1. Introduction
The frequent occurrence of pesticide poisoning and its associated high fatality rate pose a serious threat to the health of rural residents [
1]. Rural hospitals admit hundreds of patients annually for pesticide poisoning, with a mortality rate as high as 15–30% [
2,
3]. This alarming situation not only threatens the lives of farmers but also places immense pressure on the rural healthcare system. Patients poisoned with pesticides, especially paraquat and diquat, experience severe pain accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Additionally, the respiratory system is severely affected. Following pesticide poisoning, patients may develop progressive respiratory distress and cyanosis due to pesticide-induced damage to the structural and functional integrity of the lungs, leading to pulmonary edema, fibrosis, and respiratory failure. In severe cases, mechanical ventilation may be required within a short period to sustain life [
4,
5].
Management of pesticide poisoning involves the rapid removal of toxic substances, including the removal of contaminated clothing and skin decontamination. In cases of oral ingestion, vomiting and gastric lavage are necessary. Specific antidotes, such as atropine and tripralidoxime, should be administered according to the poisoning agent, for organophosphorus poisoning, while closely monitoring and supporting vital signs. Blood purification therapy should be considered when clinically indicated.
In this study, pesticide poisoning detection and analysis were performed using Agilent 6495 high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Plasma samples were pretreated with methanol protein precipitation. An acetonitrile-water gradient mobile phase was employed with a flow rate of 0.4 mLmin-1. Sample separation was achieved using a Waters XBridge BEH HILIC column XP (100 mm long, 2.1 mm inner diameter, 2.5 µm particle diameter) (Part No. 186006079, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted in electrospray ionization (ESI) positive ion mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for quantification of paraquat (m/z 186.1171.1) and diquat (m/z 183.1157.1). This method was applied to detect clinical plasma concentrations of paraquat and diquat, with a 5 µL injection volume used for high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) system analysis.
The albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG), a clinical indicator reflecting renal function and acid-base balance status, has garnered increasing attention in recent years. The anion gap, defined as the difference between unmeasured cations and anions in the blood, is widely used to assess acid-base imbalances [
6]. As albumin is a negatively charged protein, fluctuations in its concentration can influence the anion gap calculation. Therefore, correcting the anion gap for albumin levels yields more accurate diagnostic insights and better informs clinical management. Several studies have explored the use of ACAG in cardiac-related conditions [
7,
8]. However, research on the predictive value of ACAG for myocardial injury due to pesticide poisoning remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ACAG and secondary myocardial injury and to evaluate its predictive performance. The goal was to uncover potential associations between ACAG and acute myocardial injury, thereby providing new insights and methods for early intervention and prognostic assessment in patients with pesticide poisoning.
2. Methods
2.1 Research Objects
This study included 16 variables. According to the principle that the sample size should be 5–20 times the number of variables, and considering a 20% missing data rate, the required sample size was estimated to range between 96 and 384. Due to the limitations inherent in a retrospective design, achieving complete double-blinding was not feasible. However, data extraction and outcome assessment were independently performed by investigators blinded to group allocation to minimize bias. Screening and enrollment are shown in
Fig. 1.
A total of 205 patients with acute pesticide poisoning (paraquat or diquat) admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between March 2017 and December 2024 were enrolled. Patients were classified into the myocardial injury group (n = 81) and the non-myocardial injury group (n = 124) based on the occurrence of secondary acute myocardial injury. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Patients met the clinical diagnostic criteria for acute pesticide poisoning [
9]; (2) A clear history of pesticide exposure or ingestion; (3) Hospital admission within 4 hours of poisoning; (4) Age
18 years; (5) Serum cholinesterase activity reduced to less than 30% of normal levels; (6) First-time pesticide poisoning. The exclusion criteria included: (1) Presence of cardiovascular or immune system comorbidities; (2) History of cardiac surgery; (3) Incomplete clinical data; (4) Death on the day of hospital admission; (5) Poisoned caused by combining other drugs; (6) Receipt of blood purification therapy before admission.
2.2 Research Methods and Relevant Definitions
2.2.1 Diagnostic Criteria for Myocardial Injury
Two days after admission, if the following two criteria are met, secondary myocardial injury was diagnosed two days after admission if two or more of the following criteria were: (1) Clinical symptoms such as chest tightness, palpitations, or precordial discomfort; (2) Cardiac enzyme levels at least two times higher above the normal reference range; (3) New electrocardiographic abnormalities, including ST-segment and T-wave (ST-T) segment alterations, frequent premature ventricular contractions, or conduction blocks [
10].
2.2.2 Toxicity Grading Criteria
The Poison Severity Score (PSS) was developed between 1990 and 1994 by the European Association of Poison Centers and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) [
11], in collaboration with the International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS) and the European Commission, as a standardized and reliable scoring system to describe the severity of poisoning. The score does not provide prognostic information. PSS grades poisoning severity as follows: 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe; and 4 = fatal. Therefore, all deceased patients are assigned a score of 4. In this study, patients with a PSS score
3 were classified as having severe poisoning.
2.2.3 Laboratory Indices
Within 24 hours of hospitalization, blood gas analysis, complete blood count, and biochemical parameters were measured. The albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) and anion gap (AG) were calculated using the following formulas [
12]:
2.2.4 Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) [
13] comprises three components: the acute physiology score, age score, and chronic health score. A higher total score indicates a more severe condition and an increased risk of mortality.
2.2.5 Definitions of Respiratory Failure and Renal Dysfunction
Respiratory failure [
14] is defined as Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial blood (PaO
2)
60 mmHg, with or without Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Arterial Blood (PaCO
2)
50 mmHg. Acute kidney disease [
15] is characterized by a
35% decrease in glomerular filtration rate or a
50% increase in serum creatinine.
2.2.6 Comparison of Cardiac Function Indicators and Survival in Patients With Different AMAG Values Before and After Treatment
Patients’ echocardiograms before treatment and after treatment and survival within 6 months after discharge were collected.
2.2.7 General Data Collection
General patient information was retrieved from the hospital’s electronic medical record system.
2.3 Statistical Analysis
The collected experimental data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For normally distributed continuous variables, data were presented as mean standard deviation ( S). The independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups, and the paired sample t test was used for comparison within groups. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies, with comparisons made using the chi-square (2) test. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors influencing secondary myocardial injury. Significant variables from univariate analysis were tested for multicollinearity before inclusion into the logistic regression model. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between variables. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of ACAG for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test. A p-value 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1 Univariate Analysis of Factors Influencing Secondary Acute Myocardial Injury in Patients With Acute Pesticide Poisoning
Comparisons of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pesticide type, time to admission, hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count (PLT), renal dysfunction, and admission heart rate revealed no statistically significant differences between groups (
p 0.05). However, AG, ACAG, number of respiratory failure cases, APACHE II score, and number of severe poisoning cases were significantly higher in the myocardial injury group compared to the non-myocardial injury group (
p 0.05). In contrast, albumin levels were significantly lower in the myocardial injury group (
p 0.05), as shown in
Table 1.
3.2 Variable Correlation Analysis
According to correlation analysis, ACAG was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.528,
p 0.05) and positively correlated with AG and APACHE II scores (r = 0.974 and 0.365, respectively;
p 0.05). Respiratory failure was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.160,
p 0.05) and positively correlated with APACHE II score (r = 0.206,
p 0.05). Severe poisoning was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.217,
p 0.05) and positively correlated with ACAG and AG (r = 0.230 and 0.199, respectively;
p 0.05), as shown in
Table 2.
3.3 Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Influencing Factors
Multicollinearity analysis was performed on significant variables identified in univariate analysis, leading to the exclusion of AG and albumin. ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and severe poisoning were used as independent variables in a binary logistic regression model, with the occurrence of secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning as the dependent variable (myocardial-injury = 1; non-myocardial-injury = 0). The results of the binary Logistics regression analysis indicated that ACAG (OR = 1.586 (1.358, 1.853)), respiratory failure (OR = 4.432 (1.838, 10.685)), APACHE II (OR = 1.242 (1.118, 1.380)), and severe poisoning (OR = 3.472 (1.392, 8.664)) were influencing factors for the occurrence of secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning (
p 0.05), as shown in Tables
3,
4.
3.4 ROC Curve Analysis of Predictive Value
The ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for ACAG was 0.859 (
p 0.001), with a standard error of 0.025 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.809–0.909. The corresponding Youden index was 0.55. At this threshold, the sensitivity was 59.26%, and the specificity was 95.97%. For APACHE II, the AUC was 0.770 (
p 0.001), with a standard error of 0.035 and a 95% CI of 0.701–0.839. The Youden index was 0.46, with a sensitivity of 54.32% and a specificity of 91.94%. The AUC for severe poisoning was 0.630 (
p = 0.002), with a standard error of 0.041 and a 95% CI of 0.551–0.709. The Youden index was 0.26, with a sensitivity of 49.38% and a specificity of 76.61%. For respiratory failure, the AUC was 0.657 (
p 0.001), with a standard error of 0.040 and a 95% CI of 0.580–0.735. The corresponding Youden index was 0.31, with a sensitivity of 60.49% and a specificity of 70.97% (
Table 5 and
Fig. 2).
3.5 Optimal Cutoff Value of ACAG and Patient Survival Rate
The survival probability in the group with ACAG
24.54 was significantly higher than that in the group with ACAG
24.54 (
p 0.05). Refer to
Table 6 for further details.
3.6 Comparison of Cardiac Function Indicators Before and After Treatment in Patients With Different ACAG Values
Before treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed in cardiac function indicators between the groups (
p 0.05). After treatment, cardiac function indicators in patients with ACAG
24.54 were significantly superior to those in patients with ACAG
24.54, and the difference was statistically significant (
p 0.05). Refer to
Table 7 for detailed data.
4. Discussion
In this study, clinical data from 205 patients with acute pesticide poisoning were analyzed to investigate the predictive value of ACAG for secondary acute myocardial injury. The results indicate that ACAG is a valuable indicator for predicting secondary acute myocardial injury in such patients, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity.
Significant differences were observed between the two groups in ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and poisoning severity. Binary logistic regression analysis confirmed that ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and severity of poisoning are independent influencing factors for the development of secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. A previous study by Aydın and Aksakal [
16] also indicated a significant association between elevated ACAG and increased mortality rate in hospitalized heart failure patients. These findings are consistent with the current study, providing additional validation for the current research. These findings suggest that ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and poisoning severity are key factors contributing to the risk of secondary acute myocardial injury following pesticide poisoning. Several potential mechanisms may explain these associations. First, ACAG reflects electrolyte balance. Pesticide poisoning often leads to electrolyte imbalances, particularly acid-base disturbances. As a sensitive indicator of these imbalances, changes in ACAG may reflect variations in intracellular and extracellular ion concentrations in myocardial cells, contributing to myocardial injury.
Second, ACAG is related to inflammatory responses. Pesticide exposure triggers systemic inflammation, and changes in albumin levels may indicate the severity and duration of this response [
17]. Since ACAG adjusts the anion gap corrected for albumin, it may indirectly reflect the inflammatory response status of the body, thereby affecting myocardial outcomes [
18]. Third, ACAG is linked to renal function. Pesticide-induced nephrotoxicity may impair acid-base balance. By correcting for albumin levels, ACAG offers a more accurate reflection of the renal function status on the anion gap, which is closely associated with myocardial injury [
19,
20]. Lastly, ACAG directly correlates with the severity of poisoning. Patients with severe poisoning show significantly higher ACAG values than those with mild poisoning, indicating that ACAG may serve as a sensitive marker for identifying patients at higher risk of myocardial injury.
Further correlation analysis revealed that ACAG is negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.528) and positively correlated with anion gap (AG), APACHE II score and severe Poisoning (r = 0.974, 0.365, 0.230). These correlation results suggest that variations in ACAG are closely related to the overall severity of the patient’s condition, with a particularly strong correlation with the APACHE II score, which reflects the clinical severity. This further supports the feasibility of using ACAG as a predictive indicator for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. Although ACAG demonstrates high specificity and may help reduce unnecessary medical interventions, its sensitivity is relatively low. This may be due to its stronger emphasis on accurately identifying patients without acute myocardial injury, which may limit its potential to capture certain characteristics of patients with acute myocardial injury. Consequently, some cases may be missed during screening, which limits its effectiveness as a universal clinical screening tool.
To evaluate the predictive value of ACAG for acute myocardial injury, this study employed ROC curve analysis. The findings indicate that ACAG has the highest predictive value, with an AUC of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.809–0.909), a standard error of 0.025, and a Youden index of 0.55. At this threshold, the sensitivity was 59.26%, and the specificity was 95.97%. A previous study by Lu
et al. [
21] also demonstrated that ACAG performs well in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction, which is consistent with the results of this study. These findings suggest that ACAG not only exhibits high predictive accuracy but also excels in specificity. High specificity indicates that, in clinical practice, ACAG can accurately identify patients without acute myocardial injury, thereby helping avoid unnecessary medical interventions and optimizing the use of medical resources.
Furthermore, this study compared the survival probability and post-treatment cardiac function indicators of patients across different ACAG levels. The results showed that the survival probability in the ACAG
24.54 group was significantly higher than in the ACAG
24.54 group. Additionally, post-treatment cardiac function indicators in the ACAG
24.54 group were significantly superior to those in the ACAG
24.54 group. These findings further underscore the value of ACAG in predicting prognosis and cardiac function in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. In clinical practice, physicians can formulate more personalized treatment strategies by considering the patient’s ACAG level in conjunction with other clinical indicators. For patients with elevated ACAG levels, closer monitoring and earlier intervention may help reduce the risk of acute myocardial injury, improve prognosis, and enhance quality of life. Previous research by Xu
et al. [
22] showed that incorporating ACAG into clinical decision-making for atrial fibrillation could improve treatment outcomes, which is consistent with the findings of this study and further supports the predictive value of ACAG in prognosis.
Based on the findings of this study, several clinical implications can be proposed. First, in patients with elevated ACAG, more intensive cardioprotective interventions, such as optimizing electrolyte balance or administering antioxidant therapy, may yield significant benefits. For example, dynamic monitoring of ACAG levels may guide the targeted use of antioxidants (e.g., N-acetylcysteine) or inform the application of mechanical ventilation to improve oxygenation in patients with respiratory failure, thereby reducing the risk of myocardial injury. Moreover, emerging therapeutic approaches such as exome-delivered circular RNAs (circRNAs) offer promising new directions for myocardial protection. Hu
et al. [
23] reported that adipose-derived exosomal circ-0008302 could mitigate oxidative stress-induced myocardial damage by targeting the Mir-466i-5p/MStrA pathway, suggesting that RNA-based exosome therapy may represent a novel treatment strategy for patients with elevated ACAG.
Current standard treatments for acute myocardial injury, such as beta blockers and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, are not yet stratified based on ACAG levels. Future studies should explore the potential value of ACAG as a treatment stratification biomarker. For instance, whether patients with ACAG 24.54 should receive prioritized intensive monitoring or early intervention, such as continuous Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and dynamic myocardial enzyme profiling, remains an open question. Additionally, individualized treatment plans could incorporate ACAG measurements, especially in high-risk patients with significantly elevated ACAG levels. A comprehensive therapeutic approach combining antioxidant therapy, exosome-based interventions, and mechanical support, guided by dynamic ACAG trends, may enable precision myocardial protection and optimize clinical outcomes.
The results of this study suggest that ACAG holds promising potential for predicting secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. However, certain limitations should be acknowledged. First, the sample size was relatively small, which may impact the accuracy and generalizability of the results. Future research should include larger-scale, multicenter studies for further validation. Second, this study did not assess the dynamic changes in ACAG over time. Continuous monitoring may better capture disease progression and treatment outcomes. Additionally, this study did not employ statistical methods such as the DeLong test to compare the AUC values of ACAG with other predictors (e.g., APACHE II score). Without such comparisons, it is challenging to determine whether the differences are statistically significant. The current results only suggest a certain degree of predictive value, and more conclusive evidence is needed. Future studies should focus on expanding the sample size and incorporating dynamic monitoring to enhance the predictive accuracy and clinical utility of ACAG in the management of patients with acute pesticide poisoning.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, this study confirms the predictive value of ACAG for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning through in-depth analysis of clinical data. ACAG is closely associated with the overall severity of the patient’s condition and demonstrates excellent specificity. Additionally, ACAG levels are strongly linked to patient prognosis. With continued research and advances in clinical practice, broader applications of ACAG in the management of acute pesticide poisoning are anticipated. Simultaneously, the ongoing development and refinement of other relevant indicators and diagnostic methods will be essential to further improve patient outcomes and enhance the overall quality of care for patients with acute pesticide poisoning.
Key Points
ACAG demonstrates significant predictive value for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning, with the area under the ROC curve reaching 0.859 (sensitivity 59.26%, specificity 95.97%).
Binary logistic regression analysis identified ACAG (OR = 1.586), respiratory failure (OR = 4.432), APACHE II score (OR = 1.242), and severe poisoning (OR = 3.472) as independent risk factors for secondary myocardial injury.
Correlation analysis revealed that ACAG is negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.528) and positively correlated with anion gap (AG), APACHE II score and severe Poisoning (r = 0.974, 0.365, 0.230).
An ACAG cutoff value of 24.54 can effectively distinguish patients at high risk of pesticide poisoning.
Availability of Data and Materials
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.