Hypoxia-Activated PERK Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Gliomas: A Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomic Study With Therapeutic Implications
Jingyan Gu , Yue Kong , Yaohua Liu , Xu Wang , Hongyu Tang , Tingting Zang , Jian Yin , Lianping Gu
Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12) : 46692
Glioma, the most common brain tumor in adults, exhibits marked hypoxia and invasiveness. Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and the unfolded protein response (UPR) have been implicated in tumor progression, while epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) drives invasion and metastasis.
This study explored the role of ERS, particularly the PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) pathway, in promoting EMT and malignancy in glioma. Based on publicly available bulk transcriptomic data, we analyzed PERK activity in high-grade and hypoxic gliomas. PERK activation across glioma subtypes was compared using publicly available single-cell sequencing, and its correlation with EMT upregulation was evaluated using pseudotime analysis. The effects of PERK on glioma migration and invasion in a hypoxic environment were investigated using PERK-silenced glioma cell lines. In vivo tumorigenicity was assessed in nude mice by measuring tumor size and EMT marker expression. Intercellular communication was examined using CellChat analysis. Hypoxic niche regions were identified using publicly available spatial transcriptomics with PERK-EMT co-localization.
Hypoxia-induced PERK activation promoted EMT, enhancing glioma cell migration and tumor growth. High PERK signatures correlated with EMT activation in aggressive gliomas. Genetic silencing of PERK reduced the expression of EMT-related proteins, an effect partially reversed by hypoxia. Inhibition of PERK signaling decreased tumor size in mice. PERK-activated glioma subpopulations exhibited stronger cell–cell communication through secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1)-CD44 interactions. Spatial transcriptomic analysis confirmed enrichment of the PERK/EMT pathway in hypoxic niches alongside SPP1-CD44 co-localization.
These findings reveal PERK-driven EMT as a key mechanism linking ER stress to glioma progression, with hypoxia reinforcing this axis. Targeting the PERK signaling axis or SPP1-CD44 interactions may offer novel therapeutic strategies against aggressive gliomas.
glioma / epithelial-mesenchymal transition / hypoxia / endoplasmic reticulum stress / PERK kinase
| [1] |
Wen PY, Packer RJ. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: clinical implications. Neuro-oncology. 2021; 23: 1215–1217. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab120. |
| [2] |
Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M, Le Rhun E, Tonn JC, Minniti G, et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology. 2021; 18: 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z. |
| [3] |
Kalluri AL, Shah PP, Lim M. The Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Primary CNS Neoplasms: A Review of Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Approaches. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032020. |
| [4] |
Charles NA, Holland EC, Gilbertson R, Glass R, Kettenmann H. The brain tumor microenvironment. Glia. 2011; 59: 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.21136. |
| [5] |
Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2020; 21: 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0250-z. |
| [6] |
Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2014; 15: 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3758. |
| [7] |
Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2009; 119: 1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI39104. |
| [8] |
Rankin EB, Giaccia AJ. Hypoxic control of metastasis. Science. 2016; 352: 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4405. |
| [9] |
Kubelt C, Hattermann K, Sebens S, Mehdorn HM, Held-Feindt J. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in paired human primary and recurrent glioblastomas. International Journal of Oncology. 2015; 46: 2515–2525. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2944. |
| [10] |
Fan P, Zhang N, Candi E, Agostini M, Piacentini M, TOR Centre, et al. Alleviating hypoxia to improve cancer immunotherapy. Oncogene. 2023; 42: 3591–3604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-023-02869-2. |
| [11] |
Madden E, Logue SE, Healy SJ, Manie S, Samali A. The role of the unfolded protein response in cancer progression: From oncogenesis to chemoresistance. Biology of the Cell. 2019; 111: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/boc.201800050. |
| [12] |
Yang Z, Matteson EL, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. T-cell metabolism in autoimmune disease. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2015; 17: 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0542-4. |
| [13] |
Read A, Schröder M. The Unfolded Protein Response: An Overview. Biology. 2021; 10: 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10050384. |
| [14] |
Saini KK, Chaturvedi P, Sinha A, Singh MP, Khan MA, Verma A, et al. Loss of PERK function promotes ferroptosis by downregulating SLC7A11 (System Xc⁻) in colorectal cancer. Redox Biology. 2023; 65: 102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2023.102833. |
| [15] |
Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science. 2011; 334: 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209038. |
| [16] |
Talukdar G, Orr HT, Lei Z. The PERK pathway: beneficial or detrimental for neurodegenerative diseases and tumor growth and cancer. Human Molecular Genetics. 2023; 32: 2545–2557. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddad103. |
| [17] |
Ricciardi CA, Gnudi L. The endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in kidney disease: Implications for vascular growth factors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2020; 24: 12910–12919. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15999. |
| [18] |
Liu Y, Chen P, Xu L, Wang B, Zhang S, Wang X. GALNT2 sustains glioma stem cells by promoting CD44 expression. Aging. 2023; 15: 2208–2220. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204609. |
| [19] |
Zhang H, Cao H, Luo H, Zhang N, Wang Z, Dai Z, et al. RUNX1/CD44 axis regulates the proliferation, migration, and immunotherapy of gliomas: A single-cell sequencing analysis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023; 14: 1086280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1086280. |
| [20] |
Ozato Y, Kojima Y, Kobayashi Y, Hisamatsu Y, Toshima T, Yonemura Y, et al. Spatial and single-cell transcriptomics decipher the cellular environment containing HLA-G+ cancer cells and SPP1+ macrophages in colorectal cancer. Cell Reports. 2023; 42: 111929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111929. |
| [21] |
Nallasamy P, Nimmakayala RK, Karmakar S, Leon F, Seshacharyulu P, Lakshmanan I, et al. Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment Factor Promotes Cancer Stemness via SPP1-CD44 Axis. Gastroenterology. 2021; 161: 1998–2013.e7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.023. |
| [22] |
Luo H, Xia X, Huang LB, An H, Cao M, Kim GD, et al. Pan-cancer single-cell analysis reveals the heterogeneity and plasticity of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Nature Communications. 2022; 13: 6619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34395-2. |
| [23] |
Qi J, Sun H, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Xun Z, Li Z, et al. Single-cell and spatial analysis reveal interaction of FAP+ fibroblasts and SPP1+ macrophages in colorectal cancer. Nature Communications. 2022; 13: 1742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29366-6. |
| [24] |
You G, Zheng Z, Huang Y, Liu G, Luo W, Huang J, et al. scRNA-seq and proteomics reveal the distinction of M2-like macrophages between primary and recurrent malignant glioma and its critical role in the recurrence. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2023; 29: 3391–3405. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.14269. |
| [25] |
Zhao Z, Zhang KN, Wang Q, Li G, Zeng F, Zhang Y, et al. Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA): A Comprehensive Resource with Functional Genomic Data from Chinese Glioma Patients. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics. 2021; 19: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.10.005. |
| [26] |
Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013; 41: D991–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1193. |
| [27] |
Abdelfattah N, Kumar P, Wang C, Leu JS, Flynn WF, Gao R, et al. Single-cell analysis of human glioma and immune cells identifies S100A4 as an immunotherapy target. Nature Communications. 2022; 13: 767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28372-y. |
| [28] |
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005; 102: 15545–15550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102. |
| [29] |
Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 1739–1740. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260. |
| [30] |
Jassal B, Matthews L, Viteri G, Gong C, Lorente P, Fabregat A, et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Research. 2020; 48: D498–D503. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1031. |
| [31] |
Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Research. 2023; 51: D638–D646. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1000. |
| [32] |
Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Waldner M, Obenauf AC, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity. 2013; 39: 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.003. |
| [33] |
Neftel C, Laffy J, Filbin MG, Hara T, Shore ME, Rahme GJ, et al. An Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for Glioblastoma. Cell. 2019; 178: 835–849.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.024. |
| [34] |
Qiu X, Hill A, Packer J, Lin D, Ma YA, Trapnell C. Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nature Methods. 2017; 14: 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4150. |
| [35] |
Jin S, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Zhang L, Chang I, Ramos R, Kuan CH, et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nature Communications. 2021; 12: 1088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9. |
| [36] |
Elhanani O, Ben-Uri R, Keren L. Spatial profiling technologies illuminate the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2023; 41: 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2023.01.010. |
| [37] |
Pavlova NN, Zhu J, Thompson CB. The hallmarks of cancer metabolism: Still emerging. Cell Metabolism. 2022; 34: 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2022.01.007. |
| [38] |
Greenwald AC, Darnell NG, Hoefflin R, Simkin D, Mount CW, Gonzalez Castro LN, et al. Integrative spatial analysis reveals a multi-layered organization of glioblastoma. Cell. 2024; 187: 2485–2501.e26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.029. |
| [39] |
Verhaak RGW, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010; 17: 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020. |
| [40] |
Hara T, Chanoch-Myers R, Mathewson ND, Myskiw C, Atta L, Bussema L, et al. Interactions between cancer cells and immune cells drive transitions to mesenchymal-like states in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2021; 39: 779–792.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.002. |
| [41] |
Wang L, Wen J, Sun Y, Yang X, Ma Y, Tian X. Knockdown of NUPR1 inhibits angiogenesis in lung cancer through IRE1/XBP1 and PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 signaling pathways. Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland). 2023; 18, 20230796. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2023-0796. |
| [42] |
Soni H, Bode J, Nguyen CDL, Puccio L, Neßling M, Piro RM, et al. PERK-mediated expression of peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase supports angiogenesis in glioblastoma. Oncogenesis. 2020; 9: 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-020-0201-8. |
| [43] |
Kaw K, Chattopadhyay A, Guan P, Chen J, Majumder S, Duan XY, et al. Smooth muscle α-actin missense variant promotes atherosclerosis through modulation of intracellular cholesterol in smooth muscle cells. European Heart Journal. 2023; 44: 2713–2726. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad373. |
| [44] |
Poulsen KL, McMullen MR, Huang E, Kibler CD, Sheehan MM, Leng L, et al. Novel Role of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Upstream Control of the Unfolded Protein Response After Ethanol Feeding in Mice. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2019; 43: 1439–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14065. |
| [45] |
Blais JD, Addison CL, Edge R, Falls T, Zhao H, Wary K, Koumeni C, et al. Perk-dependent translational regulation promotes tumor cell adaptation and angiogenesis in response to hypoxic stress. Molecular and cellular biology. 2006; 26: 9517–9532. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01145-06. |
| [46] |
Bill R, Wirapati P, Messemaker M, Roh W, Zitti B, Duval F, et al. CXCL9:SPP1 macrophage polarity identifies a network of cellular programs that control human cancers. Science. 2023; 381: 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade2292. |
| [47] |
Liu Y, Xun Z, Ma K, Liang S, Li X, Zhou S, et al. Identification of a tumour immune barrier in the HCC microenvironment that determines the efficacy of immunotherapy. Journal of Hepatology. 2023; 78: 770–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2023.01.011. |
| [48] |
Chen P, Zhao D, Li J, Liang X, Li J, Chang A, et al. Symbiotic Macrophage-Glioma Cell Interactions Reveal Synthetic Lethality in PTEN-Null Glioma. Cancer Cell. 2019; 35: 868–884.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2019.05.003. |
| [49] |
Pietras A, Katz AM, Ekström EJ, Wee B, Halliday JJ, Pitter KL, et al. Osteopontin-CD44 signaling in the glioma perivascular niche enhances cancer stem cell phenotypes and promotes aggressive tumor growth. Cell Stem Cell. 2014; 14: 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.005. |
Songjiang District science and technology research project(18sjkjgg19)
Songjiang District science and technology research project(18sjkjgg20)
Songjiang District science and technology research project(18sjkjgg34)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |