such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Additionally, data on the duration of ECMO support, IABP support, CRRT support, mechanical ventilation, and the use of tracheotomy and bronchoscopy were documented. The maximal vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and laboratory test results within 48 hours of ECMO initiation—such as white blood cell and platelet counts, procalcitonin levels, liver and renal function, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), and troponin (TnI)—were also recorded. Microbiological data, including the type and site of isolated bacteria, presence of adverse events, CVC duration, ICU stay, and in-hospital mortality were noted.

2.6 Statistics

The analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and R software, version 4.4.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous variables are presented as the median (interquartile range, IQR) or the mean (standard deviation, SD), whereas categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages). For continuous variables, t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for normally distributed and skewed variables, respectively. The \chi² test or Fisher’s exact test was performed to compare binary outcomes. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to uncover the determinants linked to NIs and in-hospital mortality rates. Nonlinear associations were explored using restricted cubic splines (RCS). A two-piecewise linear regression model was then constructed to determine the inflection point. A two-sided p-value 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

From July 2020 to January 2025, 166 ICU patients treated with ECMO were screened. We excluded 30 patients who required V-V or mixed ECMO configurations, 2 patients with incomplete records, 3 patients who had infections before ECMO support, 8 patients younger than 18 years, and 26 patients who died within 48 hours. Thus, 97 patients who received VA-ECMO were enrolled in the final analysis (Table 1).

62.89% (61/97) of patients experienced NIs after VA-ECMO implantation. As shown in Table 2, 21 pathogens were detected, with the most common gram-negative organisms being Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 21), Klebsiella (n = 17), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 11). The most common gram-positive organisms were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, n = 8) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, n = 6). The respiratory tract was the main site of infection.

The incidence of NIs was 117.99 cases per 1000 ECMO-days and 38.61 cases per 1000 ICU-days, respectively. To further investigate the characteristics and impact of these infections, the cohort was stratified into two groups based on the occurrence of NIs, as detailed in Table 3. In the NIs group, more patients were male (67.21% vs. 44.44%, p = 0.028). Longer ECMO duration and higher incidences of tracheotomy, bronchoscopy, and blood transfusion were more common in the NIs group (p = 0.003, 0.001, 0.002, and 0.004, respectively). The CVC duration, ICU stay, and hospital stay were longer in the NIs group (p = 0.015, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the non-NIs group (69.44%, 25/36) than in the NIs group (49.18%, 30/61), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (OR = 2.348, 95% CI: 0.985–5.599, p = 0.052). This is likely attributable to our limited sample size and the competing risks in this critically ill population, where mortality is heavily influenced by the underlying severity of the primary illness. Landmark analysis (restricted to patients still on ECMO at day 3) demonstrated that longer ICU stay remained significantly associated with NIs (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03–1.22, p = 0.006), whereas the association with ECMO duration was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (Supplementary Tables 1,2). This clarifies the impact of accounting for immortal time bias and reverse causation.

Table 4 presents the results of univariate logistic regression analyses identifying factors associated with NIs. Univariate analysis indicated that longer durations of ECMO (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05–1.51, p = 0.013), CVC duration (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01–1.27, p = 0.041), ICU stay (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07–1.22, p 0.001), and blood transfusion (OR: 7.45, 95% CI: 1.89–29.28, p = 0.004) were associated with NIs. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 1A, the RCS analysis suggested a nonlinear relationship between NIs risk and ICU stay duration (p for nonlinearity = 0.036). The risk of NIs remained low until approximately 24 days of ICU stay.

Table 5 showed the characteristics of 97 patients stratified into 2 groups based on survival status. Patients in the survivor group were younger than those in the nonsurvivor group (51.02 \pm 15.20 vs. 58.05 \pm 12.42, p = 0.014) and had a lower incidence of diabetes (9.52% vs. 29.09%, p = 0.018). In addition, the nonsurvivors had higher Cr levels (147 [IQR 114.5–217.0] vs. 125 [IQR 99.0–166.5], p = 0.040) and greater rates of CRRT support (67.27% vs. 45.24%, p = 0.029). The overall rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECMO was 25.45%. This rate was significantly greater in the nonsurvivor group (p = 0.046). There were significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events (74.55% vs. 21.43%, p 0.001) and ICU stay duration in days (18 [IQR 12.75–27.25] vs. 11 [IQR 4.00–18.00], p 0.001) between the two groups. However, there were no differences in infection rate, white blood cell count, PLT count, or PCT levels (p = 0.052, 0.055, 0.126, and 0.060, respectively).

Table 6 shows the univariate analyses of factors associated with death. Univariate logistic regression analysis suggested that age (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07, p = 0.017), history of diabetes (OR: 3.90, 95% CI: 1.19–12.73, p = 0.024), total bilirubin (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02, p = 0.020), CRRT support (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.09–5.70, p = 0.031), and occurrence of adverse events (OR: 11.85, 95% CI: 4.52–31.08, p 0.001) were associated factors associated with death. RCS analysis suggested that the relationship between the risk of death and length of ICU stay was nonlinear (p-value for nonlinearity = 0.043). The risk of death decreased up to approximately 14 days of ICU stay (Fig. 1B).

4. Discussion

In our single-center retrospective cohort study, we found that NIs were common in ICU patients supported by VA-ECMO. The incidence of NIs was 62.89%. The most common microorganism associated with NIs was Acinetobacter baumannii. Longer durations of ECMO and CVC, blood transfusion, and prolonged ICU stay were associated factors for NIs. In addition, after the inflection point of approximately 24 days of ICU stay, the incidence of NIs increased dramatically. Finally, the occurrence of adverse events correlated with increased in-hospital mortality.

4.1 Characteristics and Associated Factors for NIs

In our cohort, gram-negative bacteria were the predominant microorganisms causing NIs in patients supported by VA-ECMO. This finding is consistent with previous studies [14, 15, 16]. Xia et al. [17] have identified Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as prevalent pathogens responsible for NIs. Patients often require mechanical ventilators, CRRT, and intravenous catheters at the same time during ECMO support. Sites of endotracheal tubes and cannulas are often colonized by microorganisms. Moreover, ECMO patients with compromised immune systems and mucosal barrier damage are prone to infections [18]. However, the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in the prevention of NIs remains inconclusive [19, 20]. Thus, identifying associated factors for NIs and adopting appropriate treatment strategies are critical. In our study, associated factors for NIs included blood transfusion, long ECMO duration, CVC duration, and ICU stay. The need for blood transfusion was an indication that the patient was in a more severe condition. However, a blood transfusion is essential for patients experiencing haemorrhage and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Moreover, the association between blood transfusion and adverse outcomes has been attributed to immunosuppression in the recipient, which can lead to NIs. This finding is consistent with previous studies [21]. This finding has been confirmed by similar studies [22, 23]. A longer duration of ECMO not only increases the risk of prolonged exposure to invasive devices, but also leads to extended ICU and hospital stays. These factors are associated with an increased risk of NIs [24]. However, a prolonged ECMO duration is likely a strong marker of underlying critical illness severity and complexity rather than an independent causal factor for acquiring NIs. In contrast, the persistent association with ICU length of stay, even after the landmark adjustment, strengthens its role as a robust, independent risk factor, highlighting the importance of cumulative exposure to the hospital environment and invasive procedures. These identified associated factors for NIs are likely strong markers of underlying critical illness severity and prolonged exposure to invasive care, rather than independent causal agents of infection. For example, longer ECMO support may reflect more complex primary conditions (e.g., cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure) that inherently increase vulnerability to infections due to immune suppression or compromised barriers. Blood transfusion often signifies complications like hemorrhage or anemia, which are common in critically ill patients and may serve as indicators of disease burden rather than direct causes of infection. Similarly, extended CVC use and ICU stay highlight the intensity of medical interventions and overall patient acuity, which collectively elevate the risk of exposure to pathogens. Therefore, these factors should be interpreted as proxies for the cumulative impact of critical illness and invasive care, underscoring the need for integrated management strategies to mitigate infection risks in this vulnerable population. In contrast to previous studies, we estimated the inflection points of ECMO duration and ICU stay to predict the occurrence of NIs using RCS analysis. The relationship between ECMO duration and NIs incidence was a positive linear correlation. This indicates that prolonged ECMO increases the risk of NIs. The occurrence of NIs increased significantly when ICU stay exceeded approximately 24 days. These findings provide valuable insights for the prevention and management of VA-ECMO-associated NIs.

