Exploratory Study on Genetic Variants Related to Hydatidosis Susceptibility and Albendazole Pharmacogenetics in the Cusco Region in Peru

Luis Jaramillo-Valverde , Marlon Yuri Garcia-Paitan , Dolly Landeo , Saul J. Santivañez , Ramon Cacacabelos

Frontiers in Bioscience-Scholar ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 40566

PDF (289KB)
Frontiers in Bioscience-Scholar ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) :40566 DOI: 10.31083/FBS40566
Original Research
research-article
Exploratory Study on Genetic Variants Related to Hydatidosis Susceptibility and Albendazole Pharmacogenetics in the Cusco Region in Peru
Author information +
History +
PDF (289KB)

Abstract

Background:

Hydatidosis, caused by Echinococcus granulosus, is a neglected zoonotic disease with significant public health implications in endemic regions, such as in Cusco, Peru. Genetic factors influencing susceptibility to infection and responses to albendazole, the primary treatment, remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigates genetic polymorphisms associated with hydatidosis susceptibility and albendazole metabolism in the Cusco region.

Methods:

Hence, a cross-sectional study was conducted using 20 individuals from endemic areas. Peripheral blood samples were collected for genomic DNA extraction, followed by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping using the Illumina Global Screening Array. Polymorphisms in genes related to immunity (interleukin 10 (IL10), interleukin 17A (IL17A), vitamin D receptor (VDR), interferon gamma (IFNG), forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), interleukin 4 (IL4), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2), interleukin 12B (IL12B), and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGFB1)) and drug metabolism genes (cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 4 (CYP3A4), cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily B member 6 (CYP2B6), cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 2 (CYP1A2), ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1), solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1), and cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily E member 1 (CYP2E1)) were analyzed.

Results:

High-frequency alleles were identified in six SNPs associated with susceptibility to Echinococcus granulosus: IL10 rs1800896 (77.5%), IL17A rs2275913 (97.5%), IFNG rs2779249 (92.5%), FOXP3 rs11568821 (97.5%), TGFB1 rs1800469 (80.0%), and VDR rs2228570 (87.5%). Likewise, elevated allele frequencies were observed for two SNPs potentially involved in albendazole metabolism: CYP3A4 rs2740574 (87.5%) and CYP2B6 rs2266780 (97.5%). A comparative analysis with other populations revealed significant differences in SNP frequencies in the Cusco population, both in SNPs related to susceptibility (IL17A rs2275913, VDR rs2228570, and TGFB1 rs1800469; p < 0.001) and pharmacogenetic-related SNPs (CYP2B6 rs2266782, SLCO1B1 rs4149056, and CYP2E1 rs8330; p < 0.05), suggesting the existence of unique local genetic patterns.

Conclusion:

These findings underscore the importance of pharmacogenetic screening to optimize albendazole therapy and support precision medical approaches for hydatidosis management in endemic regions. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to confirm these associations.

Keywords

hydatidosis / genetic susceptibility / Echinococcus granulosus / pharmacogenetics / SNPs / albendazole

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Luis Jaramillo-Valverde, Marlon Yuri Garcia-Paitan, Dolly Landeo, Saul J. Santivañez, Ramon Cacacabelos. Exploratory Study on Genetic Variants Related to Hydatidosis Susceptibility and Albendazole Pharmacogenetics in the Cusco Region in Peru. Frontiers in Bioscience-Scholar, 2025, 17(3): 40566 DOI:10.31083/FBS40566

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

Hydatidosis is a zoonotic parasitic disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus, a cestode that leads to the formation of hydatid cysts in various organs, primarily the liver and lungs [1]. This disease presents a significant public health burden, particularly in regions where livestock farming and close human-animal interactions facilitate its transmission [2]. Endemic areas, such as Cusco, Peru, continue to report high infection rates due to environmental, socioeconomic, and cultural factors that sustain the parasite’s life cycle [3].

Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, hydatidosis remains a major cause of morbidity, often requiring complex medical or surgical interventions [4]. Albendazole, the primary pharmacological treatment, demonstrates variable efficacy across individuals, which has been linked to genetic factors influencing drug metabolism and immune response [5]. Studies have highlighted the role of genetic predisposition in both susceptibility to infection and response to pharmacological therapy [6]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several candidate genes involved in immune modulation and drug metabolism, providing insights into inter-individual differences in disease susceptibility and treatment efficacy [7].

This genetic susceptibility may influence the host’s response to infection, determining the severity of the clinical presentation and the effectiveness of treatment in hydatidosis. Among the genes implicated in modulating the immune response to this disease are interleukin 10 (IL10), IL17A, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2), vitamin D receptor (VDR), interferon gamma (IFNG), Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGFB1), all of which are involved in inflammatory pathways and immune tolerance mechanisms [8, 9, 10, 11].

Pharmacogenetics has emerged as a crucial field in understanding how genetic variations influence drug metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity [12]. Enzymes such as cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 4 (CYP3A4) and CYP2C19 are essential to albendazole metabolism, influencing its bioavailability and therapeutic impact [13]. Genetic polymorphisms in these enzymes have been associated with altered drug response, potentially leading to treatment failure or adverse effects [14]. Likewise, polymorphisms associated with the metabolism of albendazole, the main drug used in the treatment of hydatidosis, have been reported. Genes such as CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2E1, ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1), and solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) have been linked to the bioavailability, therapeutic efficacy, and toxicity profile of albendazole [13, 15]. By investigating the pharmacogenetic profile of individuals receiving albendazole, this study aims to contribute to the optimization of treatment regimens, minimizing variability and improving clinical outcomes [16].

The prevalence of genetic variations that may be linked to albendazole metabolism and hydatidosis susceptibility in people from endemic areas in Cusco, Peru, is examined in this exploratory investigation. The goal of the study is to find biologically significant variations that might merit more research in subsequent association studies, even though no phenotypic or clinical outcome data were gathered. Through single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping using the Illumina Global Screening Array, we aim to identify genetic markers that may influence both disease susceptibility and therapeutic response [17]. This research has implications for the development of personalized medicine strategies, which could lead to more effective disease management in endemic populations.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Study Design and Population

This study employed a cross-sectional design to investigate the prevalence of genetic susceptibility to hydatidosis and pharmacogenetic response to albendazole. Participants were recruited from three endemic localities in Cusco, Peru, with a study population of 20 individuals selected from regional healthcare centers and the local community. Participants were between the ages of 18 and 60, lived in Cusco’s endemic districts, and gave written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included current or prior antiparasitic treatment, chronic infections (e.g., HIV or tuberculosis), autoimmune diseases, or refusal to provide a blood sample.

2.2 Sample Collection and DNA Extraction

Peripheral blood samples (3 mL) were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and stored at –80 °C until processing. Genomic DNA was extracted using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (K182001, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocols. DNA purity and concentration were evaluated using a NanoDrop Lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and DNA integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.3 Genotyping and SNP Selection

Genome-wide SNP genotyping was performed using the Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA) (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), which includes pharmacogenetically relevant and disease-associated polymorphisms. SNPs selected for analysis focused on genes involved in immune regulation, inflammation, pathogen defense, and immune tolerance (IL10, IL4, IL17A, TNF, TLR4, CTLA4, VDR, TGFB1, MBL2, IFNG, FOXP3 and IL12B) and drug metabolism (CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2B6, ABCB1, SLCO1B1 and CYP2E1). This study also presents a comparative analysis of risk allele frequencies among the Cusco population and other populations, including Peru, Colombia, Mexico, and global data. Allele frequency information for external populations was obtained from the 1000 Genomes Project and the Ensembl Genome Browser (GRCh37/hg19 release). Data analysis was conducted using whole-genome association analysis toolset (PLINK) v1.9 (Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA). Standard QC limits were met by all individual samples, with call rates over 98% and no heterozygosity outliers found. Concordance rates could not be determined since duplicate genotyping was not carried out due to the small sample size. There were no differences in the distribution of genotypes by sex. Less than 2% of SNPs were eliminated because of poor call rates, and none were eliminated because of deviation from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (p < 0.05). These exclusions had little bearing on the study of the target polymorphisms.

2.4 Statistical Analysis

For genotypic and allelic frequencies, 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Data analysis was carried out using Stata 15 program (StataCorp. 2016. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

The allele frequency analysis of genetic variants related to hydatidosis susceptibility and albendazole metabolism in the Cusco population (Table 1) showed that the IL10 rs1800896 (–1082 A/G) polymorphism had a G allele frequency of 0.775 (95% CI: 0.645–0.904), while the IL17A rs2275913 (–197 G/A) polymorphism exhibited an A allele frequency of 0.975 (0.926–1.023). Other polymorphisms evaluated included VDR rs2228570 (M1I C/T), which presented a T allele frequency of 0.875 (95% CI: 0.772–0.977), and IFNG rs2779249 (–1616 T/C), where the C allele was observed at a frequency of 0.925 (95% CI: 0.843–1.006). Additionally, FOXP3 rs11568821 (–3279 A/C) showed a high C allele frequency of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.926–1.023), and TGFB1 rs1800469 (–509 C/T) exhibited a T allele frequency of 0.800 (95% CI: 0.676–0.923). The CYP2B6 rs2266780 (Q172H G>T) polymorphism exhibited a T allele frequency of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.926–1.023), while the CYP3A4 rs2740574 (–392 A>G) polymorphism showed a G allele frequency of 0.875 (95% CI: 0.772–0.977); both polymorphisms are involved in drug metabolism.

The genotypic distribution of the studied polymorphisms is summarized in Table 2. The most frequently observed heterozygous genotype was CYP3A4 rs2242480, with a GA frequency of 0.600 (95% CI: 0.360–0.799). This was followed by MBL2 rs1800450, IL12B rs3212227 and ABCB1 rs1045642, each with genotype frequencies of 0.550 (95% CI: 0.317–0.762) for the GA, AC, and CT genotypes, respectively. Non-heterozygous genotypes was observed in TLR4 (rs4986790, rs4986791) and MBL2 (rs1800451, rs5030737). In terms of non-wild type homozygous genotypes, TLR4 rs4986791 had all TT frequency (100%), followed by IL17A rs2275913, FOXP3 rs11568821 and CYP2B6 rs2266780, each with genotype frequencies of 0.950 (95% CI: 0.677–0.994) for the AA, CC, and TT genotypes, respectively.

Table 3 presents a comparative analysis of risk allele frequencies between the Cusco population and other populations, including Peru, Colombia, Mexico, and global data from the 1000 Genomes Project. The TGFB1 rs1800469 T allele frequency in Cusco (80.0%) was notably higher than in Peru (57.06%), Colombia (43.62%), Mexico (39.84%) and global population (36.80%) (p < 0.001). The VDR rs2228570 T allele frequency in Cusco (87.5%) was considerably higher than the reported frequencies for Peru (69.41%), Colombia (40.96%), Mexico (48.44%), and the global population (32.85%) (p < 0.001). In contrast, the IL17A rs2275913 G allele frequency in Cusco (2.5%) was the lowest among all populations analyzed (p < 0.001), highlighting a potential distinctive immune-related genetic profile in this high-altitude population. In case of impact drug metabolism, CYP2B6 rs2266782 G allele frequency in Cusco (90.0%) was slightly upper than the reported frequencies for Peru (70.00%), Colombia (71.81%), and Mexico (67.19%) and global population (65.22%) (p = 0.003). The SLCO1B1 (rs4149056) and CYP2E1 (rs8330) allele frequency varied among these populations (p = 0.001 and p = 0.041 respectively).

4. Discussion

This study provides crucial insights into the genetic basis of hydatidosis susceptibility and the pharmacogenetics of albendazole treatment. The identification of high-prevalence SNPs in IL10, IL17A, VDR, IFNG, FOXP3, and TGFB1 highlights the role of immune and metabolic pathways in infection outcomes. Similar to findings in other parasitic diseases, IL10 polymorphisms influence immune suppression and parasite persistence, while IL17A variants impact inflammatory responses and resistance to infection [18, 19]. Studies from different regions confirm the role of VDR polymorphisms in modulating macrophage activity and parasite clearance, while IFNG variants have been linked to immune activation and disease severity [20, 21].

Additionally, the regulatory functions of FOXP3 and TGFB1 are essential in determining immune tolerance and inflammation during E. granulosus infection. Polymorphisms in FOXP3 affect Treg cell activity, influencing susceptibility and disease progression, with similar findings reported in Turkish and Indian populations [22, 23]. TGFB1 polymorphisms, associated with immune suppression and tissue remodeling, parallel observations in schistosomiasis and leishmaniasis, reinforcing the cytokine’s role in modulating helminthic infections [24, 25]. These findings emphasize the genetic complexity of hydatidosis and align with global studies, supporting the need for personalized treatment approaches.

For example, because IL17A is involved in neutrophil recruitment and pro-inflammatory responses to parasites [26], the low frequency of the IL17A rs2275913 A variant in Cusco (2.5%) may suggest a unique immunological profile. Similarly, immunological suppression and chronic infection may be encouraged by the high frequency of the TGFB1 rs1800469 T allele, which is associated with higher TGFB1 expression. Changes in macrophage activity have been linked to the common VDR rs2228570 T allele [27]. Despite the lack of clinical data, these results point to population-specific genetic patterns that need more functional research.

Analysis revealed that high-prevalence SNPs in CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 could affect albendazole treatment outcomes. By altering enzyme activity, genetic variations in CYP3A4, specifically CYP3A4*1B (rs2740574), may have an impact on albendazole metabolism [28, 29]. To keep things focused, only the variants examined in our dataset are discussed, even if other variants have been described. These results offer a preliminary understanding of the population’s baseline pharmacogenetic profiles, which need further functional and clinical verification. These findings highlight the need for pharmacogenetically guided dosing to improve albendazole treatment outcomes and minimize adverse effects.

Polymorphisms in CYP2B6, such as CYP2B66 (rs3745274) and CYP2B69 (rs28399499), affect albendazole metabolism, potentially altering its therapeutic efficacy in hydatidosis [30, 31]. Studies on other antiparasitic drugs suggest that CYP2B6 variants contribute to interindividual variability in drug clearance, reinforcing the need for pharmacogenetic screening to optimize albendazole dosing and enhance treatment response [32, 33]. Further research is needed to establish personalized dosing strategies based on CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 genetic profiles, ensuring better therapeutic outcomes and reduced toxicity in hydatidosis patients.

The genetic variability observed in the Cusco population compared to other Latin American populations highlights differences in immune regulation and drug metabolism. The higher TGFB1 rs1800469 T allele frequency may influence inflammatory responses, while variations in VDR rs2228570 could affect immune function and disease susceptibility [34, 35]. These findings emphasize the importance of population-specific genetic studies to understand disease risk and treatment outcomes [36, 37]. Regarding pharmacogenetics, the elevated CYP2B6 rs2266782 G allele frequency suggests potential differences in drug metabolism, impacting albendazole efficacy and other treatments [38, 39]. Variability in SLCO1B1 (rs4149056) and CYP2E1 (rs8330) further highlights the need for pharmacogenetic screening to optimize drug dosing and minimize adverse effects in this population [40, 41].

The variability observed in treatment responses highlight the necessity for personalized medicine approaches in endemic populations. By integrating pharmacogenetic screening into clinical practice, clinicians may optimize albendazole dosing and predict treatment efficacy based on genetic profiles. Personalized medicine strategies have been successfully implemented for other antiparasitic drugs, demonstrating improved patient outcomes and reduced drug resistance [42, 43].

The statistical power and precision of allele frequency estimations are severely limited by the small sample size (n = 20), despite the fact that this study offers insightful genetic information about the endemic population of Cusco. These results are quite uncertain, as evidenced by the broad confidence intervals found, for as for IL10 rs1800896 (G allele frequency: 0.775; 95% CI: 0.645–0.904). These restrictions hinder the capacity to establish strong genetic connections and limit the generalizability of our findings. Consequently, it is appropriate to consider the outcomes as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Additionally, gene-environment interactions should be explored, considering the impact of dietary, microbiome, and immune factors on disease progression and drug metabolism [44, 45].

This study offers early proof of genetic variability associated with albendazole metabolism and hydatidosis that is specific to a group. The results are used to generate hypotheses, despite being based only on genotypic data with no clinical link. In order to enable precision medicine in endemic settings, future research should investigate multi-omic techniques and validate these findings in larger cohorts with phenotypic and pharmacokinetic data.

5. Conclusions

Our study concludes by offering important initial insights into the genetic diversity of candidate genes that may be connected to albendazole metabolism and hydatidosis risk. The identification of key SNPs in IL10, IL17A, VDR, IFNG, FOXP3, and TGFB1 reinforces the role of immune regulation in infection outcomes, with parallels observed in other parasitic diseases. Additionally, genetic variability in CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 highlights the potential impact of polymorphisms on albendazole metabolism, emphasizing the need for pharmacogenetic-guided dosing strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Differences in allele frequencies between the Cusco population and other Latin American groups further emphasize the importance of population-specific genetic studies to refine treatment approaches.

As hydatidosis remains a persistent health challenge in endemic regions, the application of precision medicine approaches could significantly impact disease management by enabling more effective and personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on expanding genomic databases, incorporating multi-ethnic populations, and exploring gene-environment interactions to refine our understanding of host-parasite dynamics and optimize therapeutic interventions. These advancements could pave the way for a more individualized approach to hydatidosis treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes and contributing to more efficient disease control efforts in affected regions.

References

[1]

Gessese AT. Review on Epidemiology and Public Health Significance of Hydatidosis. Veterinary Medicine International. 2020; 2020: 8859116. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8859116.

[2]

Abdelghani MH, M’rad S, Chaâbane-Banaoues R, Taoufik S, Charfedine MA, Zemzemi L, et al. Zoonotic threat of cystic echinococcosis in Tunisia: insights into livestock prevalence and identification of the G1 genotype. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025; 12: 1536368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1536368.

[3]

Sánchez E, Cáceres O, Náquira C, Garcia D, Patiño G, Silvia H, et al. Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus from Peru by sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 gene. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2010; 105: 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762010000600013.

[4]

Alzoubi M, Daradkeh S, Daradka K, Shattarat LN, Al-Zyoud A, Al-Qalqili LA, et al. The recurrence rate after primary resection cystic echinococcosis: A meta-analysis and systematic literature review. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2025; 48: 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.09.038.

[5]

Whittaker C, Chesnais CB, Pion SDS, Kamgno J, Walker M, Basáñez MG, et al. Factors associated with variation in single-dose albendazole pharmacokinetics: A systematic review and modelling analysis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2022; 16: e0010497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010497.

[6]

Bakhtiar NM, Spotin A, Mahami-Oskouei M, Ahmadpour E, Rostami A. Recent advances on innate immune pathways related to host-parasite cross-talk in cystic and alveolar echinococcosis. Parasites & Vectors. 2020; 13: 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04103-4.

[7]

Robinson JR, Denny JC, Roden DM, Van Driest SL. Genome-wide and Phenome-wide Approaches to Understand Variable Drug Actions in Electronic Health Records. Clinical and Translational Science. 2018; 11: 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12522.

[8]

Touil-Boukoffa C, Sancéau J, Tayebi B, Wietzerbin J. Relationship among circulating interferon, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-6 and serologic reaction against parasitic antigen in human hydatidosis. Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research: the Official Journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research. 1997; 17: 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.1997.17.211.

[9]

Alvarez Rojas CA, Kronenberg PA, Aitbaev S, Omorov RA, Abdykerimov KK, Paternoster G, et al. Genetic diversity of Echinococcus multilocularis and Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in Kyrgyzstan: The A2 haplotype of E. multilocularis is the predominant variant infecting humans. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020; 14: e0008242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008242.

[10]

Liu T, Li H, Li Y, Wang L, Chen G, Pu G, et al. Integrative Analysis of RNA Expression and Regulatory Networks in Mice Liver Infected by Echinococcus multilocularis. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2022; 10: 798551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.798551.

[11]

Antony JS, Ojurongbe O, van Tong H, Ouf EA, Engleitner T, Akindele AA, et al. Mannose-binding lectin and susceptibility to schistosomiasis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2013; 207: 1675–1683. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jit081.

[12]

Oates JT, Lopez D. Pharmacogenetics: An Important Part of Drug Development with A Focus on Its Application. International Journal of Biomedical Investigation. 2018; 1: 111. https://doi.org/10.31531/2581-4745.1000111.

[13]

Wu Z, Lee D, Joo J, Shin JH, Kang W, Oh S, et al. CYP2J2 and CYP2C19 are the major enzymes responsible for metabolism of albendazole and fenbendazole in human liver microsomes and recombinant P450 assay systems. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013; 57: 5448–5456. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00843-13.

[14]

Ahmed S, Zhou Z, Zhou J, Chen SQ. Pharmacogenomics of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters: Relevance to Precision Medicine. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics. 2016; 14: 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2016.03.008. Erratum in: Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2018; 16: 152–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2018.04.001.

[15]

Bapiro TE, Andersson TB, Otter C, Hasler JA, Masimirembwa CM. Cytochrome P450 1A1/2 induction by antiparasitic drugs: dose-dependent increase in ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase activity and mRNA caused by quinine, primaquine and albendazole in HepG2 cells. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2002; 58: 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-002-0512-z.

[16]

Algorta J, Krolewiecki A, Pinto F, Gold S, Muñoz J. Pharmacokinetic Characterization and Comparative Bioavailability of an Innovative Orodispersible Fixed-Dose Combination of Ivermectin and Albendazole: A Single Dose, Open Label, Sequence Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial in Healthy Volunteers. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022; 13: 914886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.914886.

[17]

Tozzi V, Rosenberger A, Kube D, Bickeböller H. Global, pathway and gene coverage of three Illumina arrays with respect to inflammatory and immune-related pathways. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG. 2019; 27: 1716–1723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0441-2.

[18]

Mills KHG. IL-17 and IL-17-producing cells in protection versus pathology. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2023; 23: 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00746-9.

[19]

Sykes AL, Larrieu E, Poggio TV, Céspedes MG, Mujica GB, Basáñez MG, et al. Modelling diagnostics for Echinococcus granulosus surveillance in sheep using Latent Class Analysis: Argentina as a case study. One Health (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2021; 14: 100359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100359.

[20]

Salem DA, Alghamdi MA, Al-Ghamdi HS, Alghamdi BA, Elsamanoudi AZE, Hasan A. Vitamin D status, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism, and haplotype in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis: Correlation with susceptibility and parasite load index. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2023; 17: e0011393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011393.

[21]

Hamad BS, Shnawa BH, Alrawi RA, Ahmed MH. Comparative analysis of host immune responses to Hydatid cyst in human and ovine hepatic cystic Echinococcosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2024; 273: 110775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110775.

[22]

Zheng L, Wang X, Xu L, Wang N, Cai P, Liang T, et al. Foxp3 gene polymorphisms and haplotypes associate with susceptibility of Graves’ disease in Chinese Han population. International Immunopharmacology. 2015; 25: 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2015.02.020.

[23]

White MPJ, McManus CM, Maizels RM. Regulatory T-cells in helminth infection: induction, function and therapeutic potential. Immunology. 2020; 160: 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13190.

[24]

Barral-Netto M, Barral A, Brownell CE, Skeiky YA, Ellingsworth LR, Twardzik DR, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta in leishmanial infection: a parasite escape mechanism. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1992; 257: 545–548. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1636092.

[25]

Frade AF, Oliveira LCD, Costa DL, Costa CHN, Aquino D, Van Weyenbergh J, et al. TGFB1 and IL8 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to visceral leishmaniasis. Infection, Genetics and Evolution: Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Genetics in Infectious Diseases. 2011; 11: 912–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.02.014.

[26]

Navarro-Compán V, Puig L, Vidal S, Ramírez J, Llamas-Velasco M, Fernández-Carballido C, et al. The paradigm of IL-23-independent production of IL-17F and IL-17A and their role in chronic inflammatory diseases. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023; 14: 1191782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1191782.

[27]

Meza-Meza MR, Vizmanos B, Rivera-Escoto M, Ruiz-Ballesteros AI, Pesqueda-Cendejas K, Parra-Rojas I, et al. Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Genetic Variants: Relationship of FokI Genotypes with VDR Expression and Clinical Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. Genes. 2022; 13: 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112016.

[28]

Klein K, Zanger UM. Pharmacogenomics of Cytochrome P450 3A4: Recent Progress Toward the “Missing Heritability” Problem. Frontiers in Genetics. 2013; 4: 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00012.

[29]

Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang Y, Jin W, Zhang Z, Jin L, et al. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5: the crucial roles in clinical drug metabolism and the significant implications of genetic polymorphisms. PeerJ. 2024; 12: e18636. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18636.

[30]

Liu ZQ, Zhu B, Tan YF, Tan ZR, Wang LS, Huang SL, et al. O-Dealkylation of fluoxetine in relation to CYP2C19 gene dose and involvement of CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2002; 300: 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.300.1.105.

[31]

Mangó K, Kiss ÁF, Fekete F, Erdős R, Monostory K. CYP2B6 allelic variants and non-genetic factors influence CYP2B6 enzyme function. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12: 2984. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07022-9.

[32]

Desta Z, Saussele T, Ward B, Blievernicht J, Li L, Klein K, et al. Impact of CYP2B6 polymorphism on hepatic efavirenz metabolism in vitro. Pharmacogenomics. 2007; 8: 547–558. https://doi.org/10.2217/14622416.8.6.547.

[33]

Vo TT, Varghese Gupta S. Role of Cytochrome P450 2B6 Pharmacogenomics in Determining Efavirenz-Mediated Central Nervous System Toxicity, Treatment Outcomes, and Dosage Adjustments in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Pharmacotherapy. 2016; 36: 1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1852.

[34]

Ishibashi CM, de Oliveira CEC, Guembarovski RL, Hirata BKB, Vitiello GAF, Guembarovski AL, et al. Genetic Polymorphisms of the TGFB1 Signal Peptide and Promoter Region: Role in Wilms Tumor Susceptibility? Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL. 2021; 8: 22–31. https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i4.182.

[35]

Zhang W, Xu Y. Association Between Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism rs2228570 and Allergic Rhinitis. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine. 2020; 13: 327–335. https://doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S262402.

[36]

Lee CL, Chuang CK, Chiu HC, Chang YH, Tu YR, Lo YT, et al. Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2025; 22: 903–919. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.101219.

[37]

Gurdasani D, Barroso I, Zeggini E, Sandhu MS. Author Correction: Genomics of disease risk in globally diverse populations. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2019; 20: 562. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0153-z. Erratum for: Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2019; 20: 520–535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0144-0.

[38]

Langmia IM, Just KS, Yamoune S, Brockmöller J, Masimirembwa C, Stingl JC. CYP2B6 Functional Variability in Drug Metabolism and Exposure Across Populations-Implication for Drug Safety, Dosing, and Individualized Therapy. Frontiers in Genetics. 2021; 12: 692234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.692234.

[39]

Desta Z, El-Boraie A, Gong L, Somogyi AA, Lauschke VM, Dandara C, et al. PharmVar GeneFocus: CYP2B6. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2021; 110: 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2166.

[40]

Brunham LR, Lansberg PJ, Zhang L, Miao F, Carter C, Hovingh GK, et al. Differential effect of the rs4149056 variant in SLCO1B1 on myopathy associated with simvastatin and atorvastatin. The Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2012; 12: 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1038/tpj.2010.92.

[41]

Neafsey P, Ginsberg G, Hattis D, Johns DO, Guyton KZ, Sonawane B. Genetic polymorphism in CYP2E1: Population distribution of CYP2E1 activity. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews. 2009; 12: 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400903158359.

[42]

Folahan FF. Neglected tropical diseases: progress and expectations. The Lancet. Microbe. 2023; 4: e137–e138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00029-0.

[43]

Mehlotra RK, Henry-Halldin CN, Zimmerman PA. Application of pharmacogenomics to malaria: a holistic approach for successful chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomics. 2009; 10: 435–449. https://doi.org/10.2217/14622416.10.3.435.

[44]

Wakelin D. Genetic control of susceptibility and resistance to parasitic infection. Advances in Parasitology. 1978; 16: 219–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60575-8.

[45]

Yiannakopoulou ECh. Pharmacogenomics of phase II metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters: clinical implications. The Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2013; 13: 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/tpj.2012.42.

Funding

Universidad Continental under the institutional funding framework established by Resolution(4412-2024-R/UC)

PDF (289KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/