Acute appendicitis in adults: only clinical and laboratory diagnostics, only imaging, or both?

Abstract

The presented article is devoted to the discussion of the necessity and expediency of using medical visualization diagnostics — radiological imaging — of acute appendicitis as an independent or complex approach in combination with clinical and laboratory data. Until now, the clinical diagnosis of each individual case of acute appendicitis is complicated, and its formulation requires combining clinical, laboratory and imaging data, since it includes a wide range of differential diagnoses depending on age and gender. The literature provides data that the frequency of negative appendectomies based on the results of a clinical examination can be up to 28.2%. Radiological imaging is used as an adjunct to clinical diagnostics using ultrasound examination, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, but the role of the latter is limited by the duration of the study, increased cost, unavailability around the clock, as well as the presence of absolute contraindications. Sonography and computed tomography in diagnostics have a number of advantages and disadvantages, and the question of choosing a specific method still causes scientific controversy. We also provide illustrative clinical examples demonstrating echographic and computed tomographic imaging manifestations of acute appendicitis, as well as discuss visualization signs. For a patient with suspected acute appendicitis, in order to increase the accuracy of diagnosis, reduce complications or the need of undergoing unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach is necessary, taking into account age, gender and constitution, however, the question of choosing the optimal method of medical imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis between ultrasound and computed tomography remains debatable.

Keywords

acute appendicitis / appendicolitis / appendix / complicated appendicitis / computed tomography / magnetic resonance imaging / medical imaging / ultrasound

References

[1] Krylov N, Samokhvalov A. Ultrasound and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Vrach. 2016;27(12):39–41. (In Russ.)

[2] Крылов Н., Самохвалов А. Ультразвуковое исследование и компьютерная томография в диагностике острого аппендицита // Врач. 2016. Т. 27, № 12. С. 39–41.

[3] Hoffmann JC, Trimborn C-P, Hoffmann M, et al. Classification of acute appendicitis (CAA): treatment directed new classification based on imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography) and pathology. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36(11):2347–2360. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03940-8

[4] Hoffmann J.C., Trimborn C.-P., Hoffmann M., et al. Classification of acute appendicitis (CAA): treatment directed new classification based on imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography) and pathology // Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2021. Vol. 36, N. 11. P. 2347–2360. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03940-8

[5] Nicqeshen N, Dilashini S, Kirthana S. Role of clinical scoring system and imaging in acute appendicitis in adults: a review of literature. Med J Malaysia. 2020;75(3):316–321. PMID: 32467556

[6] Nicqeshen N., Dilashini S., Kirthana S. Role of clinical scoring system and imaging in acute appendicitis in adults: a review of literature // Med. J. Malaysia. 2020. Vol. 75, N. 3. P. 316–321. PMID: 32467556

[7] Noori IF, Jabbar AS, Noori AF. Clinical scores (Alvarado and AIR scores) versus imaging (ultrasound and CT scan) in the diagnosis of equivocal cases of acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(4):676–683. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000270

[8] Noori I.F., Jabbar A.S., Noori A.F. Clinical scores (Alvarado and AIR scores) versus imaging (ultrasound and CT scan) in the diagnosis of equivocal cases of acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study // Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.). 2023. Vol. 85, N. 4. P. 676–683. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000270

[9] Raffa A, Abduljabbar A, Alharthy A. Comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography scanning accuracy in diagnosing acute appendicitis at King Abdulaziz university hospital. Cureus. 2022;14(11): e31880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31880

[10] Raffa A., Abduljabbar A., Alharthy A. Comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography scanning accuracy in diagnosing acute appendicitis at King Abdulaziz university hospital // Cureus. 2022. Vol. 14, N. 11. P. e31880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31880

[11] Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3

[12] Di Saverio S., Podda M., De Simone B., et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines // World J. Emerg. Surg. 2020. Vol. 15, N. 1. P. 27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3

[13] Tarulli M, Rezende-Nedo J, Vlachou PA. Focused CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(6): 2081–2088. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01942-3

[14] Tarulli M., Rezende-Nedo J., Vlachou P.A. Focused CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis // Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019. Vol. 44, N. 6. P. 2081–2088. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01942-3

[15] Téoule P, de Laffolie J, Rolle U, Reissfelder C. Acute appendicitis in childhood and adulthood. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(45):764–774. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0764

[16] Téoule P., de Laffolie J., Rolle U., Reissfelder C. Acute appendicitis in childhood and adulthood // Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020. Vol. 117, N. 45. P. 764–774. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0764

[17] Bhangu A. RIFT Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative. Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2020;107(1):73–86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11440

[18] Bhangu A. RIFT Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative. Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis // Br. J. Surg. 2020. Vol. 107, N. 1. P. 73–86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11440

[19] Kim HY, Park JH, Lee YJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of CT features for differentiating complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Radiology. 2018;287(1):104–115. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171260

[20] Kim H.Y., Park J.H., Lee Y.J., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of CT features for differentiating complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis // Radiology. 2018. Vol. 287, N. 1. P. 104–115. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171260

[21] Bom WJ, Bolmers MD, Gans SL, et al. Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis by ultrasound imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. BJS Open. 2021;5(2):zraa030. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa030

[22] Bom W.J., Bolmers M.D., Gans S.L., et al. Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis by ultrasound imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy // BJS Open. 2021. Vol. 5, N. 2. Art. zraa030. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa030

[23] Fersahoğlu MM, Çiyiltepe H, Ergin A, et al. Effective use of CT by surgeons in acute appendicitis diagnosis. Ulus travma acil cerrahi derg. 2021;27(1):43–49. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.13359

[24] Fersahoğlu M.M., Çiyiltepe H., Ergin A., et al. Effective use of CT by surgeons in acute appendicitis diagnosis // Ulus. travma acil cerrahi derg. 2021. Vol. 27, N. 1. P. 43–49. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.13359

[25] Naidu A, Dhruwa C. Study on evaluation of ultrasound and CT scan indiagnosis of appendicitis. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022;6(S3):9505–9511. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8346

[26] Naidu A., Dhruwa C. Study on evaluation of ultrasound and CT scan indiagnosis of appendicitis // International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022. Vol. 6, N. S3. P. 9505–9511. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8346

[27] Rait JS, Ajzajian J, McGillicuddy J, et al. Acute appendicitis and the role of pre-operative imaging: A cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;59:258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.008

[28] Rait J.S., Ajzajian J., McGillicuddy J., et al. Acute appendicitis and the role of pre-operative imaging: A cohort study // Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.). 2020. Vol. 59. P. 258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.008

[29] Park JH, Salminen P, Tannaphai P, Lee KH. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis in adolescents and young adults: review of evidence. Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(5):517–528. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0596

[30] Park J.H., Salminen P., Tannaphai P., Lee K.H. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis in adolescents and young adults: review of evidence // Korean J. Radiol. 2022. Vol. 23, N. 5. P. 517–528. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0596

[31] Wu J, Zhang T, Zhu Y, Gong N. Diagnostic value of ultrasound compared to CT in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10(10):14377–14385.

[32] Wu J., Zhang T., Zhu Y., Gong N. Diagnostic value of ultrasound compared to CT in patients with suspected acute appendicitis // Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017. Vol. 10, N. 10. P. 14377–14385.

[33] Mostbeck G, Adam EJ, Nielsen MB, et al. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(2):255–263. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0469-6

[34] Mostbeck G., Adam E.J., Nielsen M.B., et al. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first // Insights Imaging. 2016. Vol. 7, N. 2. P. 255–263. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0469-6

[35] Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW. Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(5):1006–1012. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12334

[36] Chang S.T., Jeffrey R.B., Olcott E.W. Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014. Vol. 203, N. 5. P. 1006–1012. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12334

[37] Zisman A, Novi B, Gaughan J, Carr L. Factors affecting utilization of CT scan following ultrasound evaluation of suspected appendicitis. J Osteopath Med. 2022;122(6):313–318. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0251

[38] Zisman A., Novi B., Gaughan J., Carr L. Factors affecting utilization of CT scan following ultrasound evaluation of suspected appendicitis // J. Osteopath. Med. 2022. Vol. 122, N. 6. P. 313–318. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0251

[39] Kim HY, Park JH, Lee SS, et al. CT in differentiating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis: presence of any of 10 CT features versus radiologists’ gestalt assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213(5):W218–W227. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21331

[40] Kim H.Y., Park J.H., Lee S.S., et al. CT in differentiating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis: presence of any of 10 CT features versus radiologists’ gestalt assessment // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2019. Vol. 213, N. 5. P. W218–W227. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21331

[41] Eurboonyanun K, Rungwiriyawanich P, Chamadol N, et al. Accuracy of nonenhanced CT vs contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021;50(3):315–320. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.010

[42] Eurboonyanun K., Rungwiriyawanich P., Chamadol N., et al. Accuracy of nonenhanced CT vs contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults // Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2021. Vol. 50, N. 3. P. 315–320. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.010

[43] Lev-Cohain N, Sosna J, Meir Y, et al. Dual energy CT in acute appendicitis: value of low mono-energy. Clin Imaging. 2021;77:213–218. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.04.007

[44] Lev-Cohain N., Sosna J., Meir Y., et al. Dual energy CT in acute appendicitis: value of low mono-energy // Clin. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 77. P. 213–218. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.04.007

[45] Trout AT, Towbin AJ, Fierke SR, et al. Appendiceal diameter as a predictor of appendicitis in children: improved diagnosis with three diagnostic categories derived from a logistic predictive model. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(8):2231–2238. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3639-x

[46] Trout A.T., Towbin A.J., Fierke S.R., et al. Appendiceal diameter as a predictor of appendicitis in children: improved diagnosis with three diagnostic categories derived from a logistic predictive model // Eur. Radiol. 2015. Vol. 25, N. 8. P. 2231–2238. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3639-x

[47] Ranieri DM, Enzerra MD, Pickhardt PJ. Prevalence of appendicoliths detected at CT in adults with suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216(3):677–682. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23149

[48] Ranieri D.M., Enzerra M.D., Pickhardt P.J. Prevalence of appendicoliths detected at CT in adults with suspected appendicitis // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2021. Vol. 216, N. 3. P. 677–682. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23149

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector