Comparative Analysis of the Bioactivity and Anti-Inflammatory Effects Against Endotoxin in Mitochondria for Transplantation: Impact of Muscle Origin in Rats

Da-Wei Huang , Heng-Juei Hsu , Pei-Wen Chen , Ming-Tse Wu , Chia-En Wong , Chi-Chen Huang , Po-Hsuan Lee , Hui-Fang Chen , Jung-Shun Lee

Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 37367

PDF (5486KB)
Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) :37367 DOI: 10.31083/FBL37367
Original Research
research-article
Comparative Analysis of the Bioactivity and Anti-Inflammatory Effects Against Endotoxin in Mitochondria for Transplantation: Impact of Muscle Origin in Rats
Author information +
History +
PDF (5486KB)

Abstract

Background:

Mitochondria are essential for cellular energy production and cell survival. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in various neurological disorders, prompting the development of novel therapeutic approaches targeting these organelles. Among these, mitochondrial transplantation (MT), which replaces dysfunctional mitochondria with healthy counterparts from donor tissues, has emerged as a promising strategy. While skeletal muscle is a rich source of mitochondria, the optimal muscle tissue for MT remains unidentified, and the potential functional differences among mitochondria from various muscle types are not fully understood. This study investigates the quantity, size, respiratory function, energy production, and anti-inflammatory effects of mitochondria isolated from red skeletal muscle (RSM), mixed skeletal muscle (MSM), and white skeletal muscle (WSM).

Methods:

Mitochondria were extracted from the soleus muscle (RSM), pectoralis major and rectus abdominis (MSM), and biceps brachii and gastrocnemius (WSM) of healthy 8-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats. Nanoparticle tracking analysis was employed to determine mitochondrial quantity and size. The activities of mitochondrial complexes I, II, and IV and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content were assessed. The protective effects of mitochondria (100 μg/mL) from each muscle type against lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 5 μg/mL)-induced cell death and mitochondrial membrane potential disruption were evaluated in PC-12 neuronal cells.

Results:

RSM-derived mitochondria exhibited a smaller average size and significantly higher mitochondrial content compared to those from MSM (mean size: p = 0.0056, vs. pectoralis major; p = 0.0056, vs. rectus abdominis; count of mitochondria: p < 0.0001, vs. pectoralis major; p < 0.0001, vs. rectus abdominis) and WSM (mean size: p = 0.0006, vs. biceps brachii; p < 0.0001, vs. gastrocnemius; count of mitochondria: p < 0.0001, vs. biceps brachii; p < 0.0001, vs. gastrocnemius). Additionally, RSM mitochondria demonstrated the highest activity of mitochondrial complex I among the three muscle types (p = 0.0001, vs. pectoralis major; p = 0.0095, vs. rectus abdominis; p < 0.0001, vs. biceps brachii; p < 0.0001, vs. gastrocnemius). WSM-derived mitochondria showed relatively lower complex II activity (p = 0.0006, biceps brachii vs. soleus; p = 0.0218, biceps brachii vs. rectus abdominis), while complex IV activity and ATP content were comparable across all groups. Supplementation with mitochondria isolated from RSM and WSM, but not MSM, effectively mitigated LPS-induced cell death (mitochondria isolated from soleus: p = 0.0031; biceps brachii: p = 0.0046; gastrocnemius: p = 0.0169) and preserved mitochondrial membrane potential (mitochondria isolated from soleus: p = 0.0204; biceps brachii: p = 0.0086; gastrocnemius: p = 0.0001) in PC-12 cells.

Conclusions:

RSM emerges as the optimal source for mitochondrial extraction, demonstrating superior respiratory activity and significant protective effects against LPS-induced cell death and mitochondrial dysfunction. These findings provide critical insights into optimizing MT outcomes through the strategic selection of mitochondrial sources.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

adenosine triphosphate / lipopolysaccharide / mitochondrial membrane potential / mitochondrial dysfunction / skeletal muscle

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Da-Wei Huang, Heng-Juei Hsu, Pei-Wen Chen, Ming-Tse Wu, Chia-En Wong, Chi-Chen Huang, Po-Hsuan Lee, Hui-Fang Chen, Jung-Shun Lee. Comparative Analysis of the Bioactivity and Anti-Inflammatory Effects Against Endotoxin in Mitochondria for Transplantation: Impact of Muscle Origin in Rats. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2025, 30(5): 37367 DOI:10.31083/FBL37367

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a significant challenge observed across a spectrum of conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], sarcopenia, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [11], diabetes [12], obesity [13], cancers [14, 15, 16, 17], Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy [18, 19], and cardiovascular diseases [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Mitochondria are essential organelles responsible for generating energy, regulating cellular metabolism, and maintaining cellular homeostasis. They play a crucial role in determining cell survival by controlling pathways related to energy production, apoptosis, and the cellular stress response [29]. When mitochondrial function is compromised, it disrupts cellular metabolism, leading to an accumulation of oxidative stress, which can further impair mitochondrial function. This, in turn, affects the ability of mitochondria in producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP), regulating calcium levels, and managing cellular damage [30]. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also linked to the failure of mitophagy, a selective process by which damaged mitochondria are degraded. When mitophagy is impaired, dysfunctional mitochondria accumulate, worsening cellular stress and triggering cell death pathways. Given that mitochondria are crucial in regulating apoptosis, the buildup of damaged mitochondria can overwhelm the cell’s defenses, leading to irreversible damage and cell death [31, 32].

As a result, restoring mitochondrial function has emerged as a pivotal area of research focus, employing pharmacological interventions [33], mitochondrial replacement [34], gene [35], and stem cell therapies [36]. Among these, mitochondrial transplantation (MT), involving the direct transplantation of healthy mitochondria into affected sites to replace or rescue dysfunctional ones, stands out as a notable strategy. This technique has attracted considerable attention from researchers owing to its capacity to rapidly augment mitochondrial function [37]. MT has shown promising results in rectifying and augmenting cellular bioenergetics, structural integrity, and functional capacity, thereby mitigating oxidative stress and inflammation [38, 39, 40, 41]. Furthermore, it has the potential to impede cancer cell migration and enhance sensitivity to chemotherapy [16]. Consequently, MT represents a promising avenue for therapeutic interventions, particularly in diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction [18].

Based on a literature review, the potential donor sources for MT include a range of tissues, such as neural cells, mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, adipocytes, cardiomyocytes, and skeletal muscle cells (Supplementary Table 1) [7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79]. A previous study reported that mitochondria derived from organs with a high energy demand, such as the heart, lung, or muscle, exhibit more robust respiratory profiles than those sourced from low-energy-demand organs, such as the spleen or kidney [80]. In particular, muscle-derived mitochondria retain the highest intact membrane potential, compared to those sourced from the brain, brown adipose tissue, or white adipose tissue, as assessed using the JC-1 assay [81].

The skeletal muscle, which is rich in mitochondria and possesses a higher concentration than the myocardium [28], holds substantial promise as a source of mitochondria for MT because of its widespread distribution throughout the body [82] and remarkable regenerative capacity [83]. For example, mitochondria derived from the pectoralis major muscle have been shown to improve motor function in rats following ischemic stroke [84], whereas those from the gastrocnemius muscle enhance lung mechanics and mitigate lung tissue injury in mice subjected to ischemia-reperfusion damage [43]. Furthermore, the transplantation of mitochondria isolated from various muscle sources has been shown to exert therapeutic benefits in several diseases (Table 1) [9, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 38, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 84]. Nevertheless, the optimal skeletal muscle tissue to achieve the highest MT efficacy has not yet been clearly characterized.

Skeletal muscles are highly conserved tissues essential for locomotion and posture, forming an interconnected network with the skeletal system to facilitate movement. In vertebrates, skeletal muscles are generally categorized into red skeletal muscle (RSM) and white skeletal muscle (WSM), with an intermediate type known as mixed skeletal muscle (MSM) [85]. Red fibers (slow-twitch, oxidative fibers) are characterized by their small diameter, high myoglobin content, and dense capillary supply. They also contain numerous large mitochondria located beneath the sarcolemma and between the myofibrils, along with lipid droplets in the sarcoplasm [86]. These features enable red fibers to sustain prolonged contractions and resist fatigue due to their reliance on oxidative phosphorylation, making them predominant in postural muscles such as the soleus and deep back muscles [87]. In contrast, white fibers (fast-twitch, glycolytic fibers) are larger in diameter, contain fewer mitochondria and lipid droplets, and primarily depend on anaerobic metabolism [86]. These properties make them well-suited for rapid and powerful contractions, as seen in muscles like the gastrocnemius [86]. MSM exhibit a combination of oxidative and glycolytic metabolic properties. Given the distinct bioenergetic profiles of these muscle types [82], their mitochondrial function may vary significantly. Therefore, a comprehensive investigation into the structural and functional characteristics of mitochondria from RSM, MSM, and WSM is essential for identifying the optimal source for MT and advancing its clinical application.

To bridge this knowledge gap, we categorized skeletal muscles into RSM (soleus), MSM (pectoralis major and rectus abdominis), and WSM (biceps brachii and gastrocnemius) based on previous reports [88, 89, 90] and isolated purified mitochondria from these muscle types in rats. We quantified the mitochondrial size and number, and assessed mitochondrial respiratory chain activity and ATP production. Building on our previous findings that transplanted mitochondria can suppress inflammagen-induced inflammation in primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons [3], we further evaluated the effects of mitochondria from these muscle types on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cell death and mitochondrial membrane potential imbalance in PC-12 neuronal cells. These findings provide essential insights that will help researchers to address knowledge gaps in the field of MT research and support the advancement of its therapeutic applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Animals

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC approval number: 113033) of National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, Taiwan. Eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (n = 40, weight: 250–300 g, procured from BioLASCO Nangang District, Taipei, Taiwan) were used as mitochondrial donors in the experiments. The rats were housed separately in ventilated cages, with ad libitum access to food and water, and maintained under controlled environmental conditions at approximately 24 °C with humidity ranging from 45% to 65%. The rats were exposed to 11-h light and 13-h dark cycles, with lights on at 7 AM. All experimental procedures were conducted during the light phase.

2.2 Allogeneic Mitochondrial Isolation

Functional mitochondria were extracted from the RSM (soleus muscle), MSM (pectoralis major and rectus abdominis), and WSM (biceps brachii and gastrocnemius) of healthy donor rats. In brief, donor rats were placed in a prone position and deeply anesthetized using 4–5% isoflurane (Panion & BF Biotech Inc., Taipei, Taiwan) administered via inhalation at a flow rate of 1 L/min. Incisions were made at the targeted sites, and the superficial connective tissues were carefully removed to expose the designated muscles. The muscle specimens of interest were dissected, and the donor rats were euthanized by inhalation of an overdose of isoflurane (~10%). Muscle samples with the same wet weight were excised, fragmented into small pieces, and homogenized in mitochondrial isolation solution provided in mitochondria isolation kit (Cat. # 89801; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using a glass tissue grinder (Cat. # CLS-5007-02, Chemglass Inc, Vineland, NJ, USA). The resultant homogenates were centrifuged at 700 ×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants obtained were then re-centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 15 min at 4 °C to isolate mitochondria. The supernatants were discarded, and the resulting pellets underwent two washes with the provided wash buffer (Cat. # 89801; Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 5 min at 4 °C each time. The washed pellets containing the isolated mitochondria were accurately weighed using a microbalance, and suspended in mitochondrial isolation buffer or PBS (for mitochondrial size analysis) at the desired concentration for further examinations.

2.3 Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was applied to determine the size distribution of the mitochondria isolated from the various skeletal muscle types. Mitochondrial samples were diluted with 0.1 µm-filtered PBS (particle count <10 particles/frame) to achieve the recommended concentrations (approximately 108–109 particles/mL). NTA measurements were conducted in triplicate using a NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) equipped with a 488-nm laser at a frame rate of 25 frames/s, with the temperature maintained at 25 °C. The scientific complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (sCMOS) camera level was set to 14, and the detection threshold was adjusted to 5. The detection range was maintained between 20–100 particles per frame. The mean size and number of mitochondria particles were analyzed and obtained using NanoSight NTA software (v 3.2., Malvern Panalytical).

2.4 Measurements of Respiratory Chain Complex Activity in Isolated Mitochondria

The activities of complexes I, II, and IV within the isolated mitochondria (100 µg per sample, directly measured using a microbalance) were assessed using commercial assay kits (complex I: Cat. #: 700930; complex II: Cat. #: 700940; complex IV: Cat. #: 700990, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance readings were recorded at 340 nm for the complex I assay, 600 nm for the complex II assay, and 550 nm for the complex IV assay. The obtained values were normalized to those from the vehicle control group (mitochondria isolation buffer).

2.5 Measurements of ATP Content in Isolated Mitochondria

The ATP content in the isolated mitochondria (100 µg per sample, directly measured using a microbalance) was determined using a commercial assay kit (Cat. #: ab83355, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance readings were recorded at 570 nm.

2.6 PC-12 Cell Culture and Treatment

Rattus PC-12 cells (Cat#: CRL-1721, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA; RRID: CVCL_0481), validated by short tandem repeat (STR) profiling and confirmed to be mycoplasma-free, were used in this study. The PC-12 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Cat#: A1049101, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Cat#: TMS-013-BKR, Merck-Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA; Lot#: VP2002200, endotoxin <0.05 EU/mL) and penicillin-streptomycin (Cat#: 15140122, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 and 95% air, and subcultured every three days when cell confluency reached 80%. Cells used in the experiments were between passages four and ten. For treatments, PC-12 cells were seeded onto culture plates at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells/cm2. Sixteen hours post-seeding, cultures were treated with 5 µg/mL LPS (from Escherichia coli O55:B5, Cat#: L2880, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; stock concentration: 1 mg/mL in PBS), or an equivalent volume of vehicle control, PBS, for 24 hours. Subsequently, allogeneic mitochondria (100 µg/mL) or an equal volume of mitochondria isolation buffer were added to the cultures and incubated for an additional 24 hours. Following this incubation, all cultures were subjected to further analyses.

2.7 Cell Viability Assay

Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (Cat#: ALX-850-039, Enzo Life Sciences, Long Island, NY, USA). PC-12 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 10,000 cells per well and subjected to the designated treatments. Subsequently, 10 µL of Cell Counting Kit-8 reagent was added to each well containing 90 µL of culture medium. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 1 hour, after which the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Model: SpectraMax iD5, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Cell viability was determined as a percentage of the untreated vehicle control group and reported accordingly.

2.8 JC-1 Staining

A commercial JC-1 assay kit (Cat#: 10009172, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to assess the mitochondrial membrane potential in PC-12 cells. Following the LPS and mitochondria treatments, JC-1 staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 24 hours after the initiation of allogenic mitochondrial treatment, the culture medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium containing 1% JC-1 stock solution. After incubating at 37 °C for 30 minutes, the cultures were washed with the provided JC-1 buffer and prepared for further analysis. Fluorescence intensities were measured using a fluorescence plate reader (Model: SpectraMax iD5, Molecular Devices) at Ex/Em: 535/595 nm (red) and Ex/Em: 485/535 nm (green). The red-to-green fluorescence intensity ratio was calculated and presented. For imaging, PC-12 cells were seeded in 8-well chamber slides, treated, and stained with JC-1 under identical conditions. Fluorescent images were captured using a fluorescence microscope system (Model: Axiovert 5 digital, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a digital camera.

2.9 Statistical Analysis

Numerical data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism software (v 10.4.0, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. The normality of each dataset was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Since all data groups passed the normality test, parametric analyses were used in this study. Differences between more than two independent groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Designs involving two independent variables were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test when the main effects or interactions were significant.

3. Results

3.1 Characterization of the Size and Abundance of Mitochondria Isolated From RSM, MSM, and WSM

We collected various muscle types from rats, including samples of the RSM (soleus), MSM (pectoralis major and rectus abdominis), and WSM (biceps brachii and gastrocnemius) (Fig. 1A), from which mitochondria were isolated. NTA analysis revealed that the average mitochondrial size decreased in the order of WSM, MSM, and RSM, with soleus-derived mitochondria exhibiting the smallest size (Fig. 1B). Additionally, RSM exhibited a significantly higher mitochondrial abundance compared to WSM and MSM (Fig. 1C), while the numbers of mitochondria isolated from WSM and MSM were comparable (Fig. 1C).

3.2 Comparisons of Respiratory Chain Complex Activities and ATP Content in Mitochondria Isolated From the RSM, MSM, and WSM

Given the pivotal role of the oxidative phosphorylation complexes in mitochondrial functionality and cellular energy metabolism, we examined how the muscle origin influences the activity of complexes I, II, and IV within isolated mitochondria. These analyses revealed that the activity of complex I in mitochondria isolated from RSM was higher than that observed in the mitochondria isolated from MSM and WSM (Fig. 2A). Regarding complex II activity, a relative decrease was noted in mitochondria isolated from biceps brachii, one of the selected WSM (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the activity of complex IV (Fig. 2C) and the ATP content (Fig. 2D) of mitochondria from all selected muscle tissues were similar. These findings collectively suggest that mitochondria isolated from RSM exhibit superior respiratory chain activity.

3.3 Comparison of Protective Effects of Mitochondria Isolated From the RSM, MSM, and WSM on LPS-Induced Cell Death and Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Loss in Neuronal Cells

Based on our previous findings that transplanted mitochondria can mitigate inflammagen-induced inflammation in primary DRG neurons [3], we subsequently examined the protective effects of mitochondria from different muscle types against LPS-induced cell death and mitochondrial membrane potential disruption in PC-12 neuronal cells. Sixteen hours after seeding, cultures were treated with 5 µg/mL LPS, or an equivalent volume of vehicle control for 24 hours. Subsequently, 100 µg/mL allogeneic mitochondria or an equivalent volume of mitochondria isolation buffer was added to the cultures and incubated for another 24 hours. After incubation, the cultures underwent further analyses (Fig. 3A). The results revealed that LPS treatment significantly increased PC-12 cell death across all assays (Fig. 3B–G). Post-treatment with mitochondria derived from RSM (Fig. 3B,G) and WSM (Fig. 3E–G), but not MSM (Fig. 3C,D,G), effectively mitigated LPS-induced damage.

JC-1 staining was employed to evaluate mitochondrial membrane potential. LPS markedly reduced the JC-1 fluorescence red-to-green ratio, a key indicator of mitochondrial membrane potential (Fig. 4). Similar to the cell viability assay results, treatment with mitochondria derived from the RSM (Fig. 4A,B,G) and WSM (Fig. 4A,E–G), but not the MSM (Fig. 4A,C,D), restored mitochondrial membrane potential disrupted by LPS. Unexpectedly, supplementation with allogeneic mitochondria from the soleus (Fig. 4B), rectus abdominis (Fig. 4D), and biceps brachii (Fig. 4E) resulted in a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in LPS-untreated PC-12 cultures. These findings highlight the differential neuroinflammation-protective capacities of mitochondria from distinct muscle types, with RSM and WSM mitochondria effectively mitigating LPS-induced cell death and preserving mitochondrial membrane potential in PC-12 cells. Moreover, the results underscore the dual effects of allogeneic mitochondria supplementation, which may vary depending on the inflammatory state of neuronal cells.

4. Discussion

The present study aimed to determine the optimal skeletal muscle source for mitochondrial isolation in MT. Our findings demonstrated that mitochondria isolated from the RSM were smaller on average compared to those from the WSM and MSM. Furthermore, the RSM contained a significantly higher abundance of mitochondria than the MSM and WSM. Functionally, RSM-derived mitochondria exhibited the highest mitochondrial complex I activity among the three muscle types, whereas mitochondria from the biceps brachii (a selected WSM) showed relatively reduced complex II activity. In contrast, the complex IV activity and ATP content were comparable across all selected muscle tissues. When assessing the potential of allogeneic mitochondria isolated from different muscle types for counteracting neuroinflammation, we observed that mitochondria from the RSM and WSM, but not the MSM, effectively mitigated LPS-induced cell death and preserved mitochondrial membrane potential in PC-12 neuronal cells. Collectively, these results indicate that RSM is the optimal source for mitochondrial isolation when efficiency is evaluated based on the mitochondrial yield from muscles of equivalent weight, independent of wound location. These findings offer valuable insights and establish a foundation for improving mitochondrial therapy by identifying an ideal mitochondrial source to maximize therapeutic outcomes.

Mitochondrial characteristics significantly affect the essential cellular processes. In this study, we found that RSM contained a notably higher proportion of smaller mitochondria and a greater overall mitochondrial count than WSM and MSM. Notably, mitochondrial size was identified as a factor that influences mitochondrial membrane potential [91]. Indeed, it has been reported that an increase in mitochondrial mass or enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential corresponds to a higher rate of transcription and translation per unit volume [92, 93]. Miettinen and Björklund [94] previously proposed that mitochondrial functionality peaks in intermediate-sized cells within a population. Interestingly, the distribution of mitochondria varies among different cellular structures. For example, in neurons, axonal mitochondria tend to be smaller and less abundant, whereas dendritic mitochondria are larger and more densely concentrated [95]. Furthermore, various diseases require different mitochondrial doses. Notably, we advocate offering mitochondria of diverse sizes to meet specific needs, ensuring an optimal selection for mitochondrial applications.

Prior research has indicated that 75% of the variation in cellular translation rates is attributable to mitochondrial activity [94]. While a previous study compared the protein composition of extracted mitochondria from the RSM and WSM, it did not evaluate their quantity or detailed respiratory functions [96]. Within the respiratory chain, complex I serves as the primary entry point, and deficiencies in its function can result in significant bioenergetic deficits and mitochondrial instability. The findings of this study revealed that RSM exhibited significantly higher complex I activity compared to WSM and MSM. Elevated levels of the complex I substrate NADH, likely due to complex I dysfunction, have been associated with the resistance of certain cancer cells to apoptosis [17]. In the mitochondria associated with ischemic heart disease, complex I activity decreases by 25% [27], and treatments, such as continuous MT administration for seven days, are required for toxin-induced liver injury [75]. Regarding complex II activity, the WSM showed a relatively lower activity than the RSM and MSM. Previous research indicates that a high-fat, high-sucrose diet reduces cardiac mitochondrial ATP synthesis and complex II activity [13]. Similarly, Rochester et al. [97] demonstrated reduced activity of succinate dehydrogenase, a component of complex II in the electron transport chain, in the skeletal muscles of individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Conversely, our results revealed no significant differences in complex IV activity across the different muscle types. Complex IV, the final component of the electron transport chain, is directly involved in electron flow. Decreased complex IV activity has been reported in patients with Alzheimer’s disease [6]. Interestingly, reducing complex IV activity in the absence of surfeit locus protein 1, a key assembly protein, has been shown to significantly increase lifespan in mouse models [98]. One of the primary aims of MT is to enhance or restore ATP production in recipient cells, thereby improving energy supply [28]. Protein synthesis and cellular growth rely heavily on mitochondrial ATP generation [93]. Notably, our findings indicated that ATP levels were consistent across the different muscle sources.

Our previous studies have demonstrated that MT exhibits promising therapeutic potential in mitigating neuroinflammation. Among rats with traumatic spinal cord injury, the intraparenchymal administration of 100 µg of allogenic mitochondria significantly reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the injured spinal cord [2]. Furthermore, intra-DRG administration of 100 µg of allogenic mitochondria suppressed glial reactivity and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the spinal cords of rats subjected to spinal nerve ligation [3]. In vitro, mitochondrial supplementation effectively reversed capsaicin-induced inflammation, and restored mitochondrial membrane potential in primary DRG neurons [3]. Building on this, we investigated the differences in the anti-inflammatory properties of mitochondria derived from various muscle tissues. Our findings revealed that mitochondria isolated from the RSM and WSM effectively alleviated LPS-induced cell death, and restored mitochondrial membrane potential in PC-12 cultures, indicating their robust protective effects under inflammatory conditions. However, these protective effects were absent in cultures treated with mitochondria from MSM, highlighting tissue-specific differences in mitochondrial functionality and therapeutic potential. Interestingly, despite comparable respiratory chain complex activity and ATP levels between mitochondria from MSM and WSM, only WSM-derived mitochondria conferred protection against LPS-induced damage. This suggested that their beneficial effects may be mediated by mechanisms beyond mitochondrial respiratory function. Recent studies indicate that mitochondria can release extracellular vesicles, known as mitovesicles, which carry mitochondrial components involved in inflammation-related processes [99, 100, 101]. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the unique protective effects of WSM-derived mitochondria against LPS-induced damage beyond their role in oxidative phosphorylation. Collectively, these results suggest that the RSM and WSM are promising donor tissues for anti-inflammatory applications, potentially due to their unique mitochondrial profiles. Moreover, notably, our study also revealed a dual effect of allogenic mitochondrial supplementation. While RSM- and WSM-derived mitochondria demonstrated clear benefits in LPS-treated cultures, supplementation with mitochondria from the soleus, rectus abdominis, and biceps brachii muscles unexpectedly caused a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in LPS-untreated PC-12 cultures. This paradoxical finding indicates that the impact of allogenic mitochondria may vary depending on the baseline inflammatory state of recipient cells. Such variability underscores the complexity of mitochondrial transplantation as a therapeutic approach, as the benefits of supplementation may not be universal and could differ based on the cellular or tissue environment. Overall, these findings highlight several critical considerations for future clinical applications of MT. First, selecting the appropriate donor tissue may be essential to maximizing therapeutic efficacy. Second, understanding the recipient cell state—particularly whether inflammatory processes are present—will be pivotal in predicting the outcome of mitochondrial supplementation. Finally, further research is required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these tissue-specific and inflammation-dependent effects, as this knowledge could inform strategies to optimize MT protocols for various clinical scenarios.

