Morphological Remodeling of the Spinal Cord After Experimental Neurotmesis with Early Ipidacrine Administration: An Electron Microscopy Study

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve injuries represent a significant medical and social concern both in peacetime and during armed conflict. These injuries require prolonged inpatient care and frequently result in long-term disability. In response to peripheral nerve damage, retrograde reactive changes occur in the parent neurons and associated spinal cord cells. Understanding these processes may allow for more accurate predictions of clinical outcomes and recovery timelines. Elucidating the response of the lumbar spinal cord segment to peripheral nerve injury and subsequent treatment may enhance therapeutic efficacy.

AIM: To examine the regularities of reactive changes in the spinal cord segment following neurotmesis in order to improve the strategy and tactics of treating patients with this pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental neurotmesis of the sciatic nerve was surgically induced in six male Wistar rats. Three animals received ipidacrine for seven days, whereas the remaining three served as untreated controls.

RESULTS: This electron microscopy study examined changes in the lumbar segment of the spinal cord seven days after neurotmesis, with and without ipidacrine treatment. Retrograde processes following sciatic nerve injury affected not only the parent neurons of the damaged fibers but also nerve fibers, glial cells (including oligodendrocytes), and the microcirculatory bed. Qualitative and quantitative differences in spinal cord morphology were observed between the experimental and control groups, and morphological predictors of successful recovery were identified.

CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated that a 7-day course of ipidacrine administration following sciatic nerve neurotmesis exerted a beneficial effect on adaptive neuroplastic processes in the lumbar segment of the spinal cord.

Keywords

ipidacrine / neuroglia / neuron / nerve fibers / regeneration / spinal cord / peripheral nerve injury / electron microscopy

References

[1] Zhivolupov SA, Rashidov NA, Onishchenko LS, et al. Characteristics of reactive neuroplastic changes after experimental traumatic neuropathy of sciatic nerve. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2015;(2(50)):163–169. EDN: TVSTHP

[2] Ranson SW. Alterations in the spinal ganglion cells following neurotomy. J Comp Neurol Psychol. 1909;19:125–153. Сitation by Pannese E, Ledda M, Cherkas PS, et al. Satellite cell reactions to axon injury of sensory ganglion neurons: Increase in number of gap junctions and formation of bridges connecting previously separate perineuronal sheaths. Anat Embryol. 2003;206:337–347. doi: 10.1007/s00429-002-0301-6

[3] Nechipurenko NI. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of traumatic lesions of peripheral nerves. Meditsinskiye novosti. 1997;(5):9–16. (In Russ.)

[4] Ambron RT, Walters ET Priming events and retrograde injury signals. A new perspective on the cellular and molecular biology of nerve regeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 1996;13(1):61–79. doi: 10.1007/BF02740752

[5] Odinak MM, Zhivolupov SA. Diseases and injuries of the peripheral nervous system: a tutorial. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit.; 2009. 367. (In Russ.)

[6] Liu Y, Wang H. Peripheral nerve injury induced changes in the spinal cord and strategies to counteract/enhance the changes to promote nerve regeneration. Neural Regen. Res. 2020;(15):189–198. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.265540

[7] Zhivolupov SA, Rashidov NA, Onishchenko LS, et al. The comparative pattern of neuromidin and magnetic stimulation influence on neuroplasticity in experimental traumatic neuropathy. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114 (6):57–62. EDN: STWNNT

[8] Mironov AA, Komissarchik YaYu, Mironov VA. Methods of electron microscopy in biology and medicine: Methodical guide. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 1994. 400. (In Russ.)

[9] Pin JP, Duvoisin R. The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure and functions. Neuropharmacology. 2005;34(1):1–26. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(94)00129-g

[10] Kubatiev AA, Paltsyn AA. Intracellular brain regeneration: a new view. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2012;67(8):21–25. EDN: PDBBSV doi: 10.15690/vramn.v67i8.345

[11] Garbern J, Yool D, Moore G, et al. Patients lacking the major CNS myelin protein, proteolipid protein 1, develop length-dependent axonal degeneration in the absence of demyelination and inflammation. Brain. 2002;(125):551–561. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf043

[12] Fünfschilling U, Supplie LM, Mahad D, et al. Glycolytic oligodendrocytes maintain myelin and long-term axonal integrity. Nature. 2012;485(7399):517–521. doi: 10.1038/nature11007

[13] Nave K-A, Werner HB. Myelination of the nervous system: mechanisms and functions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:503–533. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013101

[14] Duncan GJ, Manesh SB, Hilton BJ, et al. W. The fate and function of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells after traumatic spinal cord injury. Glia. 2020;68(2):227–245. doi: 10.1002/glia.23706

[15] Tarasidis G, Watanabe O, Mackinnon SE, et al. End-to-side neurorrhaphy: A long term study of neural regeneration in a rat model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;119(4):337–341. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70074-9

[16] Goldberg JL. How does an axon grow? Genes Dev. 2003;17(8):941–958. doi: 10.1101/gad.1062303

[17] Gordh T, Sharma HS. Chronic spinal nerve ligation induces microvascular permeability disturbances, astrocytic reaction, and structural changes in the rat spinal cord. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;96:335–340. doi: 10.1007/3-211-30714-1_70

[18] Lanskaya OV. Synaptic and neuronal plasticity in various functional states of the nervous system. NovaInfo.Ru. 2016;2(57):35–52. EDN: XETGPR

[19] Semchenko VV, Stepanov SS, Bogolepov NN. Synaptic plasticity of the brain (fundamental and applied aspects). M.: Directmedia; 2014. 498 p. (In Russ.)

[20] Kuo MF, Grosch J, Fregni F, et al. Focusing еffect of acetylcholine on neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci. 2007;27(52):14442–14447. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4104-07.2007

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector