The Common Immune Pathological Mechanism and Therapeutic Challenges of Chronic Skin Diseases: Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis and Vitiligo

Ruiting Ma , Wenyu Ma

Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 44099

PDF (848KB)
Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) :44099 DOI: 10.31083/FBL44099
Review
review-article
The Common Immune Pathological Mechanism and Therapeutic Challenges of Chronic Skin Diseases: Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis and Vitiligo
Author information +
History +
PDF (848KB)

Abstract

Chronic skin diseases like psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and vitiligo, characterized by long-term courses, frequent relapses, and complex management, severely affect patients’ lives. This review summarizes their epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies, focusing on elucidating the core synergistic roles of cytokines including interleukin (IL)-17, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). Comparative analysis reveals overlapping genetic, immune, and environmental factors. Current therapeutic approaches have limitations, whereas targeted biologics, especially novel biologics developed using gene editing and cell therapy technologies to achieve precise immune modulation, demonstrate tremendous potential. Cross-disease immune investigations hold substantial value: (1) The identification of common targets to uncover shared immunoregulatory features, cross-regulatory patterns of key signaling pathways, and common disease targets amenable to drug repurposing. (2) The advancement of precision medicine through mechanism-based treatment approaches, such as broad-spectrum inhibitors and optimized combination therapies. (3) To guide drug development of individualized treatments using novel therapeutics by providing crucial insights into skin immunology. This research facilitates the shift from “disease-classification-based management” to “immune phenotype-directed therapeutics,” supporting the development of novel biologics and individualized strategies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

chronic skin diseases / IL-17 / TNF-α / IFN-γ / targeted biologic therapy / broad-spectrum pathway inhibitors

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ruiting Ma, Wenyu Ma. The Common Immune Pathological Mechanism and Therapeutic Challenges of Chronic Skin Diseases: Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis and Vitiligo. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2026, 31(1): 44099 DOI:10.31083/FBL44099

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Background

Chronic skin diseases (CSDs) are defined as persistent cutaneous disorders characterized by prolonged duration (>6 weeks), progressive evolution, treatment resistance, and relapsing-remitting courses. These diseases exhibit dynamic clinical patterns of sustained activity or intermittent exacerbation, driven by multi-system interactions involving immune dysregulation, barrier dysfunction, and neurogenic inflammation [1].

Core features:

(1) Stubborn disease course: Alternating active and remission phases with limited curative potential through conventional therapies.

(2) Pathological accumulation: Chronic inflammation induces cumulative damage, including epidermal barrier disruption, aberrant keratinocyte differentiation, and dermal matrix remodeling.

(3) Systemic manifestations: Associations with metabolic dysregulation, psychological comorbidities (e.g., anxiety disorders), and multi-organ involvement.

CSDs arise from multifactorial interactions involving genetic predisposition, immune dysfunction, infections, environmental triggers (e.g., pollutants), and lifestyle factors. Common clinical presentations include erythema, papules, blisters, scales, lichenification, and pigmentary changes, frequently accompanied by pruritus, pain, or burning sensations.

The relapsing nature of CSDs necessitates stepwise therapeutic regimens involving acute-phase control, maintenance therapy, and preventive management. Interventions span pharmacotherapy (e.g., biologics, immunosuppressants), physical modalities (e.g., phototherapy), and surgical approaches. Patient education on skin care and lifestyle modifications is critical for disease control.

Major CSDs include Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis, Seborrheic Dermatitis, Vitiligo, Contact Dermatitis, Acne, etc. [2, 3, 4, 5]. These disorders share progressive epidermal barrier failure that disrupts cutaneous immune homeostasis, often leading to psychosocial burdens (e.g., anxiety and social withdrawal) and substantial socioeconomic costs.

2. Disease Epidemiology

CSDs affect diverse populations globally, with distinct demographic predispositions and risk factors across subtypes. Notably, atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, and vitiligo exhibit epidemiological burdens, respectively, as summarized in Table 1 (Ref. [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]), imposing significant health and socioeconomic impacts, warranting urgent mechanistic and therapeutic investigations [1].

2.1 Incidence

Psoriasis: Global prevalence of 2%–3%, peaking in young adults (15–30 years), with rising pediatric cases. Males show marginally higher susceptibility (Table 1) [19]. AD: Affects ~10% globally, with marked age disparity: 15%–30% in children vs. 2%–10% in adults. Increasing prevalence in low-income countries and early childhood populations (Table 1) [6]. Vitiligo: Prevalence of 0.5%–2%, age- and sex-independent, though lower in colder climates (Table 1) [7, 8, 9].

2.2 Geographical Distribution

Psoriasis/Vitiligo: Higher incidence in cold/dry regions (e.g., Northern Europe, Russia) versus lower rates in warm/humid areas (e.g., Southeast Asia).

AD: Elevated prevalence in Africa/Oceania versus Northern/Eastern Europe. Urban areas in China report higher AD rates than rural regions, potentially linked to urban allergen exposure [3].

2.3 Disease Trends

Psoriasis: Psoriasis can manifest at any age, with most patients exhibiting winter exacerbations or recurrences and summer remission. This seasonality is likely attributed to dry winter conditions that accelerate transepidermal water loss and compromise barrier integrity. The overall incidence has an upward trend, and the incidence rate of late-onset psoriasis in elderly women has increased.

AD: Peak incidence in childhood, then gradually decreased, and was consistent in the region after adolescence. Spring/summer flares correlate with allergen surges and ultraviolet (UV) exposure. Global prevalence increases due to pollution and lifestyle shifts [11, 20, 21].

Vitiligo: Vitiligo demonstrates a global prevalence of 0.5%–2% with no predominant age-or sex-specific clustering, though pediatric and adolescent cases are more prevalent. Most patients experience seasonal stabilization during autumn/winter and spring/summer exacerbations, particularly during seasonal transitions. This pattern likely reflects the combined effects of heightened UV radiation and metabolic acceleration in warmer months, where UV-induced oxidative stress may damage melanocytes and disrupt melanogenesis. Mirroring trends in other chronic dermatoses, vitiligo incidence shows a progressive rise globally, with notably increasing pediatric cases potentially linked to environmental triggers [7, 8, 9, 10].

2.4 Key SNP Genes

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), defined as genome-wide DNA sequence variations caused by single-nucleotide substitutions, serve as critical genetic markers for gene mapping and disease association studies. By analyzing SNP-disease correlations, researchers can pinpoint susceptibility loci linked to pathological mechanisms, providing actionable insights for diagnostic refinement and therapeutic development [11, 20]. Different chronic skin diseases have different SNPs (Table 1):

Psoriasis: Human Leukocyte Antigen C locus (HLA-C) (major susceptibility locus) [21];

AD: FLG (filaggrin loss-of-function), interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 (Th2 polarization) [6, 13, 14];

Vitiligo: CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated Antigen-4, immune checkpoint dysregulation), TYR (Tyrosinase gene, melanogenesis defects) [10, 15].

CSDs inflict profound physical and psychological burdens (e.g., chronic pruritus, depression, social stigmatization) while driving substantial healthcare costs. Advancing research into pathogenesis and targeted therapies remains imperative to alleviate patient suffering and socioeconomic strain.

Table 1 summarizes what has been mentioned above. It can be seen that there are many overlapping factors, such as temporal trend, gender, contribution among the three chronic skin diseases.

3. Disease Pathogenesis

3.1 Cellular and Cytokine Networks in Disease Pathogenesis

Inflammatory cytokines play central roles in chronic skin disorders by initiating and sustaining pathological inflammation. Key mediators such as IL-1β, Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-6, released by immune cells, trigger vascular dilation, immune cell recruitment, and classic inflammatory manifestations (e.g., erythema, swelling). Chemokines further amplify inflammation by recruiting neutrophils and T cells to lesional skin, establishing a self-perpetuating inflammatory microenvironment, as summarized in Table 2 (Ref. [2, 14, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]).

3.1.1 Disease-Specific Pathways

Psoriasis: The Th17/IL-17 axis dominates, where IL-23 activates Th17 cells to secrete IL-17A/F, driving keratinocyte hyperproliferation (epidermal thickening, scaling) and amplifying IL-6/TNF-α release, creating a pro-inflammatory feedback loop [2, 22, 23].

AD: Th2 polarization (IL-4, IL-13) suppresses barrier protein expression, compromising skin integrity, while IL-31 mediates pruritus, perpetuating the itch-scratch cycle [16, 24]; TNF-α exacerbates immune dysregulation by promoting inflammatory cell survival and suppressing regulatory T cells (Tregs).

Vitiligo: Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) induces keratinocyte secretion of CXCL9/10 [14], recruits CD8⁺ T cells to infiltrate the skin, and co-mediates melanocyte destruction with TNF-α to maintain inflammation [25].

3.1.2 Overlapping Mechanisms

IL-17 (interleukin-17) can promote Th17 cell-mediated autoimmunity in some patients (Table 2, Fig. 1), induce keratinocytes to secrete IL-6 and IL-8, and recruit neutrophils and T cells [26]. Cytokines like IL-4/IL-13 impair keratinocyte differentiation (barrier dysfunction, microbial colonization), while transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) activates fibroblasts, promoting collagen deposition and sclerosis. Collectively, these factors sustain chronicity through immune activation, barrier disruption, and aberrant cell proliferation.

3.1.3 Therapeutic Implications

These cells and inflammatory factors are involved in different chronic skin diseases, but they play different roles. Therefore, precise blockade of specific factors has become a key strategy for treating chronic skin diseases. The use of biologics targeting the above-mentioned inflammatory factors for the treatment of chronic skin diseases further confirms the core pathogenic mechanism of inflammatory factors.

3.2 Initiation, Progression, and Maintenance of Chronic Skin Diseases

Initiation refers to the initial phase where pathogenic factors breach host defenses. Progression involves dynamic pathological expansion from localized to systemic involvement, while maintenance denotes persistent chronicity with sustained pathological processes.

3.2.1 Psoriasis

Initiation: Triggered by genetic predisposition and environmental interactions.

Progression: Driven by Th17-mediated inflammatory circuits (e.g., IL-23/IL-17 axis).

Maintenance: Sustained by immune memory and epigenetic dysregulation [2, 30, 31, 32].

3.2.2 AD

Initiation: Originates from genetic barrier defects and environmental sensitization.

Progression: Dominated by Th2 polarization (IL-4/IL-13), with chronic inflammation marked by IFN-γ (Th1) and IL-17 (Th17) upregulation, leading to epidermal hyperplasia and refractory lesions.

Maintenance: Linked to epigenetic alterations and immune memory, akin to psoriasis [6, 24].

3.2.3 Vitiligo

Initiation: Genetic susceptibility and oxidative stress trigger melanocyte-directed autoimmunity.

Progression: Sustained by IFN-γ-CXCL9/10 axis-mediated CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxicity, amplified by IL-6/IL-17-driven suppression of regulatory T cells (Tregs).

Maintenance: Perpetuated by immune memory and melanocyte stem cell depletion, resulting in chronicity [7, 9, 19].

3.2.4 Clinical Implications

Disease staging guides therapeutic strategies: progression phases require inflammation control (e.g., biologics targeting IL-17/IL-23), while maintenance necessitates multimodal approaches (e.g., targeted therapies combined with lifestyle modifications), as summarized in Table 2 and Table 3 (Ref. [2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33]). Precision in staging enhances treatment efficacy and long-term outcomes.

4. Role of Inflammatory Cytokines in Disease Pathogenesis

Having outlined the complex cellular and cytokine networks underlying psoriasis, AD, and vitiligo (Section 3). As shown in the Venn diagram (Fig. 2), we now focus on the specific roles of the pivotal inflammatory mediators that drive these shared pathways. This section delves into the mechanistic contributions of IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, whose synergistic effects are central to disease pathogenesis.

4.1 IL-17A/Th17 Axis

AD: Th17 cells contribute to pathogenesis via IL-17A, which activates keratinocyte inflammatory networks (e.g., STAT3 signaling), recruits’ neutrophils, and induces aberrant keratinocyte proliferation. This disrupts skin barrier function, exacerbating inflammation and perpetuating the itch-scratch cycle [34, 35, 36, 37].

Psoriasis: IL-17A binds keratinocyte receptors, triggering inflammatory cascades (e.g., NF-κB) that drive hyperproliferation, epidermal thickening, and scaly plaques. It also amplifies tissue damage by dysregulating immune cell function [38, 39, 40].

Vitiligo: Elevated IL-17 in lesional skin directly suppresses melanocyte proliferation, melanogenesis, and differentiation and enzymatic activity [41, 42]. Concurrently, it disrupts immune equilibrium, promoting autoimmune melanocyte destruction [43, 44].

4.2 TNF-α

AD & Psoriasis: Acting on keratinocytes, it can stimulate the release of various inflammatory mediators, exacerbate inflammatory reactions, and also affect the function of immune cells, exacerbating the recurrence of AD disease. Similarly, TNF-α is also one of the important inflammatory factors in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, which can trigger an inflammatory cascade reaction together with other inflammatory factors, affecting immune cells and promoting the differentiation and proliferation of Th17 cells [45].

Vitiligo: TNF-α induces melanocyte apoptosis via pro-apoptotic pathways (e.g., caspase activation) and trigger immune inflammatory responses, affecting the synthesis and transport of melanin, further damaging melanocytes [46].

4.3 IFN-γ

Psoriasis: Similar to TNF-α, IFN-γ can activate immune cells to produce a large amount of inflammatory factors and induce the amplification of the inflammatory cascade. In addition, IFN-γ can act on keratinocytes, accelerating their proliferation while inhibiting their normal differentiation, leading to typical pathological changes of psoriasis such as epidermal thickening and hyperkeratosis. In terms of regulating the balance of Th1/Th2 cells, psoriasis is consistent with AD. IFN-γ can enhance the immune response of Th1 cells, inhibit the function of Th2 cells, break the balance of Th1/Th2 cells, shift the immune response towards Th1 type, and promote the occurrence and development of psoriasis.

AD: Reduced IFN-γ permits Th2 dominance (elevated IL-4/IL-13/IL-5), inducing an immune response characterized by elevated IgE and increased eosinophils, leading to skin inflammation and itching.

Vitiligo: IFN-γ enhances cytotoxic CD8⁺ T/NK cell activity against melanocytes, perpetuating pigment loss [17, 47].

5. Therapeutic Strategies for Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases

Given the above pathogenesis, the development of targeted therapy strategies has become crucial. Targeted therapy, by precisely intervening in the key pathways of diseases, not only breaks through the optimal therapeutic effects of traditional treatments but also reshapes the treatment pattern through molecular subtyping and individualized approaches. Its value is not only reflected in the improvement of clinical indicators, but more importantly, it reconstructs the treatment goals of chronic skin diseases from “symptom control” to “disease modification”, promotes comorbidity management, and achieves biomarker-stratified therapy. It is a strategic development direction for modern dermatology in treatment. There are currently few research reports on whether these diseases also have some commonalities in existing treatment methods. Below, we analyze therapeutic commonalities and distinctions across psoriasis, AD, and vitiligo:

5.1 Topical Medications

Psoriasis can be treated with glucocorticoids, vitamin D3 derivatives, retinoids, calcineurin inhibitors, etc.; AD can be treated with glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors, zinc oxide oil, calamine lotion, etc.; Vitiligo can be treated with glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors, and vitamin D3 derivatives. It can be seen that there are many similarities in topical medications for them.

5.2 Systemic Medication

For psoriasis, methotrexate, cyclosporine, biologics such as TNF-α inhibitors: adalimumab, infliximab, IL-17 inhibitors: secukinumab, and small molecule targeted drugs such as JAK inhibitors: tofacitinib, etc., are used for treatment [48]; AD can use antihistamines, glucocorticoids, biologics such as IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors: Dupilumab, immunosuppressants such as JAK inhibitors: Upadacitinib, etc.; Vitiligo can use glucocorticoids, antioxidants, biologics such as JAK inhibitors: Tofacitinib, Ruxolitinib, immunosuppressants such as JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors: Decernotinib, etc.

5.3 Physical Therapy

Psoriasis and vitiligo are mostly treated with narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB), 308 excimer laser, and UVA combined with psoralen (PUVA) [49]; AD treatment often uses narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB), UVA1, and pulsed dye laser (PDL) [50, 51, 52].

5.4 Surgical Treatment

When the condition of patients with vitiligo is in the stable stage, there is no new lesion or expansion of the leukoderma for at least 6 to 12 months, or there is no repigmentation after at least 6 months of drug treatment and phototherapy, surgical treatment can be adopted. Common surgical methods include: Autologous Epidermal Transplantation (AET): a procedure involving the transplantation of non-cultured epidermal sheets or cell suspensions derived from the patient’s own healthy skin to the depigmented areas; Autologous Melanocyte Cell Transplantation (MCAT): specifically referring to the in vitro expansion of melanocytes isolated from a patient’s healthy skin biopsy, followed by their transplantation into the vitiligo lesions.

5.5 Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment

Commonly used prescriptions for psoriasis treatment in TCM include Xiaoyin Granules, Compound Indigo Naturalis Capsules, etc., [50, 53]. The commonly used prescriptions in AD are Xiaofeng San and Siwu Tang. Common prescriptions for vitiligo include Liuwei Dihuang Wan, Tongqiao Huoxue Tang, etc. In addition, traditional Chinese medicine fumigation, acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine tinctures, or ointments can also be used for treatment [54].

Regarding the treatment methods and pathogenesis of these three chronic skin diseases, there are many commonalities in topical drug treatment. For example, glucocorticoid is the first-line drug for all three diseases: psoriasis (potent glucocorticoids such as halometasone), AD (medium-potency glucocorticoids such as hydrocortisone), and vitiligo (local block therapy). However, long-term use can cause skin atrophy (with an incidence of about 20%–30%) [49]. Calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus/pimecrolimus) are the first-line non-hormonal drugs for AD (the first choice for children), the second-line treatment for vitiligo (with an effective rate of 50%–60% on the face and neck), and are used in thin skin areas for psoriasis patients [50]. Vitamin D3 derivatives (Calcipotriol) are the first-line combination drugs for psoriasis (with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score improvement of 75%), while for vitiligo, it is used as an adjuvant therapy (with a repigmentation rate of approximately 30%–40%) [55]. All of them involve the Th1/Th17 inflammatory pathway and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, but the specific mechanisms and the weights of the targets are different. In terms of the pathogenesis, the core common target that causes the disease is the IL-17/IL-23 axis, which is the core driving factor of psoriasis, partially involved in AD, and can synergize with IFN-γ in vitiligo; the JAK-STAT pathway can regulate multiple cytokines and has certain therapeutic potential in the three diseases; TNF-α is an inflammatory amplifier in psoriasis and AD, and also plays a part in vitiligo. In the existing inhibitor treatments, Upadacitinib, as a JAK inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and AD, and is in clinical trials for vitiligo; Ruxolitinib cream, as a JAK inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of vitiligo indications, and the topical research for psoriasis and AD is still in progress [56]. It can be seen that for patients with comorbidities, the “one drug for multiple treatments” of targeted therapeutic drugs is very promising. Targeted therapy based on IL-17/IFN-γ can better reduce side effects and expand the scope of indications in future studies.

6. Discussion

Current therapeutic approaches for chronic skin diseases offer diverse options for personalized treatment; however, all modalities carry inherent risks of adverse effects and disease recurrence. Long-term topical or systemic glucocorticoids use may lead to skin atrophy, telangiectasia, hyperpigmentation, Cushing’s syndrome, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and osteoporosis. Abrupt discontinuation can trigger rebound exacerbations. Other topical agents may cause skin irritation, dryness, desquamation, erythema, pruritus, or burning sensations. Systemic therapies, including oral medications, are associated with gastrointestinal disturbances, hepatorenal toxicity, bone marrow suppression, drowsiness, dizziness, xerostomia, and mucosal dryness. Phototherapy, commonly employed for these conditions, increases the risk of erythema, pruritus, blistering, and photocarcinogenesis [52]. Biologic therapies may induce injection-site reactions (redness, pain, itching), headaches, dizziness, hematologic abnormalities, elevated liver enzymes, gastrointestinal disturbances [51, 57, 58], and immunogenicity-driven drug resistance due to anti-drug antibody formation. Such resistance not only compromises disease control but also escalates treatment costs and limits therapeutic options.

The three chronic skin diseases discussed—psoriasis, AD, and vitiligo—share overlapping pathogenic mechanisms mediated by IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNF-α. These cytokines collectively:

(1) Induce keratinocytes and immune cells to release pro-inflammatory chemokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-8, CXCL10), recruiting neutrophils and T cells to amplify inflammation.

(2) Drive keratinocyte proliferation and secretion of inflammatory factors: Causing psoriasis epidermal hyperplasia and AD barrier disruption.

(3) Synergize in immune polarization: TNF-α and IL-1β enhance Th1/Th17 differentiation, establishing a self-sustaining inflammatory loop. IFN-γ and TNF-α augment cytotoxic functions (e.g., melanocyte destruction in vitiligo) and dendritic cell (DC)-mediated antigen presentation, initiating autoimmune responses.

IL-17 inhibitors (e.g., Secukinumab, Ixekizumab), validated for psoriasis. Then, whether this preparation can also be used in the severe AD subtype with high Th17 activity. Preclinical studies demonstrate that IL-17A blockade reduces melanocyte apoptosis and promotes repigmentation in vitiligo models [54], positioning IL-17 as a shared inflammatory hub across these diseases. Providing a theoretical basis for “one drug, multiple diseases”.

Current evidence indicates that IL-17 inhibitors demonstrate significant efficacy in psoriasis and show therapeutic potential for specific subtypes of AD and vitiligo. While large-scale clinical trials are still required for validation, future advancements in precision subtyping, combination therapies, and novel dual-target agent development hold promise for realizing the “one drug, multiple diseases” paradigm. Such strategies could enhance drug resistance mechanisms, reduce side effects of existing inhibitors, expand therapeutic scope, and advance individualized treatment.

The growing heterogeneity of chronic skin diseases has rendered traditional clinical classification methods—based on lesion morphology or disease staging—insufficient for precision medicine. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, offers innovative solutions by integrating multi-omics data (genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic) with clinical phenotypic information. AI not only overcomes the limitations of conventional subtyping but also elucidates dynamic regulatory networks of central pathways (e.g., IL-17, IFN-γ), providing molecular-level decision-making support for the “one drug, multiple diseases” strategy.

Future interdisciplinary collaborations should integrate AI with liquid biopsy, real-time sensors, and other technologies to enable continuous monitoring of disease-related biomarkers and real-time acquisition of patients’ physiological and environmental data. This integration will facilitate the development of personalized treatment regimens. AI-driven dermoscopic image analysis systems could dynamically monitor skin disease progression and adjust therapeutic strategies in real time, optimizing outcomes and enabling dynamic precision management of chronic skin conditions.

Furthermore, establishing cross-disease multi-omics databases and deeply integrating AI-assisted decision systems with electronic health records will consolidate multimodal data. This approach will transition the “one drug, multiple diseases” concept from empirical medicine to precision science, maximizing the therapeutic breadth and depth of single agents. Data-driven decision-making will achieve the tripartite precision medicine goals of individualization, dynamic adaptation, and preventive care, ultimately revolutionizing the management of chronic skin diseases.

7. Conclusion

This review underscores that chronic skin conditions, including psoriasis, AD, and vitiligo, share common immunopathological mechanisms, centered on complex inflammatory cascades driven by overlapping cytokines and immune cell crosstalk.

(1) Shared Inflammatory Drivers: IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ are critical mediators underlying the initiation, persistence, and progression of these diseases, providing a unified target for cross-disease therapeutic strategies.

(2) Efficacy of Single-Agent, Multi-Disease Therapies: IL-17 axis inhibitors have demonstrated robust efficacy in psoriasis and emerging promise in AD or vitiligo. This approach enhances treatment efficiency, reduces adverse effects, and marks a pivotal shift from disease-specific care to mechanism-driven therapy.

(3) Future Directions: Integration of AI with multi-omics data will enable highly precise immune phenotyping, empowering clinicians to dynamically tailor treatments. This will expand the utility of single-agent therapies and transform chronic skin disease management into a personalized, data-driven practice.

By merging mechanistic insights with innovative technologies, we can develop more effective, scalable treatments—ultimately improving outcomes for patients with these debilitating conditions.

References

[1]

Cinicola BL, Corrente S, Castagnoli R, Lougaris V, Giardino G, Leonardi L, et al. Primary atopic disorders and chronic skin disease. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. 2022; 33: 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.13633.

[2]

Armstrong AW, Read C. Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review. JAMA. 2020; 323: 1945–1960. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4006.

[3]

Frazier W, Bhardwaj N. Atopic Dermatitis: Diagnosis and Treatment. American Family Physician. 2020; 101: 590–598.

[4]

Stachow R, Küppers-Chinnow M, Scheewe S. Rehabilitation of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Skin Diseases. Die Rehabilitation. 2017; 56: 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-104205. (In German)

[5]

Boehncke WH, Schön MP. Psoriasis. Lancet. 2015; 386: 983–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61909-7.

[6]

Avena-Woods C. Overview of atopic dermatitis. The American Journal of Managed Care. 2017; 23: S115–S123.

[7]

Yang Y, Du Y, Cui B. Polyphenols targeting multiple molecular targets and pathways for the treatment of vitiligo. Frontiers in Immunology. 2024; 15: 1387329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1387329.

[8]

Frisoli ML, Essien K, Harris JE. Vitiligo: Mechanisms of Pathogenesis and Treatment. Annual Review of Immunology. 2020; 38: 621–648. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-100919-023531.

[9]

Katz EL, Harris JE. Translational Research in Vitiligo. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021; 12: 624517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.624517.

[10]

Bergqvist C, Ezzedine K. Vitiligo: A focus on pathogenesis and its therapeutic implications. The Journal of Dermatology. 2021; 48: 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.15743.

[11]

Esmaeili F, Narimani Z, Vasighi M. Discovering SNP-disease relationships in genome-wide SNP data using an improved harmony search based on SNP locus and genetic inheritance patterns. PLoS ONE. 2023; 18: e0292266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292266.

[12]

Murdaca G, Paladin F, Orsi A, Gangemi S. Interleukin-31: A Pro-inflammatory Oriented Cytokine. Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark Edition). 2025; 30: 37462. https://doi.org/10.31083/fbl37462.

[13]

Nutten S. Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism. 2015; 66: 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1159/000370220.

[14]

Spritz RA, Santorico SA. The Genetic Basis of Vitiligo. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2021; 141: 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.06.004.

[15]

Ramot Y, Rosenberg V, Zhou L, Harbers S. Epidemiology and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Vitiligo: A Real-World Analysis. Advances in Therapy. 2024; 41: 2890–2906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02875-0.

[16]

Tsoi LC, Rodriguez E, Stölzl D, Wehkamp U, Sun J, Gerdes S, et al. Progression of acute-to-chronic atopic dermatitis is associated with quantitative rather than qualitative changes in cytokine responses. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020; 145: 1406–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.11.047.

[17]

Acharya P, Mathur M. Association of atopic dermatitis with vitiligo: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2020; 19: 2016–2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13263.

[18]

Bergqvist C, Ezzedine K. Vitiligo: A Review. Dermatology. 2020; 236: 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506103.

[19]

Feng Y, Lu Y. Advances in vitiligo: Update on therapeutic targets. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022; 13: 986918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.986918.

[20]

Tawfik NS, Spruit MR. Corrigendum to: the SNPcurator: literature mining of enriched SNP-disease associations. Database. 2021; 2021: baab070. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baab070.

[21]

Raharja A, Mahil SK, Barker JN. Psoriasis: a brief overview. Clinical Medicine. 2021; 21: 170–173. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2021-0257.

[22]

Park H, Li Z, Yang XO, Chang SH, Nurieva R, Wang YH, et al. A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17. Nature Immunology. 2005; 6: 1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1261.

[23]

Griffiths CEM, Armstrong AW, Gudjonsson JE, Barker JNWN. Psoriasis. Lancet. 2021; 397: 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32549-6.

[24]

Zhou J, Liang G, Liu L, Feng S, Zheng Z, Wu Y, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals abnormal differentiation of keratinocytes and increased inflammatory differentiated keratinocytes in atopic dermatitis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV. 2023; 37: 2336–2348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.19256.

[25]

Leung AKC, Lam JM, Leong KF, Hon KL. Vitiligo: An Updated Narrative Review. Current Pediatric Reviews. 2021; 17: 76–91. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573396316666201210125858.

[26]

Ni X, Xu Y, Wang W, Kong B, Ouyang J, Chen J, et al. IL-17D-induced inhibition of DDX5 expression in keratinocytes amplifies IL-36R-mediated skin inflammation. Nature Immunology. 2022; 23: 1577–1587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-022-01339-3.

[27]

Cai Y, Shen X, Ding C, Qi C, Li K, Li X, et al. Pivotal role of dermal IL-17-producing γδ T cells in skin inflammation. Immunity. 2011; 35: 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.001.

[28]

Maliyar K, Sibbald C, Pope E, Gary Sibbald R. Diagnosis and Management of Atopic Dermatitis: A Review. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2018; 31: 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000547414.38888.8d.

[29]

Huang D, Lu J, Tan F. Improvement of Pruritus and Efficacy in the Early Stage of Therapy with Upadacitinib, Abrocitinib, or Dupilumab in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Prospective, Cohort, Observational Study. Dermatitis: Contact, Atopic, Occupational, Drug. 2024; 35: 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2023.0132.

[30]

Li H, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Guo Y, Yao Z. Update on the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Atopic Dermatitis. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology. 2021; 61: 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-021-08880-3.

[31]

Liu S, He M, Jiang J, Duan X, Chai B, Zhang J, et al. Triggers for the onset and recurrence of psoriasis: a review and update. Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS. 2024; 22: 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01381-0.

[32]

Wang Y, Li S, Li C. Perspectives of New Advances in the Pathogenesis of Vitiligo: From Oxidative Stress to Autoimmunity. Medical Science Monitor. 2019; 25: 1017–1023. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914898.

[33]

Gomes IA, de Carvalho FO, de Menezes AF, Almeida FM, Shanmugam S, de Souza Siqueira Quintans J, et al. The role of interleukins in vitiligo: a systematic review. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV. 2018; 32: 2097–2111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15016.

[34]

Krzysiek J, Lesiak A, Szybka M, Michalak A, Pastuszak-Lewandoska D, Grzegorczyk J, et al. The role of heterodimer IL-17-A/F in atopic dermatitis. Postepy Dermatologii i Alergologii. 2022; 39: 1093–1100. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2022.122604.

[35]

Noda S, Suárez-Fariñas M, Ungar B, Kim SJ, de Guzman Strong C, Xu H, et al. The Asian atopic dermatitis phenotype combines features of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with increased TH17 polarization. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2015; 136: 1254–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.015.

[36]

Esaki H, Brunner PM, Renert-Yuval Y, Czarnowicki T, Huynh T, Tran G, et al. Early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis is TH2 but also TH17 polarized in skin. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2016; 138: 1639–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.013.

[37]

Christensen RE, Jafferany M. Psychiatric and psychologic aspects of chronic skin diseases. Clinics in Dermatology. 2023; 41: 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.03.006.

[38]

Kotobuki Y, Tanemura A, Yang L, Itoi S, Wataya-Kaneda M, Murota H, et al. Dysregulation of melanocyte function by Th17-related cytokines: significance of Th17 cell infiltration in autoimmune vitiligo vulgaris. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research. 2012; 25: 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00945.x.

[39]

Furue M. Regulation of Filaggrin, Loricrin, and Involucrin by IL-4, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-22, AHR, and NRF2: Pathogenic Implications in Atopic Dermatitis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21: 5382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155382.

[40]

Bakshi H, Nagpal M, Singh M, Dhingra GA, Aggarwal G. Treatment of Psoriasis: A Comprehensive Review of Entire Therapies. Current Drug Safety. 2020; 15: 82–104. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886315666200128095958.

[41]

Dwivedi M, Laddha NC, Begum R. Correlation of increased MYG1 expression and its promoter polymorphism with disease progression and higher susceptibility in vitiligo patients. Journal of Dermatological Science. 2013; 71: 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.04.026.

[42]

Kumar R, Theiss AL, Venuprasad K. RORγt protein modifications and IL-17-mediated inflammation. Trends in Immunology. 2021; 42: 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2021.09.005.

[43]

Wang CQF, Akalu YT, Suarez-Farinas M, Gonzalez J, Mitsui H, Lowes MA, et al. IL-17 and TNF synergistically modulate cytokine expression while suppressing melanogenesis: potential relevance to psoriasis. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2013; 133: 2741–2752. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.237.

[44]

Chen J, Li S, Li C. Mechanisms of melanocyte death in vitiligo. Medicinal Research Reviews. 2021; 41: 1138–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21754.

[45]

Ma X, Yu S. Vitiligo. Ophthalmology. Retina. 2023; 7: 1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2023.08.008.

[46]

Bhardwaj S, Bhatia A, Kumaran MS, Parsad D. Role of IL-17A receptor blocking in melanocyte survival: A strategic intervention against vitiligo. Experimental Dermatology. 2019; 28: 682–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13773.

[47]

Fried R, Lebwohl M, Bettencourt M, Koo J, Jacobson A. Onset of Plaque Psoriasis Treatment Responses With Anti-IL-17/IL-23 Biologic Therapies. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. 2022; 21: 854–860. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.66791.

[48]

Heidemeyer K, Kulac M, Sechi A, Cazzaniga S, Naldi L. Lasers for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology. 2023; 19: 717–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2023.2205640.

[49]

Karagaiah P, Valle Y, Sigova J, Zerbinati N, Vojvodic P, Parsad D, et al. Emerging drugs for the treatment of vitiligo. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs. 2020; 25: 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2020.1712358.

[50]

Mandlik DS, Mandlik SK. Atopic dermatitis: new insight into the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and novel treatment strategies. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology. 2021; 43: 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923973.2021.1889583.

[51]

Wang MC, Chou YT, Kao MC, Lin QY, Chang SY, Chen HY. Topical Chinese herbal medicine in treating atopic dermatitis (eczema): A systematic review and meta-analysis with core herbs exploration. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2023; 317: 116790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.116790.

[52]

Kurz B, Berneburg M, Bäumler W, Karrer S. Phototherapy: Theory and practice. Journal of the German Society of Dermatology: JDDG. 2023; 21: 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15126.

[53]

Wang Z, Zhang G, Zhang H, Li L. Xiaoyin Jiedu Granules may alleviate psoriasis-like skin diseases in mice by regulating sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor expression and reducing Th17 cells. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e19109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19109.

[54]

Chen YS, Huang TH, Liu CL, Chen HS, Lee MH, Chen HW, et al. Locally Targeting the IL-17/IL-17RA Axis Reduced Tumor Growth in a Murine B16F10 Melanoma Model. Human Gene Therapy. 2019; 30: 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2018.104.

[55]

Tokuyama M, Mabuchi T. New Treatment Addressing the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21: 7488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207488.

[56]

Kashetsky N, Turchin I. Utilization of Topical Ruxolitinib in Dermatology: A Review. Skin Therapy Letter. 2023; 28: 8–13.

[57]

Yang XY, Cai WL, Guo CL, Chen QH. Chinese Medicine as Supporting Therapy for Psoriasis: Past, Present, and Future. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2023; 29: 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-022-3683-8.

[58]

Su Z, Zeng YP. Dupilumab-Associated Psoriasis and Psoriasiform Manifestations: A Scoping Review. Dermatology. 2023; 239: 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1159/000530608.

PDF (848KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/