4.2 Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality

Previous studies have demonstrated that NIs patients have a lower ECMO weaning survival rate and a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with non-NIs patients [25, 26]. Wang J and colleagues reported that the incidence of NIs was associated with a 3.726-fold higher risk of in-hospital death in ECMO-supported patients [27]. In our study, we did not find a statistically significant association between NIs and in-hospital mortality in univariate analysis (p = 0.052). However, this lack of significance may be attributed to limited statistical power due to our small sample size, as well as potential survivor bias, wherein only patients with longer survival times could develop NIs. Additionally, survivor bias could have influenced our results, as patients who died early in the ICU stay (median 13.88 days) may not have been exposed to NIs risks, thereby diluting the observed effect. Instead, we identified that older age, a history of diabetes, and hepatic or renal dysfunction were significantly associated factors for in-hospital mortality. This finding underscores that a patient’s baseline pathophysiological status prior to ECMO initiation is critical for determining outcomes. Furthermore, a shorter ICU stay was also associated with mortality. This is not contradictory, as most deaths in our cohort occurred early during the ICU stay (within a median of 13.88 days), likely due to severe initial clinical deterioration. Therefore, we speculate that patients with a worse clinical status at baseline are at a higher risk of early death despite VA-ECMO support. Conversely, for those who survive this critical early phase, a prolonged ICU stay may subsequently increase the risk of developing NIs.

4.3 Limitations and Strengths

Our study has several limitations. First, its retrospective, single-center design and small sample size may limit the generalizability of our findings to the broader population of VA-ECMO patients who develop NIs in the ICU. The small sample size may have increased the risk of Type II errors, meaning we might have missed a true association between NIs and mortality. Furthermore, the higher mortality in the non-NIs group could be partly explained by severe initial clinical deterioration, which led to early death before NIs could develop. Second, due to the limited sample size and number of outcome events in our cohort, we were unable to construct stable multivariate models to adjust for potential confounders. Therefore, the identified associated factors are based on univariate analyses and should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to independently validate these associations. Third, the diagnosis of NIs was based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 1988 criteria. While these criteria were rigorously applied, they are less specific than contemporary definitions. However, the consistent application of the same criteria across all patient groups ensures the internal validity of the comparative analyses presented herein. Future studies utilizing current standardized definitions are warranted to confirm our findings. Finally, this study did not analyze the duration of mechanical ventilation, an important potential risk factor for NIs, due to the unavailability of these data in our records. This may limit the comprehensiveness of our risk factor assessment for NIs. Despite these limitations, our findings offer valuable insights, particularly in demonstrating the use of RCS to explore nonlinear correlations between variables and outcomes. We believe that future large-scale, multicenter studies are warranted to validate our findings and provide more robust evidence on the characteristics and impact of NIs in VA-ECMO patients.

5. Conclusions

Our study found a high incidence of NIs among critically ill patients supported by VA-ECMO, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most prevalent pathogen. Independent associated factors for NIs included prolonged durations of ECMO and CVC placement, as well as blood transfusion. Furthermore, a prolonged ICU stay is a key modifiable risk factor for NIs in this population. The role of ECMO duration should be de-emphasized as a direct driver of infection risk and instead presented as a proxy indicator for a prolonged and complicated clinical course.

Availability of Data and Materials

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

[1] Butt SP, Razzaq N, Saleem Y, Cook B, Abdulaziz S. Improving ECMO therapy: Monitoring oxygenator functionality and identifying key indicators, factors, and considerations for changeout. The Journal of Extra-corporeal Technology. 2024; 56: 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023047.

[2] Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Jefferies MR, Huxtable RF, Haiduc NJ, Fong SW. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cardiopulmonary support in infancy. Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs. 1976; 22: 80–93.

[3] Tonna JE, Boonstra PS, MacLaren G, Paden M, Brodie D, Anders M, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry International Report 2022: 100,000 Survivors. ASAIO Journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992). 2024; 70: 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002128.

[4] Danial P, Olivier ME, Bréchot N, Ponnaiah M, Schoell T, D’Alessandro C, et al. Association Between Shock Etiology and 5-Year Outcomes After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023; 81: 897–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.12.018.

[5] Rajsic S, Treml B, Jadzic D, Breitkopf R, Oberleitner C, Popovic Krneta M, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of mortality and complications. Annals of Intensive Care. 2022; 12: 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01067-9.

[6] Bjelic M, Kumar N, Gu Y, Chase K, Paic F, Gosev I. Cause of In-Hospital Death After Weaning from Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2022; 37: 1545–1552. https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666221086839.

[7] Kim GS, Lee KS, Park CK, Kang SK, Kim DW, Oh SG, et al. Nosocomial Infection in Adult Patients Undergoing Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2017; 32: 593–598. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.4.593.

[8] Li X, Wang X, Wang L, Li C, Hao X, Du Z, et al. Impact of Nosocomial Infection on in-Hospital Mortality Rate in Adult Patients Under Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation After Cardiac Surgery. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2023; 16: 4189–4200. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S390599.

[9] Durães-Campos I, Costa C, Ferreira AR, Basílio C, Torrella P, Neves A, et al. ECMO for drug-refractory electrical storm without a reversible trigger: a retrospective multicentric observational study. ESC Heart Failure. 2024; 11: 2129–2137. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14756.

[10] Bouglé A, Bombled C, Margetis D, Lebreton G, Vidal C, Coroir M, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients assisted by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: Epidemiology and risk factors of treatment failure. PloS One. 2018; 13: e0194976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194976.

[11] Schmidt M, Bréchot N, Hariri S, Guiguet M, Luyt CE, Makri R, et al. Nosocomial infections in adult cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clinical Infectious Diseases: an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2012; 55: 1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis783.

[12] Lv X, Han Y, Liu D, Chen X, Chen L, Huang H, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2024; 19: e0308078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308078.

[13] Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. American Journal of Infection Control. 1988; 16: 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3.

[14] Li ZJ, Zhang DF, Zhang WH. Analysis of Nosocomial Infection and Risk Factors in Patients with ECMO Treatment. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2021; 14: 2403–2410. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S306209.

[15] Uçar H, Yıldırım S, Köse Ş Kirakli C. Incidence of nosocomial infection and causative microorganism during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients, a single center study. Perfusion. 2024; 39: 1388–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591231194931.

[16] Wang C, Li S, Wang F, Yang J, Yan W, Gao X, et al. Nosocomial Infections During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pediatric Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2022; 10: 873577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.873577.

[17] Xia J, Gao J, Tang W. Nosocomial infection and its molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Bioscience Trends. 2016; 10: 14–21. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2016.01020.

[18] He C, Yang S, Yu W, Chen Q, Shen J, Hu Y, et al. Effects of continuous renal replacement therapy on intestinal mucosal barrier function during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a porcine model. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2014; 9: 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-72.

[19] Martínez-Martínez M, Nuvials FX, Riera J. Nosocomial infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2022; 28: 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000976.

[20] Orso D, Fodale CM, Fossati S, Venturini S, Fonda F, Cugini F, et al. Do patients receiving extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation need antibiotic prophylaxis? A systematic review and meta-analysis on 7,996 patients. BMC Anesthesiology. 2024; 24: 410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02796-z.

[21] Gunst MA, Minei JP. Transfusion of blood products and nosocomial infection in surgical patients. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2007; 13: 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e32826385ef.

[22] Ladhani HA, Ho VP, Charbonnet CC, Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Brown JB, et al. Dose-dependent association between blood transfusion and nosocomial infections in trauma patients: A secondary analysis of patients from the PAMPer trial. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2021; 91: 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003251.

[23] Wang Y, Ren J, Yao Z, Wang W, Wang S, Duan J, et al. Clinical Impact and Risk Factors of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Nosocomial Infection: A Propensity Score-Matching Study from 2018 to 2020 in a Teaching Hospital in China. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2023; 16: 569–579. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S394269.

[24] MacLaren G, Schlapbach LJ, Aiken AM. Nosocomial Infections During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: a Journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2020; 21: 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002190.

[25] Ait Hssain A, Vahedian-Azimi A, Ibrahim AS, Hassan IF, Azoulay E, Darmon M. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of nosocomial infection in adult patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care (London, England). 2024; 28: 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04946-8.

[26] Li X, Wang L, Wang H, Hou X. Outcome and Clinical Characteristics of Nosocomial Infection in Adult Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022; 10: 857873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.857873.

[27] Wang J, Wang L, Jia M, Du Z, Hou X. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Related Nosocomial Infection after Cardiac Surgery in Adult Patients. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021; 36: 743–751. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0068.

Funding

Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Educational Committee(2024AH051191)

Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Educational Committee(2024AH052829)

Science Foundation for Outstanding Youth of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College(2021byyfyjq02)