Chorionic bump: ultrasound predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome

Igor S. Zheleznyak , Vladimir V. Ryazanov , Gulnaz K. Sadykova , Igor V. Boykov , Sergey G. Glebov , Natalya Yu. Kuznetsova , Anastasiya Ya. Latysheva , Roman A. Postanogov

Russian Military Medical Academy Reports ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 303 -309.

PDF
Russian Military Medical Academy Reports ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) :303 -309. DOI: 10.17816/rmmar546120
Reviews
research-article

Chorionic bump: ultrasound predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

For the first time R. Harris et al. in 2006 a chorionic bump was described, detected by ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy, having characteristic ultrasound signs and localization. Modern knowledge about the etiology and clinical significance of chorionic bump for predicting the outcome of pregnancy is insufficient and contradictory. Inconsistency of the data may be due to the rarity of occurrence, a small sample of the studied groups, the lack of histopathological studies. Among doctors who make ultrasound investigations there is a low awareness of chorionic bump and as a result an erroneous interpretation of sonography data. Nevertheless, there is more and more evidence that this sign is a predictor of an adverse outcome of pregnancy. Doctors who make ultrasound investigations in the first trimester of pregnancy should be aware of the chorionic bump and be able to differentiate it with other pathological conditions. If a chorionic bump is detected, ultrasound examination in dynamics should be recommended. Based on the study of domestic and foreign literature, this scientific review presents modern ideas about the pathomorphology of chorionic bump, informations about significance in terms of predicting the outcome of pregnancy, and the main aspects of ultrasound diagnostics and differential diagnosis of this pathology.

Keywords

choriodecidual tissue / chorionic bump / fertilized egg / outcome / predictor / pregnancy / ultrasound examination

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Igor S. Zheleznyak, Vladimir V. Ryazanov, Gulnaz K. Sadykova, Igor V. Boykov, Sergey G. Glebov, Natalya Yu. Kuznetsova, Anastasiya Ya. Latysheva, Roman A. Postanogov. Chorionic bump: ultrasound predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Russian Military Medical Academy Reports, 2023, 42(3): 303-309 DOI:10.17816/rmmar546120

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Harris RD, Couto C, Karpovsky C, et al. The chorionic bump: a first-trimester pregnancy sonographic finding associated with a guarded prognosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(6):757–763. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.757

[2]

Harris R.D., Couto C., Karpovsky C., et al. The chorionic bump: a first-trimester pregnancy sonographic finding associated with a guarded prognosis. // J. Ultrasound Med. 2006. Vol. 25, No. 6. P. 757–763. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.757

[3]

Arleo EK, Troiano RN. Chorionic bump on first-trimester sonography: not necessarily a poor prognostic indicator for pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(1):137–142. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.1.137

[4]

Arleo E.K., Troiano R.N. Chorionic bump on first-trimester sonography: not necessarily a poor prognostic indicator for pregnancy // J. Ultrasound Med. 2015. Vol. 34, No. 1. P. 137–142. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.1.137

[5]

Galleguillos C, Sepulveda W. Chorionic bump: Progression to a subamniotic hematoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;30(Pt 1):90–93. DOI: 10.1177/1742271X211008565

[6]

Galleguillos C., Sepulveda W. Chorionic bump: Progression to a subamniotic hematoma // J. Ultrasound Med. 2022. Vol. 30 (Pt 1). P. 90–93. DOI: 10.1177/1742271X211008565

[7]

Yousaf A, Tayyab A, Anil MSU, et al. Chorionic Bump: Radiologic Features and Pregnancy Outcomes. Cureus. 2020;12(11): e11480. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11480

[8]

Yousaf A., Tayyab A., Anil M.S.U., et al. Chorionic Bump: Radiologic Features and Pregnancy Outcomes // Cureus. 2020. Vol. 12, No. 11. P. e11480. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11480

[9]

Silva MC, Sepulveda-Martinez A, Guinez R, et al. Chorionic bump: an early ultras und marker for adverse obstetric outcome. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(5):237–241. DOI: 10.1159/000493477

[10]

Silva M.C., Sepulveda-Martinez A., Guinez R., et al. Chorionic bump: an early ultras und marker for adverse obstetric outcome // Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2019. Vol. 84, No. 3. P. 237–241. DOI: 10.1159/000493477

[11]

Altynnik NA, Medvedev MV, Voityuk EG. Chorial protrusion: analysis of 16 observations and literature review. Prenatal diagnostics. 2018;17(2):116–121. (In Russ.)

