Informativeness of the doppler twinkling artifact in the diagnosis of urinary tract calculi

Abstract

The kidney stone disease (nephrolithiasis, urolithiasis) is a common urological problem that affects both adults and children and has a high recurrence rate. Early and reliable imaging diagnosis of urolithiasis is important for early pain relief and the avoidance of complications that require surgical intervention. Non-contrast computed tomography is considered the method of choice in the diagnosis of urolithiasis, however, this method is associated with exposure to ionizing radiation. Ultrasound diagnostics or sonography, in contrast, is considered as the method of early diagnosis of urolithiasis that is widely spread, highly accessible and does not use ionizing radiation. Recently, the attention of sonographers has been attracted by the so-called twinkling artifact or the artifact of the “colored comet tail”, which occurs in the Doppler color flow mapping behind a calculus in the urinary tract. The twinkling artifact is a phenomenon of a rapid change (“twinkle”) of red and blue behind the calculus. Among adult patients, the artifact shows high sensitivity in finding urinary stones, but at the same time a high level of false-positive results. However, the sensitivity of the artifact in children is higher than in adults, whereas the rate of false-positive findings is much lower. According to many authors, the sensitivity and specificity of the twinkling artifact as an independent diagnostic sign of urolithiasis are both very heterogeneous, especially compared to non-contrast computed tomography. Nevertheless, the artifact is known to increase the diagnostic efficiency in stone detection to more than 90%. We believe that the twinkling artifact in the Doppler color flow mapping should always be considered as an additional diagnostic tool, which is complementary to B-mode ultrasonography and increases its sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords

colored comet tail” artifact / computed tomography / doppler color flow mapping / doppler twinkling artifact / ultrasound diagnostics / urinary tract calculi / urolithiasis

References

[1] Nabheerong P, Kengkla K, Saokaew S, Naravejsakul K. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler twinkling artifact for identifying urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound. 2023;26(2): 321–331. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-022-00759-z

[2] Nabheerong P., Kengkla K., Saokaew S., Naravejsakul K. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler twinkling artifact for identifying urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Ultrasound. 2023. Vol. 26, No. 2. P. 321–331. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-022-00759-z

[3] Verhagen MV, Watson TA, Hickson M. Acoustic shadowing in pediatric kidney stone ultrasound: a retrospective study with non-enhanced computed tomography as reference standard. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(6):777–783. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04372-x

[4] Verhagen M.V., Watson T.A., Hickson M. Acoustic shadowing in pediatric kidney stone ultrasound: a retrospective study with non-enhanced computed tomography as reference standard // Pediatr. Radiol. 2019. Vol. 49, No. 6. P. 777–783. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04372-x

[5] Behbahan AG, Emami E. Etiology of Urolithiasis in Children. Journal of Pediatric Nephrology. 2022;10(2):74–82. DOI: 10.22037/jpn.v10i2.37104

[6] Behbahan A.G., Emami E. Etiology of Urolithiasis in Children // Journal of Pediatric Nephrology. 2022. Vol. 10, No. 2. P. 74–82. DOI: 10.22037/jpn.v10i2.37104

[7] Ryazanov VV, Kutsenko VP, Sadykova GK, et al. Differential diagnosis of urinary stones of different chemical composition, by using dual energy computed tomography. Vrach. 2023;34(3):43–48. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.29296/25877305-2023-03-08

[8] Рязанов В.В., Куценко В.П., Садыкова Г.К., и др. Дифференциальная диагностика мочевых камней разного химического состава с использованием двухэнергетической компьютерной томографии // Врач. 2023. Т. 34, № 3. С. 43–48. DOI: 10.29296/25877305-2023-03-08

[9] Din XJ, Hing EY, Abdul Hamid H. Diagnostic Value of Colour Doppler Twinkling Artefact in Detecting Nephrolithiasis. Hong Kong Journal of Radiology. 2020;3(4):268–274. DOI: 10.12809/hkjr2017049

[10] Din X.J., Hing E.Y., Abdul Hamid H. Diagnostic Value of Colour Doppler Twinkling Artefact in Detecting Nephrolithiasis // Hong Kong Journal of Radiology. 2020. Vol. 23, No. 4. P. 268–274. DOI: 10.12809/hkjr2017049

[11] Hanafi MQ, Fakhrizadeh A, Jaafaezadeh E. An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(2):401. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18

[12] Hanafi M.Q., Fakhrizadeh A., Jaafaezadeh E. An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning // J. Family Med. Prim. Care. 2019. Vol. 8, No. 2. P. 401. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18

[13] Krakhotkin DV, Chernylovskyi VA, Sarica K, et al. Diagnostic value ultrasound signs of stones less than or equal to 10 mm and clinico-radiological variants of ureteric colic. Asian Journal of Urology. 2023;10(1):39–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.015

[14] Krakhotkin D.V., Chernylovskyi V.A., Sarica K., et al. Diagnostic value ultrasound signs of stones less than or equal to 10 mm and clinico-radiological variants of ureteric colic // Asian Journal of Urology. 2023. Vol. 10, No. 1. P. 39–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.015

[15] Roberson NP, Dillman JR, O’Hara SM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of kidney stones in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(7):962–972. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4099-7

[16] Roberson N.P., Dillman J.R., O’Hara S.M., et al. Comparison of ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of kidney stones in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study // Pediatr. Radiol. 2018. Vol. 48, No. 7. P. 962–972. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4099-7

[17] Cunitz BW, Harper JD, Sorensen MD, et al. Quantification of Renal Stone Contrast with Ultrasound in Human Subjects. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1123–1130. DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0404

[18] Cunitz B.W., Harper J.D., Sorensen M.D., et al. Quantification of Renal Stone Contrast with Ultrasound in Human Subjects // J. Endourol. 2017. Vol. 31, No. 11. P. 1123–1130. DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0404

[19] Abdel-Gawad M, Kadasne RD, Elsobky E, et al. Prospective Comparative Study between Color Doppler Ultrasound with Twinkling and Non-Contrast Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic. The Journal of Urology. 2016;196(3):757–762. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.175

[20] Abdel-Gawad M., Kadasne R.D., Elsobky E., et al. Prospective Comparative Study between Color Doppler Ultrasound with Twinkling and Non-Contrast Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic // The Journal of Urology. 2016. Vol. 196, No. 3. P. 757–762. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.175

[21] Laher AE, McDowall J, Gerber L, et al. The ultrasound ‘twinkling artefact’ in the diagnosis of urolithiasis: hocus or valuable point-of-care-ultrasound? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):13–20. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000601

[22] Laher A.E., McDowall J., Gerber L., et al. The ultrasound ‘twinkling artefact’ in the diagnosis of urolithiasis: hocus or valuable point-of-care-ultrasound? A systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 2020. Vol. 27, No. 1. P. 13–20. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000601

[23] Bacha R, Manzoor I, Gilani SA, Khan AI. Clinical Significance of Twinkling Artifact in the Diagnosis of Urinary Stones. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(12):3199–3206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.015

[24] Bacha R., Manzoor I., Gilani S.A., Khan A.I. Clinical Significance of Twinkling Artifact in the Diagnosis of Urinary Stones // Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2019. Vol. 45, No. 12. P. 3199–3206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.015

[25] Rokni E, Simon JC. The effect of crystal composition and environment on the color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(3):035021. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb2ad

[26] Rokni E., Simon J.C. The effect of crystal composition and environment on the color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact // Phys. Med. Biol. 2023. Vol. 68, No. 3. P. 035021. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb2ad

[27] Rokni E, Zinck S, Simon JC. Evaluation of Stone Features That Cause the Color Doppler Ultrasound Twinkling Artifact. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47(5):1310–1318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.016

[28] Rokni E., Zinck S., Simon J.C. Evaluation of Stone Features That Cause the Color Doppler Ultrasound Twinkling Artifact // Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2021. Vol. 47, No. 5. P. 1310–1318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.016

[29] Gromov AI, Sapozhnikov OA, Kaprin AD. Doppler twinkling artifact: physical mechanisms and place in diagnostic practice. State of the art. Medical Visualization. 2023;27(1):120–134. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-1206

[30] Громов А.И., Сапожников О.А., Каприн А.Д. Доплеровский артефакт мерцания: физические механизмы и место в диагностической практике. Современное состояние вопроса // Медицинская визуализация. 2023. Т. 27, № 1. С. 120–134. DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-1206

[31] Adel H, Sattar A, Rahim A, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Doppler Twinkling Artifact for Identifying Urinary Tract Calculi. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5647. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5647

[32] Adel H., Sattar A., Rahim A., et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Doppler Twinkling Artifact for Identifying Urinary Tract Calculi // Cureus. 2019. Vol. 11, No. 9. Art. e5647. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5647

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector