Predictive Value of Albumin-Corrected Anion Gap for Secondary Acute Myocardial Injury in Patients With Acute Pesticide Poisoning

Jiayuan Wang , Bin Li

British Journal of Hospital Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 87 ›› Issue (2) : 50656

PDF (931KB)
British Journal of Hospital Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 87 ›› Issue (2) :50656 DOI: 10.31083/BJHM50656
Article
research-article
Predictive Value of Albumin-Corrected Anion Gap for Secondary Acute Myocardial Injury in Patients With Acute Pesticide Poisoning
Author information +
History +
PDF (931KB)

Abstract

Aims/Background:

Acute pesticide poisoning frequently results in secondary acute myocardial injury. Identifying predictive biomarkers, such as albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG), is crucial for early intervention. This study aimed to explore the predictive value of ACAG for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 205 patients with acute pesticide poisoning admitted between March 2017 and December 2024. Patients were classified into a myocardial injury group (n = 81) and a non-myocardial injury group (n = 124) based on the presence of secondary acute myocardial injury. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were employed to identify factors influencing secondary acute myocardial injury. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between variables, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the predictive value of ACAG.

Results:

No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pesticide type, admission time, hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count (PLT), renal insufficiency, or admission heart rate (p > 0.05). The myocardial injury group had significantly higher anion gap (AG) and ACAG values, incidence of respiratory failure, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, and number of severe poisoning cases compared to the non-myocardial injury group (p < 0.05). Albumin levels were significantly lower in the myocardial injury group (p < 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed that ACAG was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.528, p < 0.05) and positively correlated with AG and APACHE II scores (r = 0.974, 0.365, p < 0.05). Respiratory failure was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.160, p < 0.05) and positively correlated with APACHE II scores (r = 0.206, p < 0.05). Severe poisoning showed a negative correlation with albumin (r = –0.217, p < 0.05) and positive correlations with ACAG and AG (r = 0.230, 0.199, p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that ACAG (odds ratio (OR) = 1.586, p < 0.001), respiratory failure (OR = 4.432, p = 0.001), APACHE II score (OR = 1.242, p < 0.001), and severe poisoning (OR = 3.472, p = 0.008) were significant influencing factors for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. ROC analysis results showed that ACAG had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.859 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.809–0.909, p < 0.001), with a standard error of 0.025, a Youden index of 0.55, sensitivity of 59.26%, and specificity of 95.97%. Patients with ACAG ≤24.54 had significantly higher survival probability and better post-treatment cardiac function indicators than those with ACAG >24.54 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

ACAG has strong predictive value for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. It is recommended that ACAG be routinely assessed upon admission in these patients.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

albumin / acute myocardial injury / anion / pesticide

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiayuan Wang, Bin Li. Predictive Value of Albumin-Corrected Anion Gap for Secondary Acute Myocardial Injury in Patients With Acute Pesticide Poisoning. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2026, 87(2): 50656 DOI:10.31083/BJHM50656

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

The frequent occurrence of pesticide poisoning and its associated high fatality rate pose a serious threat to the health of rural residents [1]. Rural hospitals admit hundreds of patients annually for pesticide poisoning, with a mortality rate as high as 15–30% [2, 3]. This alarming situation not only threatens the lives of farmers but also places immense pressure on the rural healthcare system. Patients poisoned with pesticides, especially paraquat and diquat, experience severe pain accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Additionally, the respiratory system is severely affected. Following pesticide poisoning, patients may develop progressive respiratory distress and cyanosis due to pesticide-induced damage to the structural and functional integrity of the lungs, leading to pulmonary edema, fibrosis, and respiratory failure. In severe cases, mechanical ventilation may be required within a short period to sustain life [4, 5].

Management of pesticide poisoning involves the rapid removal of toxic substances, including the removal of contaminated clothing and skin decontamination. In cases of oral ingestion, vomiting and gastric lavage are necessary. Specific antidotes, such as atropine and tripralidoxime, should be administered according to the poisoning agent, for organophosphorus poisoning, while closely monitoring and supporting vital signs. Blood purification therapy should be considered when clinically indicated.

In this study, pesticide poisoning detection and analysis were performed using Agilent 6495 high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Plasma samples were pretreated with methanol protein precipitation. An acetonitrile-water gradient mobile phase was employed with a flow rate of 0.4 mLmin-1. Sample separation was achieved using a Waters XBridge BEH HILIC column XP (100 mm long, 2.1 mm inner diameter, 2.5 µm particle diameter) (Part No. 186006079, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted in electrospray ionization (ESI) positive ion mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for quantification of paraquat (m/z 186.1171.1) and diquat (m/z 183.1157.1). This method was applied to detect clinical plasma concentrations of paraquat and diquat, with a 5 µL injection volume used for high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) system analysis.

The albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG), a clinical indicator reflecting renal function and acid-base balance status, has garnered increasing attention in recent years. The anion gap, defined as the difference between unmeasured cations and anions in the blood, is widely used to assess acid-base imbalances [6]. As albumin is a negatively charged protein, fluctuations in its concentration can influence the anion gap calculation. Therefore, correcting the anion gap for albumin levels yields more accurate diagnostic insights and better informs clinical management. Several studies have explored the use of ACAG in cardiac-related conditions [7, 8]. However, research on the predictive value of ACAG for myocardial injury due to pesticide poisoning remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ACAG and secondary myocardial injury and to evaluate its predictive performance. The goal was to uncover potential associations between ACAG and acute myocardial injury, thereby providing new insights and methods for early intervention and prognostic assessment in patients with pesticide poisoning.

2. Methods

2.1 Research Objects

This study included 16 variables. According to the principle that the sample size should be 5–20 times the number of variables, and considering a 20% missing data rate, the required sample size was estimated to range between 96 and 384. Due to the limitations inherent in a retrospective design, achieving complete double-blinding was not feasible. However, data extraction and outcome assessment were independently performed by investigators blinded to group allocation to minimize bias. Screening and enrollment are shown in Fig. 1.

A total of 205 patients with acute pesticide poisoning (paraquat or diquat) admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between March 2017 and December 2024 were enrolled. Patients were classified into the myocardial injury group (n = 81) and the non-myocardial injury group (n = 124) based on the occurrence of secondary acute myocardial injury. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Patients met the clinical diagnostic criteria for acute pesticide poisoning [9]; (2) A clear history of pesticide exposure or ingestion; (3) Hospital admission within 4 hours of poisoning; (4) Age 18 years; (5) Serum cholinesterase activity reduced to less than 30% of normal levels; (6) First-time pesticide poisoning. The exclusion criteria included: (1) Presence of cardiovascular or immune system comorbidities; (2) History of cardiac surgery; (3) Incomplete clinical data; (4) Death on the day of hospital admission; (5) Poisoned caused by combining other drugs; (6) Receipt of blood purification therapy before admission.

2.2 Research Methods and Relevant Definitions

2.2.1 Diagnostic Criteria for Myocardial Injury

Two days after admission, if the following two criteria are met, secondary myocardial injury was diagnosed two days after admission if two or more of the following criteria were: (1) Clinical symptoms such as chest tightness, palpitations, or precordial discomfort; (2) Cardiac enzyme levels at least two times higher above the normal reference range; (3) New electrocardiographic abnormalities, including ST-segment and T-wave (ST-T) segment alterations, frequent premature ventricular contractions, or conduction blocks [10].

2.2.2 Toxicity Grading Criteria

The Poison Severity Score (PSS) was developed between 1990 and 1994 by the European Association of Poison Centers and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) [11], in collaboration with the International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS) and the European Commission, as a standardized and reliable scoring system to describe the severity of poisoning. The score does not provide prognostic information. PSS grades poisoning severity as follows: 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe; and 4 = fatal. Therefore, all deceased patients are assigned a score of 4. In this study, patients with a PSS score 3 were classified as having severe poisoning.

2.2.3 Laboratory Indices

Within 24 hours of hospitalization, blood gas analysis, complete blood count, and biochemical parameters were measured. The albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) and anion gap (AG) were calculated using the following formulas [12]:

ACAG = AG + [ 44 - albumin ( g/L ) ] × 0.25 ; AG = ( Na + + K + ) - ( Cl - + HCO 3 - ) .

2.2.4 Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) [13] comprises three components: the acute physiology score, age score, and chronic health score. A higher total score indicates a more severe condition and an increased risk of mortality.

2.2.5 Definitions of Respiratory Failure and Renal Dysfunction

Respiratory failure [14] is defined as Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial blood (PaO2) <60 mmHg, with or without Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Arterial Blood (PaCO2) >50 mmHg. Acute kidney disease [15] is characterized by a 35% decrease in glomerular filtration rate or a 50% increase in serum creatinine.

2.2.6 Comparison of Cardiac Function Indicators and Survival in Patients With Different AMAG Values Before and After Treatment

Patients’ echocardiograms before treatment and after treatment and survival within 6 months after discharge were collected.

2.2.7 General Data Collection

General patient information was retrieved from the hospital’s electronic medical record system.

2.3 Statistical Analysis

The collected experimental data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For normally distributed continuous variables, data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (X¯ ± S). The independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups, and the paired sample t test was used for comparison within groups. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies, with comparisons made using the chi-square (χ2) test. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors influencing secondary myocardial injury. Significant variables from univariate analysis were tested for multicollinearity before inclusion into the logistic regression model. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between variables. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of ACAG for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 Univariate Analysis of Factors Influencing Secondary Acute Myocardial Injury in Patients With Acute Pesticide Poisoning

Comparisons of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pesticide type, time to admission, hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count (PLT), renal dysfunction, and admission heart rate revealed no statistically significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). However, AG, ACAG, number of respiratory failure cases, APACHE II score, and number of severe poisoning cases were significantly higher in the myocardial injury group compared to the non-myocardial injury group (p < 0.05). In contrast, albumin levels were significantly lower in the myocardial injury group (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 1.

3.2 Variable Correlation Analysis

According to correlation analysis, ACAG was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.528, p < 0.05) and positively correlated with AG and APACHE II scores (r = 0.974 and 0.365, respectively; p < 0.05). Respiratory failure was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.160, p < 0.05) and positively correlated with APACHE II score (r = 0.206, p < 0.05). Severe poisoning was negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.217, p < 0.05) and positively correlated with ACAG and AG (r = 0.230 and 0.199, respectively; p < 0.05), as shown in Table 2.

3.3 Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Influencing Factors

Multicollinearity analysis was performed on significant variables identified in univariate analysis, leading to the exclusion of AG and albumin. ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and severe poisoning were used as independent variables in a binary logistic regression model, with the occurrence of secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning as the dependent variable (myocardial-injury = 1; non-myocardial-injury = 0). The results of the binary Logistics regression analysis indicated that ACAG (OR = 1.586 (1.358, 1.853)), respiratory failure (OR = 4.432 (1.838, 10.685)), APACHE II (OR = 1.242 (1.118, 1.380)), and severe poisoning (OR = 3.472 (1.392, 8.664)) were influencing factors for the occurrence of secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning (p < 0.05), as shown in Tables 3,4.

3.4 ROC Curve Analysis of Predictive Value

The ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for ACAG was 0.859 (p < 0.001), with a standard error of 0.025 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.809–0.909. The corresponding Youden index was 0.55. At this threshold, the sensitivity was 59.26%, and the specificity was 95.97%. For APACHE II, the AUC was 0.770 (p < 0.001), with a standard error of 0.035 and a 95% CI of 0.701–0.839. The Youden index was 0.46, with a sensitivity of 54.32% and a specificity of 91.94%. The AUC for severe poisoning was 0.630 (p = 0.002), with a standard error of 0.041 and a 95% CI of 0.551–0.709. The Youden index was 0.26, with a sensitivity of 49.38% and a specificity of 76.61%. For respiratory failure, the AUC was 0.657 (p < 0.001), with a standard error of 0.040 and a 95% CI of 0.580–0.735. The corresponding Youden index was 0.31, with a sensitivity of 60.49% and a specificity of 70.97% (Table 5 and Fig. 2).

3.5 Optimal Cutoff Value of ACAG and Patient Survival Rate

The survival probability in the group with ACAG 24.54 was significantly higher than that in the group with ACAG >24.54 (p < 0.05). Refer to Table 6 for further details.

3.6 Comparison of Cardiac Function Indicators Before and After Treatment in Patients With Different ACAG Values

Before treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed in cardiac function indicators between the groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, cardiac function indicators in patients with ACAG 24.54 were significantly superior to those in patients with ACAG >24.54, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Refer to Table 7 for detailed data.

4. Discussion

In this study, clinical data from 205 patients with acute pesticide poisoning were analyzed to investigate the predictive value of ACAG for secondary acute myocardial injury. The results indicate that ACAG is a valuable indicator for predicting secondary acute myocardial injury in such patients, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity.

Significant differences were observed between the two groups in ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and poisoning severity. Binary logistic regression analysis confirmed that ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and severity of poisoning are independent influencing factors for the development of secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. A previous study by Aydın and Aksakal [16] also indicated a significant association between elevated ACAG and increased mortality rate in hospitalized heart failure patients. These findings are consistent with the current study, providing additional validation for the current research. These findings suggest that ACAG, respiratory failure, APACHE II score, and poisoning severity are key factors contributing to the risk of secondary acute myocardial injury following pesticide poisoning. Several potential mechanisms may explain these associations. First, ACAG reflects electrolyte balance. Pesticide poisoning often leads to electrolyte imbalances, particularly acid-base disturbances. As a sensitive indicator of these imbalances, changes in ACAG may reflect variations in intracellular and extracellular ion concentrations in myocardial cells, contributing to myocardial injury.

Second, ACAG is related to inflammatory responses. Pesticide exposure triggers systemic inflammation, and changes in albumin levels may indicate the severity and duration of this response [17]. Since ACAG adjusts the anion gap corrected for albumin, it may indirectly reflect the inflammatory response status of the body, thereby affecting myocardial outcomes [18]. Third, ACAG is linked to renal function. Pesticide-induced nephrotoxicity may impair acid-base balance. By correcting for albumin levels, ACAG offers a more accurate reflection of the renal function status on the anion gap, which is closely associated with myocardial injury [19, 20]. Lastly, ACAG directly correlates with the severity of poisoning. Patients with severe poisoning show significantly higher ACAG values than those with mild poisoning, indicating that ACAG may serve as a sensitive marker for identifying patients at higher risk of myocardial injury.

Further correlation analysis revealed that ACAG is negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.528) and positively correlated with anion gap (AG), APACHE II score and severe Poisoning (r = 0.974, 0.365, 0.230). These correlation results suggest that variations in ACAG are closely related to the overall severity of the patient’s condition, with a particularly strong correlation with the APACHE II score, which reflects the clinical severity. This further supports the feasibility of using ACAG as a predictive indicator for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. Although ACAG demonstrates high specificity and may help reduce unnecessary medical interventions, its sensitivity is relatively low. This may be due to its stronger emphasis on accurately identifying patients without acute myocardial injury, which may limit its potential to capture certain characteristics of patients with acute myocardial injury. Consequently, some cases may be missed during screening, which limits its effectiveness as a universal clinical screening tool.

To evaluate the predictive value of ACAG for acute myocardial injury, this study employed ROC curve analysis. The findings indicate that ACAG has the highest predictive value, with an AUC of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.809–0.909), a standard error of 0.025, and a Youden index of 0.55. At this threshold, the sensitivity was 59.26%, and the specificity was 95.97%. A previous study by Lu et al. [21] also demonstrated that ACAG performs well in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction, which is consistent with the results of this study. These findings suggest that ACAG not only exhibits high predictive accuracy but also excels in specificity. High specificity indicates that, in clinical practice, ACAG can accurately identify patients without acute myocardial injury, thereby helping avoid unnecessary medical interventions and optimizing the use of medical resources.

Furthermore, this study compared the survival probability and post-treatment cardiac function indicators of patients across different ACAG levels. The results showed that the survival probability in the ACAG 24.54 group was significantly higher than in the ACAG >24.54 group. Additionally, post-treatment cardiac function indicators in the ACAG 24.54 group were significantly superior to those in the ACAG >24.54 group. These findings further underscore the value of ACAG in predicting prognosis and cardiac function in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. In clinical practice, physicians can formulate more personalized treatment strategies by considering the patient’s ACAG level in conjunction with other clinical indicators. For patients with elevated ACAG levels, closer monitoring and earlier intervention may help reduce the risk of acute myocardial injury, improve prognosis, and enhance quality of life. Previous research by Xu et al. [22] showed that incorporating ACAG into clinical decision-making for atrial fibrillation could improve treatment outcomes, which is consistent with the findings of this study and further supports the predictive value of ACAG in prognosis.

Based on the findings of this study, several clinical implications can be proposed. First, in patients with elevated ACAG, more intensive cardioprotective interventions, such as optimizing electrolyte balance or administering antioxidant therapy, may yield significant benefits. For example, dynamic monitoring of ACAG levels may guide the targeted use of antioxidants (e.g., N-acetylcysteine) or inform the application of mechanical ventilation to improve oxygenation in patients with respiratory failure, thereby reducing the risk of myocardial injury. Moreover, emerging therapeutic approaches such as exome-delivered circular RNAs (circRNAs) offer promising new directions for myocardial protection. Hu et al. [23] reported that adipose-derived exosomal circ-0008302 could mitigate oxidative stress-induced myocardial damage by targeting the Mir-466i-5p/MStrA pathway, suggesting that RNA-based exosome therapy may represent a novel treatment strategy for patients with elevated ACAG.

Current standard treatments for acute myocardial injury, such as beta blockers and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, are not yet stratified based on ACAG levels. Future studies should explore the potential value of ACAG as a treatment stratification biomarker. For instance, whether patients with ACAG >24.54 should receive prioritized intensive monitoring or early intervention, such as continuous Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and dynamic myocardial enzyme profiling, remains an open question. Additionally, individualized treatment plans could incorporate ACAG measurements, especially in high-risk patients with significantly elevated ACAG levels. A comprehensive therapeutic approach combining antioxidant therapy, exosome-based interventions, and mechanical support, guided by dynamic ACAG trends, may enable precision myocardial protection and optimize clinical outcomes.

The results of this study suggest that ACAG holds promising potential for predicting secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning. However, certain limitations should be acknowledged. First, the sample size was relatively small, which may impact the accuracy and generalizability of the results. Future research should include larger-scale, multicenter studies for further validation. Second, this study did not assess the dynamic changes in ACAG over time. Continuous monitoring may better capture disease progression and treatment outcomes. Additionally, this study did not employ statistical methods such as the DeLong test to compare the AUC values of ACAG with other predictors (e.g., APACHE II score). Without such comparisons, it is challenging to determine whether the differences are statistically significant. The current results only suggest a certain degree of predictive value, and more conclusive evidence is needed. Future studies should focus on expanding the sample size and incorporating dynamic monitoring to enhance the predictive accuracy and clinical utility of ACAG in the management of patients with acute pesticide poisoning.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study confirms the predictive value of ACAG for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning through in-depth analysis of clinical data. ACAG is closely associated with the overall severity of the patient’s condition and demonstrates excellent specificity. Additionally, ACAG levels are strongly linked to patient prognosis. With continued research and advances in clinical practice, broader applications of ACAG in the management of acute pesticide poisoning are anticipated. Simultaneously, the ongoing development and refinement of other relevant indicators and diagnostic methods will be essential to further improve patient outcomes and enhance the overall quality of care for patients with acute pesticide poisoning.

Key Points

ACAG demonstrates significant predictive value for secondary acute myocardial injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning, with the area under the ROC curve reaching 0.859 (sensitivity 59.26%, specificity 95.97%).

Binary logistic regression analysis identified ACAG (OR = 1.586), respiratory failure (OR = 4.432), APACHE II score (OR = 1.242), and severe poisoning (OR = 3.472) as independent risk factors for secondary myocardial injury.

Correlation analysis revealed that ACAG is negatively correlated with albumin (r = –0.528) and positively correlated with anion gap (AG), APACHE II score and severe Poisoning (r = 0.974, 0.365, 0.230).

An ACAG cutoff value of 24.54 can effectively distinguish patients at high risk of pesticide poisoning.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

[1]

Keleb A, Ademas A, Abebe M, Berihun G, Desye B, Bezie AE. Knowledge of health risks, safety practices, acute pesticide poisoning, and associated factors among farmers in rural irrigation areas of northeastern Ethiopia. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024; 12: 1474487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1474487.

[2]

Eizadi-Mood N, Mahvari R, Akafzadeh Savari M, Mohammadbeigi E, Feizi A, Mirmoghtadaei P, et al. Acute pesticide poisoning in the central part of Iran: A 4-year cross-sectional study. SAGE Open Medicine. 2023; 11: 20503121221147352. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121221147352.

[3]

Kouli M, Al Houri HN, Jomaa S, Issa A, Arrouk DMN, Alhouri A, et al. Epidemiology of poisoning in Syria (1999 through 2020). Clinical Toxicology. 2023; 61: 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2022.2156882.

[4]

Jones GM, Vale JA. Mechanisms of toxicity, clinical features, and management of diquat poisoning: a review. Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology. 2000; 38: 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1081/clt-100100926.

[5]

Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Duarte JA, Sánchez-Navarro A, Remião F, Bastos ML, Carvalho F. Paraquat poisonings: mechanisms of lung toxicity, clinical features, and treatment. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 2008; 38: 13–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440701669959.

[6]

Zhang B, Bai J, Wang H, Huang F, Miao L, Wang J, et al. Prognostic Value of the Albumin Corrected Anion Gap in ICU Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Sepsis: A MIMIC-IV Cohort Study. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2025; 20: 3979–3992. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S544857.

[7]

Pan Z, Lin J, Huo C, Yin D, Guo Q. Increased serum albumin corrected anion gap levels are associated with poor prognosis in septic patients with liver cirrhosis. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14: 21510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72703-6.

[8]

Wang M, Yang S, Deng J, Wu D, He C, Li G, et al. Unveiling the hidden risks: albumin-corrected anion gap as a superior marker for cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: insights from a nationally prospective cohort study. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2024; 15: 1461047. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1461047.

[9]

Simpson WM, Jr, Schuman SH. Recognition and management of acute pesticide poisoning. American Family Physician. 2002; 65: 1599–1604.

[10]

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018; 138: e618–e651. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617.

[11]

Persson HE, Sjöberg GK, Haines JA, Pronczuk de Garbino J. Poisoning severity score. Grading of acute poisoning. Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology. 1998; 36: 205–213. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563659809028940.

[12]

López A, García B, Gómez A, González L, González N, Martín L, et al. Concordance of the ions and GAP anion obtained by gasometry vs standard laboratory in critical care. Medicina Intensiva. 2019; 43: 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2018.06.009.

[13]

Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine. 1985; 13: 818–829.

[14]

Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. The European Respiratory Journal. 2017; 50: 1602426. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02426-2016.

[15]

Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, Chawla LS, Parikh CR, Thakar CV, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2013; 61: 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.349.

[16]

Aydın SŞ Aksakal E. Relationship Between Albumin-Corrected Anion Gap and Mortality in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients. Cureus. 2023; 15: e45967. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45967.

[17]

Sheng H, Lu J, Zhong L, Hu B, Sun X, Dong H. The correlation between albumin-corrected anion gap and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. ESC Heart Failure. 2024; 11: 826–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14639.

[18]

Wang Y, Tao Y, Yuan M, Yu P, Zhang K, Ying H, et al. Relationship between the albumin-corrected anion gap and short-term prognosis among patients with cardiogenic shock: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV and eICU databases. BMJ Open. 2024; 14: e081597. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081597.

[19]

Alevrakis E, Papadakis DD, Vagionas D, Koutsoukou A, Pontikis K, Rovina N, et al. Strong ion gap and anion gap corrected for albumin and lactate in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit. International Journal of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology. 2024; 16: 10–27. https://doi.org/10.62347/PTUU2265.

[20]

Guo H, Wang J. Association Between Albumin-Corrected Anion Gap and In-Hospital Mortality and Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. Medical Science Monitor. 2024; 30: e943012. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.943012.

[21]

Lu Z, Yao Y, Xu Y, Zhang X, Wang J. Albumin corrected anion gap for predicting in-hospital death among patients with acute myocardial infarction: A retrospective cohort study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024; 79: 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100455.

[22]

Xu J, Wang Z, Wang Y, Chen X, Ma L, Wang X. Association of elevated albumin-corrected anion gap with all-cause mortality risk in atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2025; 25: 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04518-w.

[23]

Hu C, Wang S, Wang Y, Fan Z, Sun X, Liu Z. Exosomal circRNA-0008302 from Adipose-derived Stem Cells Protects Against Myocardial Injury. Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications. 2024; 9: 965. https://doi.org/10.15212/CVIA.2024.0020.

PDF (931KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/