[12]

Алтынник Н.А., Медведев М.В., Войтюк Э.Г. Хориальное выпячивание: анализ 16 наблюдений и обзор литературы // Пренатальная диагностика. 2018. Т. 17, № 2. С. 116–121.

[13]

Sana Y, Appiah A, Davison A, et al. Clinical significance of first-trimester chorionic bumps: a matched case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(5):585–589. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12528

[14]

Sana Y., Appiah A., Davison A., et al. Clinical significance of first-trimester chorionic bumps: a matched case-control study // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. Vol. 42, No. 5. P. 585–589. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12528

[15]

Younesi L, Shahnazari R. Chorionic Bump in First-trimester Sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;25(Pt 4):221–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmu.2017.04.004

[16]

Younesi L., Shahnazari R. Chorionic Bump in First-trimester Sonography // J. Ultrasound Med. 2017. Vol. 25 (Pt 4). P. 221–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmu.2017.04.004

[17]

Sepulveda W. Chorionic bump at 11 to 13 weeks’ gestation: Prevalence and clinical significance. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(Pt 6): 471–476. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5454

[18]

Sepulveda W. Chorionic bump at 11 to 13 weeks’ gestation: Prevalence and clinical significance // Prenat. Diagn. 2019. Vol. 39 (Pt 6). P. 471–476. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5454

[19]

Lu Y, Wu Y, Huang F, Ren M. A single-center retrospective study of the clinical significance of chorionic bump at early stage of gestation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021;85(3):e13346. DOI: 10.1111/aji.13346

[20]

Lu Y., Wu Y., Huang F., Ren M. A single-center retrospective study of the clinical significance of chorionic bump at early stage of gestation // Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2021. Vol. 85, No. 3. P. e13346. DOI: 10.1111/aji.13346

[21]

Wax JR, Cartin A, Litton C, et al. First-trimester chorionic bump —Association with fetal aneuploidy in a high-risk population. J Clin Ultrasound. 2017;45(1):3–7. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22417

[22]

Wax J.R., Cartin A., Litton C., et al. First-trimester chorionic bump — Association with fetal aneuploidy in a high-risk population // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2017. Vol. 45, No. 1. P. 3–7. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22417

[23]

Baalmann CG, Galgano SJ, Pietryga JA, et al. A Case of a Chorionic Bump: New Sonographic-Histopathologic Findings With Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(Pt 9):1968–1970. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14240.

[24]

Baalmann C.G., Galgano S.J., Pietryga J.A., et al. A Case of a Chorionic Bump: New Sonographic-Histopathologic Findings With Review of the Literature // J. Ultrasound Med. 2017. Vol. 36 (Pt 9). P. 1968–1970. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14240

[25]

Carvalho RS, Osório M, Brito C, et al. Chorionic bump in a pregnant patient with a history of infertility. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018: bcr2018225091. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-225091

[26]

Carvalho R.S., Osório M., Brito C., et al. Chorionic bump in a pregnant patient with a history of infertility // BMJ Case Rep. 2018. Vol. 2018. P. bcr2018225091. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-225091

[27]

Woodward PJ, Kennedy A, Sohaey R. Diagnosis Imaging: Obstetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2016. 1240 p.

[28]

Woodward P.J., Kennedy A., Sohaey R. Diagnosis Imaging: Obstetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 2016. 1240 p.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

PDF

164

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/