While this study characterized the functional properties of mitochondria isolated from different muscle sources, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, although our preliminary results indicated that the protein content of isolated mitochondria was comparable across different sources (data not shown), we cannot rule out the possibility that variations in mitochondrial complex activities may be due to differences in their expression levels. Second, based on prior findings that transplanted allogenic mitochondria can mitigate inflammation in animals with traumatic neural injuries, this study focused on comparing the effects of mitochondria from different skeletal muscle types on LPS-induced changes in PC-12 neuronal cells. Since LPS-induced inflammatory responses in vivo are primarily mediated by immune-associated glial cells, such as microglia and astrocytes, we specifically examined LPS effects on cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential in a neuron-only culture system. However, we recognize the need for further investigations into how mitochondria from different skeletal muscle types influence LPS-induced inflammatory responses in animal models. Lastly, we did not examine the structural differences between mitochondria from different sources. Notably, the folds of the mitochondrial inner membrane, known as cristae, house the electron transfer chain complexes responsible for establishing the proton motive force necessary for ATP production. ATP synthase flux is diffusion-limited and influenced by cristae shape and size, with lamellar cristae exhibiting 30–80% higher ATP output than tubular cristae. Future research is needed to explore the internal mitochondrial factors underlying these structural and functional differences among various sources. These limitations should be taken into consideration when interpreting our findings.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the critical influence of mitochondrial source on the efficacy of MT in addressing cellular dysfunction and inflammation. Among the different muscle types examined, RSM emerges as the most promising donor tissue, characterized by its smaller mitochondrial size, higher mitochondrial content, and superior complex I activity. These features likely contribute to its more significant protective effects against LPS-induced cell death and mitochondrial membrane potential disruption in PC-12 neuronal cells. While mitochondria from the WSM also demonstrated protective properties, those from the MSM did not exhibit comparable benefits, underscoring the functional variability of mitochondria based on their tissue of origin. Our findings provide a foundation for optimizing MT strategies by identifying the most effective mitochondrial sources, with RSM offering distinct advantages for therapeutic applications. Future research should further explore the mechanisms driving these tissue-specific differences and assess their implications in preclinical and clinical models of neurological disorders.

References

[1]

Doyle TM, Salvemini D. Mini-Review: Mitochondrial dysfunction and chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. Neuroscience Letters. 2021; 760: 136087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136087.

[2]

Lin MW, Fang SY, Hsu JYC, Huang CY, Lee PH, Huang CC, et al. Mitochondrial Transplantation Attenuates Neural Damage and Improves Locomotor Function After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Rats. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2022; 16: 800883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.800883.

[3]

Huang CC, Chiu HY, Lee PH, Fang SY, Lin MW, Chen HF, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation attenuates traumatic neuropathic pain, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis in rats with nerve root ligation. Molecular Pain. 2023; 19: 17448069231210423. https://doi.org/10.1177/17448069231210423.

[4]

Monzio Compagnoni G, Di Fonzo A, Corti S, Comi GP, Bresolin N, Masliah E. The Role of Mitochondria in Neurodegenerative Diseases: the Lesson from Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. Molecular Neurobiology. 2020; 57: 2959–2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-01926-1.

[5]

DuBoff B, Feany M, Götz J. Why size matters - balancing mitochondrial dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends in Neurosciences. 2013; 36: 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.002.

[6]

Yan SD, Stern DM. Mitochondrial dysfunction and Alzheimer’s disease: role of amyloid-beta peptide alcohol dehydrogenase (ABAD). International Journal of Experimental Pathology. 2005; 86: 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0959-9673.2005.00427.x.

[7]

Alexander JF, Seua AV, Arroyo LD, Ray PR, Wangzhou A, Heiβ-Lückemann L, et al. Nasal administration of mitochondria reverses chemotherapy-induced cognitive deficits. Theranostics. 2021; 11: 3109–3130. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.53474.

[8]

Zhang Z, Wei D, Li Z, Guo H, Wu Y, Feng J. Hippocampal Mitochondrial Transplantation Alleviates Age-Associated Cognitive Decline via Enhancing Wnt Signaling and Neurogenesis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2022; 2022: 9325302. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9325302.

[9]

Shi X, Zhao M, Fu C, Fu A. Intravenous administration of mitochondria for treating experimental Parkinson’s disease. Mitochondrion. 2017; 34: 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2017.02.005.

[10]

Chang JC, Wu SL, Liu KH, Chen YH, Chuang CS, Cheng FC, et al. Allogeneic/xenogeneic transplantation of peptide-labeled mitochondria in Parkinson’s disease: restoration of mitochondria functions and attenuation of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neurotoxicity. Translational Research: the Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 2016; 170: 40–56.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2015.12.003.

[11]

Urbina-Varela R, Castillo N, Videla LA, Del Campo A. Impact of Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response as New Adaptive Mechanisms Underlying Old Pathologies: Sarcopenia and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21: 7704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207704.

[12]

Bullon P, Newman HN, Battino M. Obesity, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis and chronic periodontitis: a shared pathology via oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction? Periodontology 2000. 2014; 64: 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2012.00455.x.

[13]

Sverdlov AL, Elezaby A, Behring JB, Bachschmid MM, Luptak I, Tu VH, et al. High fat, high sucrose diet causes cardiac mitochondrial dysfunction due in part to oxidative post-translational modification of mitochondrial complex II. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2015; 78: 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.07.018.

[14]

Boland ML, Chourasia AH, Macleod KF. Mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2013; 3:292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00292.

[15]

Chang JC, Chang HS, Wu YC, Cheng WL, Lin TT, Chang HJ, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation regulates antitumour activity, chemoresistance and mitochondrial dynamics in breast cancer. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research: CR. 2019; 38: 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1028-z.

[16]

Celik A, Orfany A, Dearling J, Del Nido PJ, McCully JD, Bakar-Ates F. Mitochondrial transplantation: Effects on chemotherapy in prostate and ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2023; 161: 114524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114524.

[17]

Pelicano H, Xu RH, Du M, Feng L, Sasaki R, Carew JS, et al. Mitochondrial respiration defects in cancer cells cause activation of Akt survival pathway through a redox-mediated mechanism. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2006; 175: 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512100.

[18]

Pieczenik SR, Neustadt J. Mitochondrial dysfunction and molecular pathways of disease. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 2007; 83: 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2006.09.008.

[19]

Carelli V, Ross-Cisneros FN, Sadun AA. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of optic neuropathies. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2004; 23: 53–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2003.10.003.

[20]

Sadoshima J, Kitsis RN, Sciarretta S. Editorial: Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Diseases. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021; 8: 645986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.645986.

[21]

Doulamis IP, Guariento A, Duignan T, Orfany A, Kido T, Zurakowski D, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation for myocardial protection in diabetic hearts. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2020; 57: 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz326.

[22]

Guariento A, Doulamis IP, Duignan T, Kido T, Regan WL, Saeed MY, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation for myocardial protection in ex-situ‒perfused hearts donated after circulatory death. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation: the Official Publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2020; 39: 1279–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2020.06.023.

[23]

Alemany VS, Nomoto R, Saeed MY, Celik A, Regan WL, Matte GS, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation preserves myocardial function and viability in pediatric and neonatal pig hearts donated after circulatory death. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024; 167: e6–e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.010.

[24]

Moskowitzova K, Shin B, Liu K, Ramirez-Barbieri G, Guariento A, Blitzer D, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation prolongs cold ischemia time in murine heart transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation: the Official Publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2019; 38: 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.025.

[25]

Weixler V, Lapusca R, Grangl G, Guariento A, Saeed MY, Cowan DB, et al. Autogenous mitochondria transplantation for treatment of right heart failure. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021; 162: e111–e121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.011.

[26]

Cowan DB, Yao R, Akurathi V, Snay ER, Thedsanamoorthy JK, Zurakowski D, et al. Intracoronary Delivery of Mitochondria to the Ischemic Heart for Cardioprotection. PloS One. 2016; 11: e0160889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160889.

[27]

Paradies G, Petrosillo G, Pistolese M, Di Venosa N, Federici A, Ruggiero FM. Decrease in mitochondrial complex I activity in ischemic/reperfused rat heart: involvement of reactive oxygen species and cardiolipin. Circulation Research. 2004; 94: 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000109416.56608.64.

[28]

Masuzawa A, Black KM, Pacak CA, Ericsson M, Barnett RJ, Drumm C, et al. Transplantation of autologously derived mitochondria protects the heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2013; 304: H966–H982. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00883.2012.

[29]

Sedlackova L, Korolchuk VI. Mitochondrial quality control as a key determinant of cell survival. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Cell Research. 2019; 1866: 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.12.012.

[30]

Guo C, Sun L, Chen X, Zhang D. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regeneration Research. 2013; 8: 2003–2014. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.21.009.

[31]

Chen W, Zhao H, Li Y. Mitochondrial dynamics in health and disease: mechanisms and potential targets. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2023; 8: 333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01547-9.

[32]

Lu Y, Li Z, Zhang S, Zhang T, Liu Y, Zhang L. Cellular mitophagy: Mechanism, roles in diseases and small molecule pharmacological regulation. Theranostics. 2023; 13: 736–766. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.79876.

[33]

Singh A, Faccenda D, Campanella M. Pharmacological advances in mitochondrial therapy. EBioMedicine. 2021; 65: 103244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103244.

[34]

Miliotou AN, Foltopoulou PF, Ingendoh-Tsakmakidis A, Tsiftsoglou AS, Vizirianakis IS, Pappas IS, et al. Protein Transduction Domain-Mediated Delivery of Recombinant Proteins and In Vitro Transcribed mRNAs for Protein Replacement Therapy of Human Severe Genetic Mitochondrial Disorders: The Case of Sco2 Deficiency. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15: 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010286.

[35]

Ocana-Santero G, Díaz-Nido J, Herranz-Martín S. Future Prospects of Gene Therapy for Friedreich’s Ataxia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 1815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041815.

[36]

Chatre L, Verdonk F, Rocheteau P, Crochemore C, Chrétien F, Ricchetti M. A novel paradigm links mitochondrial dysfunction with muscle stem cell impairment in sepsis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Basis of Disease. 2017; 1863: 2546–2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.04.019.

[37]

Tan YL, Eng SP, Hafez P, Abdul Karim N, Law JX, Ng MH. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Mitochondrial Transfer as a Cell Rescue Strategy in Regenerative Medicine: A Review of Evidence in Preclinical Models. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2022; 11: 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szac044.

[38]

Gollihue JL, Patel SP, Eldahan KC, Cox DH, Donahue RR, Taylor BK, et al. Effects of Mitochondrial Transplantation on Bioenergetics, Cellular Incorporation, and Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2018; 35: 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5605.

[39]

Li Y, Wang Y, Yang W, Wu Z, Ma D, Sun J, et al. ROS-responsive exogenous functional mitochondria can rescue neural cells post-ischemic stroke. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2023; 11: 1207748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1207748.

[40]

Wu HC, Fan X, Hu CH, Chao YC, Liu CS, Chang JC, et al. Comparison of mitochondrial transplantation by using a stamp-type multineedle injector and platelet-rich plasma therapy for hair aging in naturally aging mice. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie. 2020; 130: 110520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110520.

[41]

Nascimento-Dos-Santos G, de-Souza-Ferreira E, Lani R, Faria CC, Araújo VG, Teixeira-Pinheiro LC, et al. Neuroprotection from optic nerve injury and modulation of oxidative metabolism by transplantation of active mitochondria to the retina. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Basis of Disease. 2020; 1866: 165686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165686.

[42]

Zhao J, Qu D, Xi Z, Huan Y, Zhang K, Yu C, et al. Mitochondria transplantation protects traumatic brain injury via promoting neuronal survival and astrocytic BDNF. Translational Research: the Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 2021; 235: 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2021.03.017.

[43]

Moskowitzova K, Orfany A, Liu K, Ramirez-Barbieri G, Thedsanamoorthy JK, Yao R, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation enhances murine lung viability and recovery after ischemia-reperfusion injury. American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2020; 318: L78–L88. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00221.2019.

[44]

Hsu CH, Roan JN, Fang SY, Chiu MH, Cheng TT, Huang CC, et al. Transplantation of viable mitochondria improves right ventricular performance and pulmonary artery remodeling in rats with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2022; 163: e361–e373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.014.

[45]

Yan C, Ma Z, Ma H, Li Q, Zhai Q, Jiang T, et al. Mitochondrial Transplantation Attenuates Brain Dysfunction in Sepsis by Driving Microglial M2 Polarization. Molecular Neurobiology. 2020; 57: 3875–3890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-01994-3.

[46]

Fang SY, Roan JN, Lee JS, Chiu MH, Lin MW, Liu CC, et al. Transplantation of viable mitochondria attenuates neurologic injury after spinal cord ischemia. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021; 161: e337–e347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.151.

[47]

Shin B, Saeed MY, Esch JJ, Guariento A, Blitzer D, Moskowitzova K, et al. A Novel Biological Strategy for Myocardial Protection by Intracoronary Delivery of Mitochondria: Safety and Efficacy. JACC. Basic to Translational Science. 2019; 4: 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.08.007.

[48]

Emani SM, Piekarski BL, Harrild D, Del Nido PJ, McCully JD. Autologous mitochondrial transplantation for dysfunction after ischemia-reperfusion injury. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017; 154: 286–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.018.

[49]

Guariento A, Piekarski BL, Doulamis IP, Blitzer D, Ferraro AM, Harrild DM, et al. Autologous mitochondrial transplantation for cardiogenic shock in pediatric patients following ischemia-reperfusion injury. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021; 162: 992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.151.

[50]

Blitzer D, Guariento A, Doulamis IP, Shin B, Moskowitzova K, Barbieri GR, et al. Delayed Transplantation of Autologous Mitochondria for Cardioprotection in a Porcine Model. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2020; 109: 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.075.

[51]

Orfany A, Arriola CG, Doulamis IP, Guariento A, Ramirez-Barbieri G, Moskowitzova K, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation ameliorates acute limb ischemia. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2020; 71: 1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.079.

[52]

Pang YL, Fang SY, Cheng TT, Huang CC, Lin MW, Lam CF, et al. Viable Allogeneic Mitochondria Transplantation Improves Gas Exchange and Alveolar-Capillary Permeability in Rats with Endotoxin-Induced Acute Lung Injuries. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022; 19: 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.73151.

[53]

Rossi A, Asthana A, Riganti C, Sedrakyan S, Byers LN, Robertson J, et al. Mitochondria Transplantation Mitigates Damage in an In Vitro Model of Renal Tubular Injury and in an Ex Vivo Model of DCD Renal Transplantation. Annals of Surgery. 2023; 278: e1313–e1326. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006005.

[54]

Doulamis IP, Guariento A, Duignan T, Kido T, Orfany A, Saeed MY, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation by intra-arterial injection for acute kidney injury. American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology. 2020; 319: F403–F413. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00255.2020.

[55]

Jabbari H, Roushandeh AM, Rostami MK, Razavi-Toosi MT, Shokrgozar MA, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation ameliorates ischemia/reperfusion-induced kidney injury in rat. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Basis of Disease. 2020; 1866: 165809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165809.

[56]

Lee JM, Hwang JW, Kim MJ, Jung SY, Kim KS, Ahn EH, et al. Mitochondrial Transplantation Modulates Inflammation and Apoptosis, Alleviating Tendinopathy Both In Vivo and In Vitro. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2021; 10: 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10050696.

[57]

Hwang JW, Lee MJ, Chung TN, Lee HAR, Lee JH, Choi SY, et al. The immune modulatory effects of mitochondrial transplantation on cecal slurry model in rat. Critical Care (London, England). 2021; 25: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03436-x.

[58]

Ma H, Jiang T, Tang W, Ma Z, Pu K, Xu F, et al. Transplantation of platelet-derived mitochondria alleviates cognitive impairment and mitochondrial dysfunction in db/db mice. Clinical Science (London, England: 1979). 2020; 134: 2161–2175. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20200530.

[59]

Zhao Z, Yu Z, Hou Y, Zhang L, Fu A. Improvement of cognitive and motor performance with mitotherapy in aged mice. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2020; 16: 849–858. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.40886.

[60]

Bamshad C, Habibi Roudkenar M, Abedinzade M, Yousefzadeh Chabok S, Pourmohammadi-Bejarpasi Z, Najafi-Ghalehlou N, et al. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells-harvested mitochondrial transplantation improved motor function in TBI models through rescuing neuronal cells from apoptosis and alleviating astrogliosis and microglia activation. International Immunopharmacology. 2023; 118: 110106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110106.

[61]

Jia X, Wang Q, Ji J, Lu W, Liu Z, Tian H, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation ameliorates hippocampal damage following status epilepticus. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine. 2023; 6: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12310.

[62]

Javani G, Ghaffari-Nasab A, Farajdokht F, Mohaddes G. Chronic stress-induced apoptosis is mitigated by young mitochondria transplantation in the prefrontal cortex of aged rats. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2023; 26: 725–730. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJBMS.2023.69551.15145.

[63]

Javani G, Babri S, Farajdokht F, Ghaffari-Nasab A, Mohaddes G. Mitochondrial transplantation improves anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in aged stress-exposed rats. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2022; 202: 111632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2022.111632.

[64]

Wang Y, Ni J, Gao C, Xie L, Zhai L, Cui G, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation attenuates lipopolysaccharide- induced depression-like behaviors. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. 2019; 93: 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.04.010.

[65]

Ene HM, Karry R, Farfara D, Ben-Shachar D. Mitochondria play an essential role in the trajectory of adolescent neurodevelopment and behavior in adulthood: evidence from a schizophrenia rat model. Molecular Psychiatry. 2023; 28: 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01865-4.

[66]

Yang X, Zhou P, Zhao Z, Li J, Fan Z, Li X, et al. Improvement Effect of Mitotherapy on the Cognitive Ability of Alzheimer’s Disease through NAD+/SIRT1-Mediated Autophagy. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2023; 12: 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12112006.

[67]

Bobkova NV, Zhdanova DY, Belosludtseva NV, Penkov NV, Mironova GD. Intranasal administration of mitochondria improves spatial memory in olfactory bulbectomized mice. Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.). 2022; 247: 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702211056866.

[68]

Alway SE, Paez HG, Pitzer CR, Ferrandi PJ, Khan MM, Mohamed JS, et al. Mitochondria transplant therapy improves regeneration and restoration of injured skeletal muscle. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 2023; 14: 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13153.

[69]

Zhu Z, Li X, Wang X, Zuo X, Ma Y, Gao X, et al. Photobiomodulation augments the effects of mitochondrial transplantation in the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats by facilitating mitochondrial transfer to neurons via Connexin 36. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine. 2022; 8: e10473. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10473.

[70]

Sun X, Chen H, Gao R, Qu Y, Huang Y, Zhang N, et al. Intravenous Transplantation of an Ischemic-specific Peptide-TPP-mitochondrial Compound Alleviates Myocardial Ischemic Reperfusion Injury. ACS Nano. 2023; 17: 896–909. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c05286. (online ahead of print)

[71]

Sun X, Chen H, Gao R, Huang Y, Qu Y, Yang H, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation ameliorates doxorubicin-induced cardiac dysfunction via activating glutamine metabolism. iScience. 2023; 26: 107790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107790.

[72]

Zeng J, Liu J, Ni H, Zhang L, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Mitochondrial transplantation reduces lower limb ischemia-reperfusion injury by increasing skeletal muscle energy and adipocyte browning. Molecular Therapy. Methods & Clinical Development. 2023; 31: 101152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.101152.

[73]

Islam MN, Das SR, Emin MT, Wei M, Sun L, Westphalen K, et al. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nature Medicine. 2012; 18: 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2736.

[74]

Cloer CM, Givens CS, Buie LK, Rochelle LK, Lin YT, Popa S, et al. Mitochondrial transplant after ischemia reperfusion promotes cellular salvage and improves lung function during ex-vivo lung perfusion. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation: the Official Publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2023; 42: 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2023.01.002.

[75]

Zhao Z, Hou Y, Zhou W, Keerthiga R, Fu A. Mitochondrial transplantation therapy inhibit carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury through scavenging free radicals and protecting hepatocytes. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine. 2020; 6: e10209. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10209.

[76]

Pang YL, Fang SY, Huang CC, Lin MW, Roan JN, Tsai KJ, et al. Transplantation of viable allogeneic mitochondria protects kidney function in a mouse model of haemorrhagic shock and rhabdomyolysis-induced acute renal injury. Shock (Augusta, Ga.). 2025; 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002579. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002579.

[77]

Kim MJ, Lee JM, Min K, Choi YS. Xenogeneic transplantation of mitochondria induces muscle regeneration in an in vivo rat model of dexamethasone-induced atrophy. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 2024; 45: 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-023-09643-7.

[78]

Cassano JM, Marycz K, Horna M, Nogues MP, Morgan JM, Herrmann DB, et al. Evaluating the Safety of Intra-Articular Mitotherapy in the Equine Model: A Potential Novel Treatment for Osteoarthritis. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2023; 120: 104164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104164.

[79]

Yu Z, Hou Y, Zhou W, Zhao Z, Liu Z, Fu A. The effect of mitochondrial transplantation therapy from different gender on inhibiting cell proliferation of malignant melanoma. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021; 17: 2021–2033. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.59581.

[80]

Patananan AN, Sercel AJ, Wu TH, Ahsan FM, Torres A, Jr, Kennedy SAL, et al. Pressure-Driven Mitochondrial Transfer Pipeline Generates Mammalian Cells of Desired Genetic Combinations and Fates. Cell Reports. 2020; 33: 108562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108562.

[81]

Nakamura Y, Park JH, Hayakawa K. Therapeutic use of extracellular mitochondria in CNS injury and disease. Experimental Neurology. 2020; 324: 113114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113114.

[82]

Gan Z, Fu T, Kelly DP, Vega RB. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial remodeling in exercise and diseases. Cell Research. 2018; 28: 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0078-7.

[83]

Relaix F, Zammit PS. Satellite cells are essential for skeletal muscle regeneration: the cell on the edge returns centre stage. Development (Cambridge, England). 2012; 139: 2845–2856. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.069088.

[84]

Zhang Z, Ma Z, Yan C, Pu K, Wu M, Bai J, et al. Muscle-derived autologous mitochondrial transplantation: A novel strategy for treating cerebral ischemic injury. Behavioural Brain Research. 2019; 356: 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.09.005.

[85]

Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiological Reviews. 2011; 91: 1447–1531. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2010.

[86]

Ogata T. Structure of motor endplates in the different fiber types of vertebrate skeletal muscles. Archives of Histology and Cytology. 1988; 51: 385–424. https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc.51.385.

[87]

Franzini-Armstrong C, Peachey LD. Striated muscle-contractile and control mechanisms. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1981; 91: 166s–186s. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.91.3.166s.

[88]

Vitorino R, Ferreira R, Neuparth M, Guedes S, Williams J, Tomer KB, et al. Subcellular proteomics of mice gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Analytical Biochemistry. 2007; 366: 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2007.04.009.

[89]

Klein CS, Marsh GD, Petrella RJ, Rice CL. Muscle fiber number in the biceps brachii muscle of young and old men. Muscle & Nerve. 2003; 28: 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10386.

[90]

Lovering RM, Anderson LD. Architecture and fiber type of the pyramidalis muscle. Anatomical Science International. 2008; 83: 294–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00226.x.

[91]

Chen H, Chomyn A, Chan DC. Disruption of fusion results in mitochondrial heterogeneity and dysfunction. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005; 280: 26185–26192. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M503062200.

[92]

das Neves RP, Jones NS, Andreu L, Gupta R, Enver T, Iborra FJ. Connecting variability in global transcription rate to mitochondrial variability. PLoS Biology. 2010; 8: e1000560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000560.

[93]

Guantes R, Rastrojo A, Neves R, Lima A, Aguado B, Iborra FJ. Global variability in gene expression and alternative splicing is modulated by mitochondrial content. Genome Research. 2015; 25: 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.178426.114.

[94]

Miettinen TP, Björklund M. Cellular Allometry of Mitochondrial Functionality Establishes the Optimal Cell Size. Developmental Cell. 2016; 39: 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.09.004.

[95]

Seager R, Lee L, Henley JM, Wilkinson KA. Mechanisms and roles of mitochondrial localisation and dynamics in neuronal function. Neuronal Signaling. 2020; 4: NS20200008. https://doi.org/10.1042/NS20200008.

[96]

Glancy B, Balaban RS. Protein composition and function of red and white skeletal muscle mitochondria. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 2011; 300: C1280–90. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00496.2010.

[97]

Rochester L, Barron MJ, Chandler CS, Sutton RA, Miller S, Johnson MA. Influence of electrical stimulation of the tibialis anterior muscle in paraplegic subjects. 2. Morphological and histochemical properties. Paraplegia. 1995; 33: 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.112.

[98]

Dell’agnello C, Leo S, Agostino A, Szabadkai G, Tiveron C, Zulian A, et al. Increased longevity and refractoriness to Ca(2+)-dependent neurodegeneration in Surf1 knockout mice. Human Molecular Genetics. 2007; 16: 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl477.

[99]

Fan L, Yao L, Li Z, Wan Z, Sun W, Qiu S, et al. Exosome-Based Mitochondrial Delivery of circRNA mSCAR Alleviates Sepsis by Orchestrating Macrophage Activation. Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). 2023; 10: e2205692. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202205692.

[100]

Konaka H, Kato Y, Hirano T, Tsujimoto K, Park J, Koba T, et al. Secretion of mitochondrial DNA via exosomes promotes inflammation in Behçet’s syndrome. The EMBO Journal. 2023; 42: e112573. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112573.

[101]

Guerra F, Ponziani FR, Cardone F, Bucci C, Marzetti E, Picca A. Mitochondria-Derived Vesicles, Sterile Inflammation, and Pyroptosis in Liver Cancer: Partners in Crime or Innocent Bystanders? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25: 4783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094783.

Funding

Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation)(RD-113010)

Chiayi Christian Hospital(R113-032)

PDF (5486KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/