The Role of m6A Modification in Regulating MSC Differentiation and Immunomodulation: Implications for Regenerative Medicine and Therapeutic Applications

Junhui Zhao , Xiaoyun Zhang , Yanhui Wang , Yu Zeng , Hongliang Sun , Xiaodong Cui

Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9) : 36475

PDF (3150KB)
Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9) :36475 DOI: 10.31083/FBL36475
Review
review-article
The Role of m6A Modification in Regulating MSC Differentiation and Immunomodulation: Implications for Regenerative Medicine and Therapeutic Applications
Author information +
History +
PDF (3150KB)

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely utilized in tissue repair, anti-inflammatory treatment, and cell therapy due to their remarkable multidirectional differentiation potential, immunosuppressive capabilities, and low immunogenicity. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying their functions are intricate, and epigenetic modifications are a significant contributing factor. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification affects the proliferation, differentiation, and immunomodulation of MSCs by regulating the stability, transport, and translation of RNA. Studies have shown that m6A modification promotes osteogenic differentiation through the bone morphogehetic protein/small mothers against decapentaplegic (BMP/Smad) and wingless-related integration site/β-catenin (Wnt/β-catenin) pathways. It also enhances the anti-inflammatory effect of MSCs by modulating immune cell polarization and the release of inflammatory mediators. Moreover, exosomes secreted by MSCs contribute to immunomodulation and the response to cancer treatment by regulating the m6A modification of genes in target cells. “Writers” of m6A, such as methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) and METTL14, and “erasers”, such as fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5), are crucial in regulating the functions of MSCs. Targeting m6A modification via the clinical application of MSCs may represent a new cancer treatment strategy. Therefore, a comprehensive investigation of the m6A regulatory mechanism is essential. This review provides theoretical and technical support for the clinical use of MSCs, facilitating the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

m6A / mesenchymal stem cells / differentiation / immunity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Junhui Zhao, Xiaoyun Zhang, Yanhui Wang, Yu Zeng, Hongliang Sun, Xiaodong Cui. The Role of m6A Modification in Regulating MSC Differentiation and Immunomodulation: Implications for Regenerative Medicine and Therapeutic Applications. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2025, 30(9): 36475 DOI:10.31083/FBL36475

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are adult stem cells. They have multidirectional differentiation potential and self-renewal ability and are widely distributed in various tissues such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, and the umbilical cord [1, 2, 3]. MSCs show promising applications in tissue regeneration, immunomodulation, and cell therapy due to their excellent immunomodulatory ability, low immunogenicity, and multilineage differentiation potential [4]. However, the maintenance of the medicinal effects of MSCs represents a highly intricate and arduous subject area, and epigenetic modification may be a significant regulatory factor in this context.

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification is crucial in posttranscriptional regulation [5]. It affects RNA stability, transport, splicing, and translation efficiency [6]. Additionally, many scientific studies have shown its importance in the proliferation, differentiation, and immunomodulation of MSCs. For instance, m6A modulates the osteogenic potential of MSCs by regulating key signaling pathways, such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) and wingless-related integration site/β-catenin (Wnt/β-catenin) pathways [7, 8]. Furthermore, m6A modification increases the anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory capacity of MSCs by modulating the expression of inflammatory factors and macrophage polarization [9, 10, 11]. Specifically, the m6A modification affects the interaction between MSCs and macrophages, promoting the conversion of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages into anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, thereby creating a microenvironment more conducive to tissue regeneration [12]. Concurrently, alterations in the microenvironment serve to modulate MSC function, thereby enabling bidirectional regulation and interaction with immune cells [13]. In addition, in MSCs, m6A modification can regulate the tumor microenvironment; specifically, it can enhance cancer cell stemness and drug resistance by reprogramming MSCs to a pro-oncogenic phenotype [14]. These findings provide an invaluable theoretical foundation for elucidating the impact of m6A modifications on the regulation of the immune and tumor microenvironments by MSCs.

m6A modification is a dynamic and reversible process coordinated by multiple proteins. “Writers” like methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) and METTL14 recognize specific RNA sequences and catalyze adenine methylation. “Readers” such as YTH domain-containing family protein 1 (YTHDF1) and YTHDF2 bind to m6A sites, regulating RNA stability, splicing, and translation. “Erasers” including fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) remove methyl groups via demethylation, maintaining m6A modification balance and fine-tuning gene expression [15]. METTL3 has been demonstrated to promote osteogenic differentiation and inhibit adipogenic differentiation. Conversely, the deletion of the demethylase ALKBH5 has been shown to significantly enhance self-renewal in MSCs [16, 17]. These research findings suggest that elevating the level of m6A modification by modulating the m6A regulatory mechanism can efficaciously regulate the multidirectional differentiation potential of MSCs, thereby offering novel insights and strategies for regenerative therapies leveraging MSCs. A thorough exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying m6A modification, as well as the methodologies for enhancing the efficacy of MSC-based clinical treatments through the targeting of m6A regulatory factors, will represent a significant research avenue. This study is designed to systematically investigate the role of m6A modifications in regulating MSC functions, thereby providing valuable theoretical understandings and technical assistance for the application of MSCs in the field of regenerative medicine.

2. m6A Modification Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of MSCs

Owing to their strong osteogenic potential, MSCs hold significant promise as a treatment for orthopedic conditions such as osteoporosis, periodontitis, bone defects, and fractures [18, 19, 20]. Accordingly, exploring therapeutic targets by targeting the mechanisms that promote and inhibit the osteogenic differentiation capacity of MSCs can effectively enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs [21]. m6A modifications are common post-transcriptional modifications that not only affect a variety of biological processes such as cellular inflammation, apoptosis, autophagy, senescence, and iron death but also regulate cellular differentiation and transdifferentiation, which in turn are involved in disease progression [22, 23, 24, 25]. Consequently, targeting m6A regulators enables the modulation of the level of epigenetic m6A modifications in vivo and in vitro through the utilization of agonists, inhibitors, or gene silencing and overexpression techniques, thereby influencing cellular function and disease progression [26, 27]. Recent study has found that the osteogenic differentiation process in MSCs is associated with m6A modification. m6A modification promotes osteogenic differentiation and inhibits adipogenic differentiation in MSCs [9]. These findings provide new ideas for enhancing the potential value of MSCs in treating skeletal diseases at the level of m6A modification.

2.1 Regulating Cell Aging, Autophagy and Angiogenesis

Age-associated osteoporosis (OP) is a disorder typified by the cellular senescence of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) resulting from the accrual of oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction [28]. The senescence of BMSCs not only exacerbates local inflammation but also disrupts the balance of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs, leading to the progression of age-related skeletal diseases [29]. The current therapeutic approach for OP is primarily focused on the utilization of antidepressant and anabolic agents. The current therapeutic approach for OP is focused primarily on the utilization of antidepressant and anabolic agents. Although these drugs promote bone formation, they also present a number of potential adverse side effects, such as fever, nausea, bone pain, and even the possibility of carcinogenesis [30]. Consequently, the osteogenic potential of BMSCs can be augmented by alleviating their senescence. Research has demonstrated that the antioxidant quercetin mitigates oxidative stress in orofacial mesenchymal stem cells (OMSCs) through the promotion of Per1 m6A modification, thus reducing cellular aging, enhancing the expression of osteogenic genes, and facilitating periodontal tissue regeneration [31]. Knockdown of METTL3 reduces the m6A modification of the critical cell cycle regulator Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) in dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), leading to senescence and apoptosis [32]. Thus, targeting METTL3 in DPSCs may inhibit cellular aging and serve as a therapeutic strategy for periodontitis. Additionally, MSC senescence is closely associated with the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) [33]. In MSCs, ALKBH5 promotes the degradation of cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily B member 1 (CYP1B1) mRNA via m6A demethylation, thereby alleviating mitochondrial dysfunction and attenuating mesenchymal stem cell senescence and osteoarthritis progression [17].

Autophagy is a protective mechanism that prevents apoptosis [34]. The development of skeletal diseases is often accompanied by impaired autophagy, resulting in defective osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs [35]. Research has shown that METTL14 promotes the m6A modification of beclin-1 mRNA; insulin-like growth factor 2 binding protein (IGF2BP) reader proteins mediate the increase in beclin-1 expression, thereby inducing autophagy and promoting the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs [36]. Another reader protein, YTHDF1, is highly expressed during the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs, promoting autophagy and cell proliferation and differentiation, thereby accelerating fracture healing [37]. However, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Moreover, MSCs can promote autophagy through paracrine regulation of m6A modification. The initiation of autophagy begins with the activation of the unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) complex, consisting of ULK1, focal adhesion kinase family-interacting protein of 200 kDa (FIP200), and autophagy-related protein 13 (ATG13) [38]. Loss of FIP200 disrupts ULK1 phosphorylation and stability, thereby inhibiting autophagy induction [39, 40]. In cocultured nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) with BMSCs, ALKBH5 facilitates the demethylation of FIP200 mRNA and, through the reader protein YTHDF2, suppresses FIP200 mRNA degradation. This increase in autophagy helps prevent apoptosis, indicating that BMSC injections can be used as a therapeutic strategy for intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) [41].

During bone formation, osteogenesis is closely intertwined with angiogenesis, a process essential for bone tissue regeneration [42]. BMSCs contribute to neovascularization by differentiating into endothelial cells and promoting local angiogenesis via the secretion of factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin [43]. Knockdown of METTL3 in BMSCs reduces VEGF expression, impairing the angiogenic potential of these cells [44]. Conversely, overexpression of METTL3 and METTL14 upregulates VEGF-A via m6A modification, enhancing osteogenesis and angiogenesis [45]. In addition to their role in bone formation, MSCs play pivotal roles in various other tissue repair processes. For example, METTL3, in conjunction with insulin-like growth factor 2 binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2), facilitates the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) from adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), thereby inducing the formation of lymphatic vessels and accelerating wound healing in diabetic mice [46]. Although various miRNAs in MSC-derived exosomes have been identified as regulators of angiogenic factors, the specific role of m6A modification in the formation and secretion of these exosomes is unclear [47].

2.2 Activating the Osteogenic Signaling Pathway

BMSCs can differentiate into osteoblastic (OB) cells under certain conditions [21]. Osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs involves a variety of signaling pathways, mainly including bone morphogehetic protein/small mothers against decapentaplegic (BMP/Smad) [48], Wnt/β-catenin [49], parathyroid hormone (PTH) [50], PI3K-AKT [51], and JAK/STAT [52]. These signaling pathways interact and work in synergy to regulate OB differentiation and bone formation through the direct or indirect actions of key transcription factors such as Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), Osterix (Osx), β-catenin, Smads, and osteopontin (Opn) [21, 53]. Conversely, sclerostin (SOST) is a negative regulator of osteoblast-specific expression [54]. PTH and oestrogen inhibit SOST expression, whereas the transcription factors Osterix and RUNX2 promote SOST expression, which ultimately prevents BMP and Wnt signaling by binding to BMP type I or II receptors and Wnt co-receptor low-density lipoprotein-related protein 5/6 (Wnt co-receptor LRP5/6) [55]. Mutations in the SOST gene are linked to conditions such as sclerosteosis, Van Buchem disease and osteoporosis [56]. Research has demonstrated that m6A modification modulates the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by regulating various signaling pathways [9, 57]. The following schematic shows a summary of how m6A regulatory factors are involved in various pathways and mechanisms (Fig. 1).

2.3 Regulation of Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs)

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small noncoding RNAs, play crucial roles in the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by regulating gene expression [58]. Different miRNAs exert varying effects on MSC osteogenic differentiation. For example, miR-21 targets the PI3K/β-catenin pathway to promote MSC osteogenesis [59], whereas miR-133 and miR-135 negatively regulate osteogenesis by targeting RUNX2 and Smad5 [60]. Increasing evidence indicates that m6A modification influences the regulatory capacity of miRNAs in MSC osteogenesis by affecting miRNA activity. For instance, Wilms’ tumor-associated protein (WTAP) enhances the m6A modification of miR-29b-3p, which activates histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4), promoting BMSC osteogenesis [61].

m6A modification not only acts directly on miRNAs but also regulates MSC osteogenesis by influencing the processing of primary miRNAs (pri-miR) [62]. For instance, WTAP promotes the maturation of pri-miR-181a and pri-miR-181c, while METTL3 inhibits the maturation of pri-miR-320, promoting BMSC osteogenesis [63, 64]. Additionally, METTL14 fosters the maturation of pri-miR-873, inhibiting BMSC proliferation [62]. Furthermore, METTL3 in stem cells of the apical papilla (SCAPs) has been demonstrated to promote osteogenic differentiation of SCAPs by inhibiting the maturation of miR-196b-5p through binding to DiGeorge syndrome critical region 8 protein (DGCR8) [65].

Recent studies have also revealed interactions between miRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). LncRNAs have been demonstrated to impact miRNA regulation of osteogenic differentiation in MSCs. For example, the lncRNA H19 acts as a sponge to absorb miR-141, weakening its ability to inhibit β-catenin and promote osteogenesis [66]. The interaction between lncRNAs and miRNAs is also regulated by m6A modification. For example, METTL3-mediated m6A modification of the lncRNA MIR99AHG promotes BMSC-mediated osteogenesis by targeting miR-4660 [67].

Thus, m6A modification plays a critical role in regulating ncRNA function, inducing diverse osteogenic effects by modulating the expression and activity of ncRNAs. Compared with traditional osteogenic therapies, targeting ncRNAs offers greater specificity, enabling precise bone formation or repair regulation while minimizing systemic side effects [68]. Furthermore, the multitarget nature of ncRNAs, including miRNAs, can increase the therapeutic potential of MSCs [69]. Therefore, studying the impact of m6A modification on miRNA activity may facilitate its application in osteogenic therapies and expand its clinical value in treating bone diseases.

3. m6A Modification Promotes the Chondrogenic Differentiation of MSCs

OA is a degenerative joint disease marked by joint deformity, pain, loss of function, and excessive inflammation, with the knee being the most commonly affected area [70, 71, 72]. Inflammation plays a central role in the onset and progression of OA. Macrophages activate the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich–containing family, pyrin domain–dontaining-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, thereby releasing pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines (such as IL-1β and IL-18). These substances increase the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) in chondrocytes, accelerating the degradation of the cartilage matrix and impairing chondrocyte function [73, 74, 75]. While the SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) regulates the expression of collagen types II, IX, and XI, as well as aggrecan, promoting cartilage repair, with NF-κB modulating the role of SOX9 in chondrogenesis [76, 77, 78].

BMSCs are progressively being recognized as an innovative therapeutic modality for OA. Their principal biological functionalities encompass: (1) The capacity to differentiate into chondrocyte-like cells within the joint milieu, thereby compensating for the impaired chondrocyte function observed during the progression of OA [79]. (2) The ability to mediate therapeutic effects through the secretion of Extracellular Vesicles (EVs), which play a pivotal role in the management of OA [80]. Consequently, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which m6A modifications regulate these biological functions of BMSCs could provide new strategies for OA treatment.

3.1 Chondrogenic Differentiation

BMSCs have the potential to differentiate into chondrocytes, and the key to treating cartilage defects is to enhance their proliferation and differentiation [81]. An investigation has demonstrated that the m6A modification, facilitated by METTL3 and collaborating with the 5-methylcytosine (m5C) modification mediated by NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 4 (Nsun4), promotes the translation of SOX9 by recruiting YTHDF2 and eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 (eEF1α-1), thus enhancing the chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs [82]. Additionally, METTL3 protects the cartilage matrix and promotes the chondrogenic differentiation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells by inhibiting the expression of MMP3, MMP13, and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) [83].

Furthermore, research findings have indicated that collagen hydrogels, which bear resemblance to the natural cartilage matrix, offer a malleable environment conducive to cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. By downregulating FTO and reducing the expression of cytoskeletal recombinant proteins actinin-alpha 1 (ACTN1) and ACTN4, which regulate adhesion and the actin cytoskeletal signaling pathways, collagen hydrogels facilitate the chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs [84]. These findings indicate new opportunities for the use of collagen hydrogels in OA treatment.

3.2 Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles (MSC-EVs) for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis

While mesenchymal stem cell therapy (MSCT) has shown great potential in treating various diseases, challenges such as poor MSC survival, low permeability, and limited blood circulation in bone tissue have hindered its broader application [19]. Consequently, MSCs primarily exert their therapeutic effects through the secretion of cytokines and exosomes rather than through the direct action of the cells themselves [85, 86, 87]. MSC-EVs exhibit inherent targeting properties towards injured tissues and display minimal immunogenicity, thereby mitigating the likelihood of transplant rejection. This renders them exceptionally safe for clinical applications, and they have been investigated as drug-delivery vectors for targeted tissue repair [88].

MSC-EVs are extracellular vesicles that are approximately 40–150 nm in size and contain various bioactive molecules, such as proteins, lipids and RNA, which are key to the therapeutic effects of MSCs [89]. Recent research indicates that m6A modification serves as a downstream effector of MSC-EVs. In this context, MSC-EVs modulate the activity of methyltransferases within recipient cells, subsequently impacting cellular functionalities. For example, human umbilical cord-derived MSC-EVs (hucMSC-EVs) carry miR-1208, which inhibits METTL3 activity in macrophages, reducing the m6A levels of NLRP3 mRNA, alleviating inflammation, and suppressing MMP13 expression in chondrocytes, ultimately slowing the progression of OA in mice [10]. However, BMSC-EVs downregulate METTL3 activity in chondrocytes, promote ACSL4 expression, inhibit ferroptosis, and protect cartilage [90].

Furthermore, MSC-EVs can transport methylation enzymes such as FTO, directly regulating chondrocyte function in an m6A-dependent manner. For example, FTO-overexpressing MSC-derived EVs (FTO-EVs) regulate chondrocyte autophagy and apoptosis in a YTHDF2-dependent manner by upregulating autophagy-related proteins ATG5 and ATG7 while downregulating the pro-apoptotic gene BNIP3, thus triggering autophagy and inhibiting apoptosis, providing a novel therapeutic target for OA treatment [91].

While MSCT involves transplantation, MSC-EVs can be administered via injection, avoiding the complex procedures involved in cell culture and expansion, thereby simplifying the treatment process [92]. Furthermore, MSC-EVs exhibit natural biocompatibility and lower toxicity, with fewer side effects than traditional drug therapies, making them a promising strategy for arthritis treatment and offering new therapeutic options for patients [93, 94]. However, current research on the impact of m6A modification on the formation and secretion of MSC-EVs remains limited, and further development of techniques to regulate the specific cargo within MSC-EVs is needed. Table 1 (Ref. [10, 90, 91]) shows a summary of the therapeutic effects of MSCs-EVs on osteoarthritis.

4. m6A Modification Inhibits the Differentiation of MSCs Into Palmitic Lipids

MSCs are a vital source of adipocytes, and their adipogenic differentiation is also regulated by m6A modification [95], primarily through the ERK1/2 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathways. PPAR-γ, a crucial regulatory factor, governs both adipogenesis and osteogenesis, with its upregulation closely linked to bone loss and increased adipogenic differentiation [96, 97].

FTO has been demonstrated to promote osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by reducing PPAR-γ expression through demethylation. Conversely, FTO has also been shown to inhibit osteogenesis and accelerate adipogenic differentiation by upregulating PPAR-γ through growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11) [98, 99]. Research has indicated that demonstrated that when METTL14 is overexpressed in BMSCs obtained from patients with steroid—associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head, it can promote osteogenic differentiation through the regulation of RUNX2 and PPAR-γ [100], suggesting that METTL14 may serve as an upstream regulator of the FTO-PPAR-γ axis. Furthermore, Insulin-like growth factor 2 binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) augments myosin light chain kinase (MYLK) expression through m6A modification, thereby inhibiting the phosphorylation of the ERK1/2 pathway and consequently impeding MSC adipogenic differentiation [101]. In vivo investigations have demonstrated that the overexpression of IGF2BP3 in MSCs derived from abdominal adipose tissue can lead to a reduction in body weight in mice and ameliorate insulin resistance [102].

In the tumor microenvironment, adipocytes derived from MSCs contribute to tumor growth and drug resistance by accumulating free fatty acids and releasing adipokines [103, 104, 105]. Study has shown that loss of METTL3 promotes MSC adipogenic differentiation by inhibiting the AKT1 signaling pathway, accelerating cancer progression, and increasing resistance to cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [106]. Therefore, targeting m6A modification to regulate the AKT signaling pathway presents a potential strategy for overcoming chemotherapy resistance in AML [107].

In the context of endocrine diseases, obesity exacerbates insulin resistance, worsening glucose metabolism in diabetic patients [108]. Thus, targeting the regulation of adipogenic differentiation in adipose-derived MSCs may offer a novel approach to alleviate insulin resistance in obese diabetic patients [101]. m6A modification has demonstrated significant therapeutic potential in inhibiting MSC adipogenic differentiation, providing promising new targets for treatment. Further exploring the specific regulatory mechanisms of m6A modification in this process will offer crucial theoretical insights and therapeutic strategies for addressing adipose-related diseases and cancer drug resistance.

5. m6A Modification Modulates the Immunoregulation and Microenvironment of MSCs

MSCs communicate information with the surrounding microenvironment and cells through paracrine effects, thereby regulating inflammatory responses, influencing microenvironmental status, and exerting immunomodulatory functions. Research indicates that MSCs can modulate cell functions and the microenvironment by regulating the activity of m6A-modifying proteins in nearby cells. The exchange of information is of significant importance for the processes of tissue repair, immune homeostasis, and the improvement of pathological states. For example, MSCs reduce inflammation and improve kidney injury in diabetic nephropathy (DN) mice by inhibiting WTAP expression in renal tubular epithelial cells (HK-2), which leads to decreased Enolase 1 expression and reduced secretion of inflammatory factors [109]. Conversely, research has demonstrated that the microenvironment is capable of regulating the pluripotency of MSCs at the post-transcriptional level. For example, TNF-α present within the microenvironment inhibits the differentiation of MSCs into sweat gland cells by downregulating the expression of FTO in MSCs [110].

5.1 The Immunoinflammatory Functions of BMSCs

MSCs are vital in maintaining immune and inflammatory homeostasis [111, 112]. As key immune cells, monocytes can be recruited by MSCs from peripheral blood to inflamed tissues, where they differentiate into either M1 pro-inflammatory or M2 anti-inflammatory macrophages [113]. This procedure is of paramount importance for the preservation of immune homeostasis. The recruitment of monocytes induced by MSCs and the polarization of M1 macrophages play significant roles in the pathogenesis of a diverse range of diseases, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS), spinal cord injury, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [114].

MSC-EVs facilitate the polarization of macrophages towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype by regulating m6A modification, thereby exerting immunoregulatory effects [115]. For instance, hucMSC-EVs can upregulate and enhance the binding of METTL3 to Slc37a2 mRNA, increasing Slc37a2 expression and promoting the polarization of macrophages towards the M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype, which alleviates IBD [12]. Study has also shown that specific treatments of MSCs can regulate the contents of MSC-EVs via m6A modification. For example, melatonin administration results in a reduction in METTL3 expression in MSCs. This leads to an increase in the levels of the deubiquitinase ubiquitin specific peptidase 29 (USP29) in extracellular vesicles derived from MSCs. Extracellular vesicles containing USP29 interact with nuclear factor-like 2 (NRF2) in macrophages, thereby promoting the deubiquitination of NRF2 and increasing its stability. This, in turn, induces the anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage phenotype. This intricate process facilitates functional recovery in mice following spinal cord injury (SCI) [116].

While MSCs influence monocyte recruitment and polarization, macrophages also affect them. For example, in diabetic peri-implantitis, M1 macrophage polarization is also present, and an “information exchange” between inflammatory cells and alveolar bone MSCs inhibits MSC osteogenic differentiation [117]. Recent study suggests that reduced ALKBH5 expression may be how macrophages inhibit MSC osteogenic differentiation in diabetic peri-implantitis [118]. The interaction between MSCs and monocytes is also evident in AS. AS-MSCs secrete monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), leading to monocyte infiltration and M1 polarization, exacerbating chronic inflammation [119]. Furthermore, TNF-α secretion promotes m6A modification of engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) in MSCs via METTL14, increasing its expression and driving pathological MSC migration and Osteogenesis in AS [13]. However, MSCs overexpressing METTL16 can inhibit monocyte recruitment by degrading MCP1 mRNA through YTHDF2, suggesting a potential strategy for alleviating chronic inflammation in AS [120] (Fig. 2).

Research has also shown that pro-inflammatory factors in the microenvironment can induce MSCs to express immunosuppressive molecules, enhancing their immunosuppressive effects. For instance, IFN-γ activates the ERK signaling pathway in MSCs and induces WTAP phosphorylation, upregulating the expression of immunosuppressive molecules via YTHDF1, thus enhancing MSC-mediated inhibition of activated T cells. This mechanism underscores the potential application of MSCs in treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases [121].

In summary, m6A modification plays a crucial role in the interaction between MSCs and immune cells and in immunomodulation, influencing the progression of various diseases. MSCs also play a key role in the tumor microenvironment, and m6A modification is involved and has significant impacts. Next, we will delve into the specific mechanisms of m6A modification in the tumor microenvironment and related research progress.

5.2 Tumor Microenvironment

MSCs are critical in shaping the tumor microenvironment and regulating tumor cell functions, influencing tumor proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, and immune evasion [122, 123]. MSCs can be reprogrammed within different microenvironments through various mechanisms, inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), promoting cell proliferation, maintaining the tumor stem cell niche, and modulating tumor metabolism [124]. For example, exosomes derived from gastric cancer cells upregulate colony-stimulating factor 2 (CSF2) through the IGF2BP2-dependent m6A pathway, thereby inducing the ubiquitination of Notch1 and inhibiting its signaling cascade. This reprograms MSCs into a pro-tumor phenotype, enhancing gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration, and drug resistance, and providing new therapeutic targets and intervention strategies for gastric cancer [125, 126, 127].

Moreover, MSC-EVs hold significant regulatory and therapeutic potential in the tumor microenvironment. MSC-EVs can transport proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and RNA demethylases [128, 129]. For instance, the exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (FTO-EVs) can demethylate long non-coding RNA long non-coding RNA of colorectal cancer (GLCC1), thereby activating the c-Myc signaling pathway and augmenting the invasiveness and drug resistance of acute myeloid leukemia cells [130]. In vivo study have also shown that BMSC-EVs loaded with shRNA-ALKBH5 can inhibit the expression of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C), reduce the ubiquitination and degradation of p53, and suppress the stemness, proliferation, and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells [131].

The anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects of m6A modification in MSCs provide new opportunities for identifying therapeutic targets. m6A modification can regulate paracrine functions, modulating immune responses and inflammation to improve disease microenvironments. In cancer therapy, m6A modification inhibits tumor proliferation and metastasis by controlling signaling between MSCs and tumor cells. Targeting m6A modification can enhance the anti-inflammatory effects of MSCs, reducing inflammatory factors through gene regulation and offering new therapeutic avenues for inflammation-related diseases and cancer. Therefore, further understanding of its specific mechanisms will be crucial for developing novel treatment strategies.

6. m6A Modification Leads to Other Functional Changes in MSCs

MSCs are adult stem cells found in a wide range of tissues, including bone marrow, heart, lungs, and adipose tissue [2]. m6A modification plays a crucial role in regulating MSC differentiation, but abnormal differentiation can lead to the progression of various diseases. For instance, METTL3 promotes the aberrant differentiation of MSCs into myofibroblasts in lung tissue, contributing to pulmonary fibrosis [132]. In aortic valve interstitial cells, METTL3 enhances osteogenic differentiation, leading to aortic valve calcification (AVC) [133, 134]. Additionally, under hypoxic conditions, METTL3 drives the differentiation of ADSCs into vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), accelerating the progression of myocardial infarction (MI) [135]. These findings highlight the critical role of m6A modification in controlling MSC differentiation and disease progression, offering new potential therapeutic targets for related conditions.

MSC-EVs can also regulate various cellular functions by modulating m6A modification. For example, MSC-EVs play a neuroprotective role in neurological disorders by reducing neuronal damage and improving recovery after ischemic stroke. Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in BMSC-EVs targets lncRNA-ZFAS1 in neurons damaged by stroke, upregulating FTO, reducing dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) expression, increasing translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 20 (TOM20) levels, mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction, and alleviating neuronal injury [136]. Additionally, MSC-EVs loaded with si-FTO can be delivered to the brains of animal models, where they stabilize ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) mRNA, suppress α-Syn expression, reduce dopaminergic neuron death, and slow the progression of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [137]. Furthermore, miR-335-5p in hucMSC-EVs suppresses METTL14, reducing m6A modification of integrin beta 4 (ITGβ4), alleviating acute lung injury (ALI), and promoting lung tissue regeneration [138]. MSC-EVs also regulate lipid metabolism in hepatocytes, slowing the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). miR-627-5p derived from hucMSCs improves glucose and lipid metabolism by inhibiting FTO expression, reducing liver damage, and presenting a potential therapeutic approach for NAFLD [139]. Additionally, MSC-EVs can serve as carriers for hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α). Overexpressed HIF-1α-EVs can enhance YTHDF1 expression in pancreatic β-cells, boosting autophagy-related proteins (ATG5, ATG2A, ATG14), reversing hypoxia-induced apoptosis and aging in β-cells, and providing a potential strategy to improve the success rate of islet transplantation [140] (Table 2, Ref. [10, 12, 16, 90, 130, 131, 137, 138, 140, 141]).

7. Summary and Discussion

In recent years, the roles of m6A modification in MSCs, especially in regulating osteogenic differentiation, antiaging, autophagy, and immunomodulation, have drawn much attention. MSCs can differentiate into various cell types and self-renew; thus, they have great potential in treating bone diseases and immune disorders and in regenerative medicine. However, the functions of MSCs and their regulatory mechanisms are complex. As a critical epigenetic regulatory mechanism, m6A modification profoundly influences MSC biological functions through various signaling pathways and targets.

Firstly, m6A modification plays a crucial role in promoting MSC differentiation. Additionally, m6A modification mitigates MSC aging by modulating autophagy, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function, thus enhancing their potential for use in bone repair and anti-aging therapies. Targeted regulation of m6A factors like METTL3 and ALKBH5 has been recognized as an effective strategy for treating osteoporosis, fractures, and arthritis. Moreover, m6A modification helps alleviate obesity and insulin resistance by inhibiting adipogenic differentiation pathways, improving the tumor microenvironment, and reducing cancer cell stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. Secondly, in the realm of immunomodulation, m6A modification significantly reduces inflammation by regulating MSC recruitment of monocytes, inhibiting inflammasome formation, and controlling the polarization of M1 macrophages. Furthermore, the interaction between immune cells and the microenvironment also impacts MSC function. Research indicates that MSC paracrine signaling modulates immune function by influencing the activity of m6A-modifying proteins [135].

MSCs hold significant potential for treating cardiovascular diseases (CVD) by promoting angiogenesis, reducing inflammation, and improving heart function [47, 142]. The knockout of ALKBH5 has been shown to enhance the viability of AMSCs and improve heart function in mice [141]. Also, microRNAs from MSC-EVs offer a new approach to treating CVD. Research suggests that miRNAs within MSC-EVs can regulate the activity of m6A-modifying proteins in target cells, thereby modulating cellular functions [136]. However, the impact of m6A modification on the generation and secretion of MSC-EVs warrants further investigation.

Future research should focus on several key areas: First, a deeper analysis of the specific mechanisms by which various m6A regulatory factors (such as METTL3, FTO, etc.) influence MSC differentiation and immune regulation will aid in developing precision treatment strategies for specific diseases. Second, integrating high-throughput sequencing technology with gene editing tools will further elucidate the global role of m6A modification in regulating MSC function and its potential targets. These approaches are expected to optimize the therapeutic effects of MSCs in orthopedic diseases, immune-related disorders, and regenerative medicine.

Notably, m6A modification research has revealed multiple new avenues for the clinical application of MSCs. In the treatment of bone diseases, further research on enhancement of the osteogenic differentiation ability of MSCs by regulating m6A modification may lead to the development of novel bone repair materials or cell-based treatment regimens. For example, gene-editing techniques can be used to upregulate the expression of METTL3 in MSCs, enhancing their osteogenic differentiation for the treatment of bone defects or osteoporosis. In the treatment of immune-related diseases, regulating m6A modification can optimize the immunomodulatory function of MSCs. In inflammatory bowel disease, by modulating m6A-related molecules in MSC-EVs, it is possible to promote the polarization of macrophages into the anti-inflammatory M2 type, thereby reducing the inflammatory response. In the field of cancer treatment, targeting m6A modification to affect the interaction between MSCs and tumor cells can inhibit tumor growth and metastasis. For example, by regulating m6A modification, the supportive effect of MSCs on tumor cells can be reduced, and the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs can be increased, providing new ideas and methods for cancer treatment.

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, this review comprehensively elucidates the role of m6A modification in MSCs. It significantly impacts MSC differentiation, including promoting osteogenic and chondrogenic while inhibiting adipogenic differentiation, offers new strategies for skeletal and metabolic diseases and cancer treatment. In immunomodulation, it’s crucial for the interaction between MSCs and immune cells, potentially optimizing MSC-based therapies for immune-mediated diseases. In the tumor microenvironment, targeting m6A modification in MSCs may develop new cancer therapies. However, the precise mechanisms and translation to clinical applications need further study. Overall, research on m6A modification in MSCs has great potential for advancing regenerative medicine and disease treatment.

References

[1]

Zhao YQ, Xu YY, Zheng YM, Han F, Zhang Y, Pan RL, et al. Human Placenta-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Neurological Function in Rats with Intrauterine Hypoxic-Ischaemic Encephalopathy by Reducing Apoptosis and Inflammatory Reactions. Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition). 2024; 29: 139. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2904139.

[2]

Yi T, Song SU. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells and their therapeutic applications. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2012; 35: 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-012-0202-z.

[3]

Yuan Y, Liu T. Influence of mesenchymal stem cells from different origins on the therapeutic effectiveness of systemic lupus erythematosus. Experimental Cell Research. 2024; 442: 114263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2024.114263.

[4]

Devlin MJ, Rosen CJ. The bone-fat interface: basic and clinical implications of marrow adiposity. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2015; 3: 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70007-5.

[5]

Xiao Y, Zhu X, Li Q, Wang Z, Zuo Q, Liu X, et al. m6A-Mediated IRS1 Regulates the Development of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma through p53/Line-1 Signaling. Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition). 2024; 29: 257. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2907257.

[6]

Fan Y, Lv X, Chen Z, Peng Y, Zhang M. m6A methylation: Critical roles in aging and neurological diseases. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2023; 16: 1102147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2023.1102147.

[7]

Li Z, Wang P, Li J, Xie Z, Cen S, Li M, et al. The N6-methyladenosine demethylase ALKBH5 negatively regulates the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through PRMT6. Cell Death & Disease. 2021; 12: 578. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03869-4.

[8]

Ma L, Zhou X, Yao S, Zhang X, Mao J, Vona B, et al. METTL3-dependent m6A modification of PSEN1 mRNA regulates craniofacial development through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Death & Disease. 2024; 15: 229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06606-9.

[9]

Chen X, Hua W, Huang X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Li G. Regulatory Role of RNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Bone Biology and Osteoporosis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020; 10: 911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00911.

[10]

Zhou H, Shen X, Yan C, Xiong W, Ma Z, Tan Z, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate osteoarthritis of the knee in mice model by interacting with METTL3 to reduce m6A of NLRP3 in macrophage. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2022; 13: 322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-03005-9.

[11]

Huart C, Gupta MS, Van Ginderachter JA. The role of RNA modifications in disease-associated macrophages. Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids. 2024; 35: 102315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102315.

[12]

Xu X, Peng J, Wang N, Ocansey DKW, Zhang X, Mao F. hucMSC-Ex alleviates inflammatory bowel disease in mice by enhancing M2-type macrophage polarization via the METTL3-Slc37a2-YTHDF1 axis. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 2024; 40: 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-024-09921-1.

[13]

Xie Z, Yu W, Zheng G, Li J, Cen S, Ye G, et al. TNF-α-mediated m6A modification of ELMO1 triggers directional migration of mesenchymal stem cell in ankylosing spondylitis. Nature Communications. 2021; 12: 5373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25710-4.

[14]

Li M, Zha X, Wang S. The role of N6-methyladenosine mRNA in the tumor microenvironment. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Reviews on Cancer. 2021; 1875: 188522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188522.

[15]

Flamand MN, Tegowski M, Meyer KD. The Proteins of mRNA Modification: Writers, Readers, and Erasers. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2023; 92: 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-052521-035330.

[16]

Zhou S, Zhang G, Wang K, Yang Z, Tan Y. METTL3 potentiates osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via IGF2BP1/m6A/RUNX2. Oral Diseases. 2024; 30: 1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.14526.

[17]

Ye G, Li J, Yu W, Xie Z, Zheng G, Liu W, et al. ALKBH5 facilitates CYP1B1 mRNA degradation via m6A demethylation to alleviate MSC senescence and osteoarthritis progression. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2023; 55: 1743–1756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-023-01059-0.

[18]

Torrecillas-Baena B, Pulido-Escribano V, Dorado G, Gálvez-Moreno MÁ Camacho-Cardenosa M, Casado-Díaz A. Clinical Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Bone Regeneration. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 4385. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134385.

[19]

Shang F, Yu Y, Liu S, Ming L, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, et al. Advancing application of mesenchymal stem cell-based bone tissue regeneration. Bioactive Materials. 2021; 6: 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.014.

[20]

Han I, Kwon BS, Park HK, Kim KS. Differentiation Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Is Related to Their Intrinsic Mechanical Properties. International Neurourology Journal. 2017; 21: S24–S31. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1734856.428.

[21]

Qu Z, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Wang X, Yan L. Natural Compounds for Bone Remodeling: Targeting osteoblasts and relevant signaling pathways. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2024; 180: 117490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117490.

[22]

Shi JX, Zhang ZC, Yin HZ, Piao XJ, Liu CH, Liu QJ, et al. RNA m6A modification in ferroptosis: implications for advancing tumor immunotherapy. Molecular Cancer. 2024; 23: 213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-024-02132-6.

[23]

Long H, Yu Y, Ouyang J, Lu H, Zhao G. Insights into RNA N6-methyladenosine and programmed cell death in atherosclerosis. Molecular Medicine (Cambridge, Mass.). 2024; 30: 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-024-00901-z.

[24]

Li W, Liu Y, Xu R, Zong Y, He L, Hu J, et al. M6A modification in cardiovascular disease: With a focus on programmed cell death. Genes & Diseases. 2023; 11: 101039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2023.05.023.

[25]

Zhou S, Liu J, Wan A, Zhang Y, Qi X. Epigenetic regulation of diverse cell death modalities in cancer: a focus on pyroptosis, ferroptosis, cuproptosis, and disulfidptosis. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2024; 17: 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01545-6.

[26]

Feng G, Wu Y, Hu Y, Shuai W, Yang X, Li Y, et al. Small molecule inhibitors targeting m6A regulators. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2024; 17: 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01546-5.

[27]

Gao Z, Zha X, Li M, Xia X, Wang S. Insights into the m6A demethylases FTO and ALKBH5: structural, biological function, and inhibitor development. Cell & Bioscience. 2024; 14: 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-024-01286-6.

[28]

Zhou X, Hong Y, Zhang H, Li X. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Rejuvenation: Current Status and Challenges. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2020; 8: 364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00364.

[29]

Cheng M, Yuan W, Moshaverinia A, Yu B. Rejuvenation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Ameliorate Skeletal Aging. Cells. 2023; 12: 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12070998.

[30]

Yang X, Zhang S, Lu J, Chen X, Zheng T, He R, et al. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in skeletal diseases. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2024; 11: 1268019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1268019.

[31]

Zhu H, Cai C, Yu Y, Zhou Y, Yang S, Hu Y, et al. Quercetin-Loaded Bioglass Injectable Hydrogel Promotes m6A Alteration of Per1 to Alleviate Oxidative Stress for Periodontal Bone Defects. Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). 2024; 11: e2403412. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202403412.

[32]

Luo H, Liu W, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Jiang X, Wu S, et al. METTL3-mediated m6A modification regulates cell cycle progression of dental pulp stem cells. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2021; 12: 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02223-x.

[33]

Greene MA, Loeser RF. Aging-related inflammation in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2015; 23: 1966–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.01.008.

[34]

Ma Y, Wang S, Wang H, Chen X, Shuai Y, Wang H, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and dental implant osseointegration during aging: from mechanisms to therapy. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2023; 14: 382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03611-1.

[35]

Wei Y, Zheng Z, Zhang Y, Sun J, Xu S, Di X, et al. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation by autophagy. Open Medicine (Warsaw, Poland). 2024; 19: 20240968. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0968.

[36]

He M, Lei H, He X, Liu Y, Wang A, Ren Z, et al. METTL14 Regulates Osteogenesis of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells via Inducing Autophagy Through m6A/IGF2BPs/Beclin-1 Signal Axis. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2022; 11: 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szac049.

[37]

Gao X, Wang J, Wang Y, Li W, Pan Z. The m6A Reader YTHDF1 Accelerates the Osteogenesis of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Partly via Activation of the Autophagy Signaling Pathway. Stem Cells International. 2023; 2023: 5563568. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5563568.

[38]

Joo JH, Wang B, Frankel E, Ge L, Xu L, Iyengar R, et al. The Noncanonical Role of ULK/ATG1 in ER-to-Golgi Trafficking Is Essential for Cellular Homeostasis. Molecular Cell. 2016; 62: 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.04.020.

[39]

Itakura E, Mizushima N. Characterization of autophagosome formation site by a hierarchical analysis of mammalian Atg proteins. Autophagy. 2010; 6: 764–776. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.6.6.12709.

[40]

Hara T, Takamura A, Kishi C, Iemura SI, Natsume T, Guan JL, et al. FIP200, a ULK-interacting protein, is required for autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2008; 181: 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200712064.

[41]

Li G, Song Y, Liao Z, Wang K, Luo R, Lu S, et al. Bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate compression-induced apoptosis of nucleus pulposus cells by N6 methyladenosine of autophagy. Cell Death & Disease. 2020; 11: 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2284-8.

[42]

Huang C, Ness VP, Yang X, Chen H, Luo J, Brown EB, et al. Spatiotemporal Analyses of Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis via Intravital Imaging in Cranial Bone Defect Repair. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2015; 30: 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2460.

[43]

Yin X, Wei Y, Qin H, Zhao J, Chen Y, Yao S, et al. Oxygen tension regulating hydrogels for vascularization and osteogenesis via sequential activation of HIF-1α and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in bone regeneration. Biomaterials Advances. 2024; 161: 213893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213893.

[44]

Tian C, Huang Y, Li Q, Feng Z, Xu Q. Mettl3 Regulates Osteogenic Differentiation and Alternative Splicing of Vegfa in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20: 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030551.

[45]

Tian S, Li YL, Wang J, Dong RC, Wei J, Ma Y, et al. Chinese Ecliptae herba (Eclipta prostrata (L.) L.) extract and its component wedelolactone enhances osteoblastogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via targeting METTL3-mediated m6A RNA methylation. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2023; 312: 116433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.116433.

[46]

Zhou J, Wei T, He Z. ADSCs enhance VEGFR3-mediated lymphangiogenesis via METTL3-mediated VEGF-C m6A modification to improve wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Molecular Medicine (Cambridge, Mass.). 2021; 27: 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-021-00406-z.

[47]

Nazari-Shafti TZ, Neuber S, Garcia Duran A, Xu Z, Beltsios E, Seifert M, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells and derived extracellular vesicles: Translational strategies to increase their proangiogenic potential for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2020; 9: 1558–1569. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0432.

[48]

Duan Y, Su YT, Ren J, Zhou Q, Tang M, Li J, et al. Kidney tonifying traditional Chinese medicine: Potential implications for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022; 13: 1063899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1063899.

[49]

Zhao Y, Liu F, Pei Y, Lian F, Lin H. Involvement of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway in heterotopic ossification and ossification-related diseases. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2024; 28: e70113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.70113.

[50]

Elahmer NR, Wong SK, Mohamed N, Alias E, Chin KY, Muhammad N. Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review. Biomedicines. 2024; 12: 1635. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081635.

[51]

García-Guerrero CA, Fuentes P, Araya MJ, Djouad F, Luz-Crawford P, Vega-Letter AM, et al. How to enhance MSCs therapeutic properties? An insight on potentiation methods. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2024; 15: 331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03935-6.

[52]

Nabigol M, Hajipirloo LK, Kuhestani-Dehaghi B, Farsani MA. Effect of AML-exosomes on the cellular and molecular properties of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells: Expression of JAK/STAT signaling genes. Current Research in Translational Medicine. 2025; 73: 103474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retram.2024.103474.

[53]

Xia L, Yang Z, Hu C. PAR1 Activation, via LMBR1/BMP Axis, Promotes the Osteogenesis of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells (PDLSCs) and Alleviates the Inhibitory Effect of Sodium Butyrate on PDLSCs Osteogenesis. Discovery Medicine. 2024; 36: 1657–1671. https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.152.

[54]

Huang J, Ma T, Wang C, Wang Z, Wang X, Hua B, et al. SOST/Sclerostin impairs the osteogenesis and angiogesis in glucocorticoid-associated osteonecrosis of femoral head. Molecular Medicine (Cambridge, Mass.). 2024; 30: 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-024-00933-5.

[55]

Qin LJ, Ding DX, Cui LL, Huang QY. Expression and regulation of the SOST gene. Yi Chuan = Hereditas. 2013; 35: 939–947. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1005.2013.00939. (In Chinese)

[56]

Wu D, Li L, Wen Z, Wang G. Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2023; 21: 668. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04563-z.

[57]

Huang M, Xu S, Liu L, Zhang M, Guo J, Yuan Y, et al. m6A Methylation Regulates Osteoblastic Differentiation and Bone Remodeling. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021; 9: 783322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.783322.

[58]

Jiménez-Ortega RF, Ortega-Meléndez AI, Patiño N, Rivera-Paredez B, Hidalgo-Bravo A, Velázquez-Cruz R. The Involvement of microRNAs in Bone Remodeling Signaling Pathways and Their Role in the Development of Osteoporosis. Biology. 2024; 13: 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070505.

[59]

Meng YB, Li X, Li ZY, Zhao J, Yuan XB, Ren Y, et al. microRNA-21 promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by the PI3K/β-catenin pathway. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2015; 33: 957–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22884.

[60]

Li Z, Hassan MQ, Volinia S, van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Croce CM, et al. A microRNA signature for a BMP2-induced osteoblast lineage commitment program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008; 105: 13906–13911. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804438105.

[61]

Liu J, You Y, Sun Z, Zhang L, Li X, Dai Z, et al. WTAP-Mediated m6A RNA Methylation Regulates the Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells via the miR-29b-3p/HDAC4 Axis. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2023; 12: 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad020.

[62]

Dong X, Liao B, Zhao J, Li X, Yan K, Ren K, et al. METTL14 mediates m6a modification on osteogenic proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by regulating the processing of pri-miR-873. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2023; 28: 166. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2023.13053.

[63]

You Y, Liu J, Zhang L, Li X, Sun Z, Dai Z, et al. WTAP-mediated m6A modification modulates bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells differentiation potential and osteoporosis. Cell Death & Disease. 2023; 14: 33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05565-x.

[64]

Yan G, Yuan Y, He M, Gong R, Lei H, Zhou H, et al. m6A Methylation of Precursor-miR-320/RUNX2 Controls Osteogenic Potential of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids. 2020; 19: 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2019.12.001.

[65]

Han X, Li G, Yang H, Zhang C, Cao Y, Wang N, et al. METTL3 Promotes Osteo/Odontogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells by Inhibiting miR-196b-5p Maturation. Stem Cells International. 2023; 2023: 8992284. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8992284.

[66]

Gong YY, Peng MY, Yin DQ, Yang YF. Long non-coding RNA H19 promotes the osteogenic differentiation of rat ectomesenchymal stem cells via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2018; 22: 8805–8813. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201812_16648.

[67]

Li L, Wang B, Zhou X, Ding H, Sun C, Wang Y, et al. METTL3-mediated long non-coding RNA MIR99AHG methylation targets miR-4660 to promote bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.). 2023; 22: 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2022.2125751.

[68]

Liu R, Wu S, Liu W, Wang L, Dong M, Niu W. microRNAs delivered by small extracellular vesicles in MSCs as an emerging tool for bone regeneration. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023; 11: 1249860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1249860.

[69]

Bravo Vázquez LA, Moreno Becerril MY, Mora Hernández EO, León Carmona GGD, Aguirre Padilla ME, Chakraborty S, et al. The Emerging Role of MicroRNAs in Bone Diseases and Their Therapeutic Potential. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2021; 27: 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010211.

[70]

Abhishek A, Doherty M. Diagnosis and clinical presentation of osteoarthritis. Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America. 2013; 39: 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2012.10.007.

[71]

Gelber AC. Knee Osteoarthritis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2024; 177: ITC129–ITC144. https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01249.

[72]

Langworthy M, Dasa V, Spitzer AI. Knee osteoarthritis: disease burden, available treatments, and emerging options. Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease. 2024; 16: 1759720X241273009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X241273009.

[73]

Yan Q, Liu H, Zhu R, Zhang Z. Contribution of macrophage polarization in bone metabolism: A literature review. Cytokine. 2024; 184: 156768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2024.156768.

[74]

Sang W, Xue S, Jiang Y, Lu H, Zhu L, Wang C, et al. METTL3 involves the progression of osteoarthritis probably by affecting ECM degradation and regulating the inflammatory response. Life Sciences. 2021; 278: 119528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119528.

[75]

Zhang R, Han L, Lin W, Ba X, Yan J, Li T, et al. Mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and the effects of traditional Chinese medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2024; 321: 117432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117432.

[76]

Tian B, Zhang L, Zheng J, Kang X. The role of NF-κB-SOX9 signalling pathway in osteoarthritis. Heliyon. 2024; 10: e37191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37191.

[77]

Diederichs S, Gabler J, Autenrieth J, Kynast KL, Merle C, Walles H, et al. Differential Regulation of SOX9 Protein During Chondrogenesis of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Versus Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Shortcoming for Cartilage Formation. Stem Cells and Development. 2016; 25: 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2015.0312.

[78]

Song H, Park KH. Regulation and function of SOX9 during cartilage development and regeneration. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2020; 67: 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.04.008.

[79]

Shi X, Chen H, Yang H, Xue S, Li Y, Fang X, et al. Aptamer-Modified Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Synergized with TGF-β3 to Promote Cartilage Protection in Osteoarthritis by Enhancing Chondrogenic Differentiation of MSCs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2024; 16: 50484–50496. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c12159.

[80]

Bao C, He C. The role and therapeutic potential of MSC-derived exosomes in osteoarthritis. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2021; 710: 109002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2021.109002.

[81]

Wang X, He W, Huang H, Han J, Wang R, Li H, et al. Recent Advances in Hydrogel Technology in Delivering Mesenchymal Stem Cell for Osteoarthritis Therapy. Biomolecules. 2024; 14: 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14070858.

[82]

Yang L, Ren Z, Yan S, Zhao L, Liu J, Zhao L, et al. Nsun4 and Mettl3 mediated translational reprogramming of Sox9 promotes BMSC chondrogenic differentiation. Communications Biology. 2022; 5: 495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03420-x.

[83]

Hu B, Zou X, Yu Y, Jiang Y, Xu H. METTL3 promotes SMSCs chondrogenic differentiation by targeting the MMP3, MMP13, and GATA3. Regenerative Therapy. 2023; 22: 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2023.01.005.

[84]

Chen C, Xiong K, Li K, Zhou B, Cheng J, Zhu B, et al. Identification of key genes involved in collagen hydrogel-induced chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through transcriptome analysis: the role of m6A modification. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2024; 35: 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-024-06801-2.

[85]

Wu J, Wu J, Liu Z, Gong Y, Feng D, Xiang W, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in joint diseases: Therapeutic effects and underlying mechanisms. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. 2024; 48: 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2024.07.005.

[86]

Li M, Tang Q, Liao C, Wang Z, Zhang S, Liang Q, et al. Extracellular vesicles from apoptotic BMSCs ameliorate osteoporosis via transporting regenerative signals. Theranostics. 2024; 14: 3583–3602. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.96174.

[87]

Zhang R, Mu X, Liu D, Chen C, Meng B, Qu Y, et al. Apoptotic vesicles rescue impaired mesenchymal stem cells and their therapeutic capacity for osteoporosis by restoring miR-145a-5p deficiency. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22: 580. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02829-2.

[88]

Marote A, Teixeira FG, Mendes-Pinheiro B, Salgado AJ. MSCs-Derived Exosomes: Cell-Secreted Nanovesicles with Regenerative Potential. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2016; 7: 231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00231.

[89]

Zhao W, Li K, Li L, Wang R, Lei Y, Yang H, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles in Disease Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25: 7715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147715.

[90]

Cheng S, Xu X, Wang R, Chen W, Qin K, Yan J. Chondroprotective effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in osteoarthritis. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes. 2024; 56: 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-023-09991-6.

[91]

Chen L, Liu J, Rao Z. FTO-overexpressing extracellular vesicles from BM-MSCs reverse cellular senescence and aging to ameliorate osteoarthritis by modulating METTL3/YTHDF2-mediated RNA m6A modifications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024; 278: 134600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134600.

[92]

Chen Z, Zhou T, Luo H, Wang Z, Wang Q, Shi R, et al. HWJMSC-EVs promote cartilage regeneration and repair via the ITGB1/TGF-β/Smad2/3 axis mediated by microfractures. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22: 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02451-2.

[93]

José Alcaraz M. Control of articular degeneration by extracellular vesicles from stem/stromal cells as a potential strategy for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2024; 228: 116226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116226.

[94]

You B, Zhou C, Yang Y. MSC-EVs alleviate osteoarthritis by regulating microenvironmental cells in the articular cavity and maintaining cartilage matrix homeostasis. Ageing Research Reviews. 2023; 85: 101864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2023.101864.

[95]

Liu SS, Fang X, Wen X, Liu JS, Alip M, Sun T, et al. How mesenchymal stem cells transform into adipocytes: Overview of the current understanding of adipogenic differentiation. World Journal of Stem Cells. 2024; 16: 245–256. https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v16.i3.245.

[96]

Zhuang H, Zhang X, Zhu C, Tang X, Yu F, Shang GW, et al. Molecular Mechanisms of PPAR-γ Governing MSC Osteogenic and Adipogenic Differentiation. Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2016; 11: 255–264. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574888x10666150531173309.

[97]

Lee MJ, Chen HT, Ho ML, Chen CH, Chuang SC, Huang SC, et al. PPARγ silencing enhances osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2013; 17: 1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12098.

[98]

Chen LS, Zhang M, Chen P, Xiong XF, Liu PQ, Wang HB, et al. The m6A demethylase FTO promotes the osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells by downregulating PPARG. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2022; 43: 1311–1323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-021-00756-8.

[99]

Shen GS, Zhou HB, Zhang H, Chen B, Liu ZP, Yuan Y, et al. The GDF11-FTO-PPARγ axis controls the shift of osteoporotic MSC fate to adipocyte and inhibits bone formation during osteoporosis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2018; 1864: 3644–3654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.09.015.

[100]

Cheng C, Zhang H, Zheng J, Jin Y, Wang D, Dai Z. METTL14 benefits the mesenchymal stem cells in patients with steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head by regulating the m6A level of PTPN6. Aging (Albany NY). 2021; 13: 25903–25919. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203778.

[101]

Huang X, He W, Fan S, Li H, Ye G. IGF2BP3-mediated enhanced stability of MYLK represses MSC adipogenesis and alleviates obesity and insulin resistance in HFD mice. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2024; 81: 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-05076-0.

[102]

Yao Y, Bi Z, Wu R, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Liu Q, et al. METTL3 inhibits BMSC adipogenic differentiation by targeting the JAK1/STAT5/C/EBPβ pathway via an m6A-YTHDF2-dependent manner. FASEB Journal. 2019; 33: 7529–7544. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802644R.

[103]

Hardaway AL, Herroon MK, Rajagurubandara E, Podgorski I. Bone marrow fat: linking adipocyte-induced inflammation with skeletal metastases. Cancer Metastasis Reviews. 2014; 33: 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-013-9484-y.

[104]

Samimi A, Ghanavat M, Shahrabi S, Azizidoost S, Saki N. Role of bone marrow adipocytes in leukemia and chemotherapy challenges. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2019; 76: 2489–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03031-6.

[105]

Cao Y. Adipocyte and lipid metabolism in cancer drug resistance. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2019; 129: 3006–3017. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI127201.

[106]

Liao X, Cai D, Liu J, Hu H, You R, Pan Z, et al. Deletion of Mettl3 in mesenchymal stem cells promotes acute myeloid leukemia resistance to chemotherapy. Cell Death & Disease. 2023; 14: 796. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06325-7.

[107]

Pan ZP, Wang B, Hou DY, You RL, Wang XT, Xie WH, et al. METTL3 mediates bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell adipogenesis to promote chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukaemia. FEBS Open Bio. 2021; 11: 1659–1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13165.

[108]

Roszczyc-Owsiejczuk K, Zabielski P, Imierska M, Pogodzińska K, Sadowska P, Błachnio-Zabielska A. Downregulation of CerS4 Instead of CerS2 in Liver Effectively Alleviates Hepatic Insulin Resistance in HFD Male Mice. Endocrinology. 2024; 165: bqae118. https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqae118.

[109]

Bai Y, Huang L, Fan Y, Li Y. Marrow mesenchymal stem cell mediates diabetic nephropathy progression via modulation of Smad2/3/WTAP/m6A/ENO1 axis. FASEB Journal. 2024; 38: e23729. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202301773R.

[110]

Wang Y, Wang R, Yao B, Hu T, Li Z, Liu Y, et al. TNF-α suppresses sweat gland differentiation of MSCs by reducing FTO-mediated m6A-demethylation of Nanog mRNA. Science China Life Sciences. 2020; 63: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-019-9826-7.

[111]

Shang L, Shao J, Ge S. Immunomodulatory functions of oral mesenchymal stem cells: Novel force for tissue regeneration and disease therapy. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2021; 110: 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/JLB.3MR0321-766R.

[112]

Ji W, Sun L, Wang D, Zhu W. Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate inflammatory responses through regulation of T-cell subsets. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2024; 983: 176996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176996.

[113]

Hu K, Shang Z, Yang X, Zhang Y, Cao L. Macrophage Polarization and the Regulation of Bone Immunity in Bone Homeostasis. Journal of Inflammation Research. 2023; 16: 3563–3580. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S423819.

[114]

Li Q, Lin L, Zhang C, Zhang H, Ma Y, Qian H, et al. The progression of inorganic nanoparticles and natural products for inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22: 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02246-x.

[115]

Ye T, Chen Z, Zhang J, Luo L, Gao R, Gong L, et al. Large extracellular vesicles secreted by human iPSC-derived MSCs ameliorate tendinopathy via regulating macrophage heterogeneity. Bioactive Materials. 2023; 21: 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.08.007.

[116]

Liu W, Tang P, Wang J, Ye W, Ge X, Rong Y, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from melatonin-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells containing USP29 repair traumatic spinal cord injury by stabilizing NRF2. Journal of Pineal Research. 2021; 71: e12769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12769.

[117]

Pajarinen J, Lin TH, Nabeshima A, Jämsen E, Lu L, Nathan K, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in the aseptic loosening of total joint replacements. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2017; 105: 1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35978.

[118]

Weng J, Fan H, Liu H, Tang S, Zheng Y. Abnormal Decrease of Macrophage ALKBH5 Expression Causes Abnormal Polarization and Inhibits Osteoblast Differentiation. Stem Cells International. 2023; 2023: 9974098. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9974098.

[119]

Lee HK, Kim HS, Kim JS, Kim YG, Park KH, Lee JH, et al. CCL2 deficient mesenchymal stem cells fail to establish long-lasting contact with T cells and no longer ameliorate lupus symptoms. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 41258. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41258.

[120]

Zhang Z, Xie Z, Lin J, Sun Z, Li Z, Yu W, et al. The m6A methyltransferase METTL16 negatively regulates MCP1 expression in mesenchymal stem cells during monocyte recruitment. JCI Insight. 2023; 8: e162436. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.162436.

[121]

Chen Q, Ao L, Zhao Q, Tang L, Xiong Y, Yuan Y, et al. WTAP/YTHDF1-mediated m6A modification amplifies IFN-γ-induced immunosuppressive properties of human MSCs. Journal of Advanced Research. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2024.06.019.

[122]

Atiya H, Frisbie L, Pressimone C, Coffman L. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2020; 1234: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37184-5_3.

[123]

Zhang LN, Zhang DD, Yang L, Gu YX, Zuo QP, Wang HY, et al. Roles of cell fusion between mesenchymal stromal/stem cells and malignant cells in tumor growth and metastasis. The FEBS Journal. 2021; 288: 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15483.

[124]

Fan H, Atiya HI, Wang Y, Pisanic TR, Wang TH, Shih IM, et al. Epigenomic Reprogramming toward Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition in Ovarian-Cancer-Associated Mesenchymal Stem Cells Drives Metastasis. Cell Reports. 2020; 33: 108473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108473.

[125]

Huang J, Wang X, Wen J, Zhao X, Wu C, Wang L, et al. Gastric cancer cell-originated small extracellular vesicle induces metabolic reprogramming of BM-MSCs through ERK-PPARγ-CPT1A signaling to potentiate lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Cell International. 2023; 23: 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-02935-5.

[126]

Shi H, Sun Y, Ruan H, Ji C, Zhang J, Wu P, et al. 3,3’-Diindolylmethane Promotes Gastric Cancer Progression via β-TrCP-Mediated NF-κB Activation in Gastric Cancer-Derived MSCs. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021; 11: 603533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.603533.

[127]

Ji R, Wu C, Yao J, Xu J, Lin J, Gu H, et al. IGF2BP2-meidated m6A modification of CSF2 reprograms MSC to promote gastric cancer progression. Cell Death & Disease. 2023; 14: 693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06163-7.

[128]

Xiao P, Liu YK, Han W, Hu Y, Zhang BY, Liu WL. Exosomal Delivery of FTO Confers Gefitinib Resistance to Recipient Cells through ABCC10 Regulation in an m6A-dependent Manner. Molecular Cancer Research. 2021; 19: 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0541.

[129]

Chen R, Qian Z, Xu X, Zhang C, Niu Y, Wang Z, et al. Exosomes-transmitted miR-7 reverses gefitinib resistance by targeting YAP in non-small-cell lung cancer. Pharmacological Research. 2021; 165: 105442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105442.

[130]

Kou R, Li T, Fu C, Jiang D, Wang Y, Meng J, et al. Exosome-shuttled FTO from BM-MSCs contributes to cancer malignancy and chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia by inducing m6A-demethylation: A nano-based investigation. Environmental Research. 2024; 244: 117783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.117783.

[131]

Hu Y, Liu H, Xiao X, Yu Q, Deng R, Hua L, et al. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Inhibit Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Stemness and Metastasis via an ALKBH5-Dependent Mechanism. Cancers. 2022; 14: 6059. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246059.

[132]

Lu Y, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Wu X, Bian W, Shan S, et al. METTL3-mediated m6A RNA methylation induces the differentiation of lung resident mesenchymal stem cells into myofibroblasts via the miR-21/PTEN pathway. Respiratory Research. 2023; 24: 300. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02606-z.

[133]

Zhou T, Han D, Liu J, Shi J, Zhu P, Wang Y, et al. Factors influencing osteogenic differentiation of human aortic valve interstitial cells. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021; 161: e163–e185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.039.

[134]

Liu X, Wang K, Zheng Q, Liu X, Yang Y, Xie C, et al. Schisandrol B inhibits calcification of aortic valve by targeting p53 related inflammatory and senescence. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2024; 178: 117241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117241.

[135]

Lin J, Zhu Q, Huang J, Cai R, Kuang Y. Hypoxia Promotes Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell (VSMC) Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cell (ADSC) by Regulating Mettl3 and Paracrine Factors. Stem Cells International. 2020; 2020: 2830565. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2830565.

[136]

Wang QS, Xiao RJ, Peng J, Yu ZT, Fu JQ, Xia Y. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomal KLF4 Alleviated Ischemic Stroke Through Inhibiting N6-Methyladenosine Modification Level of Drp1 by Targeting lncRNA-ZFAS1. Molecular Neurobiology. 2023; 60: 3945–3962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03301-2.

[137]

Geng Y, Long X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, You G, Guo W, et al. FTO-targeted siRNA delivery by MSC-derived exosomes synergistically alleviates dopaminergic neuronal death in Parkinson’s disease via m6A-dependent regulation of ATM mRNA. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2023; 21: 652. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04461-4.

[138]

Li L, Zhang X, Chen Y. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome-derived miR-335-5p Alleviated Lipopolysaccharide-induced Acute Lung Injury by Regulating the m6A Level of ITGβ4 Gene. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2024; 31: 5448–5467. https://doi.org/10.2174/0109298673273833231220062213.

[139]

Cheng L, Yu P, Li F, Jiang X, Jiao X, Shen Y, et al. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell-exosomal miR-627-5p ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by repressing FTO expression. Human Cell. 2021; 34: 1697–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-021-00593-1.

[140]

Fang J, Chen Z, Lai X, Yin W, Guo Y, Zhang W, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived HIF-1α-overexpressed extracellular vesicles ameliorate hypoxia-induced pancreatic β cell apoptosis and senescence through activating YTHDF1-mediated protective autophagy. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2022; 129: 106194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.106194.

[141]

Yuan X, Li T, Shi L, Miao J, Guo Y, Chen Y. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells deliver exogenous miR-26a-5p via exosomes to inhibit nucleus pulposus cell pyroptosis through METTL14/NLRP3. Molecular Medicine (Cambridge, Mass.). 2021; 27: 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-021-00355-7.

[142]

Gao X, Liang X, Liu B, Hong Y, He H, Shen Y, et al. Downregulation of ALKBH5 rejuvenates aged human mesenchymal stem cells and enhances their therapeutic efficacy in myocardial infarction. FASEB Journal. 2023; 37: e23294. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202301292R.

PDF (3150KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/