Effect of horizontal loading on orthodontic microimplants functioning as temporary support of provisional orthopedic constructions

Abstract

Orthodontic implants are currently widely used in dental practice. They are actively used because they provide a fixed support function, which allows using implants to move teeth and their groups. Using the finite element method, this article presents a mathematical analysis of stress distribution in the bone tissue and orthodontic implants providing both temporary support for provisional crowns and temporary support for tooth movement. This study aimed to examine the effect of horizontal load on orthodontic implants by applying mathematical modeling using the finite element method. The use of the finite element method for modeling stress–strain states in the “microimplant–surrounding bone tissue” system was performed with the reproduction of the material properties and parameters of the microimplant and surrounding bone tissue. 3D models of microimplants were created in the Kompas-3D program (Russia), and the stress distribution analysis was performed in the Autodesk Inventor program (USA). In this study, the peak stress values on the microimplants did not exceed 0.218 MPa with the maximum values of 880 MPa. The maximum stress values in the bone tissue were not higher than 0.024 MPa. Thus, the level of the obtained stress–strain states in both the bone tissue and microimplants is safe for horizontal loads.

Keywords

orthodontic implants / finite element method / stress distribution

References

[1] Arsenina OI, Abakarov SI, Popova NV, et al. Orthodontic treatment as a stage of rational dental prosthetics. Stomatology. 2023;102(2):54–62. EDN: LCYUSZ doi: 10.17116/stomat202310202154

[2] Арсенина О.И., Абакаров С.И., Попова Н.В., и др. Ортодонтическое лечение как этап подготовки к рациональному зубному протезированию // Стоматология. 2023. Т. 102, № 2. С. 54–62. EDN: LCYUSZ doi: 10.17116/stomat202310202154

[3] Zhulev EN, Zubareva TO. Modern approach to the planning orthodontic treatment using micro implants. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2013;(6):563. EDN: RVCWCP

[4] Жулев Е.Н., Зубарева Т.О. Современные подходы к планированию ортодонтического лечения с применением микроимплантатов // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2013. № 6. С. 563. EDN: RVCWCP

[5] Persin LS. Orthodontics. Modern methods of diagnostics of dento-mandibular anomalies: a guide for doctors. Moscow: Inform-Kniga; 2007. 248 p. (In Russ.)

[6] Персин Л.С. Ортодонтия. Современные методы диагностики зубочелюстных аномалий: руководство для врачей. Москва: Информ-книга, 2007. 248 с.

[7] Suetenkov DE, Lyasnikova AV. Prospects of orthodontic correction in patients with a high risk of periodontitis using microimplants with modified coating. Parodontologiya. 2009;(3):45–50. EDN: KXRDHJ (In Russ.)

[8] Суетенков Д.Е., Лясникова А.В. Перспективы ортодонтической коррекции у пациентов с высоким риском пародонтита с помощью микроимплантатов с модифицированным покрытием // Пародонтология. 2009. № 3. С. 45–50. EDN: KXRDHJ

[9] Abraham ST, Paul MM. Microimplants for orthodontic anchorage: A review of complication sand management. J Dent Implant. 2013;3(2):165–167. doi: 10.4103/0974-6781.118859

[10] Abraham S.T., Paul M.M. Microimplants for orthodontic anchorage: A review of complication sand management // J Dent Implant. 2013. Vol. 3, N. 2. P. 165–167. doi: 10.4103/0974-6781.118859

[11] Barros SE, Vanz V, Chiqueto K, et al. Mechanical strength of stainless steel and titanium alloy mini-implants with different diameters: an experimental laboratory study. Prog Orthod. 2021;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00352-w

[12] Barros S.E., Vanz V., Chiqueto K., et al. Mechanical strength of stainless steel and titanium alloy mini-implants with different diameters: an experimental laboratory study // Prog Orthod. 2021. Vol. 22, N. 1. ID 9. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00352-w

[13] Chen Y, Kyung HM, Zhao WT, Yu WJ. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135(3):284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.017

[14] Chen Y., Kyung H.M., Zhao W.T., Yu W.J. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: A systematic review // Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009. Vol. 135, N. 3. P. 284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.017

[15] Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, Sung JH. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35(7):417–422.

[16] Park H.S., Bae S.M., Kyung H.M., Sung J.H. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion // J Clin Orthod. 2001. Vol. 35, N. 7. P. 417–422.

[17] Park HS, Kim JY, Kwon TG. Treatment of a Class II deepbite with microimplant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(3):397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.034

[18] Park H.S., Kim J.Y., Kwon T.G. Treatment of a Class II deepbite with microimplant anchorage // Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011. Vol. 139, N. 3. P. 397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.034

[19] Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYK, Caruso JM. Implants as absolute anchorage. J Calif Dental Assoc. 2005;33(11):881–888. doi: 10.1080/19424396.2005.12224284

[20] Rungcharassaeng K., Kan J.Y.K., Caruso J.M. Implants as absolute anchorage // J Calif Dental Assoc. 2005. Vol. 33, N. 11. P. 881–888. doi: 10.1080/19424396.2005.12224284

[21] Sung JH, Kyung HM, Bae SM. Microimplants in orthodontics. Dentos Inc.; 2006. 173 p.

[22] Sung J.H., Kyung H.M., Bae S.M. Microimplants in orthodontics. Dentos Inc., 2006. 173 p.

[23] Fadeev RA, Cheban MA, Timchenko VV. The article provides adescriptionof the use of orthodontic microimplant at the same time in order to compensate for the defect of the dental series by temporary structures of dentures and to create an artificial support for orthodontic movement of teeth. The dental institute. 2021;(2):65–67. EDN: GTCXAR

[24] Фадеев Р.А., Чебан М.А., Тимченко В.В. Исправление зубочелюстных аномалий у пациентов с частичной потерей зубов с применением микроимплантатов // Институт стоматологии. 2021. № 2. С. 65–67. EDN: GTCXAR

[25] Patent for utility model RUS N. 215905 U1/09.01.2023, MPK A61C8/00. Fadeev RA, Cheban MA. Microimplant for temporary support of provisor orthopaedic construction. (In Russ.)

[26] Патент на полезную модель РФ № 215905 U1/09.01.2023, МПК A61C8/00. Фадеев Р.А., Чебан М.А. Микроимплантат для временной опоры провизорной ортопедической конструкции.

[27] Bogomolova YB, Saakyan MY, Kikeev VA. Analysis of the stress-strain state of bone tissue during orthopedic treatment with all-ceramic crowns made of zirconium dioxide supported by implants. Medical almanac. 2023;(3):48–54. EDN: OGPXZE

[28] Богомолова Ю.Б., Саакян М.Ю., Кикеев В.А. Анализ напряженно-деформированного состояния костной ткани при ортопедическом лечении цельнокерамическими коронками из диоксида циркония с опорой на имплантаты // Медицинский альманах. 2023. № 3. С. 48–54. EDN: OGPXZE

[29] Dyachenko DYu, Dyachenko SV. Finite element method in computer simulation for improved patient care in dentistry: a systematic review. Kuban scientific medical bulletin. 2021;28(5):98–116. EDN: KDCHLT doi: 10.25207/1608-6228-2021-28-5-98-116

[30] Дьяченко Д.Ю., Дьяченко С.В. Применение метода конечных элементов в компьютерной симуляции для улучшения качества лечения пациентов в стоматологии: систематический обзор // Кубанский научный медицинский вестник. 2021. Т. 28, № 5. С. 98–116. EDN: KDCHLT doi: 10.25207/1608-6228-2021-28-5-98-116

[31] Zhuruli GN. Biomechanical factors of efficiency of intraosseous dental implants (experimental-clinical study) [dissertation]. Moscow, 2010. 197 p. (In Russ.)

[32] Журули Г.Н. Биомеханические факторы эффективности внутрикостных стоматологических имплантатов (экспериментально-клиническое исследование): дисс. … д-ра мед. наук. Москва, 2010. 197 с.

[33] Rubnikovich SP, Fisyunov AD, Denisova YL, Serdyuchenko NS. Pin constructions in stomatology: Monograph. Minsk: Belarusian Science Publishing House; 2020. 165 p. (In Russ.)

[34] Рубникович С.П., Фисюнов А.Д., Денисова Ю.Л., Сердюченко Н.С. Штифтовые конструкции в стоматологии: Монография. Минск: ИД Белорусская наука, 2020. 165 с.

[35] Fadeev RA, Cheban MA. Examination of bone tissue in patients with partial loss of teeth and dental anomalies according to cone-beam computed tomography. The dental institute. 2023;(1):21–23. EDN: SNIFFJ

[36] Фадеев Р.А., Чебан М.А. Изучение костной ткани у пациентов с частичной потерей зубов и зубочелюстными аномалиями по данным конусно-лучевой компьютерной томографии // Институт стоматологии. 2023. № 1. С. 21–23. EDN: SNIFFJ

[37] Alexander RG. The Alexander discipline: Contemporary concepts and philosophies. Ormco Corporation; 1986. 461 p.

[38] Alexander R.G. The Alexander discipline: Contemporary concepts and philosophies. Ormco Corporation, 1986. 461 p.

[39] Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians. The Angle orthodontist. 2004;74(1):3–15. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0003:AUOBPA>2.0.CO;2

[40] Frost H.M. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians // The Angle orthodontist. 2004. Vol. 74, N. 1. P. 3–15. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0003:AUOBPA>2.0.CO;2

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector